Monday, October 26, 2015

Do you have what it takes to succeed in life? (Other types of IQ) Part 7

 Often when discussing the topic of IQ with liberal, guilt ridden and sensitive people (of any color) I will hear how inaccurate IQ is for determining success. Actually they do have a good point when they say that IQ really isn't everything! (As I mentioned in my post called "The problems with intelligence testing and their many confusing correlations. Part 1", there are problems with just taking a narrow view of what makes a person successful.)

 I would have to say that up until now though, my entire series on the subject of IQ (From correlations with intelligence intelligence vs. education, correlations with IQ and hormonal levels moderating behavior, the link with obesity and it's link to low IQ, as well as adding emotional quotients or EQ as a marker of success) has ended pretty badly for the dark and overall low IQ races, especially the blacks. 

In fact, liberals and their perpetual propaganda of equal rights (based on forced fairness and racial equality, as well as a misunderstanding of the intentions of the constitution. . .) seem pretty much left without excuse, when you take science like DNA into count especially. (Meaning all the exceptional and high IQ or successful dark people are mixed with white.)

 While Liberals and the scientists in their back pockets love to claim that "Cognitive and social skills are not fixed at birth, that they are not solely genetically determined, and that they can be enhanced". . . Source

When it gets down to it, This just simply is not true. Genetics do determine everything. . .if you are a purebred white, or black person, just as is the case with dog breeds. (The confusion comes from all the bi-racial "mutts" of the world.) 
A poodle will always act like a poodle, and a boxer will always act like a boxer, unless they are a mix like the picture here. Some in the litter may only look like one parent, while acting like the other, as opposed to this obvious mix. Anything goes with behavior and looks with mixed breeds. . .same thing for races. 

The blacks of the world have highly selected for white genes, even when the whites are long gone, or a mixed black just moved in. Consequently, due to the nature of selection for "good" genes, there are very few unmixed blacks in the world now. . .resulting in skin conditions like this, and any IQ or behavior.
On the other hand, only 5% of white looking people are a mix with African blood in them. . .most being found in redneck areas or places in Europe known for poverty or violence. (As I have discussed in a post here.)

Back to the topic though; as liberals love to point out, besides intelligence and emotional quotients (two inherently white race characteristics -that surface also in mixed people) there are other things that measure your chance to succeed in a "white man's world".

I.Q. isn't everything. Watch Professor Heckman's speech from the White House Summit on Early Education here:

To quote a Forbes article: "instead of exclusively focusing on your conventional intelligence quotient, you should make an investment in strengthening your EQ (emotional), MQ (Moral), and BQ (Body). These concepts may be elusive and difficult to measure, but their significance is far greater than IQ. . .A person with less education who has fully developed their EQ, MQ, and BQ can be far more successful than a person with an impressive education who falls short in these other categories."

(Conveniently, there are tests like this one to diagnose which one of the EQ, MQ, and BQ you excel in!)

As stated in one of my posts here, an education is not meaningless, but it gives little advantage to those without both an average to high IQ, and other traits as well. . .meaning, an education for the majority of minorities in this country is a waste of tax dollars, and only raising expectations of these poor people. It is simply an exercise in competing for status and equality. . .when there is none. 

So being unable to keep up and feeling forced to comply with standards of intelligence and conduct of the less aggressive white kids, the dark kids will predominantly be made to feel shamed and inferior. Causing a high rate of drop outs and frustration.

 Take away the integration though and it is even worse for black kids! The pointlessness of an education for most blacks is seen clearly in the schools in the lest mixed blacks, in Sub Sahara Africa. Only from pressure and charity from white countries do most more pure areas of Africa even have schools, as none of the countries can afford the schools on their own.

Back to the topic of different quotients needed for success though. 

My last post dealt with EQ, the one before dealt with BQ (by way of obesity) so we will deal with Moral quotent, or MQ next.

"MQ [often called spiritual quotient or SQ] directly follows EQ as it deals with your integrity, responsibility, sympathy, and forgiveness. . . Keeping commitments, maintaining your integrity, and being honest are crucial to moral intelligence."

In fact, MQ or SQ doesn't just follow EQ, mixed with IQ, EQ IS SQ! 

 Moral (MQ) or spiritual IQ (SQ), according to my research for a past post, is controlled predominately (but not completely) by a chemical called testosterone, which influences how selfish, likely to lie, likely to want revenge, as well as how committed to relationships you are. . .although it's negative aspects seem to be moderated by a high IQ.

As I've already discussed testosterone levels, which differ dependent on your race (as seen clearly in my 4th post of this series), let's get into another hormone that seems to control the rest of the moral/spiritual behavior, next. . .

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Don't worry, IQ isn't everything. . . being civil is. Part 6

Let's talk about being civil, which started in the cradle of civil-ization. (That really must have been the origin of intelligence as well, if anywhere!)

 I feel I should sum up what you may have missed in this series thus far: According to my last post "More than you probably want to know about Obesity and it's tie to low IQ part 5". . .

"The origin of modern man, with a high intelligence, which brought civilization (and thanks to very differently evolved gut bacteria), the ability to eat a new diet of meat, grains and dairy (brought from the "heavens" by the "gods" according to legend), is thus connected with all the traits of the people who also fit all the tendencies and traits of the high IQ people mentioned in my second post on IQ. (White people.) While blacks and their genes and gut stuff cause obesity."

When blacks eat the diet of white civilization, being vegetarian hunter gatherers, unable to digest the meats and fat in particular (unless very mixed with white genes from the Neanderthal), they get fat.

Blacks need a different diet in numerous ways. They have low iron needs, and don't need the red meat like whites do. This is also tied to the bloodtype origins, like O and RH- , said to have started with modern behavior, and yet the Neanderthals had it. . .

This diet is also seen weakly in the connection with the diet "eat right for your (blood) type", which says the O bloods (who started with whites, according to my research) need more meat, while the others need very little. Due to high selection for white genes, but dominant color from African genes, it is rather inaccurate though.

A point of humor here: Blacks actually have high lycopene needs, or they suffer from prostate cancer. This is why they crave watermelon, which has 40% more lycopene then raw tomatoes! Yes, the "racist" stereotype below is both accurate, and has a reason. . .fried chicken less so I'm guessing. . .but who knows!

Back to the topic at hand though. . .The race that fits all these other traits, also had the ability to be industrious and work with creativity and innovation, like shown in my third post on IQ came with civilization as well.

 Not surprisingly, these people of civilization also had (and still have) low testosterone levels by average (the supposed lowering of which -from the high level found in blacks- was also believed to have brought with it the ability to be civilized, peaceful and monogamous) as seen in my post here on IQ and testosterone.

There is yet more evidence of civilization's origin through language and religion (which clearly connects to a migration of the white race as well. . .which I have blogged on, and there is much info online about already.)

 Religions, as evolved and misunderstood as they are, all tie back to some pretty basic foundational stories and tenets, like the golden rule.

The ability to be moral or spiritual, also known as "godly" (due to it being apparently like God's nature to be such) is also tied to high IQ. This is why historically the religious leaders have always been the top dogs in society. Actually, morality and spirituality are biologically tied to the Adamic race. . . which is unquestionably the white race, as seen in my post here.

Many will hate me for this, but the truth is, that even today there are many angles of proving that morality, the golden rule, and ultimately religion originally stemmed from the white race. The most convincing way to prove this of course would be to use science. So I will!

First, is there a connection with high IQ and spirituality? Yes, but this is not to say religion. . .as the exact opposite is true.

In my post of testosterone I already showed a link between high impulse control and monogamous behavior with high IQ people, which would indicate moral. . .but there are numerous aspects of morality/spirituality. Some would call this behavior just being healthy emotionally, or having high Emotional Intelligence.

The term emotional intelligence encompasses the following five characteristics and abilities:

1. Self-awareness--knowing your emotions, recognizing feelings as they occur, and discriminating between them
2. Mood management--handling feelings so they're relevant to the current situation and you react appropriately
3. Self-motivation--"gathering up" your feelings and directing yourself towards a goal, despite self-doubt, inertia, and impulsiveness
4. Empathy--recognizing feelings in others and tuning into their verbal and nonverbal cues
5. Managing relationships--handling interpersonal interaction, conflict resolution, and negotiations

There is no doubt that religion and it's accountability and indoctrination play a huge part in most of these things. . .so a religious person could theoretically have a slight edge. . .except with empathy, which people can't be forced to put on.

Research in brain-based learning suggests that we need emotional intelligence because a good emotional health is fundamental to effective learning and being humble and teachable, as well as having control over your impulses and moods, something religion is suppose to teach, but are all unlikely if not impossible with a high testosterone! (As discussed in my post on that.)

They say we need to be teachable and be able to learn, in order to be a being a success in life. . .

And thus, according to the pros:
"People who have developed [or have] their emotional intelligence enjoy more success in every area of life: social, emotional, physical, and financial." 
 (Or is that just a correlation, not the causation. . .?)

Test your emotional intelligence here or here. Here are some tips to work on it from other sites. 9 things emotionally intelligent people won't do.

Unfortunately, emotional intelligence is highly genetic, and tied to our white testosterone levels for one. Frankly, just like a regular IQ, with emotional IQ there are obvious racial differences even with all the admixture in the blacks. A 2014 study stated lower measured emotional intelligence for Blacks than for Whites.

"One aspect of emotional intelligence is delayed gratification. . . For instance if you gave a dog a choice of eating a sausage now or eating ten in one hour, it would eat the one now, due to a lack of emotional intelligence. Another aspect is a sense of right and wrong in that someone would do the right thing even if there was no chance of being caught, whereas someone lacking emotional intelligence would commit all kinds of crimes if they knew they wouldn't be caught. These two lacks of emotional intelligences are why negroes riot and pillage/loot in their own neighborhoods at the slightest excuse. The lack of delayed gratification is why they destroy their own neighborhoods instead of others."

Low impulse control, tied to high testosterone, also leads to uncontrolled and risky spending habits. . . and ultimately poverty. This is seen in the many low IQ lottery winners, and sports players who after making millions every year, go on to bankruptcy in only a few years. (This being common in any black sport!)

There are studies on children that show that the more the child was able to delay their gratification for a marshmallow, holding out for two (called the marshmallow test on youtube) the higher their IQ. Others that show that those who delay sexual gratification, have a higher IQ. This correlation is unknowingly and repeatedly pushed on people as a reason to hold out for marriage and not to be promiscuous, due to the best marriages being with those who do. As seen in another test on impulse control with high IQ children here.

 So undoubtedly a high IQ is linked with a high EQ, although there are exceptions no doubt. The opposite (low impulse control and instant sexual gratification with the low IQ) is seen daily, mainly in the dark people. . . here are some noteworthy examples.

Is it a low IQ in the African brain, or something deeper we wonder? In fact, as I will explain later  in a future post, there are always biological reasons for behavior, and they stem from the brain.

 "Impulse control is related to the development of the frontal lobe of the brain. Lack of development means lack of impulse control. Natural impulse control varies based on race because skulls are normally different. [Unless very mixed]. . ."

"Lack of impulse control contributes to higher crime of a race.  

Sub-Saharan African DNA contributes for a lack of impulse control as seen in frequent rioting of African and Middle Eastern people who have some of this DNA. Be it rioting of immigrants in Europe or in the USA every time they perceive a social injustice (e.g. George Zimmerman)."  As confirmed in all of the studies, "more intelligent races have better impulse control.

Consequently the blacks naturally have a higher level of crime in their community, and towards those foolish enough to be around them. (Mostly black on black crime thankfully, due to white flight.) This crime has little to do with how we treat them, although it does necessitate us catering to them as children.

It also has little to do with what they have, although there is a correlation with more control when there is more money, as the one is evidence of the other, as having a high IQ may help to moderate the low impulse control a bit.

Their crime and low impulse control is also not due to their extremist religion. Their religions and traditions evolved from their nature, just as the whites religion has evolved to be more passive and tolerant as a result of their humanitarian and empathetic nature.

This crime (as I have explained in another post on the genetics reasons for violence) is not completely universal or evident on the surface with the dark races, but due to these biological and genetic traits, which the blacks have slowly evolved to and selected for, it really is inevitable. Sadly, it is like with dog breeds; it would be as foolish as expecting a Rottweiler to act like a Labrador to presume a black will act civil like a white person. . .the originator of all civilization according to all the science.

The real question is, with all the admixture and integration in the world, what can we do about it? (I have a funny feeling, if the truth gets out, the smart blacks will have something to say about all of this, and the rights of poor blacks to procreate on the tax dollar. . .)

Stay tuned, there is more about this subject though!

Sunday, July 19, 2015

More than you probably want to know about Obesity and it's tie to low IQ part 5

Ok, so this post will probably teach you more about obesity than you ever wanted to know. You will laugh, you will cry, and you might lose your lunch. . .but hang on, as this stuff is literally life-changing and needs to be spread around!

One correlation I forgot to mention in my post The correlations, associations and tendencies of smart people (part 2) is the link with being in shape (not obese), to having high IQ. Or the inverse: low IQ and it's tie with obesity. Also connecting to that, "having had a c- section and bottle feeding in infancy have been linked to being overweight later in life."

If obesity is caused by these things, we sure want to avoid them right. . .because obesity is a serious problem! Especially in the younger generation it seems!

Unfortunately, like so many other correlations, these things will not cause a single case of obesity, but are merely found in those who are obese. "Correlation does not equal causation. "

If you have been reading any of the last posts, you will note that every correlation with low IQ ties to African genes, and obesity (including the studies on c-sections and bottle feeding that supposedly helps show the cause of obesity), is no exception. Blacks have a very high rate of c-sections, and a low rate of breastfeeding by the way, as you can see in the links.

Simply put, obesity is tied to low IQ, because it is tied to blacks.
Here are the peer reviewed, scientific facts, stats and studies to back up that "racist" statement:

African American Obesity, Men and Women"Based on epidemiologic evidence, specific racial/ethnic groups seem to be particularly susceptible to obesity. Genetic studies have found support for that genetic differences between groups may contribute to such differences."

"African-American women may need to eat fewer calories or burn more than their Caucasian counterparts to lose a comparable amount of weight, according to researchers at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in a study published online today in the International Journal of Obesity."

"Several studies have suggested that African-American women don’t lose as much weight as Caucasian women in response to the same behavioral interventions of calorie restriction or increased physical activity."

"Weight loss in response to weight management shows a wide range of interindividual variation which is largely influenced by genetic determinants. The strong control of weight loss by genotype was confirmed by twin and family studies. Recently, special attention has been paid to. . .genetic factors which can predict the response to weight reduction programme."

Black woman, according to them, are unlikely to be able to lose much weight without the right genes in other words.

"Data from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) indicate that African Americans are about 1.5 times more likely to be obese (defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2) than European Americans even in homogeneous socioeconomic groups [6],[7]." (Meaning very elite mixed blacks, in the same SES -with consequently a lot of admixture- are still 150 times as likely to be obese as compared to whites!)

In fact, the percentage of European ancestry in the genes was inversely associated with BMI among African Americans. 

Accordingly, you will note that the successful, thin attractive blacks like this one [no doubt] are also generally smart, some dead give aways that they are highly mixed! Whether or not they are aware of it!

 They can actually see this in specific European alleles of the DNA!

"each additional copy of a European ancestral allele at either the Xq13.1 or the Xq25 peak is independently associated with a BMI decrease. . ."

"searches for genes in African Americans and diverse populations can result in the detection of genetic loci that have eluded discovery in European-derived populations, perhaps because the underlying variants are too rare in the latter populations."

Many other studies confirm that the more mixed European blacks are the thin ones too. Here are a few more:

"In the United States, the prevalence of obesity is higher in African Americans than whites, even after adjustment for socioeconomic status
(SES). This leads to the hypothesis that differences in genetic background [i.e. more European genes] may contribute to racial/ethnic differences in obesity-related traits."

" . . .proportions of European ancestry (PEAs) for each individual [was] scanned for the association between PEA and obesity . . . After adjusting for global PEA, each additional copy of a European ancestral allele. . . was associated with a BMI decrease. . ." 
Source Source

Color is deceptive!

We know from all these peer reviewed studies that blacks are by far, most likely to be obese, and that the more European in them, the more likely they will be thin. 
Obesity and low IQ are of course then only linked, due to a higher amount of black genes. . . no matter what color you turn out. Including white!

skinny black male with fat white womanRedneck whites in the South, being in a highly mixed area, are doubly likely to be mixed with African genes if they are obese, AND dumb! (This is why I have always avoided obese people of any color, as I always suspected they were both stupid-based on things like smoking- AND being more aggressive. 

In fact studies of testosterone levels have shown that obese people, and also smokers have higher levels of testosterone, which is clearly linked to aggression, low IQ and black genes. (As I pointed out in my post here.

This may be why high testosterone black men are attracted to obese, aggressive, low IQ white woman. . .as they are part black, and thus a genetic pull to kin! 

This is not just my observation, but studies from dating sites and many blacks have made videos about it, blogged on it, mentioned it in comedian acts and the like. One thing it no doubt comes down to, besides similar characteristics like poverty, low IQ, aggression. . . is this, "White men have higher standards when choosing a woman than most black men."

An obese white woman who use to be attracted to blacks, and has been hit on by them her whole life speaks of why white woman who are obese go black, and never go back here. (Low self esteem and being even more rejected by white males who are also intimidated by aggressive and abusive black ex boyfriends.)

"All women regardless of their race want to be loved, but if your own race of men doesn’t want you, you go to what will accept you. This is the mentality for many white women who date black men usually because they are not the wanted “stock” within their own race. In a way both parties are “using” or “settling” for each other."

In the end though, these obese woman with low self esteem are often raped, abused and killed by these same black men, according to stats on interracial crime.

I feel so sorry for these obese white woman as I know their odds of a good life, and being treated well by a high testosterone black male are slim to none.

Back to obese blacks though. . .I know what you're thinking: "They aren't obese in Africa, so how can you blame black genes for obesity?" It is so unusual to see an obese black in Africa, they would think you are nuts if you told them a stat like that 4 out of 5 black woman are obese.

 I admit, African black woman are not fat, unless you count one select area. . .their butts. There is a name for this fat, and a theorized purpose too! This is where TMI might come in, so be forewarned.

"Steatopygia is a high degree of fat accumulation in and around the buttocks. It is common among the San (Bushmen) and the adaptive advantage may have been to store food and water in times of famine and shortage."
 So a black woman's butt is like a camel's hump they say. . .

The more likely explanation in my book is like in this picture.

"this story starts out a long time ago, in a land far far away, when our ancestors were covered in fur and walked on all fours. [actually, just homo erectus] They had sex in the position that we would call “doggy style”, as most primates still do today. . . And here you have the root of our love of the posterior: Ass is what they see during sex and those who become aroused by this view will presumably seek this view more often, which results in more little ass-monkeys being born. . . the love of boobs (and actually, boobs themselves), came later."
Source-proceed at your own risk

The reason why "doggie style" is considered more dirty, crass and primitive, is frankly because it is. . .having originated no doubt with blacks, who are sexually crazed, having a high level of testosterone, as seen in my last post. They are also full of STD's and have a high rate of homosexuals as well. Behavior like that in the picture is common with blacks, which explains the occasional and generally momentary temptation of white males for black females. (In 3/4ths of interracial relationships it is black males on white females.)

While blacks love to claim big butts are sexy, what men are actually attracted to and in fact has been seen as evolutionary, seems to be the curvature of the spine, specifically a curve of 45 degrees of the lumbar and also wide hips. Those who posses such have an easier time carrying a child to full term and do not die in childbirth. Thus it is considered selection for evolutionary purposes to get a woman like this.
 A fat butt blacks have, compared to whites, but whites have wider hips. . .and no doubt this ties to why whites have safer births of bigger babies even. And though having less fat on their rear ends, whites are worldwide generally seen as more attractive, due to the golden ratio which are only found in white genes apparently.

 As for this curvature of the spine, it too may differ in races, but no study that I am aware of has published this. . .and if they did, they would likely find it differs in attractiveness to males of different racial backgrounds.

They have done studies that show people with black tendencies and personalities are attracted to larger bodies, including breasts or butts. While those with highly white characteristics, and who are wealthier are attracted to small bodies and individual parts. Which explains why rich blacks both are attracted to and get thin white woman. . .even though blacks in general get only fat white women if they are lucky. Kanye West is one of those who even rapped about this phenomenon of rich black males getting a white and thin woman. Which is only because of his mixed DNA that allows him to be both thin and smarter, thus rich. (Mind you, she is obviously a mix herself.)

 Back to fat though. . .With the exception of the fat in the rump in the Africans, they are not known for obesity, but for being very thin! Starving in fact! While we equate the unhealthy, presumably malnourished blacks in America with obesity. . .does that not strike you as contradictory?

There is increasing obesity in Africa, in specifically the more westernized parts. . . This is confusing to scientists, because the same thin Africans can come here to America, and become obese! What is the obvious conclusion? It must the different diet. Right? The Standard America Diet. (SAD)

The diet in Africa on the other hand is very whole and simple. Composed of generally a grain or starchy potato like cassava, with a cooked or raw leafy green or even grass! Rarely a palm nut soup with a meat of some sort in it. (Monkey, snake, mice, bugs, anything goes!)

 (Personal note: I had grandparents who were missionaries to Liberia west Africa for 35 years, and being a pilot, my Grandpa traveled a lot, and ate their food a lot. Liberian food, one of two basic recipes, is something we modified to always have meat and eat here and there, even now in the third generation.)

Protein was a special treat to Africans, as their diet was generally vegetarian. I have traveled all around Sub Saharan Africa as well, and in those areas protein I found was both scare and unsanitary. Often the jungle meat are poorly processed and disease infested. It is claimed ebola was started this way.

We "modern humans" need more protein, ideally from animals scientists say, because of our larger brains, which needs fat to run. . .yet Africans seem to flourish on a vegetarian diet.

"A gram of brain tissue takes 20 times more energy to grow and maintain than a gram of tissue from the kidney, heart, or liver, she said. Gut tissue is metabolically expensive too — so as brains grew gut sizes shrank. It’s likely that meat eating “made it possible for humans to evolve a larger brain size.”

This meat eating and big brain are both traced to a gene from the Neanderthal. "the observed increased brain size [in the Neanderthal]. . . requires the consumption of animal products." "Neanderthals were all top-level carnivores who derived the vast majority of their protein from animal sources, likely to be large herbivores."
Another dietary change modern man brought, according to history and archaeology, was grains. (Said to have come down from heaven by the gods.)

The white mummies in Asia apparently brought grains to the dependent darker people around them, according to the bone studies NOVA carried out with the "native" people of the Tarim basin. Most likely the Tarim mummies led to the origin of the Asian civilization. The Yellow Emperor has been reputed as the "primogenitor of civilization" of the Chinese nation according to their history. (Due to all the stuff he invented or brought there, including grains.) I wonder what gave him that title of yellow? Maybe his hair?
The link with grains and civilization is obvious. And linked to the civil behavior is the ability to digest grains, which is found in our gut, called amylase. Studies to this day show racial differences.

"if you're of European descent, your ancestors have been eating grains for roughly 7,000 years. Non-industrial cultures often treated their seeds, including grains, differently than we do today. They used soaking, sprouting and long fermentation to decrease the amount of toxins found in grains, making them more nutritious and digestible. . . we ate some combination of the following: land mammals (including organs, fat and marrow), cooked tubers, seafood (fish, mammals, shellfish, seaweed), eggs, nuts, fruit, honey, "vegetables" (stems, leaves, etc.), mushrooms, assorted land animals, birds and insects. The proportion of each food varied widely between groups. . ."

Neanderthals may have eaten much more plant material than previously suspected. They also ate cooked grains! Certain liberal camps paint a picture of our ancestors as stupid, primitive hunters, who supplemented mainly raw meaty diets with the occasional berry, but now we know that isn't true. Although it is for cannibalistic blacks stemming from only the homo erectus. . .
Note the white Neanderthal they are feasting on in the picture. . .nothing unlike what we see in parts of Africa today.

". . .for most of the last twenty million years of the evolution of our [native blacks] bodies. . . we were eating fruit, nuts, leaves the occasional bit of insect, frog, bird or mouse. . ."Source

". . .studies unanimously show that hunter-gatherer populations [blacks] have very low incidence of obesity and other diseases of civilization."

Some have suggested that obesity is traced to gut bacteria's or microbes, and " that the obese microbiota increases low-grade chronic inflammation and that this inflammation sets the stage for leptin and insulin resistance." (Two things the very mixed blacks have a high level of in civilization. . .)

"Some researchers have even hypothesized that the connection between diet and gut microbes also involve the brain. . . gut microbes produce neurotransmitters and other substances that act on various brain regions."

This article's author believes that due to obesity being found in civilization, it is thus caused by civilization. . .and in a way they are right. The diet of civilization is the mechanism by which those not originally or purely from a civilized people or area, will get fat. In a white civilization though, obesity originally was not a problem, and among whites in pure areas, obesity is still hardly a problem.

h pylori 2So blacks do poorly with these "white man's" gut bacteria, causing inflammation and obesity, but whites have caught the blacks gut bacteria too! 
(As well as the many tropical diseases they are immune to, and numerous STD's they are not immune to.)

The origins of blacks can be traced from before the biblical timeline, by the bugs in their guts, that have been slowly evolving and cohabiting with their hosts for a very long time!!

Approximately two-thirds of the world’s population is now infected with a gut parasite (the H. pylori.) that in the United States, is said to be more prevalent among African Americans, Hispanics, and lower
socioeconomic groups. [Of course all directly related to blacks.] Genetic studies strongly suggest it came into being in Africa. . .

"In Africa, where infection with H. pylori is near-universal, the incidence of stomach cancer [one of the things it causes in whites] is low. Which suggests that African H. sap and African H. pylori have had plenty of time to evolve a kind of truce over the hundred thousand years of their mutual living arrangements."

Can diseases and gut problems in the white man be traced to this very common bug infestation, originating in the black man? Apparently yes! Check out this link on what to do about the parasite you likely have gotten from too close contact with blacks.

Another thing that went with whites was drinking milk, originally raw milk. . .which only whites can digest.

This is seen in a map of lactose intolerance, where the more mixed areas and the darker they are, the more lactose intolerance they are. In fact, some articles connect lactose intolerance, obesity and diabetes.
All highly black issues!

So is eating grains, meat, and milk simply the diet that spurred on civilization and a big brain. . .or is correlation not the causation? (As usual it seems.)

"Agriculture was definitely an early facilitator of dispersal [of humans all over the world], but a variety of technological developments may have been instrumental in further spurts of dispersal: the invention of pottery, metalworking, pastoralism, sea navigation, the engines of war. . ."

So basically not just a new diet, but the whole package of civilization came with these white genes and gut bacteria. This included religion, language, mathematics, astronomy, etc.

Arab merchants and less mixed black warriors spread from the middle east as well with their adopted diet, language, culture and religion to the continent of Africa [according to DNA, in Ethiopia]. . ."
 It was there in Ethiopia that the Arabs and blacks started their own "new Jerusalem", and to this day many blacks have a pilgrimage there as a holy site. Ethiopia home of Lalibela, Axum, Gondar and the Simiens
Ethiopians, and frankly now most of Africa, can now through DNA trace their ancestry to Jewish or hebrew roots in the middle east. . . From Ethiopia they went to the horn of Africa, and on to the rest of west and north Africa.
Humanity's forgotten return to Africa revealed in DNA
Is it just me, or does that sound an awful lot like what archaeology has theorized based on carbon dating. . .?

I personally believe this can be tied to the poorly dated Neolithic stone age time.

". . .the expanding Neolithic population probably absorbed -to a limited extent- aborigines from outside the core area of the Near East, however, the bulk of the population [in the middle east] appears to share a fairly recent common ancestry."

"And this origin of common ancestry seems to be traced from the prehistoric site of the Göbekli Tepe which sits right at the center of this important area for agriculture, husbandry, language, religion, pottery, metal work, ships. . . in Mesopotamia. If there is a candidate for where the. . . population became modern, the early Neolithic of the Near East is surely it." 

"This hypothesis makes the most sense chronologically, archaeologically, genetically, and geographically."
structures A - DSource Source 

"There is a significant change in the archaeological record associated with the introduction of plant domestication (ie the Neolithic period in Europe and the Near East), such as the appearance of pottery, stone tools for plant processing, and the remains of the domesticated plants themselves (Gebauer & Price, 1992).

There is. . . an associated decrease in . . .[tooth]dentition size. . .The smaller dentition is not due to more meat, but instead [credited] to the consumption of easier to chew processed foods like bread and porridges. . . associated.. . with the adoption of agriculture. . . is a significant and dramatic population increase."

The differences in teeth between purer blacks and whites to this day (called the Sub Saharan dental complex), due partly to a larger jaw, which I will get into later. . . show they have evolved for a vegetarian diet, while whites need more meat due to our larger brains. In fact, their colons are also more suited for digesting plants I hear! Just like wild animals, we can't feed the blacks the foods of modern humans. 

This is all evidence that carbon dating of the neolithic time and the Neanderthals was wrong. When you combine genetics, agriculture and civilization (which are all said to be the things that corresponded with modern man) seen only around 7,000 years ago, all around the world. . .how is it that the Neanderthals ate grains and cooked them too?!  How were they, with their diet and big brain, not as civilized as us? Or was the evidence just destroyed? Did only those living in caves camping stay preserved enough for us to find them?

What we do know, is that genetics from Europeans, gut flora and a massive and fast diet change, as well as agriculture and farming that came with civilization, spread from the middle east to Europe and Asia. And ironically genetics shows whites went to both places from starting in the middle east. (Only after that, genetics shows a flow of modern genes back to Africa meaning blacks leaving Africa, likely as slaves, and unmixed with white or Neanderthal genes, were not homo sapien and not modern humans, unlike this picture calls them.)

So if you believe in civilization and modern (intelligent) man being created in the "image of God", and according to all mythology, in the middle east. . . the only people who fit that description are the white race, from the Neanderthals. In fact, using one tracing method, the first blue eyed person can be traced to from 6-10,000 years ago they say. And yet we now know we got those genes from the Neanderthals, who supposedly died out 40,000 years ago!!

This is a deep and controversial subject that I discussed in depth in my post: God's chosen people a race or religion? As well as in my post: All about the hybrid Neanderthal named Adam. part 5 (Most others on earth are now mixed "gentiles", being part natives of the earth, called "beast of the field", by man according to the Bible, and "wild man", according to the Sumerian text. . . How "God" or the gods felt about that, we will leave to another time. . .
More on the original blacks I blogged on here: All about Africans, the original earthly species. . .Part 6.) 

The most recent and correct models of homo erectus look just like the purest pygmies and Australian aboriginals, who came from millions of years of selection, straight from the monkeys like "Lucy" below. 

Neanderthals on the other hand (embarrassingly naked insinuating that they were primitive too) show no evolution from, or similarity to those who donated their mitochondria...  So I conclude that they had an unnatural evolution, in that they were a creation of the alien nordic gods, from a three parent child.

The final model of Neanderthal Man, the Homo Erectus and Lucy
So to sum it all up:
The origin of modern man, with a high intelligence, which brought civilization and thanks to very differently evolved gut bacteria, the ability to eat a new diet of meat, grains and dairy (brought from the heavens by the gods according to legend), is thus connected with all the traits of the people who also fit all the tendencies and traits of the high IQ people mentioned in my second post on IQ. While blacks and their genes and gut stuff cause obesity.

 These same white people also had the ability to be industrious and work with creativity and innovation, like shown in my third post on IQ came with civilization as well, Not surprisingly, these people also had low testosterone (the lowering of which -from the high level found in blacks- was also believed to have brought with it the ability to be civilized, peaceful and monogamous) as seen in my last post on IQ

There is yet more evidence of civilization's origin through language and religion, seen in the ability to be moral or spiritual, also known as "godly", due to it being like God's nature to be such. This is tied to those who are "God's" biological and pure children, as both morality and spirituality are tied to certain bloodlines. . . which is also tied to IQ, more than previously believed. I will get into that next. . .check it out here.