Love who you will, but should interracial marriages produce kids?

So there is this picture going around the internet that brings up a good point, but is totally off the real issues.

For one thing, I for one am not "mad" about what skin color a person may have. Anymore then I am mad every time I see a mule.  . .Believe me, I am not thinking "Oh no, it's a half horse, half donkey!!" Nor does the thought cross my mind to be mad at a poor kid who has no say in the matter. . .

Many would say that it is stupid and racist to even have a post that brings up such a hot topic (especially with such blurry lines of race in "the melting pot of the world"), but hear me out, there are some seriously good reasons to STOP THE MIXING! 

I would never say who you should love or live with, or even legally marry! I heard a message at my Unitarian church about gays being allowed to legally marry leads some to say "What is next, polygamy, incest, bestiality?!" Truthfully, I think the government should butt out, and I spoke up to say so in the open mic time afterwards! Marry your cat if you want to! 

That said, reproducing is a huge privilege and responsibility, and it should be something others have some input in, considering it is our world and future as well! I would love to see people asking input from friends and family, who would be able to anonymously vote about whether you should have any or more kids, or not. The truth may hurt sometimes, but there are a lot of people in the world that should not have had kids in retrospect. . .it seems even those middle class whites who have had trouble conceiving naturally are in my experience awful parents, as they are child run homes. (But that's another story.)

It should be presumed that if you are a dependent on others for your life, you should not be having kids at all, or at least until you become independent. (As in the case of minors or welfare and foodstamps recipients)




My post: parasites of dying civilizations showed stats on state dependence by race, and there is little question that per capita, the minorities in general, and the blacks in specific are by far the biggest burden on society. 

 Also if you are not in a stable relationship, you should not have kids either. According even to many astute blacks, that means that at least 3/4th of Black mothers should "cool it" and not be having kids. About 3/4th of the black babies are born out of wedlock, to young single mothers. The rate has gone down dramatically though over the years as more are getting abortions. ( 1 in 4 black babies are aborted by choice, and no, the white man has nothing to do with it, other then helping them have it safely!)
Source


Sadly, the divorce rate of the married blacks shows it makes no difference whether they get married, or not, as 70% of them will still end up divorced.  More stats on mixed marriage success or failure will come in my next post. . .

Many black men are coming down hard on black woman being the "destruction of America". We can't forget the fact that only sometimes it is a poor mothers fault. . .it takes two to tango, and many times rape (which as stated in my post here, and the chart here, is ridiculously high in dark races) is to blame for teenage unwed pregnancies. Rape is unpunished in Africa, and in fact a smart move in their "culture", which is one reason they call it a "rape culture". Rape is just what evolution has shown them works.


Until Obamacare, abortion was not covered either I have heard. So what option did a young girl with no money have when she saw that she would not be supported by the predominantly poor "deadbeat Dad" coming from the black community?! If it weren't for welfare, it would be the same as in Africa, an unsafe abortion. "In Africa, approximately 4 million unsafe abortions occur per year. About 40% of the women who undergo an abortion die as a result of the complications." Abortion in this country has been called a "black genocide", yet it is the salvation of Black mothers. Thy would do what they are doing in Africa today if we didn't intervene to save the mother. It is certainly not white supremacy to save 40% of black mothers having abortions, and giving them their own choice, as well as provide it free after counseling!

So forget interracial marriages producing kids, if you are black, you should seriously have all your ducks in a row before considering reproducing! Even the mixed couples, or couples who are both mixed, who have enough money, and support, should opt to adopt or foster instead of procreating though. . .

This being because there are numerous (and little known) differences between blacks and whites that cause common problems for mothers or kids. Things like:

•  The recessive or uneven melanin distribution as in Vitiligo. Or freckles. Both only seem to be in those of mixed ancestry.
• Different sized babies, as well as heads. . .and the ability to birth them.

• The white woman's pelvis has space for a large, big brained baby's head, unlike the black woman. So a black woman will be prone to birth traumas and needing emergency c-sections if the head measures like a white baby. Which give a kid a bad start in life in many ways . . .

"White women have a wider pelvic inlet, wider outlet, and shallower anteroposterior outlet than African-American women. . . These differences may contribute to observed racial differences in obstetric outcomes and to the development of pelvic floor disorders."Source

"Race is not just a social construct. How we interpret biological differences, such as pelvis size, skin color, etc. are not socially constructed but real observations, made from quantiative analysis. There are distinct anatomical, genetic, even behavioral differences that are not derived solely from stereotypes."

Source

• Different sized penises (though there is some variance in Africa, those with little European influence have tribes with average private parts twice that of others in the world!) to accommodate mating with the different anteroposterior outlets of their race's women. Actually there is a different angle when erect too. That, as well as the large rears of the black women suggest different mating styles, then the traditional "Missionary style" (named so because presumably it was unique in Africa before the white missionaries came) or so some tell us.

• Different sized jaws. (Causing problems with the wisdom teeth erupting in the shorter jawed whites, where there isn't any with the Blacks of Sub Sahara Africa.) "Wisdom teeth problems are more common among European whites compared to Orientals and blacks. This conclusion is supported by research on dental problems and race that concluded that racial differences exist ‘ … in the contemporary human races with regard to occlusion, tooth size, and tooth shape … interbreeding would exacerbate malocclusion and increase the number of impactions."
  Source
• Different sized nipples, to accommodate the jaw size of their babies. . .this is based on my own observations and studies with breastfeeding moms, and talking to a lactation consultant I know, but I haven't found anything official, or looked at porn to verify it. ;) Maybe someone can help me out here.

• Different incisor teeth that have a "scooped out" appearance on the tongue side. This pattern is characteristics of dark Populations today. It was also common among the Homo erectus, who's DNA is only found in the Blacks.
• Different vitamin D needs, Blacks need more then they get in America or Europe.
• Different personalities, according to the very high IQ people in the orient. 

Those associated with the Africans use to be B blooded (until they are mixed then AB or O is likely). . .but see if it fits the black stereotype to you.

General personality of people who have type B blood
—Like to go their own way
—Do what they want without considering other people’s feelings, rules and customs
—Happy-go-lucky and masters of breaking rules
—Optimistic
—Friendly and open their heart to anybody
—Not pretentious
—Afraid of being alone
—Pragmatists
—Don’t chase a dream much
—Like to play
—Love festivals and parties
—Have been in love many times
—Don’t get heart-broken over lost love

Then there's the bloodtype that is associated with the Neanderthal, and all related to them (through the European). . .not the Sub Saharan African: Bloodtype O
General personality of people who have type O blood
—Realistic
—Good at developing economic concepts
—Vigorous at earning a living
—Strong in face of adversity
—Romanticists
—Dream of getting rich quick, but actually take a steady approach
—Ambitious
—Go straight toward their goal
—Have leadership ability and often take care of younger people and people below them
—Very cautious
—Don’t care about small things, taking a wider perspective instead
—Devoted, but with a strong desire to monopolize
Source

It is easier to see who is pure African, in order to tell the original differences another way though, checking for a blood antigen, because obviously Blacks would have no antigen to their own blood. All the rest of the world has an allergic reaction to their blood though, called the Duffy antigen. So those who are white, or mixed white will have it, as if they were just barely exposed to an foreign body, and are now allergic to it. . .pure blacks that is.

Seen on this map of Africa as dark red, and striped is where nearly everyone has no Duffy antigen to blacks blood, so is a pure black.


Source
If you will note that the only areas that are white, with less Duffy blood are the white, or intermixed with whites areas of Africa. (And are civilized.)

 Those white areas took from the dark areas in the slave trade. Those pure black areas are those that were the origin of all the slaves that made it to America. The leaders that were only part black wanted to segregate from the pure blacks, but had no ability to house all the prisoners they got in "tribal warfare" with them. . .so they shipped them to America. 

Unfortunately being evolved from a different place, they also have a different way of thinking. Showing up in a Different IQ. This has been shown in books like "The Bell Curve", "Erectus among us", and "IQ and global inequality", as well as numerous other studies that have causes scientists to put together maps like this, that have never been debunked.)

Source

This difference is not to say blacks are inferior. Some even say the IQ test doesn't work on blacks, as they don't think that way. All the more reason they should not be schooled the same way either! Detroit schools scores are the lowest in the nation, with a population now of mostly blacks. It is so abismal that they say the scores show the kids were just all guessing!

Another sign of what IQ means is it's effect on civilization. One rather obvious thing is what happens to the civilization when a population changes from a group with low to high IQ. We have the indigenous population of Australia having a very low IQ (as seen in the source), then being replaced by a high IQ when the whites went there. Not surprisingly, civilization followed. While when the 90% white areas of America, like Detroit, had their population swap to almost 90% black now, we have the destruction of civilization the whites built. 

A high (110+) IQ doesn't mean everything though, nor does it guarantee a good job. It also will not make you fit in, or be a leader, nor is there any obvious benefit past 100. (Pretty much if you are very smart, you aren't going to be seen as dumb, but will not always be appreciated for your intelligence, because few can compare what genius looks like. . .)

Simply put, IQ helps a person see connections of actions to reactions, and relationships. Work ethic, follow through, impulse control, and good choices are a sign of a higher IQ. Jails are filled with those with a low IQ. To give a comparison point though, with an IQ of 70, Americans deem someone mentally handicapped, and unable to fit into civilized society. . .not surprisingly, 70 or lower is the average IQ in Sub Sahara Africa, and there is no civilized society.

Of course there are singular exceptions both in parts of Africa, or other parts of the world of mixed blacks. Some will recessively take after the whites in their IQ, even while looking black. Thus, they would be the out-layers in the IQ charts like this for instance. 

Even when taking account of supposed unfairness like income disparity, whites score an average of 15 points higher on the IQ tests then blacks who are 10 times wealthier then them. Again though, this is not to insinuate that the blacks are inferior, but the way they think is different.

My IQ is supposedly 15 points lower then my husbands, and I use to feel inferior about that, as he would be the one with the 4.0 GPA, and the top of his class awards and all. . .but then I realized how he was not focused like me, didn't retain knowledge like me, and wasn't nearly as curious as me. Nor does he see the big picture like me, while being able to handle details of things I am passionate about. He has even told me he needs my kind of smart, and that I am just as smart as he is. (I have an IQ of 106. . .give or take a few points, as I always had a crying baby interrupt me taking a test.)

Someone with a higher IQ is able to do math, see connections, relationships and make wise choices in life. Someone with a lower IQ then the average 100, is more impulsive, naive, childlike, worse at math and book work in general, but may be well suited to less "brainy" work. Sadly, if you are looking for equal wage opportunity, unfortunately most white collar jobs in management are not likely with a low IQ. If this was not true we would not see the same pattern of low IQ with low paying blue collar jobs around the world. Check out this map.

This is something I have spoken of in my post: The parasites of dying civilizations, as well as
The origin of miscegenation is cultural Marxism. . .and it will be the ruin of America. Whether good or bad, made for whites or not, the IQ test has accurately predicted a person's ability to live and work in a civilized society. (And stay out of jail.)

 IQ disparity explains the racial differences in income, and being desired for a mate, or hired for a job, much better then just pulling the "race card". The belief in inequality in lifestyles being the fault of the whites has its origin in cultural Marxism. White guilt is totally inappropriate, and is a doctrine being taught only to gain power for a few white elitists in the Democratic party. Sadly, those giving them their power (the voters) are too foolish to see they are being played for fools. Demographics of the Democrats are now mostly women, gays, and poor minorities. (90% of them)
Source

Other differences that make interbreeding bad on the health of your body include:

• Different iron baselines, causing confusion with who actually has anemia. (Whites need less)
• Differences in how we digest calcium, which ties into the vitamin D needs.
• Different baseline body PH Source
• Different baseline body temperatures. Whites classically have low temperatures. While this is true,  they don't feel colder then others, actually red heads (when healthy) are well known to feel hot because they are colder inside. This is one reason redheads can actually handle a cold water pain test much better then others, while generally being more sensitive to pain. Dentists know this, and doctors often too. Pain medication and numbing isn't as effective, thus they will avoid dentists and doctors because of painful traumas. Red heads are also known to bleed easier, and have more chance of passing out in childbirth even with less blood loss Midwives will tell you.
• Different baseline blood pressure. Those with white in their blood classically have low blood pressure. Source
• Different gestational periods. Pure black tends to be two weeks early when healthy, while mixed races are on time at 40 weeks and whites are two weeks late when healthy. Source 
• Different puberty times. " On average, African American girls show signs of puberty (with breast development and chemical changes in their bodies) almost two years sooner than white girls. . ." Source   (There is also a clear link between speed of puberty and intelligence/IQ. . .Source)
• Different diets. Neanderthals who started the RH- whites, with red hair, white skin and blue eyes, were into cooking meat, (probably) soaking and definitely cooking grains like oatmeal and having dairy products, just like the original elite class of the Sumerians, Egyptians and all their European kin of the O or RH- bloodline. While the primate line were almost exclusively vegetarian or bug eating hunter gatherers. (Other then cannibalism, or the rare meat they found.) Of course this is evidenced by the diet "Eat right for your type, and the fact that scientists say that:  "As humans moved into less hospitable environments [believed to be out of Africa], the animal content of their diet increased." Even though we have proved now that there was nothing less hospitable, and there was plenty of food in both environments.  Source Source
Not eating the traditional diet of the primate has no doubt led to or encouraged a high obesity rate in blacks, and traditional naps in all the third world nations, to help digestion after the wrong sort of meals. (Called "siestas") 

There are many more pesky differences as well, like in the voice. . .which when pure, is obvious what race we are.1

A friend of mine once told me, "There are physical differences in all species but their basic DNA allows them to be considered part of the same species. Meaning they can breed together and those traits will not cause one or the other to change the basic molecular make up of the off spring."

I'm sorry, but I have not seen this to be the case.

Now because of much inbreeding in America and the world, as a whole, we are all much more of a hybrid of two separate races, who have stemmed originally I believe from two distinct species, homo erectus and the Neanderthal. 

We still see these differences in those who are pure like (30% of African Americans, and in Sub Saharan Africa), but less so with the mixed ones. And thus a lot of the confusion that seems to debunk previous studies. Like as soon as you only count the educated and rich blacks or minorities, suddenly the differences of head or brain size is negligible between the races. 

Source

How do we reconcile all these differences in the races with our worldview? If we all evolved out of Africa from the monkey, or if we all came from Adam and Eve with creation, neither really make sense to most people. . .but I have a theory you need to consider.

I am not religious, but I think mythology, when understood in it's proper context, is historical, and enlightening, bringing with it a proper understanding of the races, and their origins. When you see  creation myths as all converging at the first civilization, from Sumerian mythology. . . then you can see there is good evidence that they are somewhat historical, but mistranslated, exaggerated and misunderstood.

Ironically though, they who would benefit from understanding the history of one race of man (those in "God's image") in the story of creation, have mainly discounted it all as myth (and the Biblical version is a good part evolved myth), while those who have no cause to pay attention to it are claiming it as their history, which it obviously is not! Check out my posts: The story of creation as seen by an Atheist. and
Proof that we did not just evolve naturally, but that "man" was intelligently designed! Part 4 for more info on that.


To understand the shorthand Hebrew (in the Bible), let's go back to it's intended meaning from the long hand Sumerian. The original creation story is much more detailed, and religious scholars who study the Sumerian agree it is the origin of the Biblical creation story.

In the Sumerian text "ATRA HASIS", it gives the account of when human kind was created. Humans (as understood now), were created in batches. The first batch (of the god's creation), according to the text were called "THE BLACK HEADED ONES", THESE WERE CREATED BASICALLY TO BE SLAVES TO THE ANUNNAKI GODS.

They were, from all I can tell, genetically manipulated to have language to understand the gods, and were given primitive knowledge, like of fire or about plants. Prometheus got in trouble with the other gods for giving them knowledge of fire. . . in the greek mythology, which is also tied to the Sumerian text.

Giving the slaves knowledge of fire was something the other gods very wisely did not approve of. As we see all the arson the blacks are responsible for in Detroit now, we might understand their wisdom. . . The fire fighters have almost given up saving most of the houses the blacks light on fire, as the effort is further bankrupting the city of now predominantly blacks.
Source
(BTW, the testing scores of the blacks in Detroit also show a more clear evidence of the IQ differences that led to the enslavement of the blacks by the Annanaki.)


After mining gold for hundreds of thousands of years with the slaves (something there is much evidence of in South Africa, thanks to the finds and research of author and presidential candidate Michael Tellinger) the god's decided to make a creation "in his image", as numerous religions attest to. The God's of all ancient history were originally depicted as physical, blond or red headed, and with white skin. (Unlike the Christian version that evolved into an invisible spirit and thus couldn't have an "image", or be heard "walking" in the garden of Eden.)

On the father's side, all the whites can trace their ancestry to start to the time and location of the middle east (where the Biblical and Sumerian creation story happened). The first blond and blue eyed woman can also be traced to around that time. If the Bible and Sumerian text was right, the only logical explanation is that if the gods were white, their children would be too. Which I discussed more in detail here.

The mother's side of whites is a little more complicated, as scientists unfortunately trace the mother side only through the mitochondria, instead of the nucleus of the egg. This made the "out of Africa theory" seem right. . . It is now evident that the mitochondria came from a donor egg, from the homo erectus. Who is not present in the pure white man, but is in the blacks. Just as the Neanderthal is not in the pure black. The ability to gene splice from 3 parents has only recently been reinvented, but it is basically the process the Sumerian text describes in the creation of the children of God!

This origin of whites coming from black's mitochondria, through the mothers side, is proven in many ways, but if this were true from being born of them and bred with them in the natural sense, whites would have gained something from their ancestors other then the mitochondria. . .could the ancient Sumerian text describing genetic manipulation be evidenced in our genes being spliced? The "Gods" were apparently highly advanced. . .and though they may have looked just like us, they were at the time, technically. . .

More proof of this is that only a few whites can trace back to anyone in Africa. (While most blacks have 22% white ancestry now. . .) If we all came out of Africa, something would link us together, like coloring (Blacks are dominant over whites), bone structure, teeth, genes, gut parasites, bloodtypes, RH factor, etc.

The original children of the gods (The Neanderthals) had RH- blood (O-), seen as alien to the planet. Unlike the blacks who were born of the homo erectus (and to this day are the only ones who have them in their ancestry) the Neanderthals were never exposed in their womb to the primate RH+ blood, but were implanted in a goddess, with only the mitochondria taken from the donor homo erectus. . .(like the "3 parent baby").

Already having the mitochondria from the blacks, you can see why we can interbreed, but with dire consequences. . .From what I have read, I believe the "original sin" in the Bible was the interbreeding of "god's children" with the dark indigenous race. This interbreeding of "races" should actually be called "species" because of their genetic separation, as spoken of in numerous posts before like here. Probably for this reason, only recently has interbreeding of our species became legal and acceptable. . . This is unfortunately because the history for the apparent "racism" was lost.  

Racism is null and void in my mind in light of specieism.

The RH- and RH+ blood found in the original whites and blacks (I believe) were not only incompatible, but interbreeding caused and still causes infertility often after the first child (if blood mixes), at least for that couple. RH- couples never have issues with infertility, and RH+ couples never have issues. This incompatibility is a leading cause of infertility in the world with all the mixes of mixes. . .as I spoke of more in this post here.

 RH+ from the primate line of the blacks is considered an impurity, just like A or B blood. . .where if the pure comes in contact with the impure, it will usually carry it on dominantly, with few exceptions.  

Similarly gut bacteria, parasites, tropical diseases, pests and STD's all came from Africa, or were carried on those who had symbiotic relationships with them. Whites are not evolved to handle African environments (including the sun), and the blacks have an inferior immunity to white diseases and have vitamin D deficiencies living in the environments whites are in. You will want to check it out in my posts about this, if you haven't already. (Start off here and also here.)

There seems to be little benefit to mixing genes, but especially for the whites. Even those who come from mixed heritages say there are no advantages. 

Analyzing the data here is what they found:

1) Mixed-race kids grow up in households that are similar along many dimensions to those in which black children grow up: similar incomes, the father is much less likely to be around than in white households, etc.

2) In terms of academic performance, mixed-race kids fall in between blacks and whites.

3) Mixed-race kids do have one advantage over white and black kids: the mixed-race kids are much more attractive then blacks, on average.

4) Mixed-race kids manage to be as bad as whites on the white behaviors and as bad as blacks on the black behaviors. Mixed-race kids act out in almost every way measured in the data set.
Source

Technically, mixing only benefits the academics (IQ) and looks of the blacks, while it inevitably brings down the white IQ and attractiveness. . .although it may improve your strength and sports performance and give you an aggressive edge as a CEO to have higher testosterone I have read.  

Mixing of course also makes kids not emotionally, mentally or physically fit in with either of their parents "races". Even when the other kids can't tell the difference in their looks, instinctively the races naturally separate (worldwide, regardless of socioeconomic status) and the mixed person will generally feel displaced in the world, and unaccepted. . . 

Whether a person sides with White or Black supremacy by only claiming one parent's side, a mixed person needs to know that it is an evolutionary and natural behavior to prefer your own pure species, so you will rightfully never feel fully accepted as a mix! This denial of origins and continual mixing hurts everyone!!

 Sadly, mixing doesn't make for a better country economically, with more equality, less crime, more peace or anything positive. . .all it does is give the pure whites more power, money and bring more inequality and cause even more crime. (Look to Brazil to see how mixing has failed.)

Source

This is what happens to the rich and middle class with mixing with the poor minorities. . .

This is the same story all over America. . .and all over the world. The elite rich will get richer, as they stay pure, and the majority will keep mixing, and keep giving the money to those who don't mix. Inequality grows the more we mix. This is due to IQ, and is completely unavoidable!

If you are considering "hooking up" with someone of another race, whether you love your race, are a "sellout" and love theirs or love them both as I do, please do us all a favor and use a reliable long term birth control! 

If you are a product of a thoughtless parent and are already mixed (most of the world) please stop the madness with you. . .For the love of the future generations of both species, we need to get back to pure whites and blacks, and allow nature to select the most fit species for each location, naturally. Or selection and evolution of millions of years was in vain.