Let me tell you about Cultural Marxism.
"Cultural Marxists have taken over the institutions of the media, [watch the new commercial "celebrate different"] education, mainstream Christianity (conservative and liberal), law, and finance. Their goal is the annihilation of Western Civilization in general and white people in particular." 
You are programmed to be a Cultural Marxist, whether you know it or not. What is cultural marxism? It is "An offshoot of Marxism that gave birth to political correctness, multiculturalism and "anti-racism." Unlike traditional Marxism that focuses on economics, Cultural Marxism focuses on culture and maintains that all human behavior is a result of culture."
Some other terms that you should understand though are: Genophilia: The love of one's own race. A natural instinct that Cultural Marxists want to deny (at least for whites).
Identitarian Religion: An older form of religion that stresses ancestral obligations. Adamantly opposed by Christian Cultural Marxists (at least for whites). Throughout nearly all human history, identitarian religion (aka, ethno-religion), has been the norm.
Nation: The very word 'nation' (from Latin 'nasci') implies link by blood. The traditional (non-Marxist) understanding of nation implies racial homogeneity. (Until very recently Europe has always been racially homogenous and USA, in 1960 census, was 90% white.) "The very essence of Cultural Marxism is the support of mass immigration / open borders."
Darwin supported the differences in race (those I spoke of in my most popular post called differences in our blood and what they mean) because he studied them. Those who don't are supporting a warped belief in creation as seen in the Bible. . .not the earlier original Sumerian text.
"Since the fall of communism discredited socialism this pseudo-religion has merely mutated and repackaged itself invading many other secular/liberal causes like a virus. All forms of . . .Marxism must have a victim class and an exploiter class in order to grow and organize. The cultural divide between the conservative white majority versus leftwing white minority means that minority must seek non-whites to build its power base. Class warfare doesn't sell, but racism does.. . people whose only identify is within their own narrow racial or social group can be more easily manipulated and controlled."
The blacks fall for this in masses, with 90% voting Democratic! Even Blacks will admit to this as a problem and even claim blacks only vote if they see someone of their own color running. Seen in the last presidential election, where more blacks then whites came out to vote!
"This is why the Democratic Party follows economic and social policies that have destroyed the black family [highly debatable, as they follow the same patterns left on their own in Africa] ,while getting 90 percent of their vote year after year. The big craze now is Hispanics as the next legion of useful idiots mostly voting for the Leftists."
Source Source
Democrats are by no means all idiots though, a small group of them are very educated. Frankly, I think a good part of them are the Unitarian Universalists, the Atheists and humanitarians. The Democrats don't even try to cater to the white middle or low class though.
"All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment - professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists - and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic."
Why the disparity? This wealthy, left-wing professional class needs to gain the support of those whose economic interests they control in order to hold power . . .they resort to the "race card" and target working-class whites and conservative whites as the cause of the their problems. They say "Give us your vote and through 'redistributive change' we will make the world a better place and hand out some of that 'Obama money'." It goes back to spite of the white working class, and demonizes the white conservatives as all religious, racist and idiot zealots.
Media and liberal groups have seriously pushed the glorification of mixing of races (also called miscegenation) in the last few generations. Why? The more mixed whites there are, the more the white elites will be in control. (For reasons I will get into later. . .)
Of course mixing makes inconsistent results, which makes some who are dark act black, while some act basically white inside now!
Examples of the latter being like Obama or Bill Cosby, who have been quite down on the bad black mothers, and absentee fathers of the blacks. These mixed folks are instantly pegged as "sellouts" by the black community, and are told they "are acting white" if they get an education and hang out with whites. There's a high chance these blacks will suffer more violence at the hands of blacks then whites do. . .crime stats already show most crime is black on black, but I wonder if the victims may be those who are acting white, in a black neighborhood? I know of one like that, and she is under pressure to change and lower herself constantly! Some, like Oprah survive to tell the story, but I'm afraid many don't. (I'll get into the effects to the children of mixed marriages in a future post though.)
Knowing about this abuse from those they look like, it seem incredible that mixed blacks almost always identify as black?
A person with only 1/16th black ancestry will still , based on "the one-drop rule", call themselves black. They will most often have very visible black characteristics, so that is one obvious reason why most mixed blacks (mulattoes) identify as black. . . Mulattoes then reintegrate into the black gene pool, as they often can't marry whites. (Although they have a better chance of marrying a white with being a mix according to stats from dating sites.)
If blacks are so proud of their black looks and blood, as self reported studies on attractiveness studies say they unrealistically do. . . (and we know based on the dating stats, that whites are proud of theirs. . .) who's idea was it to integrate?
On "miscegenation" from the book erectus among us:
After his white leader father died, his mother (who was taken from a trail in the jungle) and mixed siblings were rejected by the fathers people, and found they didn't fit in with the mothers' people either. Raised in the jungle by his mother, fighting his own family for scraps of food (one kid was killed over food) he became very bitter over being different and unaccepted by his fathers people.
Being smarter and eventually idolized by the nomadic primitive folks of his mother's side, he found it easy to gain support to overtake those he knew were looking down on him as a half breed. (A similar story is in the Bible.)
He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire, he started the Mongol invasions that resulted in the conquest of most of Eurasia. These campaigns were often accompanied by massacres of the civilized populations. Areas he conquered and slaughtered the people in or mixed his mongols with are modern-day China, Korea, Central Asian countries, and substantial portions of modern Eastern Europe, Russia and the Middle East.
The great wall of China was built to keep out the mongols he led, as they were constantly raiding, raping and pillaging the wealthy ruling class whites.
"Perhaps both the strongest and the weakest argument against miscegenation [mixed marriages] is that it can destroy an existing civilization. . . the decline of a civilization is often slow, over hundreds of years, so that people may not even realize it is happening. However, there is good evidence that a lowering of IQ individually or nationally will lower living standards as less intelligent people are less productive and consumption cannot be maintained without production (though if you borrow or steal, it can be someone else’s production)."
Source
From what I have read this mixing of races has been the death of a number of great civilizations from Egypt to Rome, Brazil/ Latin America/Mexico and now Detroit and Miami. This isn't just because of the Blacks being here as is obvious they are in huge amounts. . .it is because whites have given over power to them because of white guilt. And also simply because of the increased intelligence of the few smart mixed blacks (the ones whites generally mix with) causing whites to naively give them unfair advantage by pushing "equal rights" for all blacks.
(As long as we were separate, and knew our roles, our different races had no wars. Egypt was a good example of this for a very long time. There was no competition. The original royal whites, like up to King Tut (DNA proven to be European, with a whopping half of European men coming from him) had their role of leading (as their bloodline always has), while the blacks were content to be dependent on and supported by them. They worked under them, with good evidence of a fair system. They were like children doing chores that they were capable of doing, to help the family. . .otherwise known as slavery, yes. This compliance in the age of the gods in particular might have had something to do with the disparity in size also though. . .something I got into more in real evidence of God. Part 3)
When civilizations die Democrats (a majority now minorities) and liberals (because of an agenda of cultural marxism) will blame the poverty and crime in places like Detroit and Brazil on the economy and lack of jobs, saying it is because of "racism". While it is true that there are a lack of loans being offered to the hopeful (black) small business men or woman, yet plenty of white entrepreneurs have gone in there trying to resurrect the dead. . . As stated in my below post on this though, it is directly to do with behavior and IQ of the minorities that they have such "bad luck" getting trusted by whites. It's not something they can be schooled out of, or change with jail time or religion either. Tax payers are simply throwing money away trying to make them "act white" or "Godly". This is something honest teachers will admit to behind closed doors, as will those who work in correction facilities, or social services. Check out my links if you don't believe me.
Source Source
While giving over white control of the country to the blacks and mixed minorities (because of guilt), we continue to lie about the effects of the loss, and the mixing.
Numerous flourishing European countries suffered a blow in increased poverty as well as lowered IQ as a direct result of importing and breeding with the black slaves.
The percentage of blacks in an area translate to the IQ, and national average wage being high, or low in an area. Look below.
If you look at IQ averages in races, with different percentages of Sub Saharan black in them, you will see a very obvious pattern though.
More evidence is seen here, but there is worldwide DNA evidence as well.
Basically, wherever the Atlantic slave trade took the blacks, and the higher the amount of them, the lower the IQ, and the higher the poverty (and crime) that followed.
Richard Lynn in his 2006 book Race Differences in Intelligence reviewed the literature on worldwide IQ testing and calculated the average IQs for different races, here is a sampling:
The oldest African (free from the Neanderthal genes, who started the Europeans from all I can tell) being the San or Bushman, and a more generic term for those in their area being the Sub Saharan Africans, have the lowest scores by far. Though all of Africa has an IQ of around 70. . . the cut off of mental retardation for the rest of the world. This is seen in the schools of Detroit, dominated by the relatively pure sub saharan blacks. Check out this news report stating that the kids are getting scores as if they were guessing! Showing the sad state of the education system, and the reason why whites are leaving in droves to homeschool. And there is another one saying how lower IQ shows up in lower morals too. No shocker for those who have been exposed to black neighborhoods.
There is no doubt, knowing the DNA of some of African tribes the average IQ of even Africa being 70 is brought up by the ancient mixing in Africa, and all blacks that are unmixed may have as low as 54 even in America. (Maybe environment helps some though.)
On the other hand, the purest Europeans IMO (the original Jews, the Ashkenazi Jews) are not on the list here, but have been tested to have an average of 115. The royals and presidents of their pure bloodline average around 135! Those said to have "the divine right to rule", all being from the royal bloodlines of Europe, are the smartest in the world!
Other large studies have been done, and other books put out, like the popular "Bell curve", yet the media will not let it get out, or seek to only use stats from the 80% mixed African Americans, who have a much higher IQ thanks to their European genes. Check out the American charts, a small group is even above average intelligence. (The movie stars, comedians, scientists, dentists, doctors. . .made out to be the normal blacks by the media.)
Because of the vast difference in IQ of the original Europeans of the kingly and pure line (135) and Bushmen (54). . . Interbreeding would have been originally horrendous for the whites! (And encouraged for the blacks.) In fact, Miscegenation or mixed race marriages was illegal in many states until 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court overruled a Virginia court and declared those laws unconstitutional. "Not that long ago miscegenation was viewed as akin to bestiality."
I would guess that interbreeding is the reason why science has now admitted that "our" brains are shrinking, as well as our sculls. Over the last 30,000 years, the human brain has decreased about 10% in size. While the biggest heads and consequently brains are found in whites, who come from the Neanderthals, the blacks who have only homo erectus in them when pure, have the smallest. Head size is strongly linked with intelligence too. Those who are a mix have medium sized heads and medium IQ's.
Of course there are many excuses the liberals make for this de-evolution, saying we need less memory then in the past, or we have more efficient brains, or domesticated animals have smaller brains then those in the wild, but these are dishonest cop outs, as some scientists admit that no other animal has shown this pattern, and the wild ones with bigger brains ARE smarter. . . denial of race and IQ differences are common, and it can be easily explained as a pseudo-religion. . .
"The push behind integration has been blacks wanting to be around whites, not whites wanting to be around blacks. Mulattos resent the fact that they can never be “white,” and must accept a lower status as a “black.” They become hostile towards whites, who are the higher status group, even though they would have an even lower status if they were not partly white. Thus, whites who have mulatto children create enemies of whites, including themselves, another reason for whites to oppose miscegenation."
Interracial marriages do not bring together different or warring races. Unlike in fairy tales like Romeo and Juliet, reality is (even more) harsh. You can literally look to the past to prove that mixing causes enemies, not friends (in probably every case of the first interracial marriages at least).
When the children choose to inevitably side with the darker skinned parent (as the dark is dominant), when the parents would divorce (as is highly likely that they would, just as they do now) the dark parent would be left destitute and bitter in a white man's world. (Although the rare black woman to marry above her status may have been or even today is secretly proud to have improved her children's chances.) Sometimes the destitute parent would spread their bitterness and anger on to their dark children. This is the case with a very famous warrior. You might have heard of him, his name is Genghis khan, (below) whom 1 in 200 people in the world can trace their ancestry to.
When the children choose to inevitably side with the darker skinned parent (as the dark is dominant), when the parents would divorce (as is highly likely that they would, just as they do now) the dark parent would be left destitute and bitter in a white man's world. (Although the rare black woman to marry above her status may have been or even today is secretly proud to have improved her children's chances.) Sometimes the destitute parent would spread their bitterness and anger on to their dark children. This is the case with a very famous warrior. You might have heard of him, his name is Genghis khan, (below) whom 1 in 200 people in the world can trace their ancestry to.
Being smarter and eventually idolized by the nomadic primitive folks of his mother's side, he found it easy to gain support to overtake those he knew were looking down on him as a half breed. (A similar story is in the Bible.)
He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire, he started the Mongol invasions that resulted in the conquest of most of Eurasia. These campaigns were often accompanied by massacres of the civilized populations. Areas he conquered and slaughtered the people in or mixed his mongols with are modern-day China, Korea, Central Asian countries, and substantial portions of modern Eastern Europe, Russia and the Middle East.
The great wall of China was built to keep out the mongols he led, as they were constantly raiding, raping and pillaging the wealthy ruling class whites.
"Perhaps both the strongest and the weakest argument against miscegenation [mixed marriages] is that it can destroy an existing civilization. . . the decline of a civilization is often slow, over hundreds of years, so that people may not even realize it is happening. However, there is good evidence that a lowering of IQ individually or nationally will lower living standards as less intelligent people are less productive and consumption cannot be maintained without production (though if you borrow or steal, it can be someone else’s production)."
Source
From what I have read this mixing of races has been the death of a number of great civilizations from Egypt to Rome, Brazil/ Latin America/Mexico and now Detroit and Miami. This isn't just because of the Blacks being here as is obvious they are in huge amounts. . .it is because whites have given over power to them because of white guilt. And also simply because of the increased intelligence of the few smart mixed blacks (the ones whites generally mix with) causing whites to naively give them unfair advantage by pushing "equal rights" for all blacks.
(As long as we were separate, and knew our roles, our different races had no wars. Egypt was a good example of this for a very long time. There was no competition. The original royal whites, like up to King Tut (DNA proven to be European, with a whopping half of European men coming from him) had their role of leading (as their bloodline always has), while the blacks were content to be dependent on and supported by them. They worked under them, with good evidence of a fair system. They were like children doing chores that they were capable of doing, to help the family. . .otherwise known as slavery, yes. This compliance in the age of the gods in particular might have had something to do with the disparity in size also though. . .something I got into more in real evidence of God. Part 3)When civilizations die Democrats (a majority now minorities) and liberals (because of an agenda of cultural marxism) will blame the poverty and crime in places like Detroit and Brazil on the economy and lack of jobs, saying it is because of "racism". While it is true that there are a lack of loans being offered to the hopeful (black) small business men or woman, yet plenty of white entrepreneurs have gone in there trying to resurrect the dead. . . As stated in my below post on this though, it is directly to do with behavior and IQ of the minorities that they have such "bad luck" getting trusted by whites. It's not something they can be schooled out of, or change with jail time or religion either. Tax payers are simply throwing money away trying to make them "act white" or "Godly". This is something honest teachers will admit to behind closed doors, as will those who work in correction facilities, or social services. Check out my links if you don't believe me.
Source Source
While giving over white control of the country to the blacks and mixed minorities (because of guilt), we continue to lie about the effects of the loss, and the mixing.
Numerous flourishing European countries suffered a blow in increased poverty as well as lowered IQ as a direct result of importing and breeding with the black slaves.
The percentage of blacks in an area translate to the IQ, and national average wage being high, or low in an area. Look below.
If you look at IQ averages in races, with different percentages of Sub Saharan black in them, you will see a very obvious pattern though.
More evidence is seen here, but there is worldwide DNA evidence as well.Basically, wherever the Atlantic slave trade took the blacks, and the higher the amount of them, the lower the IQ, and the higher the poverty (and crime) that followed.
Richard Lynn in his 2006 book Race Differences in Intelligence reviewed the literature on worldwide IQ testing and calculated the average IQs for different races, here is a sampling:
- Bushmen: In Southwest Africa 54.
- Sub-Saharan Africans: In Africa 67.
- Aborigines: In Australia 62..
- Pacific Islander: In Pacific Islands 85.
- Native Americans. In North America 86
- Southeast Asians: In Southeast Asia 87.
- Arctic People: In North America 91.
- Europeans: In Europe 99. Outside Europe 99.
The oldest African (free from the Neanderthal genes, who started the Europeans from all I can tell) being the San or Bushman, and a more generic term for those in their area being the Sub Saharan Africans, have the lowest scores by far. Though all of Africa has an IQ of around 70. . . the cut off of mental retardation for the rest of the world. This is seen in the schools of Detroit, dominated by the relatively pure sub saharan blacks. Check out this news report stating that the kids are getting scores as if they were guessing! Showing the sad state of the education system, and the reason why whites are leaving in droves to homeschool. And there is another one saying how lower IQ shows up in lower morals too. No shocker for those who have been exposed to black neighborhoods.
There is no doubt, knowing the DNA of some of African tribes the average IQ of even Africa being 70 is brought up by the ancient mixing in Africa, and all blacks that are unmixed may have as low as 54 even in America. (Maybe environment helps some though.)
On the other hand, the purest Europeans IMO (the original Jews, the Ashkenazi Jews) are not on the list here, but have been tested to have an average of 115. The royals and presidents of their pure bloodline average around 135! Those said to have "the divine right to rule", all being from the royal bloodlines of Europe, are the smartest in the world!
Other large studies have been done, and other books put out, like the popular "Bell curve", yet the media will not let it get out, or seek to only use stats from the 80% mixed African Americans, who have a much higher IQ thanks to their European genes. Check out the American charts, a small group is even above average intelligence. (The movie stars, comedians, scientists, dentists, doctors. . .made out to be the normal blacks by the media.)
Because of the vast difference in IQ of the original Europeans of the kingly and pure line (135) and Bushmen (54). . . Interbreeding would have been originally horrendous for the whites! (And encouraged for the blacks.) In fact, Miscegenation or mixed race marriages was illegal in many states until 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court overruled a Virginia court and declared those laws unconstitutional. "Not that long ago miscegenation was viewed as akin to bestiality."
Of course there are many excuses the liberals make for this de-evolution, saying we need less memory then in the past, or we have more efficient brains, or domesticated animals have smaller brains then those in the wild, but these are dishonest cop outs, as some scientists admit that no other animal has shown this pattern, and the wild ones with bigger brains ARE smarter. . . denial of race and IQ differences are common, and it can be easily explained as a pseudo-religion. . .
We need to start being honest about our different origins from different species, homo erectus (to the left)
and the Neanderthal (to the right), and about what's happening in our world because of our many differences (like IQ). Until we stop the denial (and stop supporting the pseudo-religion of cultural Marxism) we can't start taking steps to preserve our different species futures. . .preferably segregated.
"No dog lover would want all the breeds of dogs to interbreed, so that all dogs are mongrels. No breeder of race horses would want his thoroughbreds to breed with common riding ponies. No garden lover wants all his flowers to come in only a single color or shape, or his tomatoes or apples in only a single variety, and no oenophile would want only a single red wine and a single white wine to choose from. . .Egalitarians love diversity so much that they insist that everything – our corporations, restaurants, hotels, neighborhoods, schools, television, movies, and textbooks must all be diverse – everything, that is, except people, who must miscegenate to become the same and therefore equal. . .Many things can be done but, until people come to believe that it is desirable and morally good to preserve their own genetic heritage, nothing will be done."
From the book erectus among us, chapter 29
and the Neanderthal (to the right), and about what's happening in our world because of our many differences (like IQ). Until we stop the denial (and stop supporting the pseudo-religion of cultural Marxism) we can't start taking steps to preserve our different species futures. . .preferably segregated."No dog lover would want all the breeds of dogs to interbreed, so that all dogs are mongrels. No breeder of race horses would want his thoroughbreds to breed with common riding ponies. No garden lover wants all his flowers to come in only a single color or shape, or his tomatoes or apples in only a single variety, and no oenophile would want only a single red wine and a single white wine to choose from. . .Egalitarians love diversity so much that they insist that everything – our corporations, restaurants, hotels, neighborhoods, schools, television, movies, and textbooks must all be diverse – everything, that is, except people, who must miscegenate to become the same and therefore equal. . .Many things can be done but, until people come to believe that it is desirable and morally good to preserve their own genetic heritage, nothing will be done."
From the book erectus among us, chapter 29
No comments:
Post a Comment