Monday, June 3, 2019

Oxytocin, too much of a good thing? Part 10

As we learned in my last post, empathy is intrinsically tied to Oxytocin levels according to science. This oxytocin induced empathy then leads to altruism through it's ability to make you want to follow the golden rule, in the hopes that others would follow suit. In fact, they say that Oxytocin is the biological basis for the golden rule! While oxytocin induced empathy, and the ability to follow the golden rule and be altruistic are all culturally considered a very good thing,"Empathy and altruism can clearly get out of hand." 
"The high affective empathy and the high emphatic guilt may have helped the Europeans in creating advanced societies . . .However, the high empathy and the high guilt may also be a cause of exploitation by others". In fact, high empathy is thought to be an "evolutionary mistake" by evolutionists, as it leads to the destruction of civilizations.
Through things like socialism.

 (Even Darwin admitted to this issue with empathy!)
Source

The fact is, unchecked empathy brings with it the desire for socialism and equality, especially in the young and inexperienced, even when it would be and is illogical!!
According to this site, that is called  pathological altruism.


Some people (generally the most intelligent ones) to their own detriment they say, may be too "agreeable", and therefore let the less "agreeable" people take advantage of them, whether in a relationship, cultural or job situation.

"Whites, as a race, are excessively “agreeable” to other races."
"Many white attitudes and behaviors towards non-Whites have been described as being influenced by pathological altruism in the willingness of whites to give up their homelands to non-whites."

"Pathological altruism is often defined as a sincere attempt to help others that instead harms others or oneself, and is “an unhealthy focus on others to the detriment of one’s own needs.”
Can we blame/credit Oxytocin (otherwise known as love) for how whites generally act overly agreeable toward other races? Yes and no.

While towards our own families, Oxytocin increases self sacrifice, it does not greatly increase it for "others", unless a misunderstanding is involved. . .in fact, some would say it is the hormone that causes violent racism!!

"In one setting, when you see another person's similarity to you, you're likely to feel a responsibility to honor the golden rule. . .[due to the similar Oxytocin levels]." "But in another context, when what you see in the person standing before you are differences [like dark skin], oxytocin might egg your neurons on to smite him."
Source

While empathetic and protective behavior would cause someone to be aggressive toward outsiders seen as a threat (like a mother bear protecting her cubs. . .)

this is only if they were predisposed to be distrusting and aggressive because of their high testosterone levels, (i.e. the average dark person, as discussed in my last post). So those with a high levels of this supposedly "racist" hormone Oxytocin are in fact very unlikely to instigate a fight or run towards a fight, but they will if their loved ones are threatened.

 Those who are likely to start fights are the unempathetic and aggressive ones. The worst are in fact those with empathy and aggression, which will only combine in mixed While supposedly fighting for the honor of their family/race, it is out of their own pride that they fight for others that look like them. (This seen abundantly clear in how they treat each other when not fighting an outsider. . .i.e. black on black crime.)

Normally whites are both pacifists and charitable, but they do it out of partial empathy/pity, and part narcissistic supply. It feels good to give to someone needy or a good cause. 
Because of empathy and pathological altruism, many whites adopt poor children from dark parts of the world, or even blacks from the ghettos of America, but while whites are very empathetic towards needy black children, fostering and adopting them at high numbers, they cannot raise them well. 

  As one guy on a youtube video put it, "Slap the little cunt, I was a bully when I was 7ish, My mother went up to me gave me slap and said "you like bullying people, how about I bully you?" Never bullied again." That's tough love. . .and it works with whites through empathy.

 Because we whites can put ourselves in their shoes through empathy, we automatically know and follow the golden rule and have natural morality with it, being religious or not. In fact, Atheists, being mostly whites are the most moral group on the globe! Whereas minorities struggle to ever learn "right" behavior, having the huge disadvantage of low Oxytocin/empathy. A few swats from a parent will only start a fight.

I have seen this done poorly on youtube where an angry hispanic kid keeps slapping his Dad's face, and the Dad keeps doing it back. The kid is simply frustrated and crying, but still mad, because the Dad is being gentle and calm, not showing who is boss. In all primate cultures the alpha subdues all under him by aggression, or dies at the hand of the younger one. In the ghettos these dark kids are willing to harm, steal from, lie to or even kill their own parents to get the upper hand. If the parent(s) at best chose the most legal recourse, that of yelling, controlling or manipulating themselves into a position of superiority, they will lose the battle.

 The other extreme is the passive parenting style of whites, which is mocked by blacks of all ages on youtube! While showing black parenting style as out of control, and violent. . .and it is. The parodies are actually not passive and white enough, being acted out by blacks, but they are still hilariously different! Watch one here.) 

All the while the whites are telling themselves that they need to be kinder, because this adopted black kid is testing their love and resolve. (An acquaintance of mine actually said that to her family!) The only solution for these kids seems to be as their ghetto families treat them, or worse! 

A bully who is black and a bully who is white have different motivations for bullying, and this causes confusions. A white boy, rich or poor will bully, not knowing better, or how it feels. Often he is having no example of a loving male at home, or having anyone to control him, often being desperate for attention of the right sort, a white boy will act out.

The misbehaving whites have often been coddled by permissive parents.

Apparently some are figuring this out, as they have made a program to reform problem (mainly minority) kids, that is as close to ghetto parenting as it gets. Check it out, they have made it into a reality show! They seem to get results! Not surprisingly, most of the young and old people in this program are minorities. And they are the only ones that could pull it off!

“Pathological altruism often involves self-righteousness,” (like this sign)



 "In the West, there is nothing that offers more ecstatic self-righteousness than denouncing “racism.”

"Religious fanatics burned heretics, commissars executed kulaks, Muslims beheaded apostates (and still do). Today, liberals hate “racists”—and “homophobes” and “sexists” and “fascists”—with the same Old Testament hatred. They are so drunk on self-righteous denunciation they are impervious to reality. Religion has not declined in the West; it has only taken new forms. . .liberalism is religion for liberals."

"[Pathological altruism] can result in “impulsive and ineffective efforts to equalize or level the playing field.” (Can you say foreign aide? How's about federal aid to all the poor blacks inner schools? Affirmative Action? This is a never ending list of charities and unfair advantages given to blacks and minorities all over the world by whites. . .)

This need to make us all equal is why " beggars make people uncomfortable; they stimulate our built-in urge to share. Some people give in to that urge but others just try to get away from beggars."


"Over a trillion dollars has been sunk into black Africa since 1960, with not much to show for it. Why do people keep giving? As this chapter explains, people get a huge psychological boost from administering aid."
Due to this pathological altruisim "they are driven by an inability to tolerate unhappiness or anger from the object of their PA; again, a good description of how whites treat non-whites."

In fact this "aid" does nothing to improve the long term stability or productivity of those receiving it. Instead it damages local economies by providing free goods which might otherwise have to be purchased locally. It also creates a dependent mentality where rather than working to better their situation, people simply become accustomed to waiting for some foreigner to rescue them with aid.

“Animal hoarders” are another example of PA. They fill their houses with “rescued” pets. . ."
"Together, these definitions are an almost perfect description of white liberal attitudes towards non-whites". Some other examples are White guilt and Holocaustianity."


"Large race differences were reported between Blacks and Whites in the US by a 1984 study which stated that "Race results suggested a comparative lack of interest in, and concern and affection for animals among nonwhites."

"A theory about the origins of PA is that it can be seen as the result of an excessively female brain. Women are more likely than men to be co-dependents and have eating disorders. . .Girls are more compliant than boys, better behaved, and more eager to please. They are better able to figure out the needs of others."

"They are politically more “liberal,” and more likely to think that an important function of government is to take care of people. Low levels of testosterone in the womb during fetal development is associated with higher levels of empathy in both sexes."
"There is very strong evidence that altruistic behavior is under genetic control. The genetic abnormality ["the only known group of people who show no racial bias"] has been called “the pathology of overfriendliness,” and people who suffer from it are excessively trusting and sympathetic. . .[likely to be taken advantage of.]

". . .people of different ethnicities and religions have different levels of guilt and show different levels of altruism."
Here's the real kicker though: It is traced to certain white genes. These are seen in whites but also Asians, who are less studied, but have high admixture anciently. 

"In a new book called Pathological Altruism, found that Asian nations, including China, Japan and Korea tended to have higher proportions of the “collectivist” gene  in their population. The key questions are: how can one gene have such an effect? And why should it spread in some populations and not others? Chiao suggests that the version predominating in Asian populations is associated with heightened anxiety levels and increased risk of depression. She adds that such populations respond by structuring their society to ward off those negative effects. The success of such social structures would then ensure that the gene would spread."
Source

So genetics play a part, but what about the actual chemicals they release, or the parts of the brain that do it? 

"The amygdala, anterior temporal cortex, and insula are parts of the brain involved in sensing the pain of others. Psychopaths [and blacks] have less brain matter in these locations than normal [white] people, and it may be that people with more brain matter in these areas have a tendency towards PA."

The neurotransmitter serotonin appears to alter moral judgment, making people less willing to offend others, while oxytocin increases sociability and trusting—within the group. "

"Depleted serotonin levels have been put forward as the biological basis for impulsive behavior patterns, and there is some evidence to support this - low serotonin has been linked to unprovoked aggressive behavior towards others, type II alcoholism, and greater risk-taking and aggression in non-human primates."
Source

As I have said before and as seen above, trust is associated with oxytocin, and found in high amounts in whites, which leads to the ability to make civilization, as said in my last post.

With low serotonin linked to aggression, as is high testosterone, according to my studies, that would also point strongly to black genes causing low levels.  In fact though, it seems due to racially different allelic receptor or serotonin transporter genes (Or serotonin sensitivity, just like with testosterone), we see blacks as having higher levels. While they see in both primates and humans that the poor mothers, and abusive genetics produce the lowest serotonin levels in monkeys and people, you can't equate correlation with causation. It seems to be species or race wide. . .except for admixture causing confusion.


So more testosterone, low Serotonin and low Oxytocin, all coming from black genes, predisposes people to be less empathetic, immoral and aggressive. While too much of the latter makes feminine males or females to be liberal and empathetic, to their detriment and often in excess.


 It is sadly, but this very empathy of whites that allows civilization within our group, is the very undoing of it when in a multicultural society!


In the Descent of man, Charles Darwin discussed this relaxation of natural selection; As human societies became more civilized, he noted that they became increasingly more sympathetic and compassionate to their weak members. He admitted that this seemed ethically right, but involved a huge genetic cost! As those surviving and reproducing would have otherwise died.

 Darwin admitted that natural selection had no play in civilization, nor would we like it if it did. . .but due to the large number of children of "the scum" of society, there is little hope for the world. 
Source

So Oxytocin induced empathy is not all good, in fact if I were to say white's had an Achilles heel, or as the article above called it, "an evolutionary mistake", it is empathy for the minorities and defective ones. This is why even the Republicans can't do what is needed about immigration laws that are ruining civilization! Thankfully Donald Trump, being your typical high IQ, socially inept, out of the box thinker, is willing to be politically incorrect and stand up for civilization!! Somebody needs to, as the dumbing down of civilization with it's darkening is the main cause of the death or destruction of it.

This is due to stupidity being downright dangerous!

“Dumb people are sort of automatically dangerous, just on account of being dumb and for no other reason. In other words, stupidity is dangerous. "



"As IQ declines, prefrontal functioning is increasingly impaired. A person with a slow prefrontal cortex is often less moral than one with a prefrontal cortex in good shape. . .when IQ drops down below 100 towards the 85-90 range in any [mixed] race, people seem to become less moral and sociopathic, manipulation, violence and exploitative behavior. . . increase."




 The low IQ people of the world, with small pre-frontal cortexes are predominantly dark. (As I will show you in another post.) So it's not a case of pre-frontal functioning being increasingly impaired with a low IQ, and causing immoral behavior, it just started that way in blacks!


"You start seeing a lot more theft, even just petty theft. A person with an IQ in that range will come over to your place and steal $5. Or a bag of chips. Or borrow $5 and refuse to pay it back."









"This sort of thing really infuriates a lot of Whites because it seems so chickenshit. I always thought that if you are going to steal something, make it a good haul."
Source

A good example of this was the Michael Brown incident and anyone who owns or has managed a convenience store or gas station can tell you this happens all the time. Blacks regularly steal "little things'. My ex-husband and I managed four of these types of stores and saw it first hand. The police rarely do anything as they are overwhelmed already and such petty crime is just not a priority, unless the perpetrator is caught in the act.

You might say that the dependency on foreign aid has become a sort of "theft" from developed nations. In fact we in the west are working as slaves to support parasites who have no incentive to better themselves, or no potential. Understandably, many people are becoming fed up with this situation.





"European societies have had their capacity for empathy pushed to the limit, as seen in the commonly heard term “aid fatigue.” And there is no easy way to turn it off."

  "The only real way is to convince oneself that the object of empathy is morally worthless."
Source

The fact is, morality is found in oxytocin, and blacks just don't have it, unless very mixed and higher IQ. . .so yes, defending a large portion of them, being morally challenged, is -I hate to say it- a poor usage of empathy, and a sign of pathology. Just as defending a loosed wild lion in civilization is also a waste of empathy and pathological. I'm all for returning both the lions and the blacks to their natural habitat though! If it still exists. (Free of aid or reparations.)

No comments:

Post a Comment