Sunday, July 19, 2015

More than you probably want to know about Obesity and it's tie to low IQ part 5

Ok, so this post will probably teach you more about obesity than you ever wanted to know. You will laugh, you will cry, and you might lose your lunch. . .but hang on, as this stuff is literally life-changing and needs to be spread around!

One correlation I forgot to mention in my post The correlations, associations and tendencies of smart people (part 2) is the link with being in shape (not obese), to having high IQ. Or the inverse: low IQ and it's tie with obesity. Also connecting to that, "having had a c- section and bottle feeding in infancy have been linked to being overweight later in life."

If obesity is caused by these things, we sure want to avoid them right. . .because obesity is a serious problem! Especially in the younger generation it seems!

Unfortunately, like so many other correlations, these things will not cause a single case of obesity, but are merely found in those who are obese. "Correlation does not equal causation. "

If you have been reading any of the last posts, you will note that every correlation with low IQ ties to African genes, and obesity (including the studies on c-sections and bottle feeding that supposedly helps show the cause of obesity), is no exception. Blacks have a very high rate of c-sections, and a low rate of breastfeeding by the way, as you can see in the links.

Simply put, obesity is tied to low IQ, because it is tied to blacks.
Here are the peer reviewed, scientific facts, stats and studies to back up that "racist" statement:

African American Obesity, Men and Women"Based on epidemiologic evidence, specific racial/ethnic groups seem to be particularly susceptible to obesity. Genetic studies have found support for that genetic differences between groups may contribute to such differences."

"African-American women may need to eat fewer calories or burn more than their Caucasian counterparts to lose a comparable amount of weight, according to researchers at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in a study published online today in the International Journal of Obesity."

"Several studies have suggested that African-American women don’t lose as much weight as Caucasian women in response to the same behavioral interventions of calorie restriction or increased physical activity."

"Weight loss in response to weight management shows a wide range of interindividual variation which is largely influenced by genetic determinants. The strong control of weight loss by genotype was confirmed by twin and family studies. Recently, special attention has been paid to. . .genetic factors which can predict the response to weight reduction programme."

Black woman, according to them, are unlikely to be able to lose much weight without the right genes in other words.

"Data from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) indicate that African Americans are about 1.5 times more likely to be obese (defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2) than European Americans even in homogeneous socioeconomic groups [6],[7]." (Meaning very elite mixed blacks, in the same SES -with consequently a lot of admixture- are still 150 times as likely to be obese as compared to whites!)

In fact, the percentage of European ancestry in the genes was inversely associated with BMI among African Americans. 

Accordingly, you will note that the successful, thin attractive blacks like this one [no doubt] are also generally smart, some dead give aways that they are highly mixed! Whether or not they are aware of it!

 They can actually see this in specific European alleles of the DNA!

"each additional copy of a European ancestral allele at either the Xq13.1 or the Xq25 peak is independently associated with a BMI decrease. . ."

"searches for genes in African Americans and diverse populations can result in the detection of genetic loci that have eluded discovery in European-derived populations, perhaps because the underlying variants are too rare in the latter populations."

Many other studies confirm that the more mixed European blacks are the thin ones too. Here are a few more:

"In the United States, the prevalence of obesity is higher in African Americans than whites, even after adjustment for socioeconomic status
(SES). This leads to the hypothesis that differences in genetic background [i.e. more European genes] may contribute to racial/ethnic differences in obesity-related traits."

" . . .proportions of European ancestry (PEAs) for each individual [was] scanned for the association between PEA and obesity . . . After adjusting for global PEA, each additional copy of a European ancestral allele. . . was associated with a BMI decrease. . ." 
Source Source

Color is deceptive!

We know from all these peer reviewed studies that blacks are by far, most likely to be obese, and that the more European in them, the more likely they will be thin. 
Obesity and low IQ are of course then only linked, due to a higher amount of black genes. . . no matter what color you turn out. Including white!

skinny black male with fat white womanRedneck whites in the South, being in a highly mixed area, are doubly likely to be mixed with African genes if they are obese, AND dumb! (This is why I have always avoided obese people of any color, as I always suspected they were both stupid-based on things like smoking- AND being more aggressive. 

In fact studies of testosterone levels have shown that obese people, and also smokers have higher levels of testosterone, which is clearly linked to aggression, low IQ and black genes. (As I pointed out in my post here.

This may be why high testosterone black men are attracted to obese, aggressive, low IQ white woman. . .as they are part black, and thus a genetic pull to kin! 

This is not just my observation, but studies from dating sites and many blacks have made videos about it, blogged on it, mentioned it in comedian acts and the like. One thing it no doubt comes down to, besides similar characteristics like poverty, low IQ, aggression. . . is this, "White men have higher standards when choosing a woman than most black men."

An obese white woman who use to be attracted to blacks, and has been hit on by them her whole life speaks of why white woman who are obese go black, and never go back here. (Low self esteem and being even more rejected by white males who are also intimidated by aggressive and abusive black ex boyfriends.)

"All women regardless of their race want to be loved, but if your own race of men doesn’t want you, you go to what will accept you. This is the mentality for many white women who date black men usually because they are not the wanted “stock” within their own race. In a way both parties are “using” or “settling” for each other."

In the end though, these obese woman with low self esteem are often raped, abused and killed by these same black men, according to stats on interracial crime.

I feel so sorry for these obese white woman as I know their odds of a good life, and being treated well by a high testosterone black male are slim to none.

Back to obese blacks though. . .I know what you're thinking: "They aren't obese in Africa, so how can you blame black genes for obesity?" It is so unusual to see an obese black in Africa, they would think you are nuts if you told them a stat like that 4 out of 5 black woman are obese.

 I admit, African black woman are not fat, unless you count one select area. . .their butts. There is a name for this fat, and a theorized purpose too! This is where TMI might come in, so be forewarned.

"Steatopygia is a high degree of fat accumulation in and around the buttocks. It is common among the San (Bushmen) and the adaptive advantage may have been to store food and water in times of famine and shortage."
 So a black woman's butt is like a camel's hump they say. . .

The more likely explanation in my book is like in this picture.

"this story starts out a long time ago, in a land far far away, when our ancestors were covered in fur and walked on all fours. [actually, just homo erectus] They had sex in the position that we would call “doggy style”, as most primates still do today. . . And here you have the root of our love of the posterior: Ass is what they see during sex and those who become aroused by this view will presumably seek this view more often, which results in more little ass-monkeys being born. . . the love of boobs (and actually, boobs themselves), came later."
Source-proceed at your own risk

The reason why "doggie style" is considered more dirty, crass and primitive, is frankly because it is. . .having originated no doubt with blacks, who are sexually crazed, having a high level of testosterone, as seen in my last post. They are also full of STD's and have a high rate of homosexuals as well. Behavior like that in the picture is common with blacks, which explains the occasional and generally momentary temptation of white males for black females. (In 3/4ths of interracial relationships it is black males on white females.)

While blacks love to claim big butts are sexy, what men are actually attracted to and in fact has been seen as evolutionary, seems to be the curvature of the spine, specifically a curve of 45 degrees of the lumbar and also wide hips. Those who posses such have an easier time carrying a child to full term and do not die in childbirth. Thus it is considered selection for evolutionary purposes to get a woman like this.
 A fat butt blacks have, compared to whites, but whites have wider hips. . .and no doubt this ties to why whites have safer births of bigger babies even. And though having less fat on their rear ends, whites are worldwide generally seen as more attractive, due to the golden ratio which are only found in white genes apparently.

 As for this curvature of the spine, it too may differ in races, but no study that I am aware of has published this. . .and if they did, they would likely find it differs in attractiveness to males of different racial backgrounds.

They have done studies that show people with black tendencies and personalities are attracted to larger bodies, including breasts or butts. While those with highly white characteristics, and who are wealthier are attracted to small bodies and individual parts. Which explains why rich blacks both are attracted to and get thin white woman. . .even though blacks in general get only fat white women if they are lucky. Kanye West is one of those who even rapped about this phenomenon of rich black males getting a white and thin woman. Which is only because of his mixed DNA that allows him to be both thin and smarter, thus rich. (Mind you, she is obviously a mix herself.)

 Back to fat though. . .With the exception of the fat in the rump in the Africans, they are not known for obesity, but for being very thin! Starving in fact! While we equate the unhealthy, presumably malnourished blacks in America with obesity. . .does that not strike you as contradictory?

There is increasing obesity in Africa, in specifically the more westernized parts. . . This is confusing to scientists, because the same thin Africans can come here to America, and become obese! What is the obvious conclusion? It must the different diet. Right? The Standard America Diet. (SAD)

The diet in Africa on the other hand is very whole and simple. Composed of generally a grain or starchy potato like cassava, with a cooked or raw leafy green or even grass! Rarely a palm nut soup with a meat of some sort in it. (Monkey, snake, mice, bugs, anything goes!)

 (Personal note: I had grandparents who were missionaries to Liberia west Africa for 35 years, and being a pilot, my Grandpa traveled a lot, and ate their food a lot. Liberian food, one of two basic recipes, is something we modified to always have meat and eat here and there, even now in the third generation.)

Protein was a special treat to Africans, as their diet was generally vegetarian. I have traveled all around Sub Saharan Africa as well, and in those areas protein I found was both scare and unsanitary. Often the jungle meat are poorly processed and disease infested. It is claimed ebola was started this way.

We "modern humans" need more protein, ideally from animals scientists say, because of our larger brains, which needs fat to run. . .yet Africans seem to flourish on a vegetarian diet.

"A gram of brain tissue takes 20 times more energy to grow and maintain than a gram of tissue from the kidney, heart, or liver, she said. Gut tissue is metabolically expensive too — so as brains grew gut sizes shrank. It’s likely that meat eating “made it possible for humans to evolve a larger brain size.”

This meat eating and big brain are both traced to a gene from the Neanderthal. "the observed increased brain size [in the Neanderthal]. . . requires the consumption of animal products." "Neanderthals were all top-level carnivores who derived the vast majority of their protein from animal sources, likely to be large herbivores."
Another dietary change modern man brought, according to history and archaeology, was grains. (Said to have come down from heaven by the gods.)

The white mummies in Asia apparently brought grains to the dependent darker people around them, according to the bone studies NOVA carried out with the "native" people of the Tarim basin. Most likely the Tarim mummies led to the origin of the Asian civilization. The Yellow Emperor has been reputed as the "primogenitor of civilization" of the Chinese nation according to their history. (Due to all the stuff he invented or brought there, including grains.) I wonder what gave him that title of yellow? Maybe his hair?

"if you're of European descent, your ancestors have been eating grains for roughly 7,000 years. Non-industrial cultures often treated their seeds, including grains, differently than we do today. They used soaking, sprouting and long fermentation to decrease the amount of toxins found in grains, making them more nutritious and digestible. . . we ate some combination of the following: land mammals (including organs, fat and marrow), cooked tubers, seafood (fish, mammals, shellfish, seaweed), eggs, nuts, fruit, honey, "vegetables" (stems, leaves, etc.), mushrooms, assorted land animals, birds and insects. The proportion of each food varied widely between groups. . ."

Neanderthals may have eaten much more plant material than previously suspected. They also ate cooked grains! Certain liberal camps paint a picture of our ancestors as stupid, primitive hunters, who supplemented mainly raw meaty diets with the occasional berry, but now we know that isn't true. Although it is for cannibalistic blacks stemming from only the homo erectus. . .
Note the white Neanderthal they are feasting on in the picture. . .nothing unlike what we see in parts of Africa today.

". . .for most of the last twenty million years of the evolution of our [native blacks] bodies. . . we were eating fruit, nuts, leaves the occasional bit of insect, frog, bird or mouse. . ."Source

". . .studies unanimously show that hunter-gatherer populations [blacks] have very low incidence of obesity and other diseases of civilization."

Some have suggested that obesity is traced to gut bacteria's or microbes, and " that the obese microbiota increases low-grade chronic inflammation and that this inflammation sets the stage for leptin and insulin resistance." (Two things the very mixed blacks have a high level of in civilization. . .)

"Some researchers have even hypothesized that the connection between diet and gut microbes also involve the brain. . . gut microbes produce neurotransmitters and other substances that act on various brain regions."

This article's author believes that due to obesity being found in civilization, it is thus caused by civilization. . .and in a way they are right. The diet of civilization is the mechanism by which those not originally or purely from a civilized people or area, will get fat. In a white civilization though, obesity originally was not a problem, and among whites in pure areas, obesity is still hardly a problem.

h pylori 2So blacks do poorly with these "white man's" gut bacteria, causing inflammation and obesity, but whites have caught the blacks gut bacteria too! 
(As well as the many tropical diseases they are immune to, and numerous STD's they are not immune to.)

The origins of blacks can be traced from before the biblical timeline, by the bugs in their guts, that have been slowly evolving and cohabiting with their hosts for a very long time!!

Approximately two-thirds of the world’s population is now infected with a gut parasite (the H. pylori.) that in the United States, is said to be more prevalent among African Americans, Hispanics, and lower
socioeconomic groups. [Of course all directly related to blacks.] Genetic studies strongly suggest it came into being in Africa. . .

"In Africa, where infection with H. pylori is near-universal, the incidence of stomach cancer [one of the things it causes in whites] is low. Which suggests that African H. sap and African H. pylori have had plenty of time to evolve a kind of truce over the hundred thousand years of their mutual living arrangements."

Can diseases and gut problems in the white man be traced to this very common bug infestation, originating in the black man? Apparently yes! Check out this link on what to do about the parasite you likely have gotten from too close contact with blacks.

Another thing that went with whites was drinking milk, originally raw milk. . .which only whites can digest.

This is seen in a map of lactose intolerance, where the more mixed areas and the darker they are, the more lactose intolerance they are. In fact, some articles connect lactose intolerance, obesity and diabetes.
All highly black issues!

So is eating grains, meat, and milk simply the diet that spurred on civilization and a big brain. . .or is correlation not the causation? (As usual it seems.)

"Agriculture was definitely an early facilitator of dispersal [of humans all over the world], but a variety of technological developments may have been instrumental in further spurts of dispersal: the invention of pottery, metalworking, pastoralism, sea navigation, the engines of war. . ."

So basically not just a new diet, but the whole package of civilization came with these white genes and gut bacteria. This included religion, language, mathematics, astronomy, etc.

Arab merchants and less mixed black warriors spread from the middle east as well with their adopted diet, language, culture and religion to the continent of Africa [according to DNA, in Ethiopia]. . ."
 It was there in Ethiopia that the Arabs and blacks started their own "new Jerusalem", and to this day many blacks have a pilgrimage there as a holy site. Ethiopia home of Lalibela, Axum, Gondar and the Simiens
Ethiopians, and frankly now most of Africa, can now through DNA trace their ancestry to Jewish or hebrew roots in the middle east. . . From Ethiopia they went to the horn of Africa, and on to the rest of west and north Africa.
Humanity's forgotten return to Africa revealed in DNA
Is it just me, or does that sound an awful lot like what archaeology has theorized based on carbon dating. . .?

I personally believe this can be tied to the poorly dated Neolithic stone age time.

". . .the expanding Neolithic population probably absorbed -to a limited extent- aborigines from outside the core area of the Near East, however, the bulk of the population [in the middle east] appears to share a fairly recent common ancestry."

"And this origin of common ancestry seems to be traced from the prehistoric site of the Göbekli Tepe which sits right at the center of this important area for agriculture, husbandry, language, religion, pottery, metal work, ships. . . in Mesopotamia. If there is a candidate for where the. . . population became modern, the early Neolithic of the Near East is surely it." 

"This hypothesis makes the most sense chronologically, archaeologically, genetically, and geographically."
structures A - DSource Source 

"There is a significant change in the archaeological record associated with the introduction of plant domestication (ie the Neolithic period in Europe and the Near East), such as the appearance of pottery, stone tools for plant processing, and the remains of the domesticated plants themselves (Gebauer & Price, 1992).

There is. . . an associated decrease in . . .[tooth]dentition size. . .The smaller dentition is not due to more meat, but instead [credited] to the consumption of easier to chew processed foods like bread and porridges. . . associated.. . with the adoption of agriculture. . . is a significant and dramatic population increase."

The differences in teeth between purer blacks and whites to this day (called the Sub Saharan dental complex), due partly to a larger jaw, which I will get into later. . . show they have evolved for a vegetarian diet, while whites need more meat due to our larger brains. In fact, their colons are also more suited for digesting plants I hear! Just like wild animals, we can't feed the blacks the foods of modern humans. 

This is all evidence that carbon dating of the neolithic time and the Neanderthals was wrong. When you combine genetics, agriculture and civilization (which are all said to be the things that corresponded with modern man) seen only around 7,000 years ago, all around the world. . .how is it that the Neanderthals ate grains and cooked them too?!  How were they, with their diet and big brain, not as civilized as us? Or was the evidence just destroyed? Did only those living in caves camping stay preserved enough for us to find them?

What we do know, is that genetics from Europeans, gut flora and a massive and fast diet change, as well as agriculture and farming that came with civilization, spread from the middle east to Europe and Asia. And ironically genetics shows whites went to both places from starting in the middle east. (Only after that, genetics shows a flow of modern genes back to Africa meaning blacks leaving Africa, likely as slaves, and unmixed with white or Neanderthal genes, were not homo sapien and not modern humans, unlike this picture calls them.)

So if you believe in civilization and modern (intelligent) man being created in the "image of God", and according to all mythology, in the middle east. . . the only people who fit that description are the white race, from the Neanderthals. In fact, using one tracing method, the first blue eyed person can be traced to from 6-10,000 years ago they say. And yet we now know we got those genes from the Neanderthals, who supposedly died out 40,000 years ago!!

This is a deep and controversial subject that I discussed in depth in my post: God's chosen people a race or religion? As well as in my post: All about the hybrid Neanderthal named Adam. part 5 (Most others on earth are now mixed "gentiles", being part natives of the earth, called "beast of the field", by man according to the Bible, and "wild man", according to the Sumerian text. . . How "God" or the gods felt about that, we will leave to another time. . .
More on the original blacks I blogged on here: All about Africans, the original earthly species. . .Part 6.) 

The most recent and correct models of homo erectus look just like the purest pygmies and Australian aboriginals, who came from millions of years of selection, straight from the monkeys like "Lucy" below. 

Neanderthals on the other hand (embarrassingly naked insinuating that they were primitive too) show no evolution from, or similarity to those who donated their mitochondria...  So I conclude that they had an unnatural evolution, in that they were a creation of the alien nordic gods, from a three parent child.

The final model of Neanderthal Man, the Homo Erectus and Lucy
So to sum it all up:
The origin of modern man, with a high intelligence, which brought civilization and thanks to very differently evolved gut bacteria, the ability to eat a new diet of meat, grains and dairy (brought from the heavens by the gods according to legend), is thus connected with all the traits of the people who also fit all the tendencies and traits of the high IQ people mentioned in my second post on IQ. While blacks and their genes and gut stuff cause obesity.

 These same white people also had the ability to be industrious and work with creativity and innovation, like shown in my third post on IQ came with civilization as well, Not surprisingly, these people also had low testosterone (the lowering of which -from the high level found in blacks- was also believed to have brought with it the ability to be civilized, peaceful and monogamous) as seen in my last post on IQ

There is yet more evidence of civilization's origin through language and religion, seen in the ability to be moral or spiritual, also known as "godly", due to it being like God's nature to be such. This is tied to those who are "God's" biological and pure children, as both morality and spirituality are tied to certain bloodlines. . . which is also tied to IQ, more than previously believed. I will get into that next. . .

Saturday, June 13, 2015

What our sex hormone levels (and their outward expressions) say about (and do to) us. Part 4

After studying the topic of hormones, how and why they differ between people and races, and the behavioral ramifications of those differences, the link with IQ becomes obvious. I am going to simplify things for you here though, as I have gathered a mountain of research on this subject and it would take me way too long to go through it all here.

The connection with hormones and IQ is a bit of a two step process though, unlike the correlations of many other things I showed in my post in part 2. Maybe you need a bit of a refresher on those though. Here is the conclusion of the many many studies I have dug up on what the high and low IQ tendencies and correlations are: 

poor or on welfare
raised in unsafe environments
likely to be in jail
uneducated, highschool drop outs
have a supervised learning style
From abusive homes
raised in large families
born to young single moms who they did not bond with.
likely to bear an illegitimate child
Not breastfed, read to, or exposed to good classical and calming music, or expose their own child to such.
Highly religious and superstitious, but with little actual sexual or morality according to jail rates.
they follow the crowd
Are nearly never self employed.
Are carefree and not aware enough of their situation to be depressed or on antidepressants.
Found predominantly in parts of the world with dark coloring, pockets of America that are integrated with those same cultures, and individuals who are also of mixed ancestry, but may not look it. . .color alone being a poor indication of your mixed ancestry.
Odds are great that they will have dark skin

And the high IQ individual's tendencies are:

They are often if not mainly wealthy.
Educated sometimes, but self motivated, surrounded with books, homeschooled and able to get into college if they want to.
From functional families and two parent homes, often neither divorced.
From mothers who are by average 30
from small families
from well bonded families by average
raised in a safe environment
raised in families that eat more protein/meat
Breastfed, fed or eat mainly healthy food.
Read to and read a lot.
Often drawn to classical or other intelligent music.
Rarely want to be employed by a company and are often entrepreneurs.
Not likely to be jailed.
Tendency to reject superstitions and religion.
Tendency to depression and worrying.
High sense of morality, not dictated by the crowd.
Civil and behaved, but sometimes see no point in rules put in place for idiots, and will speak out.
Found predominantly in places of the world with light skin; lighter skin in a population (not individual) always correlates with the highest IQ in it.
odds are great they have white skin

So taking that into consideration, we go a little deeper and look to why those with low IQ are highly correlated with divorce, jail time, abusive families, do not bond well, have babies out of wedlock and are generally aggressive and passionate. Scientists say this behavior is due to high testosterone. . .but testosterone is complicated. 

When you think of testosterone, you automatically think of males, but females have it too. (They just have a lot less.) Obese women tend to have elevated testosterone levels, but in general men have much more testosterone than woman. . .but this is not always true, and this accounts for the unusual cases of domestic abuse where the woman is the aggressor.

Because of the slight advantage males have in the testing arena with some IQ tests being more mathematical and spacial -leading to a higher number of male geniuses- a few scientists have concluded that testosterone makes you smarter.

In fact, while some is slightly advantageous, more is not! A study from pub Med states " It is concluded that T may be related to IQ. . . too low or too high T levels may be disadvantages for the fluid intelligence. . ."

Why would this be so contradictory, with testosterone causing high and low IQ?

The vast majority of people in this country (for a generation still) are white, and the prime cause of very low IQ in them is mental retardation. Have you ever met a muscular and aggressive (two signs of high testosterone) mentally handicapped white person? Stout and a maybe little strong yes, but I personally have never met any that are anything but passive sweethearts.

 So I am actually not at all surprised that the very low IQ (like probably 30-60), have low testosterone. These mentally retarded whites are no doubt why a low IQ doesn't guarantee criminal behavior. The confusion with low IQ and how it is expressed in different races is part of the issue with confusion, as a white with a low IQ looks and acts like he needs to be put in a special home, whereas a black with the same IQ appears relatively normal. . .but aggressive on closer examination.

It gets even more confusing than different racial expressions to testosterone though, as testosterone is difficult to measure, and changes throughout the day and month, depending on what you are doing. Winning a fight raises it, while losing one lowers it. Having sex raises it temporarily, then lowers it to pre-sex levels.

To make matters even more complicated, in some people testosterone is mainly converted to dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which amplifies the effect of testosterone, while bringing down the levels. So while some are low in one type of testosterone, the "high octane" type of testosterone may be high. So who has higher levels of the "high octane" dehydroepiandrosterone and generally testosterone too? Not surprisingly: blacks. Seen in men, woman and children. Here are 2 sources of scientific studies with woman.

"The difference in the dehydroepiandrosterone and testosterone levels in Bantu young women and prepubertal Bantu girls, suggests differences in adrenal activity between Bantu and Caucasian women."

"The testosterone content was markedly lower in Caucasian than in Bantu girls. "

Few scientists want to admit to the racial origin of these aggressive hormones (even though it's clearly in the genes as studies have proven time and time again), yet blacks will even brag about having high testosterone! I have met few that will deny it!

It is whites who have issues with admitting to hormone levels and the cooresponding behaviors. 

The blacks and politically correct whites reading this will now try to excuse away Testosterone levels by saying how they change throughout the day and month, dependant on what you do, as well as changing with different times of life. It also effects races differently according to the levels of other stuff like dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which amplifies the effect of testosterone, so a black can have lower levels of one, but still act like he has high testosterone.

These inconsistencies have been used as excuses (mainly by defensive whites) as to why the rare small sample groups have shown no racial differences. No doubt I could repeat those results if I had just told the men to run a marathone and/or have sex before coming to get tested. (Both lower the levels temporarily.) Oh, and make sure the blacks were old too. (As their levels are similar if not equal then.)

Scientists fearing the label "racist", and the loss of their jobs, feel it would be risky to be politically incorrect even if it means to tell the truth. So they make up a disorder for the behavior that stems from the sex hormones. Like conduct disorder.  

"CD [conduct disorder] boys had significantly higher levels of DHEAS [dehydroepiandrosterone ] and marginally significantly higher levels of A [androstenedione a form of testosterone as well]. . ." "The results suggest that adrenal androgen functioning plays an important role in the onset and maintenance, of aggression in young boys."

Other studies go on to say that "Conduct disorder is a childhood behaviour disorder that is characterized by persistent aggressive or antisocial behaviour that disrupts the child's environment and impairs his or her functioning. A proportion of children with conduct disorder have psychopathic traits. Psychopathic traits consist of a callous–unemotional component and an impulsive–antisocial component. . ."
Psychopathic traits have been linked to a large number of criminals and crimes in the world, and typical black behavior in numerous studies of all kinds, but this article puts them all together. It's a must read if you believe all are created equal.

Some scientists are brave enough to say that behavior issues (a new disorder this time called oppositional defiant disorder or ODD) may be due to "genetic factors."

."adrenal androgen functioning is specifically elevated in children with ODD [oppositional defiant disorder]. It is speculated that the mechanism could be a shift in balance of ACTH-beta-endorphin functioning in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis due to. . . genetic factors." This study was done "To examine the relationship between adrenal androgens and aggression in children with oppositional and antisocial behavior. . ."

It is clear by many studies that high levels of any form of testosterone is linked with aggression, seen more in boys and men consequently then woman or girls. . .but they also note that high testosterone causes an early puberty. If you didn't know it, blacks have a much earlier puberty, and in general mature faster, while smaller, from the day they are born. They are even born earlier and are not generally preemies according to tests.

 "The findings [about aggression and high testosterone appears to mainly] apply only to men. After puberty, testosterone levels in men are about 10 times higher than in women.

''The highest testosterone level in women tends to fall within the low range for men, so that the hormone is a far greater factor for men than women,'' said Dr. Richard Udry, head of a center for population study at the University of North Carolina, who is studying the effects of testosterone on sexuality."

Here is where the obvious connection comes to how those with a high level of testosterone, being mainly blacks and those mixed, are connected to IQ. . .
"Scientists have long linked abnormally high levels of testosterone to an unusually early involvement with sex and drug use and to certain violent crimes, like particularly vicious rapes."
"Those men who are most likely to try to dominate. . . in a prison yard. . . are likely to have higher testosterone levels than their peers, new data show."

Low IQ is also correlated with being in jail, as mentioned at the start, so one could say that those with a low IQ are likely to be more violent, be more sexual mature and be aggressively acting on it early on. (All of this is linked to a high level of testosterone being expressed.)

Not surprisingly, numerous studies have confirmed that "teens with IQs ranging from 75 to 90 had the lowest probability of virginity (the authors note this is also the same IQ range where propensity towards crime peaks)." Whereas Smart Teens Don't Have Sex (or Kiss Much Either). Each additional point of IQ increased the odds of virginity by 2.7% for males and 1.7% for females. But higher IQ had a similar relationship across the entire range of romantic/sexual interactions, decreasing the odds that teens had ever kissed or even held hands with a member of the opposite sex at each age. Not only do intelligent people have a delayed onset of sexual behavior. . . they also have a lower number of premarital sex partners throughout adulthood. . . "
While this is consistent with the theory that high IQ people are more religious and conservative, this theory is of course, not true. Religiousness correlates with lower IQ, and certain 3rd world countries. . .

"In other studies it was found that smart men were less likely to be athletic, and this paper shows, unathletic men and women have fewer sex partners. So intelligent people have lower libidos and less masculine physiques. What hormone is responsible for both sex drive and masculine builds? That's right: testosterone."

"And two new papers suggest that testosterone may depress IQ. One team found that salivary testosterone levels were lower for preadolescent boys with IQs above 130 and below 70." (The same two groups most likely to be virgins in adolescence, one by choice, one not so much. . .)

"Another paper suggests that a gene responsible for androgen sensitivity and higher sperm counts may also create a tradeoff for intelligence."

So it's androgen or testosterone sensitivity, not necessarily testostrone levels that links with aggression AND low IQ, as well as early puberty, higher libidos, more partners, more muscles and a higher sperm count. Suddenly the blacks reading this are not so thrilled about claiming high testosterone. . .but these things are all evidenced in stats of the black community.  (Things like marriage rates, rape rates, and studies on sperm count, as well as the larger package. . . linked to prostate cancer (High in the black community.), and poor parenting. . . People also believe penis size is linked to high testosterone, and blacks also lead there, according to world maps of such thing. as well as much bragging online. 

. . .In fact studies say that having a large penis is highly correlated with a low IQ. . .I wonder why!)

High testosterone has also been shown in animal studies to raise the chance of spreading diseases to whole herds or packs. This is evidenced in STD's, which run rampant in the black community, and blacks in general!!

Testosterone also is known to strengthen bones and lower your voice. . .both seen as racial differences. (Blacks having harder bones, and lower voices.)

If you note on the study about sexuality above though, it's not all men with high testosterone that are highly sexual. . .just those with an IQ above 75 and below 90, in other words, most blacks and hispanics. Hmm, is this really surprising?

In fact, the average IQ for their more pure race in sub sahara Africa  is 70. You see, according to stats, 80% of Africans are mixed with an average of 20% European genes in the USA. So being that the average black person is raised to an 86 IQ average in this country, some would be above and 90, and in the normal range, while the rest of the blacks in the low range. The same can be said for the average Hispanic with an IQ of 86. While the average for any mainly pure white countries are 102, with elite Asian nations being 107.

It seems no matter the IQ, this higher sexuality is seen in even the mixed blacks. For instance even north African blacks are highly sexual and this is found wherever they go! Check out what happened when 2,000 north Africans moved into England here.

The stats and figures of these high testosterone behaviors are often hidden by different names for dark people, like the French in Canada, or Muslims. When we look at stats on muslims and child rape or prostitution, not only do we find that they are 200 times more likely to be actually convicted, but most of the crime is not punished in their communities, which are often self governing, as cops tend to avoid those areas. Furthermore, their rape victims are likely to be white!!
Testosterone is also responsible for confidence, and self esteem though. This is something blacks, males and females revel in, and brag about, and many whites are even jealous of. Also what causes strong pesonalities and strife between blacks. . .

The swagger is a black walk of confidence that young white males often try to emulate. Whites could honestly stand more of this, as it is nice to have! It makes you less depressed for one thing, and increases your attractiveness to woman. (Depression is a trait of a high IQ, and not surprisingly, much more common in whites than blacks, according to studies.)

While confidence and a healthy self esteem is good, being a narcisist is not. Pathological Narcisism also known as narcissistic personality disorder, is found to be more prevelant in blacks, this being due to their high testosterone. 

"A 2012 study stated that Black individuals have been found to report the highest levels of self-esteem of any racial group in the United States. The study itself found higher levels of narcissism in Blacks than in Whites and also that "the pathological aspects of narcissism were more strongly associated with maladjustment for Black individuals than for White individuals".

"A 2002 study found that Australian Aboriginal secondary school students had higher average self-esteem than Europeans. This has been argued to be remarkable considering the poorer average achievement of Australian Aboriginals. [These are the purest blacks in the world, with the lowest average IQ, 54. Why they are even in a school is beyond me!] Richard Lynn has stated that similar results have been found for African Americans in the United States and Africans and Britain."

"The high self-esteem also contradicts the argument that low self-esteem (due to factors such as racism by Whites) is causing the low achievement of these groups."
Blacks have a very high opinion of themselves generally, and back down to no one, thus they make very poor marriage partners, or team players in general.

So enough about blacks having higher testosterone, another study notes that there are racial (black-white) differences in androstenedione and estradiol.
(The good news is they have a drug for this "genetic problem that causes aggression and is associated with mild mental retardation". . . One drug all blacks should look into! Others have considered this approach for blacks because of testosterone. "Assuming that higher Black testosterone levels are a causative agent in Black crime, aggression and lowered IQ, experimental interventions could be tried: two pills – first one pill to lower testosterone to Black fetus’s brains by 20%, and possibly another pill to lower Black infant testosterone by 20% – could be beneficial." 

Not only that, but there is a difference between Salivary cortisol levels of normal controls and boys with a diagnosis of ODD. "The results of the study support an important role for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis sympathetic autonomic functioning in persistent antisocial behavior in young boys."

Numerous studies like here, here and here say there are salivary cortisol difference between races, blacks being lower. This is the stress hormone, that has been claimed as another excuse for the differences in crime in the black community. 

Stressful situations are said to cause your testosterone to raise, or your cortisol to raise. Either fight, or flight. . .your heartbeat apparently giving away which you are more likely to do. Low stress and a consequently low heartrate. (This is also linked to better sleep, low depression, etc..)

Not surprisingly, when I traced that lead, I found that a low heartrate is linked strongly with aggression. Men having consistently lower heart rates than woman for one thing, meaning because of testosterone, men will be more aggressive than woman in general. (Exceptions being made for black woman compared to high IQ white or Asian males, where we see these woman being the aggressors.)

"Low resting heart rate is a strong and consistent predictor of conduct disorder and chronic aggression. . . the origin of low heart rate and its significance for understanding aggression and violence remain obscure."

I don't think aggression's origin in the low heartrate is so obscure! Blacks average heartrate proves that while lacking stress, they are more aggresive and the origin of aggression with their higher levels of it.

 As shown here in a study on the racial differences in heartrates.

 "Blacks had heart rates 6 to 12 beats per minute lower than whites of the same age and sex." 
(In fact the scientists claim it may have been a drop in testosterone levels that hailed the beginning of civilization, as you do not see coorperation or teamwork with any species with a high testosterone.)

 So according to those numerous studies, the belief that all the junk that blacks deal with is stressful for them is wrong! If anything they cause their issues, excuse them away as intentional, and simply move on with their life. (It has also been seen in racially differing effects of living without a father figure, and numerous other things that would stress out the analitical, easily depressed, high IQ person of any shade. It simply is a very obvious evidence of the confidence and happy go lucky nature of the low IQ. Something I frankly envy, and try to emulate with little sucess.)

The sex hormones certainly aren't just good or bad, but they are different in the sexes, and races. They affect Femininity or masculinity, with estrogen supposedly being the hormone to make woman more attractive, and testosterone the one to make men more attractive. There is some truth in this to be sure! As my own brothers have higher testosterone levels, and are very attractive!

This is even seen with interracial marriage rates. According to numerous stats and here on

"Asians are stereotypically viewed as relatively more feminine compared to Whites while Blacks are stereotypically viewed as relatively more masculine. One study found that this perception occurred also on an implicit (subconscious) level. Another study argued that men are more attracted to Asian women relative to Black women, while women are more attracted to Black men relative to Asian men. This since females on average prefer masculine males and males on average prefer feminine females. Statistics on interracial marriages were argued to follow this with 75% of Asian-White marriages consisting of a White husband and an Asian wife and with 73% of Black-White marriages consisting of a Black husband and and White wife."

"In a study in which participants evaluated job candidates, Asians were more likely to be selected for a leadership position that required collaboration and relationship building, traits typically perceived as feminine. Black candidates were more likely to be chosen for positions that required a fiercely competitive approach, typically seen as masculine."

"Another study analyzed data the National Collegiate Athletic Association's regarding 30 different collegiate sports and found that the more a sport was perceived to be masculine the greater the relative number of Black to Asian athletes."

"Such systematic racial differences regarding perceptions and effects are likely difficult to explain using non-biological explanations. But they can be easily explained by racial differences regarding sex hormone systems. General indications that there may be racial differences related to differences regarding sex hormones include that different populations differ regarding variables such as frequency of prostate cancer and the digit ratio which is a crude measure of prenatal androgen exposure."

See also Race and crime: Testosterone and Differential K theory.
Another article states, "Like science-backed palm reading, new studies use digit ratio to predict aggressive behavior and risk of disease."
Due to admixture of European blood in nearly if not all Africans in America, the (I believe) racial difference in finger sizes called digit ratio is not always dominantly expressed in the bi-racial person. In fact, what was originally called "ugly hands" (having a larger ring finger than pointer), is something even seen in some whites now who are mixed. 

So as studies show, there is consequently a weak correlation with digit ratio, IQ and aggression, which is why the above article says it is "a crude measurement of prenatal androgen exposure", or testosterone in the womb. (Which black women are tested as having. Debunking the belief that anything done could cause the males to raise their own testosterone. Nor are these woman stressed out and having it raised in pregnancy, although their aggressive and wild actions to calmer whites would suggest they are stressed.)

There are other things that evidence this prenatal androgen exposure as well though.
Hormonal_effectsThere is a stronger link to head/face size and shape, and they say it has to do with prenatal androgen exposure . And this they say is correlated with attractiveness. Males with more testosterone having a smaller head and wider face, and being less attractive. (While the above article says testosterone gives males more attractiveness, and females less attractiveness, this doesn't take race and selection into account. . .attractiveness differs greatly between races, and while testosterone seems to help black males slightly, it hinders black females even more. Check out Race and physical attractiveness.) As well as my article why black men are attractive and woman are rejected?

Testosterone giving traits like larger muscles, it is not considered attractive for woman, while it is for men, so this is unfortunate for black woman. Even the educated ones have found themselves 70% single. Black woman have even been accused of being men, due to larger muscles, and the other testosterone induced differences. Maybe you have heard that rumor about Michelle Obama. . . Don't worry, I defended her! Blacks liked that, even though it meant admitting they have higher testosterone levels.

As if we needed more proof that blacks are more muscular and sporty, as said in a weight lifting forum, and confirmed by all science I have read, "pound for pound blacks are stronger
but don't carry strength as well as whites. . ." (Whatever that means.)

The apes beat humans in strength too! Speaking of leg muscles the scientists say, "despite our reliance on our legs for locomotion. A 2006 study found that bonobos can jump one-third higher than top-level human athletes, and bonobo legs generate as much force as humans nearly two times heavier."

Not shockingly, blacks have the same muscle types, where with even less effort, they are much stronger. Their short twitch muscles, recovery time from build up of lactic acid and other stuff makes the black's muscles much different, and frankly originally perfectly suited for sports, fighting or hard manual labor. Source

Chimps too have been found to be about twice as strong, with different muscle structure than anotomically modern man, a term to disguise the fact that some today still do not have those features. In fact,
 "In the past few years, geneticists have identified the loci for some of these anatomical differences [that are associated with primitive homo erectus or modern man]. One gene, for example, called MYH16, contributes to the development of large jaw muscles in other apes, while a "mutation stemming from the Neanderthal was said to have been responsible for not just smaller and weaker jaws, but a bigger brain!

This brings us to the connection with the high testosterone feature of a large jaw or wide face as being tied together with a small brain, and consequent low IQ, which I will discuss further later.

 Testosterone levels are expressed most accurately in the face and body, like through the muscles, finger ratio, penis size, and even height and strength of bones they say. . .but mostly in behavior. (Sexual and otherwise aggressive.)

 Here is a very interesting article on testosterone, as seen by a man who needs to supplement due to HIV, which ironically lowers testosterone, while being found primarily in the blacks worldwide. . .Source

The most damning evidence of a high level of aggression/testosterone. . .is crime. In Africa this high testosterone is adventageous, just as it is in primates, the high ranking ones always having the most. . . but in civilization, we call it crime.
Just as in Africa, it starts young, at puberty, and that testosterone boost. (Which hits younger for blacks.)

Similarly we can see young black males accounting for a majority of the violent crimes in this country.

From "The Color of Crime Race, Crime, and Justice in America — Second, Expanded Edition, 2005"

  Major Findings: Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities. Crime Rates show that Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery. 

 When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife. 

 Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate. 

 The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic. 

 Interracial Crime Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent. 

 Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black. 

 Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa. 

 Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely...
Concerning Gang participation:

 (Not effected by cop prejudice or the legal system at all!)

 Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white, even though around 70% of this country is white! Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely. 

And while I'm on this subject, let's talk about the silance of the media on these racial matters. . .
When the media covers the gangs in the country, they generally focus on how humanitarian and charitable they are, with many lawyers and doctors, and then show the white gangs. . .but when they want to show how whites are just as bad as other minority groups they will highlight white gangs a racist white supremacists when they defend their state against hordes of Hispanic gang members. Furthermore, the media lies and says the gang fights like this are white on white. Hispanics are not white! (This was the case in the Waco bike gang fight as of late. . . The Bandidos, the second largest biker gang in the world with a history of violence in Texas, were at the center of the brawl. Picture above.) This media dishonesty is no doubt to give a false sense of security and to hide the fact that these freedom fighters are fighting a racial war in our own nation. Black gangs fight everyone, Hispanic gangs mainly fight black gangs, but whites on ocassion too, but most if not all white gangs are known for stopping the violence.

When you compare white crime with black crime it is often noted that most of black crime is among those of their own community, and similarly whites with their own community. . .which hides the vastly uneven numbers of murders and crime per portion, as blacks are a mere 13%  of this country.

Being that a comparable few victims of black crime are white, compared to white on white, it may seem that there is no problem. . .but on comparing white on black crime with black on white crime, evening up the percentages. . . you see a stark difference!!

 Which again shows the cause of all this black and hispanic crime being either an uncontrollable testosterone induced aggression, which would follow them wherever they go. . .or an intentional racism and premeditated attack on the peaceful and smarter whites, or any who are around them! I believe there is some of both, and it is linked to the amount of European genes and your IQ as to what way you are more likely to lean towards, as a more passionate, more aggressive black person. 

It really comes down to being empathetic towards your fellow man. And speaking of hormones, empathy is also in the hormones. . .but I will get into that in another post. Next though, I will delve into the most fascinating topic yet. . .obesity! Really! You will be surprised at what I have found and it's tie to IQ, and racial differences, I can almost guarantee! Check it out here.