Wednesday, September 23, 2015

To my followers and fans please help.

I just started the petition "Donald Trump: Keep our civilization in America!" and wanted to see if you could help by adding your name.

My goal is to reach 100 signatures and I need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:


Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Don't worry, IQ isn't everything. . . being civil is. Part 6

Let's talk about being civil, which started in the cradle of civil-ization. (That really must have been the origin of intelligence as well, if anywhere!)

 I feel I should sum up what you may have missed in this series thus far: According to my last post "More than you probably want to know about Obesity and it's tie to low IQ part 5". . .

"The origin of modern man, with a high intelligence, which brought civilization (and thanks to very differently evolved gut bacteria), the ability to eat a new diet of meat, grains and dairy (brought from the "heavens" by the "gods" according to legend), is thus connected with all the traits of the people who also fit all the tendencies and traits of the high IQ people mentioned in my second post on IQ. (White people.) While blacks and their genes and gut stuff cause obesity."

When blacks eat the diet of white civilization, being vegetarian hunter gatherers, unable to digest the meats and fat in particular (unless very mixed with white genes from the Neanderthal), they get fat.

Blacks need a different diet in numerous ways. They have low iron needs, and don't need the red meat like whites do. This is also tied to the bloodtype origins, like O and RH- , said to have started with modern behavior, and yet the Neanderthals had it. . .

This diet is also seen weakly in the connection with the diet "eat right for your (blood) type", which says the O bloods (who started with whites, according to my research) need more meat, while the others need very little. Due to high selection for white genes, but dominant color from African genes, it is rather inaccurate though.

A point of humor here: Blacks actually have high lycopene needs, or they suffer from prostate cancer. This is why they crave watermelon, which has 40% more lycopene then raw tomatoes! Yes, the "racist" stereotype below is both accurate, and has a reason. . .fried chicken less so I'm guessing. . .but who knows!

Back to the topic at hand though. . .The race that fits all these other traits, also had the ability to be industrious and work with creativity and innovation, like shown in my third post on IQ came with civilization as well.

 Not surprisingly, these people of civilization also had (and still have) low testosterone levels by average (the supposed lowering of which -from the high level found in blacks- was also believed to have brought with it the ability to be civilized, peaceful and monogamous) as seen in my post here on IQ and testosterone.

There is yet more evidence of civilization's origin through language and religion (which clearly connects to a migration of the white race as well. . .which I have blogged on, and there is much info online about already.)

 Religions, as evolved and misunderstood as they are, all tie back to some pretty basic foundational stories and tenets, like the golden rule.

The ability to be moral or spiritual, also known as "godly" (due to it being apparently like God's nature to be such) is also tied to high IQ. This is why historically the religious leaders have always been the top dogs in society. Actually, morality and spirituality are biologically tied to the Adamic race. . . which is unquestionably the white race, as seen in my post here.

Many will hate me for this, but the truth is, that even today there are many angles of proving that morality, the golden rule, and ultimately religion originally stemmed from the white race. The most convincing way to prove this of course would be to use science. So I will!

First, is there a connection with high IQ and spirituality? Yes, but this is not to say religion. . .as the exact opposite is true.

In my post of testosterone I already showed a link between high impulse control and monogamous behavior with high IQ people, which would indicate moral. . .but there are numerous aspects of morality/spirituality. Some would call this behavior just being healthy emotionally, or having high Emotional Intelligence.

The term emotional intelligence encompasses the following five characteristics and abilities:

1. Self-awareness--knowing your emotions, recognizing feelings as they occur, and discriminating between them
2. Mood management--handling feelings so they're relevant to the current situation and you react appropriately
3. Self-motivation--"gathering up" your feelings and directing yourself towards a goal, despite self-doubt, inertia, and impulsiveness
4. Empathy--recognizing feelings in others and tuning into their verbal and nonverbal cues
5. Managing relationships--handling interpersonal interaction, conflict resolution, and negotiations

There is no doubt that religion and it's accountability and indoctrination play a huge part in most of these things. . .so a religious person could theoretically have a slight edge. . .except with empathy, which people can't be forced to put on.

Research in brain-based learning suggests that we need emotional intelligence because a good emotional health is fundamental to effective learning and being humble and teachable, as well as having control over your impulses and moods, something religion is suppose to teach, but are all unlikely if not impossible with a high testosterone! (As discussed in my post on that.)

They say we need to be teachable and be able to learn, in order to be a being a success in life. . .

And thus, according to the pros:
"People who have developed [or have] their emotional intelligence enjoy more success in every area of life: social, emotional, physical, and financial." 
 (Or is that just a correlation, not the causation. . .?)

Test your emotional intelligence here or here. Here are some tips to work on it from other sites. 9 things emotionally intelligent people won't do.

Unfortunately, emotional intelligence is highly genetic, and tied to our white testosterone levels for one. Frankly, just like a regular IQ, with emotional IQ there are obvious racial differences even with all the admixture in the blacks. A 2014 study stated lower measured emotional intelligence for Blacks than for Whites.

"One aspect of emotional intelligence is delayed gratification. . . For instance if you gave a dog a choice of eating a sausage now or eating ten in one hour, it would eat the one now, due to a lack of emotional intelligence. Another aspect is a sense of right and wrong in that someone would do the right thing even if there was no chance of being caught, whereas someone lacking emotional intelligence would commit all kinds of crimes if they knew they wouldn't be caught. These two lacks of emotional intelligences are why negroes riot and pillage/loot in their own neighborhoods at the slightest excuse. The lack of delayed gratification is why they destroy their own neighborhoods instead of others."

Low impulse control, tied to high testosterone, also leads to uncontrolled and risky spending habits. . . and ultimately poverty. This is seen in the many low IQ lottery winners, and sports players who after making millions every year, go on to bankruptcy in only a few years. (This being common in any black sport!)

There are studies on children that show that the more the child was able to delay their gratification for a marshmallow, holding out for two (called the marshmallow test on youtube) the higher their IQ. Others that show that those who delay sexual gratification, have a higher IQ. This correlation is unknowingly and repeatedly pushed on people as a reason to hold out for marriage and not to be promiscuous, due to the best marriages being with those who do. As seen in another test on impulse control with high IQ children here.

 So undoubtedly a high IQ is linked with a high EQ, although there are exceptions no doubt. The opposite (low impulse control and instant sexual gratification with the low IQ) is seen daily, mainly in the dark people. . . here are some noteworthy examples.

Is it a low IQ in the African brain, or something deeper we wonder? In fact, as I will explain later  in a future post, there are always biological reasons for behavior, and they stem from the brain.

 "Impulse control is related to the development of the frontal lobe of the brain. Lack of development means lack of impulse control. Natural impulse control varies based on race because skulls are normally different. [Unless very mixed]. . ."

"Lack of impulse control contributes to higher crime of a race.  

Sub-Saharan African DNA contributes for a lack of impulse control as seen in frequent rioting of African and Middle Eastern people who have some of this DNA. Be it rioting of immigrants in Europe or in the USA every time they perceive a social injustice (e.g. George Zimmerman)."  As confirmed in all of the studies, "more intelligent races have better impulse control.

Consequently the blacks naturally have a higher level of crime in their community, and towards those foolish enough to be around them. (Mostly black on black crime thankfully, due to white flight.) This crime has little to do with how we treat them, although it does necessitate us catering to them as children.

It also has little to do with what they have, although there is a correlation with more control when there is more money, as the one is evidence of the other, as having a high IQ may help to moderate the low impulse control a bit.

Their crime and low impulse control is also not due to their extremist religion. Their religions and traditions evolved from their nature, just as the whites religion has evolved to be more passive and tolerant as a result of their humanitarian and empathetic nature.

This crime (as I have explained in another post on the genetics reasons for violence) is not completely universal or evident on the surface with the dark races, but due to these biological and genetic traits, which the blacks have slowly evolved to and selected for, it really is inevitable. Sadly, it is like with dog breeds; it would be as foolish as expecting a Rottweiler to act like a Labrador to presume a black will act civil like a white person. . .the originator of all civilization according to all the science.

The real question is, with all the admixture and integration in the world, what can we do about it? (I have a funny feeling, if the truth gets out, the smart blacks will have something to say about all of this, and the rights of poor blacks to procreate on the tax dollar. . .)

Stay tuned, there is more about this subject though!