Monday, April 7, 2014

Real evidence of God? Part 3

 In this dissertation I will show what I consider irrefutable proof (from many different angles) for why God is/was, in fact, a reality. So hang on to your hats, and be ready to have your presumptions and reality scientifically challenged, no matter what you may believe now! I will be including many references and links, which I encourage every serious seeker to check out. By no means will I only use the Bible for proof, like Christians usually do. . . as that is foolish and circular reasoning. I will start out with biblical theology and it's history though.

While I am not at all a "Bible thumper" and think of myself as Atheistic, I do technically believe in the "God" of the Bible and give the Bible credit when it is deserved.  I am actually only a little more an Atheist then a religious person though, because every last one of you religious people reading this will disbelieve in another person's concept of God.

My concept of God starts in the Bible, with the story of creation. It is there that we see a clue as to what God is like.  In Gen. 1:26, "God said, 'Let us make man in Our image, according to our likeness; and let them rule. . .'" So, call me crazy, but a normal reading of that verse tells the astute reader exactly what "God" is, flesh and blood! I have heard all the excuses though, and you will not likely see it as obvious as I do, so let me give you some background on the Bible.

The fact is, like I mentioned in my last post, “A lot of the stories in the Old Testament are in fact plagiarized material, particularly from the rich mythical heritage of the Sumerians – the inventors of writing. The story of Noah and the flood story, the creation of man out of clay, Cain and Abel, the gardens of Eden, the tree of knowledge, creation of Eve from Adams rib, and numerous other myths, like the throwing of Moses in the river after he was born, are all stories found recorded on Sumerian clay tablets dating 5000 years back in time”.

[That the Sumerian text is the origin for all the Old Testament Biblical stories]". . . has long been common knowledge amongst the scholars of history, archaeology and anthropology. . ."
Source Or if you are a more visual person, check out this video here.

 Just because the Sumerian text predated the Bible by thousands of years though, and is thus more accurate, that is not to say that the Bible should be discounted completely. Though much in the Bible has been shown wrong, changed, or contradictory. . . much has been misunderstood, mistranslated and consequently has evolved from the original source of the stories. In a similar way to the old game of telephone, stories passed down through oral tradition are bound to change a little here and there before they get written down. So even if we had the original of every book in the Bible, and we found that we understood the language perfectly in it's context and culture, we would still have to depend on those who passed down the stories.

The study of languages tells us a lot about the origins of "God" actually. Like the Christian "God", other culture's mythical "gods", known by different names in different languages and world myths were much changed by time and ignorance, just as we have done to Odin morphing into Santa.

There is no doubt in my mind that the original stories about the gods of every culture were based in reality. Even this one living in the north pole. . . as crazy as that may seem, a magical spirit in the heavens is just as crazy.

On the other hand, if you define "God" as the energy that connects us, or love, or some other ambiguous thing that cannot be disproven. . .then sure, that God has some evidence I suppose. 

Everyone has out of ignorance made up their own "God concept" over the years.

This evolution of myth is actually just classic human behavior, but especially towards more advanced/magical/talented/different looking people.(Just look at the idol worship over sports players or singers!)
"Chariot of the gods"made by "cargo cults"
I could focus on how the original religions evolved, as I showed they did in a past post called: All myths change and evolve, it's just human nature. . . "God" is no exception. Part 8 or I could show evidence that belief in invisible people is a holdover of numerous psychological processes. Instead I will focus on why we should give the Bible, or more specifically, the original Sumerian text some credit.

You may ask, "If it's so great, why are the later evolved Bible and Koran so popular, and most average people have never even heard of the Sumerian text?"  The Sumerian civilization, being much older then ones built over it has only recently been found! As in all archaeology, if you want to get to the old stuff, you need to dig deep. And being that we had no interest in archaeology until a few generations ago, we have had to look through newer stuff to get to the old.

 Though the Sumerian writings were in great shape, and very detailed, shown to be the longhand of the later Hebrew language, the connection with the Bible wasn't made until the latter had been compiled to make a cohesive story and translated for thousands of years! Through sheer ignorance or stubbornness, scholars keep using the Bible (oral traditions put in writing) for their source, instead of the writings that started the myths in the first place!! Mainly because if you change the original stories, even a little, you change the entire basis for the writing of the rest of the Bible, making the whole largely obsolete.

It is this misunderstanding of the original text that has caused people to make fun of the Bible as silly fairy tales. For instance, the story of Creation. . .

"Science has disproven creation though right?" you say. Sure, we know that there are layers with a progression of more complex life in it as you go up. We can prove what has happened in the the earth and the universe for what we date as millions of years through many different methods like math, astronomy, polar ice, geology, etc. This causes science-minded Christians to admit to one of these:

  1. God must have made the world and universe with age
  2. Because a day is as a thousand years to God, they were not 24 hour periods 
  3. He used evolution and the big bang to create life. "Let there be light and BANG, there it was."
The fact is though, not only can we trace the start of the universe back to a certain time and location, but we can replicate the creation of RNA from natural conditions on a naturally forming earth all the way back when life started! As we know that RNA evolved naturally to the more complex DNA and then on to single celled organisms and continually more complex organisms, the fact that life started without a need for divine help is pretty much a proven fact now.

Really, there is so much evidence for an old earth and the evolution of life and all species from other less evolved species, that most educated people just presume that the "creation" myths were just a way the "Bronze age nomads" and other stupid ancients explained the unknown to their grandkids. We science minded folk have thus always presumed the Biblical creation story is all bunk. . .

But wait, the original story of creation from the Sumerian text does not claim "God" created all things like the Bible version to the left claims. . . just man. If you define "man" as the Sumerian text and the Bible even does, that brings about a very different picture then we have been led to believe through science. . .which I will get into later in my next posts. . .

Furthermore, unlike the Bible that speaks of people watching nearby stars falling on the earth, and hovering over houses (there is actually a good explanation with another word substituted for stars though actually. . .) and the earth being flat (as I discussed in my post: A flat earth teaching in a perfect book?), the Sumerian text speaks of the planets as if from the perspective of ones who have been to them. The knowledge they had of the color, size, order, etc. of the planets and their place around the sun, we have only recently confirmed! They also had maps that showed the poles, when no one should have known about them at that time, unless they could fly of course. . .

So, the Sumerians had knowledge we are just starting to understand now, and apparently it was lost for a time to our ancestors. That was because there was little knowledge of the writings of Sumer until they had dug it up late in the 19th century They have confirmed some of the later kings from Sumer as being real, but in their kings lists they say that they were "gods", with very long lives, so hardly anyone takes the first part of the Sumerian kings list seriously. . .

The Sumerians had a word for their gods that came from the heavens (sky), and it was the Annunaki. That was the generic term. (like many use "god" now) When they described the beings, they called them "ilu" which is translated "tall guys". Ilu has since been translated as a generic "god(s)". The same word translated into Hebrew, the shorthand of Sumerian, is Elohim. While it has been translated as singular, Elohim is actually plural. It was an intentional mistranslation that doesn't fit in many places. To justify the many gods down to one, the Bible makes good and bad gods, and makes up less honored gods into demons and Angels. It is obvious in the original language that there is also no difference between sons of God, Angels, Demons, and even Satan, as well as many, many other names of the supposed "false gods".

Something most Christians apparently don't know is that the Bible both admits to "God" being "the gods", (even in the 10 commandments). The word Elohim has been mistranslated and obviously doesn't fit. The godhead evolved as a way to justify the obvious implications of gods in the Bible, but it was not what the Jews believed. The Jews believed what all "myths" before them did, that there was a pantheon of gods.

The gods, though being thought of as magical in their abilities and having a spirit, were known to be physical beings. All myths agreed on this, including the Bible before the New testament was mistranslated. Not only was "God" in the garden of Eden said to have been heard walking, something impossible for a Spirit, it says that their sons are flesh and blood who mated with "the daughters of man", in Gen. 6. (Something not possible of mystical demons, or a mystical "son of God/Angel", as many would love to believe. . .
Source Source

 How did the gods travel? You might want to check out a past post in the source for that answer. . . The evidence is overwhelming, they flew in space ships. The Bible used mistranslated words like "cloud" in their grasping for understanding, but the clear descriptions in earlier texts, or ones not manipulated for political reasons show a clear picture of the way the gods, or Angels traveled, and it wasn't wings. . .that was simply a primitive sign to indicate something could fly. There is also many ancient pictures of the crafts from the time of Egypt to the time of Jesus and after. The crafts and those in them still frequent earth, so may be the same creatures ( or servants of them) who were called gods by a less technologically advanced man.

 The gods were originally called "giant" by those on earth, and shown as such in the very start. While later seeming only slightly taller. The gods original title was "ilu" or "tall men". So in looking for the gods, we should be DNA testing the many giants remains, but instead the government has whisked them away and denied their existence when found.

 Of course anyone who read my past posts: The white royals of history were all "sons of the tall men" Part 7 knows of the connection of the giants to some on earth still. . .a dying breed.
When we read in Gen. 6 about these sons of God or "the tall men" breeding with the daughters of (earthly) man and creating giants, what it would have meant is a tall child of the gods was tempted by a short daughter of the earth.  This man has been thought to be either demon or Angel, and thus a mystical being, but only a new, part god/ man who is a similar species to the earthly one here already could have produced children. The fact that they had kids who were "men of renown" and heroes says they were compatible to some degree. A description speaking only of those not found, and mythical or interracial marriage, with the sons of God clearly speaking of only one color of man. . .which is obvious if you look at the Source

Should we trust the Bible only, or try to understand it with science? I believe it is obvious that the Bible holds much history, but we have misunderstood much of it based on poor presumptions like that the creation of "man" refers to all we now call man, and the 7 day creation is speaking of all creation. Likely there were many evolution to the story, as we can trace in a pattern from the original Sumerian story.

 I believe the dating of the Bible to be accurate, based on many things like most mutations happening "magically" at the time of man's creation, the origin of the blue eyed people, the cradle of civilization, and DNA in general, but confusion has come in with sculls and carbon dating them. Because the Species we know we stem from are said to be much older then Adam and Eve. Only from radiocarbon dating the fossils of the Neanderthal and homo erectus (who seems to be one species with the vast majority if not all of the other supposed hominim species now they say) does science seem to contradict the creation story as clarified in the Sumerian text. While in no way do I seek to give credit to an exaggerated creation story about the earth and universe being 6,000 or so years old, the age of "modern man" just might fit with the original creation story if you read on.

We know that the world was a lush paradise in the far past, and for some reason, all that changed. If a catastrophe was to take out all life at once, and bury it in ash or sediment, it would show up in coal and oil in large amounts. A catastrophe that changes a lush world into a barren one for a time would have a big effect on carbon. . .in fact there is much evidence of this happening, but people claim it was local comets. While something did happen to send the world into the ice age, it doesn't seem to have been a comet. . .but it does seem to have caused all sorts of issues, like a local flood over the area we see civilized man. . .check out the links and see what you think of the evidence for a properly understood flood.
Let's hear the scientists weigh in on the subject.
"With any radiometric dating scheme certain assumptions must be made. The first assumption made is that carbon 14 has always been produced and had the same concentration in the atmosphere. "

"[The] assumption is that radioactive decay rates stay the same and have always been what we measure them now to be. We have only been able to measure radioactive decay rates within the last hundred years."

"One thing that is agreed upon is that if a material is claimed to be 30 million years old there should be no carbon 14 atoms left. [Yet] No matter how old the carbon material is science labs almost always find some carbon 14. This problem has been studied at great length and the radiocarbon journal is filled with articles on the subject."
The explanations/excuses/guesses range from:
  1. "Carbon 14 from the surrounding environment have been introduced into the sample. This could happen from ground water washing in or bacteria invading a sample. A hard non porous carbon material such as diamond, hard coal, or amber would make this unlikely and can be ruled out for those materials.
  2. The carbon 14 lab has used materials in its processing that contain carbon 14. Perhaps the sample holder had some carbon in it.
  3. Contamination during sample preparation. This is something all labs are aware of and make great efforts to avoid this problem.
  4. Error due to the machine performing and measuring results. This is not likely given the extreme care given to these many experiments by numerous people over a span of 50 years.
  5. Nuclear synthesis of carbon 14 in situ during the experiment. This has been ruled out by experts.
  6. Nuclear synthesis of carbon 14 in the coal or marble itself while laying in the ground for alleged millions of years. This has been ruled out by experts as well.
  7. Nuclear synthesis of ordinary carbon to carbon 14 while the material is in situ. In other words could the carbon material while buried, frozen, or whatever, be lying next to or exposed to a strong radioactive material that bombarded the carbon atoms and turned some of them into carbon 14 from carbon 16. . ." Source Source

And what radioactive substance could have been around in ancient times? Hmm, none if they were all just apes. This is the lie that some would like us to believe about our origins, to be able to discredit the Bible as a whole, when like with all books, there are many nuggets of truths in it.

The fact is, there is evidence from a lot of different angles that these "gods" came to earth, and for a specific reason. . . because their planet was under attack, and the war came here. If you want a lot more evidence of a nuclear war between the gods, check out this site. Source

The god's left their mark not just with seeding their children on earth and the nuclear war, but the city underground that they built to survive it. . .or for their creation to. (No one really knows who lived there, but it was secure and intelligently built.)

 If you have never heard of the ancient underground city in Turkey, you should! "Derinkuyu is just the largest of hundreds of underground complexes built by we're-not-sure-who-exactly", to house about 20,000 people. It had access to fresh flowing water -- the wells were not connected with the surface to prevent poisoning by crafty land dwellers. It also has individual quarters, shops, communal rooms, tombs, arsenals, livestock, and escape routes. There's even a school, complete with a study room. The city was probably used as a giant bunker to protect its inhabitants from either war or natural disaster, but its architects were clearly determined to make it the most comfortable doomsday bunker ever."

 Some believe it may be much older then it was first dated. . . . And this isn't the only awesome ancient structure built by the gods! Source

Some of the ones that stand out to me are:
  •  A place called Adam's calendar, called so because it is thought to be connected to the birth place of the first civilizations. (Fascinating link lower down)
  •  "Great Zimbabwe" is a structure that seems out of place (to the right) It is the only thing around for a permanent and defended living structure in most of Africa. These huge walls and fancy brickwork, as well as other artifacts has been found to have connections to the the style of the Sumerians, Egyptians, Phoenicians, Romans, Greeks, Arabs, and even the Incas and Aztecs. (All groups said to be started by white gods.) This place is built though by Africans, and it is likely they were the first who mixed with the children of the gods, the Jews, or Hebrews. Feeling out of place with the rest of Africa, and likely as mocked as the "uncle Tom" mixed blacks today, they built themselves a formidable defense against the unmixed and jealous blacks. (Some believe the very first and only surviving one.) This may be the first example of a needed defensive city, because the gods were feared, and so were their children, who reigned as gods and kings unchallenged for a very long time. The divine right to rule was given to gods children, and those who challenged it were put down by God himself. . .until the unpardonable sin of inter racial marriage was committed and God said he would no longer defend them against the invaders who were now a part of them.
  • These circular structures with no doors or windows that are all over southern Africa were apparently used for power, and to process gold in some way. Massive amounts of power are still coming from the earth in these places! It is powered through sound waves undetectable to the human ear and magnetics, if I understand it right. Many tests were used in and around these structures to prove that they still work today. We only need to learn to harness this power now. (Was this area in Africa the origin of the first civilized "man", Adam, as some would claim or just where the gods themselves first came down to mine gold with the help of their dark earthly slaves? Read on to find out. Source
  • As more evidence of that, there are many ancient laser cut (?) gold mines near the power grids! "The past 200 years has seen a number of explorers write in great detail about these ruins, but their findings have been largely forgotten and their books are out of print. Most of these early explorers wrote about thousands of ancient mine shafts found in close proximity to the ruins. These mines have been described as sources of gold. . ." Source
The megaliths at Göbekli Tepe were erected by hunter-gatherers around 9000 B.C.
  • "Gobekli Tepe in Turkey is thought to be the oldest human construction. Gobekli Tepe seems to have been built before the advent of agriculture, religion, written language, the wheel, pottery, the domestication of animals, and the use of anything other than simple stone tools of the hunter-gatherer." Source Some believe it was made to commemorate the creation of man, in the garden of Eden. The location fits with the Bible's description, and the inscriptions and pictures are seem to strongly hint to that as well. Why was there no civilization? Being surrounded by the dark slaves they may have been eaten or killed for a time before the gods stepped in. We don't know why man was told to leave the garden, but we do have evidence even if not DNA evidence that there was a slaughter there. "human sacrifice took place in this region, spreading to Palestine, Canaan and Israel.

    Archaeological evidence suggests that victims were killed in huge death pits, children were buried alive in jars, others roasted in vast bronze bowls. . .This savagery may, indeed, hold the key to one final, bewildering mystery. . .Long ago, the site was deliberately and systematically buried in a feat of labour every bit as remarkable as the stone carvings." Around 8,000 BC, the creators of Gobekli. . .entombed the glorious temple under thousands of tons of earth. Preserving it perfectly to this day. Source
  • "The Ggantija Temples are thought to be the second oldest structures. The two temples of Gjantija are estimated to be 5,800 years old (built between 3600 and 3000 BC). According to an ancient legend, the temple walls were built in one day and one night by a female giant named Sunsuna, who did it while nursing a baby!" Source

  • Pumapunku is a large temple complex that has interlocking huge stone blocks like legos. It was built by people whom the Inca, believed were gods. On it's terrace there is a stone slab is 7.81 meters long, 5.17 meters wide and averages 1.07 meters thick. This stone slab has been estimated to weigh 131 metric tons.  It is also a part of the Tiwanaku Site. 
  • "Of all the ruins in Central and South America, Tiwanaku (or "the American stonehenge") has especially been a magnet for strange theories." Numerous "incredible" scientists were laughed out of town by stating the date for this place to be 10,000 years old, build by aliens and having implications about race too it is said. "It was here, the Inka claimed, that their creator deity, Viracocha, made the first peoples of the Andes from clay and then the first Inka. . ." I don't know about the first people of the Andes, but the Inkas have been DNA tested, and they have little connection to the blood of the gods. Source Source
  • A prehistoric underground megalithic temple structure known as the Hypogeum of Hal-Saflieni. Those who built this structure had a knowledge of acoustics that is still baffling scientists to this very day. A word spoken in the Oracle room is “magnified a hundredfold and is audible throughout the entire structure. Some call it "sexist construction" as it only works with the male voice, because it is a lower frequency. "The subterranean structure is shrouded in mystery, from the discovery of elongated skulls to stories of paranormal phenomena." Source

Hypogeum of Hal Saflieni

  •  Of course there are the many pyramids of the world. The original ones were said to be made by or for the gods. Interestingly, as opposed to the theory of them being tombs, many now believe were made to enhance the magnetics of the earth for both enhanced conscientiousness in the "dark ages", as well as powering lights like the Alexandria lighthouse, and Egypt as a whole! The pyramids have an identical technology to what Nikola Tesla made, and one which we are just now reinventing. It has been said that we are very close to wireless magnetic resonance energy for home use and the world now! All we need are powering stations, and cordless stuff to replace the old corded stuff. If the powers that be don't shut down this power source, it should be a thing of the very near future. Check out this amazing video!

It should be obvious to anyone looking at this stuff very long at all, that the ancient aliens had technology even superior to what we have today! Considering we genetically modify plants to have cells from animals (probably not the best idea) and are able to clone sheep and even humans. . . when you consider Greek, Egyptian, Babylonian etc, mythology with an open mind, it seems not only possible but likely that the gods used genetic manipulation to create many weird earthly animal combinations with their blood. 

Most of the half man/half beast combinations were short lived, and never had the chance to reproduce, as they were sterile (classic of hybrids) but that was apparently not the case with all of them. . . For instance, Mermaids have been spotted down through the ages, even brought to shore and studied and documented for years! The most recent sighting was a science expedition and on film, that has even been shown on the news! if you want to check out a modern day Merman out in very deep water, check this out here.

If that isn't proof enough for you religious folks, an ancient script (The Book of Jasher 4:18) quoted by the Bible multiple times and thus given at least a measure of credibility by some, verifies and records that the ancient world indeed had the ability to "mix species". . .something that apparently challenged and angered the gods. In a similar way the tower of Babel (maybe a docking station for a spaceship that would allow them to reach "God") was an apparent challenge to the gods.

So, the gods left evidence of their DNA, structures, technology, creations, and even their own footprints! Sometimes these footprints were found in Africa around Adam's Calendar, or later in their own temple in Israel, other times in other random places while chasing dinos! Myths of giants were common in Europe, but they were briefly in Africa, for a while in Asia and the Americas apparently too. Being huge seems to be a recessive gene that shows up in those who are mixed with the gods. . .nearly all of us now!
Source Source Source

Where the gods/Angels (and those who had the blood of them. . .) always considered "giants" I wonder? Or could they have gotten smaller in time? This may have happened in a changing world to the dinos as well. This would be after the catastrophe called "Noah's flood" in the Bible, and after their DNA (or "essence" as the Sumerians put it) was saved or were in a better location and survived the catastrophe I referenced earlier. It seems at the same time in history that we see giants, we also see dinos living with them. Check it out for yourself though!

I believe the plants, animals and likely even the alien life on Earth have shrunk due to the earth growing. . .which there is much evidence for. (Thus changing gravity.) To show how the earth is growing, and how all the continents fit perfectly together on all sides once when you remove the oceans, you need to watch this video. (And this series that shows evidence for it in the age of the rock layers and more.) I have spoken of this more in a post here. The Bible speaks of it, science confirms it, so I believe it.

 I have no definite proof of the gods in particular shrinking in time, as the dinos and other animals and plants apparently have (so this part is only a theory), but you might notice that the oldest footprints like the one above and the depictions in the oldest myths show much larger giants. While in more recent times, like in the Bible days, some of these gods or "Angels" (same word) were mistaken for normal looking "men" when they visited their creation/half children, Abraham and Sarah in Hebrews 13:2 (This is why some folks adopt the belief in shape shifting aliens or demons in order to fit in with what is known. . .I think that is silly personally.) The gods had to have looked like the children of God, both being taller then the others on earth at the time. (And we know the skeletons were not taller then now a days white men.)

These "Angels" were obviously at that time indistinguishable from those with the pure blood of the original Jews, including without wings (as I discussed earlier in how they were shown with wings only to indicate they had the power of flight) and presumably in height. Which is why the Jews were told to not forget to entertain strangers, for they may secretly be Angels/gods. (Hebrews 13:2) No doubt this was also why Jesus ("the second Adam", and true "son of god") in John 10:24 quoting Ps. 82:6, said to select leaders of the then mixed Jews, "Ye are gods".

Coming soon in my next post called: "Proof that we did not just evolve naturally, but that "man" was intelligently designed! Part 4" you will see the obvious conclusion of who Adam and Eve really were (based on their blood), who actually is related to them, what they looked like, leading to how they started what history and science calls originally a different species.

 And in the updated version much more evidence is seen to distinguish that the Jews from Adam and Eve could only be a race of people if the Bible was right, and how that race was seen clearly in the entire Bible if you understand all people did not stem from them, and some who did were a mix. Read the conclusion to the matter here in "God's chosen people, a race or religion."


  1. I find this interesting...on lunch and can't continue reading, but I plan to finish later when I can and post a comment. Thank you for this article, Angela. :)

  2. You're welcome. I suspect this info will change many lives. . .

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. No. This is all wrong. The King James Bible contains all of the truth.

  5. King James was the one who made up the thought of Ham being black, because Noah cursed his grandson. . .he was seriously speculating. We now know that we can't live off of presumptions like that, as they are debunked. Of course, if you read my next two posts, you will know that this is only the start. You have a small taste here, but there is so much more evidence, that I could teach a college course on it. Whatever the case, the original King James Bible having truth is good and fine to believe, just know that the original is not readable, and it has evolved over the years, just as our understanding of the Bible has. In Renaissance times, there was much art and writings that clarified God was an alien, but we have simply weeded those out, because it didn't fit our version of truth. Just as I am an Atheist to your made up version of God, you are an Atheist to other people's versions of God that they see in the Bible. The big difference between me and a religious person, is I actually take evidence, and have no bias that can't change with the evidence. You will keep feeding yourself these affirming messages so as to not have to change, but there is actually no leg to stand on for following the King James and avoiding it's author, origin, history, culture, etc. It is only a book, full of contradictions and errors. Look up evil to check them out.