"The Guanches of the Canary Islands, are thought to represent a relatively pure Cro-Magnon stock."
Source
"Historical evidence does support the explanation of "strong sexual asymmetry...as a result of a strong bias favoring mating between European males and aboriginal females, and to the important aboriginal male mortality during the Conquest. The genetics thus suggests the native men were sharply reduced in numbers due to the war, large numbers of Spaniard [basque/ European blooded] men stayed in the islands and married the local women, the Canarians adopted Spanish names, language, and religion, and in this way, the Canarians were Hispanicized."
"According to a recent study by Fregel et al. 2009, in spite of the geographic nearness between the Canary Islands and Morocco, the genetic heritage of the Canary islands male lineages, is mainly from European origin. "
As an interesting note, the Guanache people's had a local religion similar to the later Greeks,and Jews: "According to tradition, the male and female gods lived in mountains, from which they descended to hear the prayers of the people. "
"Until the 20th century, there were in the Canary Islands individuals called "Animeros". They were similar to healers and mystics with a syncretic belief among the Guanches [also known as] Berber religion and Christianity. As in other countries close to the islands the Animeros were considered "persons blessed by God".
There was a special process carried out on the dead of certain classes in the Islands, a processing similar to the mummies of Egypt. "In the Museo de la Naturaleza y el Hombre (Santa Cruz de Tenerife) mummies of original inhabitants of the Canary Islands are displayed."
I wonder what blood type they had. . .? This statue is a depiction of one of their leaders. . .what nationality does he look like to you? One of the European men who interbred with the local short aboriginal woman? Genetics makes the answer a pretty obvious yes.
Source
So how does this all tie into the ancient texts and more specifically the Jews? Well as you might have guessed, the names we have given to the ancient civilizations and mummies, are not always the ones they were originally known by. . . but the genealogy and the redhead/blond, blue eyed, white skin looks, as well as the DNA/RH- factor are all undeniable markers of these people. So while it's clear the genes are later in Spain and other parts of Europe, they seemed to come from Africa even before that.
Maybe, after Atlantis sunk, the gods moved to Egypt to become the Egyptian "gods? Could the Biblical account of the Jews with their special blood have been first in Africa? Was the first genetically manipulated human in the image of God, but possibly inspired by the monkeys of Africa to be smaller? Was Cro-magnon Adam? He was said to have lived almost 1,000 years though, as well as all the people before the flood, so that would be easy to trace right? Well actually they tell us that the ridiculously long lives of the first humans were just due to a mistranslation. As you can read about here. It was even stated how many years that man would have to live, according to "god" in Genesis 6:3 Then the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh[mortal]: his days shall be 120 years.”
"North Africa’s Jews originated in biblical-era Israel and are more closely related to Jews from other parts of the world than they are to non-Jewish North Africans, according to a new genetics study. Ethiopian Jews [Like Obama I believe] are so distantly related to other Jews that their community must have been founded by only a few itinerants. . ." [Which I will get into later, but are a very unrelated interbreed of dark monkey, with sons of the tall men, think, planet of the apes.]Source
"Historical evidence does support the explanation of "strong sexual asymmetry...as a result of a strong bias favoring mating between European males and aboriginal females, and to the important aboriginal male mortality during the Conquest. The genetics thus suggests the native men were sharply reduced in numbers due to the war, large numbers of Spaniard [basque/ European blooded] men stayed in the islands and married the local women, the Canarians adopted Spanish names, language, and religion, and in this way, the Canarians were Hispanicized."
"According to a recent study by Fregel et al. 2009, in spite of the geographic nearness between the Canary Islands and Morocco, the genetic heritage of the Canary islands male lineages, is mainly from European origin. "
As an interesting note, the Guanache people's had a local religion similar to the later Greeks,and Jews: "According to tradition, the male and female gods lived in mountains, from which they descended to hear the prayers of the people. "
"Until the 20th century, there were in the Canary Islands individuals called "Animeros". They were similar to healers and mystics with a syncretic belief among the Guanches [also known as] Berber religion and Christianity. As in other countries close to the islands the Animeros were considered "persons blessed by God".
There was a special process carried out on the dead of certain classes in the Islands, a processing similar to the mummies of Egypt. "In the Museo de la Naturaleza y el Hombre (Santa Cruz de Tenerife) mummies of original inhabitants of the Canary Islands are displayed."
I wonder what blood type they had. . .? This statue is a depiction of one of their leaders. . .what nationality does he look like to you? One of the European men who interbred with the local short aboriginal woman? Genetics makes the answer a pretty obvious yes.
Source
So how does this all tie into the ancient texts and more specifically the Jews? Well as you might have guessed, the names we have given to the ancient civilizations and mummies, are not always the ones they were originally known by. . . but the genealogy and the redhead/blond, blue eyed, white skin looks, as well as the DNA/RH- factor are all undeniable markers of these people. So while it's clear the genes are later in Spain and other parts of Europe, they seemed to come from Africa even before that.
Maybe, after Atlantis sunk, the gods moved to Egypt to become the Egyptian "gods? Could the Biblical account of the Jews with their special blood have been first in Africa? Was the first genetically manipulated human in the image of God, but possibly inspired by the monkeys of Africa to be smaller? Was Cro-magnon Adam? He was said to have lived almost 1,000 years though, as well as all the people before the flood, so that would be easy to trace right? Well actually they tell us that the ridiculously long lives of the first humans were just due to a mistranslation. As you can read about here. It was even stated how many years that man would have to live, according to "god" in Genesis 6:3 Then the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh[mortal]: his days shall be 120 years.”
If Cro magnon was an Israelite/ European, as we see that the Neanderthal had genes of, there should be a link to the people in the area interbreeding with animals, because that's what the Bible claimed happened [bestiality]. So what have I found the geneticists saying about the people near Atlantis on the other side of the land bridge?
"The latest research builds on an earlier study that found significant genetic similarity between European and Middle Eastern Jews. Among the new findings: Jews from Morocco and Algeria [right beside it] are more closely related to Jews from Europe, while Jews from Tunisia and Libya are more closely related to those in the Middle East.
Source
Let's look at that map again, knowing these people were sea faring people, as testified by their son Noah, whom they gave explicit directions to, and even their descendants the Basque people. (One of whom was Magellan who came first to America.) Where could they have gone first when their city was gone? Perhaps the basic path of the Neanderthals?
It is pretty easy to trace the tall men or their descendants back to the earliest Pharaohs and kings who dominated Egypt before moving to Europe. So let's start there."For millennia these Kings, Queens, Pharaohs, and Emperors have obsessively interbred with themselves to preserve and spread their bloodline. They have ruled over us since the beginning of recorded history, claiming they were given divine right to the throne by God or gods. [Now we know that simply meant "Tall guys"] This 'Divine right' is simply the right to rule by DNA."[The blood of the gods]source
The Mighty Osiris and Isis walked into the Egyptian Valley out of nowhere and assumed
command. They were taller and more imposing than the men of the time, with long blond hair,
marble-like white skin and remarkable powers that enabled them to perform miracles"
command. They were taller and more imposing than the men of the time, with long blond hair,
marble-like white skin and remarkable powers that enabled them to perform miracles"
According to many, Egyptian culture was built by Caucasians, not blacks, as we have falsely been taught. While there were darker inbreed rulers who much later violently seized the thrones. (Usually as the kings were gone in battle, or started to interbreed with the dark skinned Nubian tribes, to make peace, from what I've read. . .) Soon after the start of their reign though, the kingdom fell to decay from the inside. (like we see happen with Solomon and his strange wives in the Bible, that pattern of racial interbreeding was the undoing of many great empires.) The last great rulers where pretty obviously white ones, as is proven now with DNA. (Which is not shocking considering we've tested the Neanderthal's DNA to say the same, and they were in Africa. . .)
Here are some pictures that show the hair color and facial features of the early Egyptians in power, and you be the judge if they had the looks of the Europeans, or of blacks. . .
And while we're at it, let's tie in the Bible here: As I clarified in my past post, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were white, but it is anyone's guess just how many of Jacob's children were, from his 4 wives. (2 servants and 2 daughters of the family of Laban, meaning "white".)
One thing we do know though, is that Joseph had prophetic dreams, and was given the coat "of many colors", which was often understood as a simple gift, but it was a gift that made him the rightful heir. For which gesture, and his demeaning prophetic dreams, he was hated and sold into slavery to a traveling band of Ishmaelites coming out of Gilead. Genesis 37:12-35
After taking his coat and smearing it with a goats blood, they lied to their father, saying Joseph was dead, and hoped to never see him again. (They sure couldn't have gotten away with that stunt today with DNA analysis.)
So, if the bloodline of the RH-/o- looks passed from Adam to Joseph in Egypt, based on the Bible, that could give us an exact location of the Holy grail bloodline. So if the Bible is accurate, we should expect to see "Joseph" as a vizier in Egypt, and we can find him!
"The identity of Joseph can be found among the great princes of the 12th Dynasty. Revealing his identity to his kinsmen who had sold him into slavery, Joseph claimed that God ["the tall guys"] had made him 'A father to Pharaoh'. Throughout the long history of ancient Egypt, only one man is known to have been given the title 'A father to Pharaoh - Yuya, a vizier of the eighteenth dynasty King Tuthmosis IV. Yuya has long intrigued Egyptologists because he was buried in the Valley of Kings even though he was not a member of the Royal House." [Still likely RH- though, as he clearly had the blood of his father Jacob, because he was given the coat with long sleeves, otherwise mistranslated as colorful.]
"Yuya was, in addition to being a Vizier, also a Joseph ("Father of the Lord"), where "Joseph" is actually a title, or job description. Clearly, Yuya was an Israelite, someone in the royal circles of said Israelites, and from a long line of such."
Queen Thuya, left, Wife of Yuya. (Joseph.) Mother of Tiy.
Said to be equally blonde and Caucasian.
SourceSaid to be equally blonde and Caucasian.
If the Bible stories about Joseph are true, archaeological evidence should be able to point to the 7 years of feasting or famine. . .Studies in ‘ice cores’ found in Mount Kilimanjaro, the mountain which supplies the Nile with water, in Tanzania have revealed that a drought took place. . . around the time the Bible sets Joseph’s story.
We also know of another event around the same time. One of the most fertile areas in ancient Egypt was the land around Lake Quarun. This lake was supplied with water from one of the branches of the Nile. Droughts in Egypt used to cause this branch to dry up, leaving the land around the lake destitute. Between 1850 BC and 1650 BC a canal was built to keep the branches of the Nile permanently open, enabling water to fill Lake Quaran and keep the land fertile. This canal was so effective that it still successfully functions today. There is no record of who built the canal, but for thousands of years it has been known by one name. In Arabic it’s the “Bahr Yusef.” This translated into English means the water way of Joseph.
More external evidence supports that Joseph did exist in Egypt and that he held a high position. An ancient inscription reveals that a Yemenite Arab noble woman made a sincere complaint that she could not purchase grain from Egypt with her gold. Here it is:
A Yemenite Inscription About a Famine During The Time of Joseph
In thy name O God, the God of Hamyar,
I Tajah, the daughter of Dzu Shefer, sent my steward to Joseph,
And he delayed to return to me, I sent my hand maid
With a measure of silver, to bring me back a measure of flour:
And not being able to procure it, I sent her with a measure of gold:
And not being able to procure it, I sent her with a measure of pearls:
And not being able to procure it, I commanded them to be ground:
And finding no profit in them, I am shut up here.
Whosoever may hear it, let him commiserate me;
And should any woman adorn herself with an ornament
From my ornaments, may she die with no other than my death.
Source
There is some debate as to whether Joseph is one Visier or another, probably mostly due to some confusion about his name Joseph actually being a title. . .something that also got misinterpreted in the Bible. The argument certainly seems pretty clear though, even if the Biblical account might be slightly off, which is really not surprising considering how the Bible was pieced together. . .
In Deuteronomy 31:25-29 Moses predicted the corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death and the Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after that prediction did indeed confirm this corruption in Jeremiah 8:8. It seems pretty obvious that the Bible didn't claim to be perfect from the start.The Joseph debate can be further looked into here though.
So, what about evidence of Moses? Can we trace the pure(?) Jewish bloodline to a historical Moses?
Queen Tiy (Taia,Tyre Tiye) is on the right. Her father was Yuya (Joseph) and Mother was Thuya. Later she was the mother of King Amenhotep IV better known as Akhenaten, (She was believed to be the mother of Nefertiti as well, who some believe become the wife of Akhenaten because she appeared to have co-reigned with him.) Later Tiy became her son's wife as well!
"It was decreed, however, that no son born to Tiye could inherit the throne." (Because of the length of her father's governorship?) Tiye had a son, Tuthmosis, and in fact he did not survive (with a whip bearing his name being found later in the tomb of Tutankhamen). Based upon the evidence at hand (as well as entombed), Tiye could have concluded that the ban on her sons was for real, and when she became pregnant again, she took precautions. During her pregnancy, she moved to Goshen, where she could reside in her "confinement" among the Israelite kin. There Tiye had a her brother's wife, Tey, a daughter of the house of Levi, nurse her son.[Nefertiti was her daughter Miriam, and Smenkhkare was her son Arron.]
As far as an outsider could tell, Tey was nursing her own child, and poor Tiye had once again failed to generate a possible heir to the Egyptian throne. "Tiye's son Amenhotep IV was born in 1394 BC.
" Amenhotep IV...[was] soon to be renamed Akhenaten (Egyptian)... and known to the Israelites as Moses."
Source
"It was decreed, however, that no son born to Tiye could inherit the throne." (Because of the length of her father's governorship?) Tiye had a son, Tuthmosis, and in fact he did not survive (with a whip bearing his name being found later in the tomb of Tutankhamen). Based upon the evidence at hand (as well as entombed), Tiye could have concluded that the ban on her sons was for real, and when she became pregnant again, she took precautions. During her pregnancy, she moved to Goshen, where she could reside in her "confinement" among the Israelite kin. There Tiye had a her brother's wife, Tey, a daughter of the house of Levi, nurse her son.[Nefertiti was her daughter Miriam, and Smenkhkare was her son Arron.]
As far as an outsider could tell, Tey was nursing her own child, and poor Tiye had once again failed to generate a possible heir to the Egyptian throne. "Tiye's son Amenhotep IV was born in 1394 BC.
" Amenhotep IV...[was] soon to be renamed Akhenaten (Egyptian)... and known to the Israelites as Moses."
Source
Mose (sometimes written mosis or moses) is an Egyptian title or suffix indicating son of or rightful heir.
Source
So when "Moses" was given as his name, it was indicating that he was a "son or rightful heir" of the royal family. And like the title of Yuya's being "Joseph", "Moses" was simply misunderstood by future generations who were not familiar to the culture of the time. Furthermore he was called a "fair child", as opposed to good looking as has become it's meaning now, it's meaning then was to simply be a part of the Aryan race.
"Ahmed Osman has suggested that Akhenaten was Moses and that his maternal grandfather Yuya was the same person as the Biblical Joseph. However, it is known that Yuya's family were part of the regional nobility of Akhmin, in upper (southern) Egypt, and there is no evidence to support the rather unlikely suggestion that he was an Israelite. . ."[Or is there? It is only based on a naive belief that the native Pharaohs were not white that it would be presumed a problem to be Israelite, probably stemming from misunderstandings of the Bible, and from the later dark pharaohs.]
Akhenaten's faith bears a notable resemblance to the religion of Moses, prompting Sigmond Freud to suggest that Akhenaten was the first Monotheist: Moses. Only Akhenaten (and his family) could apparently connect with the "god" (or tall guy) though. In "the Hymn to the Aten", Akhenaten states "there is none who knows thee save thy son Akhenaten". The hymn has many similarities to the one of Davids. Who would have been a contemporary of Moses, and a white leader of a group of Habiru mercenaries, not likely a king, which could be why we can't find him written with the kings. Biblical King Saul is believed to be King Labayu though, as mentioned in the Amarna letters. David's son Solomon was believed to be an architect for the pharaohs, who did build the temple. All of them were high officials, and based on their descriptions, (as I discussed in my last post) were surely white Israelites in the royal line.
Source Source
This is believed to be the family tree of Moses
"Moses" apparently ruled Egypt for seventeen years, and angered many of his subjects by replacing the traditional Egyptian pantheon with monotheism, and was forced to abdicate the throne. (To his supposed brother Smenkhkare.) Retreating to Midian according to the Bible, and then returning to Egypt many years later with his Midianite/cushite, dark skinned wife Zipporah, (who was a descendant of Abraham through his concubine Keturah found in I Chronicles 1:32) and their two sons. (Exodus 2.15-22) Next he returned to to bring many of his Egyptian and Israelite supporters to mt. Sinai where he was told to have a meeting with god. . .were there still many gods up there on the forbidden mountain, or just one? Did he only get to see a messenger that he presumed was alone, or did the belief that he was a momotheist stem from the poor translation of "Ilu", as we discussed in the last post?Source
Moses' apparent heretic actions of denying the gods/tall men, and claiming that only the one that he and his family saw was the true god, brought the nation to the brink of civil war. He was apparently told by "god" to predict a bunch of plagues, but this could have been just a story of giving "God" credit for a natural disaster. None of the actual account makes much sense in the light of the tall men, because they couldn't harden anyone's heart, nor would there be a reason for him to do that if the "God" really wanted the Israelites to leave Egypt. The story was just a mishmash of stories based on presumption way after the fact.
We do believe a natural disaster happened though to naturally cause the plagues in the time of Moses. Some evidence of that is The Ipuwer Papyrus. The plagues described in an Egyptian papyrus are very similar to those found in the Bible. In the early 1800s, a papyrus was found in Egypt called The Admonitions of an Egyptian. It is now in the Leiden Museum in Holland. An Egyptian named Ipuwer wrote it at the end of the Middle Kingdom, around 1650 B.C.E.; scribes copied it in the 19th Dynasty, in the 1200's B.C.E.
And for another thing, scientists know what happened at about that time, causing all those plagues to come from a chain of natural events. Check it out here if you want to know more.
There was nothing holding the Jews back from leaving after those plagues had devastated their land. Especially as they weren't slaves. . . We have no archaeological evidence of either them being slaves (although the opposite of), or of them leaving in mass. Especially because they were the ruling elite!
Anyways, probably misunderstood history tells us that the confrontation between the past pharaoh Moses and the present pharaoh, about the "god"/"gods" question ended with a negotiated truce that guaranteed "Moses" and his few followers/"people" safe passage out of the country. This safe passage out of Egypt for a small group of the royal family was the famed Exodus.
Not all the millions of Jews left Egypt however, as would be presumed with a captivity/slave telling of the story. . . but the amount that did leave apparently weakened the leadership or country of the White pharaohs. Opening them up to invasions of the enemies. . . Which we see as the later dark skinned pharaohs.
On the other hand, it could simply have been the interbreeding of Moses with the foreigner Zipporah that brought in trouble with the royal line. . .
Moses had two women in his life. One was his wife Zipporah who is the mother of
two sons. The other was his "sister" [though not likely] Miriam, who is Nefertiti. Zipporah according to the Bible, is the daughter of Jethro who is descended from Reuel, son of Esau who was red and hairy.
Source
Esau's descendants were not "God's chosen people" with pure blood, and were known as Midianites or sometimes cushites who had dark skin. Apparently the gods were very upset with Moses for interbreeding with the dark skinned RH+ woman, just as they were with their own "Angels" breeding with man. Because we read that "the LORD sought Moses there to kill him, [so] Zipporah took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her sons, and cast it at Moses's feet, saying, "Surely a bloody husband art thou to me." (Exod 4:25) We assume at this point that she and the children parted ways with Moses for Zipporah later appears with her father Jethro. Miriam and Aaron complain about the "Ethiopian" woman he married in Numbers chapter 12. (This was likely the start of the later "Ethiopian" Jews mentioned earlier in this post in the genetic studies. They sometimes have RH- like our president, Obama)
After Moses took some of his followers out of Egypt. Jethro, Moses's father in law, came to the camp in the wilderness of Sinai, bringing with him Zipporah, and her two sons, Gershom, and Eliezer. The Bible does not say when Zipporah and her sons rejoined Reuel/Jethro, just that he/they brought Moses' family back to him. Apparently his union with her was a mistake in his/or "god's" eyes though, as the most common translation for what happened next, is that Moses "sent her away".
Source
It's not known exactly who wrote the history down that composed the books of Moses, but as we know that Moses couldn't write of his own death (?) on the mountain of God, so it seems unlikely that only he wrote it. It has also been claimed that because his bones were not found, "god" must have buried him. . . he was just as likely "taken up" as Enoch and Elijah were though. . .
Nefertiti to the right, (or Miriam) was with Moses until the end, and had a son with him that we call king Tut. His DNA has been recently traced to European origins, confirming again that the two parents were Europeans/ Jews.
His bloodline is the one of the kings, and the bloodline from Aaron breaks off here with his daughter princess Scota.
DNA studies on ancient Egyptian mummies have found a large number to be of rh negative blood groups. The Pharaoh Akhenaten and his family were all rh negative blood.
Source
Akhenaten was branded a heretic and the next pharaoh attempted to destroy any trace of him. (as was commonly done to those whom they disagreed with) All names were changed from 'aten' to 'amun' .
Source
The true Rh- Egyptians had all vanished at the very latest by 800 BC, and the divided and weakened Egypt was easy prey to numerous invaders. . .
"Egypt entered into a steady period of decay, caused directly by
the elimination of the original Egyptians, and their replacement with a mixed population made up of Black, Semitic and the remnant White population. This racially divergent nation was never again to reach the heights achieved by the First, Second or the first part of the Third Kingdoms. In these later years there were competing claimants to the pharaohs throne, many of whom, racially speaking, bore no resemblance to the original pharaohs at all."
"The White Egyptians left many written references to the Black population in Nubia and in their own midst. In fact, at one point, their writings record a law that forbade Blacks from entering their country at all."
An overview of these written inscriptions is highly worthwhile and devastates claims by pro-Black historians, who, in an attempt to distort the historical record, claim that the ancient Egyptian civilization was Black in racial origin. Check out "History of Egypt, from the Earliest Times to the Persian Conquest", Second Edition, 1909 - for anyone interested in a detailed overview, based on original Egyptian sources, this book is well worth reading. All the writings quoted below have been extracted from the book and are based on original Egyptian records.
"The final conquest of Nubia was attained by Sesostris III in 1840 BC. This king conducted four campaigns against the Blacks and erected several forts at strategic points, making Nubia a permanent colony of Egypt.
"A sandstone stela found in the sanctuary of Wadi Halfa contains an account of the Nubian expedition of Pharaoh Sesostris I, which carried this king's wars to their southernmost limits. At the top of this stela there is a relief showing Sesostris I standing facing the Lord of Thebes, who says:
"'I have brought for thee all countries which are in Nubia, beneath thy feet.'
"The god then gives to the king a line of bound captives, symbolizing Nubian towns.
"The inscription of Prince Amenim, which is carved into the stone in the doorway of his cliff-tomb in Benihasin, describes the Black lands as "vile." It reads as follows ("Kush" was one of the Black lands, Kush/Cush was the land that Zipporah came from.):
"'I passed Kush sailing southward, ... then his majesty returned in safety having overthrown his enemies in Kush the vile.'
"The first Semneh stela inscription recounting the subjugation of Nubia by Sesostris III reads as follows:
"'Southern boundary, made in the year 8, under the majesty of the king of Upper and Lower Egypt, Sesostris III, ... in order to prevent that any Black should cross it, by water or by land, with a ship, or any herds of the Blacks; except a Black who shall come to do trading in Iken, or with a commission. Every good thing shall be done with them but without allowing a ship of the Blacks to pass by Here, going down stream, forever.'
"In the annals of the great warrior king, Thutmose III, at the sixth Karnak pylon, there is a list that contains no less than 115 of the names of the towns and districts of the conquered Nubian regions.
"A pylon at Karnak contains possibly four hundred towns, districts, and countries conquered in Nubia. Inscribed on a black granite tablet Karnak is the famous "Hymn of Victory" which reads as follows:
"'I have bound together the Nubian Troglodytes by the tens of thousands. The northerners by hundreds of thousands as prisoners.'
"The most prominent Nubian invaders set up a new kingdom, claiming to be the inheritors of the previous kingdoms, called today the 25th dynasty. This 100-year dynasty saw a number of mixed race rulers from 730 BC to 633 BC, all claiming to be pharaohs and attempting to revive some of the older practices, such as mummification.
"The non-White "Egyptians" were however an illusion - the true White Egyptians had vanished, along with their society, and the Nubian dynasty sputtered out of its own accord.
Source Source
(Just a curious side note, but when the pharaohs were apparently told regularly "may you live forever", could it be in the hopes that they would actually inherit the ability to do so from their fathers the mythical and magical tall men?)
"Note also that Elisheba’s (and Smenkhkare/ Aaron of Egypt’s) line of Aaronite Priests previously showed on the last family tree graph, will eventually include the Hasmoneans, House of the Maccabees. These are the same Maccabees that were the direct ancestors of Mary Magdalene. Clearly, this makes Mary to be descended from royalty."
Though some earlier interpreters blended the person of
Mary of Bethany with Mary Magdalene and the sinful
woman of Luke 7:36-50, current scholars believe she
We normally think of Mary Magdalene in the Bible as a demon possessed (sick or mental) woman who was very "sinful". . .but that confusion arose from the fact that the Bible account takes from 3 Mary's in history. It seemed to be an intentional plot to discredit the favored of Jesus, the one who was painted as feminine in this picture much closer to that time, and sitting close to Jesus, being asked about what Jesus meant, as if she was an authority.
Notice her and Jesus are always portrayed as European looking, even way back when Da vinci painted this picture? She was the real leader of the Disciples, according to the Gnostic gospels, that men out of jealousy rejected. According to the Apocrypha and the book of Mary Magdalene Jesus kissed her on the mouth, and loved her the most. And according to tradition she had married Jesus, and had his children.
Source
Moses and Miriam's daughter was Kiya-tasherit.
If we are to take Biblical history for even half truth, we need to consider that when it says that Jesus was the son of David who was a son of Adam, who was a son of God, it was literally speaking of these tall men! The whole line looks like them and/or has RH-or O blood!
So while the first stories of the coming savior may have been allegorical of the winter solstice, (how an old sun will die, only to have it reborn), so Jesus became the fulfillment of the promise of the tall men for a fresh new start of the bloodline with Mary, from the line of David also. So a likely rh-, even if somewhat mixed up herself. Being that the tall men apparently planned him to be born on the exact day that the sun does die and get reborn: Dec, 25th, that connects every myth of the ancient world with the story of the sun being reborn. Was it just an allegory of things to come that made Jesus become the hero of all the stories before him, like Horus? Either that, or he was purely myth, and all the evidence of his existence was made up. If I follow all the myths and traditions, and take no one as gospel truth, I can continue the bloodline of the gods, and authenticate the story of a genetically perfect Jesus, being implanted into the womb of Mary, via a visit from an "Angel". (Tall man.)
With the pure blood line starting at Adam, then starting over at Noah, as I mentioned in another post of this series, with all the interbreeding that went on as we can see, did the tall men need to seed a perfect Adam again in the womb of Mary, a direct descendant and RH-. In this way this next "Adam" could "redeem" Israel yet again from their sin of intermarrying with half breeds, which we can see in the dark skinned foreign woman that Jacob "married", Solomon "married", Moses "married" and Boaz married. . . The bloodline was a flop!The "sons of god" were though slightly evidenced in a lot of groups now, they were not clearly only one family. (One reason why they separated off from each other I'm sure.)
The Israelites were united as a single kingdom through the reign of Solomon, but perhaps because of his strange wives, after Solomon's death they split into two definite kingdoms, one dark skinned Judah, and the rest, light skinned Israel.
"But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites. . . Of the nations concerning which the Lord said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you. " 1st Kings 11:11-12
The southern kingdom of "Judah," consisting of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin (1 Kings 12:21) with their capital at Jerusalem, and the northern kingdom of "Israel," consisting of the other ten tribes, with their capital up in Samaria.
The two kingdoms, weakened by their diversity were conquered by the dark tribes of the land. First, the northern kingdom of Israel was gradually conquered by the Assyrians and by 721 B.C. they had practically all been taken into exile to Assyria (2 Kings 17:1-23). The vast majority of them never returned, and have become known as the "Lost Ten Tribes of Israel" or the "white Assyrians". (Who quickly rose to prominence, and made Assyria an empire.)
The southern kingdom of Judah, the mixed breeds, were conquered by the Babylonians, relatives of the white pharaohs. The dark "Jews" were taken into captivity to Babylon. The original Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem (before they divided into two nations) was destroyed. When the remaining tribes of Judah were allowed to leave Babylon, they went back to Jerusalem and revolted against Rome who had taken over in the absence of their white Israelite relatives. Consequently the troublesome dark Jews were banned from Jerusalem (except for Tisha B'Av) by the Roman Empire.
The temple was rededicated under Judas Maccabaeus in 164 BCE Then the temple was looted by Marcus Licinius Crassus in 115 BC – 53 BC a Roman general and politician who played a key role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. Crassus is considered the wealthiest man in Roman history, and among the richest men in all history.
The rule of the mixed nations and treasures of the "tall men's" temple has gone from one of the white lines, to another. From the Babylonians, to the Medes, then the Persians, Greeks, and Romans. . .often even abdicating the thrones when the bloodline trumps theirs. Ending up with the kings of England.
There has been much confusion of the royal blood line. With a small bunch starting the different empires, and being overpowered eventually by the strong people coming from their original interbreeding with monkeys. Then the whites would leave, and start another empire, and the same pattern happened again!
To start at Egypt though, we can trace what happened to the leaders, by what they took with them.
"When the whites left [ Egypt ] they took their knowledge and wealth with them, including gold, crown jewels and the stone of destiny." This stone and all the jewelry the "exiled" pharaoh Moses took could be why the Biblical account mentions the loot they got from Egypt. . .which would not make as much sense if the people leaving were slaves, but it would if the ones leaving were relatives setting out for a better land and getting goodbye gifts.
"The stone they brought with them was a block of sandstone weighing 152kg. This had apparently been used as a pillow by Jacob when he had the dream reported in Genesis about Jacob's Ladder. The stone of destiny was made into a seat on which generations of Kings. . . were crowned."
"The legend of the Stone of Destiny goes back to the foundation myth of Scotland. In about 1400BC, an Egyptian Pharaoh had a daughter called Scota, [a contemporary of Moses] who married Goídel Glas [ otherwise known as Gaythelosa, a king of Greece or Portugal. . .]. They were exiled from Egypt [presumably with Moses] and eventually settled in north west Spain.[Possibly going back to the home of their ancestors the Atlanteans?]
Their descendants later conquered Ireland and became the Scotii, who also in time came to rule Scotland." According to the "Scotichronicon" - one of the earliest histories of Scotland written in the 1440s, there was a legend that a Greek prince called Gaythelos was banished, with his wife Scota, the daughter of an Egyptian Pharoah. He sailed westwards and landed in Spain. From there, he and his followers explored further and one of his sons, named Hiber, found an island (later called Ireland) which he named Scotia, after his mother. So Gaythelos' name gave rise to "Gaelic", Hiber gave rise to Hibernia and Scota gave rise to Scotia and then Scotland. The Scotichronicon does not explain, however, why Ireland is no longer called Scotia and why the Scoti came to Argyll.
Another variation on this legend suggests that an Egyptian princess married the King of Portugal in the 4th century. She brought the Stone of Destiny (Jacob's pillow in the Bible) as a dowry. Her daughter, named Scota, married the King of Ireland's son and her descendants called themselves the Children of Scota."
"Edward I of England [also a direct descendant of the bloodline] stripped Scotland of all emblems of nationhood in 1296, and took the Stone of Destiny to a new home in Westminster Abbey. For the next 700 years it was to be housed in a specially-built coronation chair, on which Kings and Queens of England, then of Britain, were crowned. . . It was used in the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953.
Source
Source
Let's talk more about the "King of kings" again (Jesus) and some of the events of his life, and see how it fits with my theory:
Jesus was said to be born in the time of the Roman rule. (Which fits perfectly, and he would have been a relative himself.) He was called out of Egypt. His mothers side was recently from the pharaohs of Egypt. . .and her ancestors left with Moses and Aaron.
His birth was said to be predicted by "Angels" or tall men, and heralded as a special event of the "gods". There were bright lights (space ships?) in the sky suddenly and angels/tall men announcing his birth.
There was a "star" (another space ship?) hovering over the place were he was born. Not feeling safe with a jealous king Herod (not as pure blooded as Jesus was foretold to be) in power, his family resorted back to their noble blooded relatives in Egypt for a time.
Jesus was later noted as a brain with the intellectuals of the time, a leader, a healer, (classic of the magical o- blooded sons of gods through mythology, and even still today in the RH-.) and was suppose to save Israel from their "sin". (The original sin was interbreeding with dark skinned people.)
We are told who Jesus was, "the Most High will overshadow you; Therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.’" (Luke 1:34-35) The Quran describes the Angel as saying, "He said, 'I am but a messenger come from thy Lord, to give thee a boy most pure. S. 19:19
We are told where Jesus came from, and it's not just from Mary! "The Deliverer will come from Zion. [the mountain of "god"] But where did his bloodline go if he actually did die? Whether or not that part of the story was added, (as seems likely) or whether it's true, he before that time had a child with Mary Magdalene, and some disciples were said to have gone with her into hiding in Spain. . .back to Atlantis?
This video talks about where Jesus went, (according to tradition, instead of superstition) after his ascension to "his Father". . . (in a space ship). Like Enoch, he came back, but not to the same people. Check this out here!
Notice her and Jesus are always portrayed as European looking, even way back when Da vinci painted this picture? She was the real leader of the Disciples, according to the Gnostic gospels, that men out of jealousy rejected. According to the Apocrypha and the book of Mary Magdalene Jesus kissed her on the mouth, and loved her the most. And according to tradition she had married Jesus, and had his children.
Source
Moses and Miriam's daughter was Kiya-tasherit.
So while the first stories of the coming savior may have been allegorical of the winter solstice, (how an old sun will die, only to have it reborn), so Jesus became the fulfillment of the promise of the tall men for a fresh new start of the bloodline with Mary, from the line of David also. So a likely rh-, even if somewhat mixed up herself. Being that the tall men apparently planned him to be born on the exact day that the sun does die and get reborn: Dec, 25th, that connects every myth of the ancient world with the story of the sun being reborn. Was it just an allegory of things to come that made Jesus become the hero of all the stories before him, like Horus? Either that, or he was purely myth, and all the evidence of his existence was made up. If I follow all the myths and traditions, and take no one as gospel truth, I can continue the bloodline of the gods, and authenticate the story of a genetically perfect Jesus, being implanted into the womb of Mary, via a visit from an "Angel". (Tall man.)
With the pure blood line starting at Adam, then starting over at Noah, as I mentioned in another post of this series, with all the interbreeding that went on as we can see, did the tall men need to seed a perfect Adam again in the womb of Mary, a direct descendant and RH-. In this way this next "Adam" could "redeem" Israel yet again from their sin of intermarrying with half breeds, which we can see in the dark skinned foreign woman that Jacob "married", Solomon "married", Moses "married" and Boaz married. . . The bloodline was a flop!The "sons of god" were though slightly evidenced in a lot of groups now, they were not clearly only one family. (One reason why they separated off from each other I'm sure.)
The Israelites were united as a single kingdom through the reign of Solomon, but perhaps because of his strange wives, after Solomon's death they split into two definite kingdoms, one dark skinned Judah, and the rest, light skinned Israel.
"But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites. . . Of the nations concerning which the Lord said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you. " 1st Kings 11:11-12
The southern kingdom of "Judah," consisting of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin (1 Kings 12:21) with their capital at Jerusalem, and the northern kingdom of "Israel," consisting of the other ten tribes, with their capital up in Samaria.
The two kingdoms, weakened by their diversity were conquered by the dark tribes of the land. First, the northern kingdom of Israel was gradually conquered by the Assyrians and by 721 B.C. they had practically all been taken into exile to Assyria (2 Kings 17:1-23). The vast majority of them never returned, and have become known as the "Lost Ten Tribes of Israel" or the "white Assyrians". (Who quickly rose to prominence, and made Assyria an empire.)
The southern kingdom of Judah, the mixed breeds, were conquered by the Babylonians, relatives of the white pharaohs. The dark "Jews" were taken into captivity to Babylon. The original Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem (before they divided into two nations) was destroyed. When the remaining tribes of Judah were allowed to leave Babylon, they went back to Jerusalem and revolted against Rome who had taken over in the absence of their white Israelite relatives. Consequently the troublesome dark Jews were banned from Jerusalem (except for Tisha B'Av) by the Roman Empire.
The temple was rededicated under Judas Maccabaeus in 164 BCE Then the temple was looted by Marcus Licinius Crassus in 115 BC – 53 BC a Roman general and politician who played a key role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. Crassus is considered the wealthiest man in Roman history, and among the richest men in all history.
The rule of the mixed nations and treasures of the "tall men's" temple has gone from one of the white lines, to another. From the Babylonians, to the Medes, then the Persians, Greeks, and Romans. . .often even abdicating the thrones when the bloodline trumps theirs. Ending up with the kings of England.
There has been much confusion of the royal blood line. With a small bunch starting the different empires, and being overpowered eventually by the strong people coming from their original interbreeding with monkeys. Then the whites would leave, and start another empire, and the same pattern happened again!
To start at Egypt though, we can trace what happened to the leaders, by what they took with them.
"When the whites left [ Egypt ] they took their knowledge and wealth with them, including gold, crown jewels and the stone of destiny." This stone and all the jewelry the "exiled" pharaoh Moses took could be why the Biblical account mentions the loot they got from Egypt. . .which would not make as much sense if the people leaving were slaves, but it would if the ones leaving were relatives setting out for a better land and getting goodbye gifts.
"The stone they brought with them was a block of sandstone weighing 152kg. This had apparently been used as a pillow by Jacob when he had the dream reported in Genesis about Jacob's Ladder. The stone of destiny was made into a seat on which generations of Kings. . . were crowned."
"The legend of the Stone of Destiny goes back to the foundation myth of Scotland. In about 1400BC, an Egyptian Pharaoh had a daughter called Scota, [a contemporary of Moses] who married Goídel Glas [ otherwise known as Gaythelosa, a king of Greece or Portugal. . .]. They were exiled from Egypt [presumably with Moses] and eventually settled in north west Spain.[Possibly going back to the home of their ancestors the Atlanteans?]
Their descendants later conquered Ireland and became the Scotii, who also in time came to rule Scotland." According to the "Scotichronicon" - one of the earliest histories of Scotland written in the 1440s, there was a legend that a Greek prince called Gaythelos was banished, with his wife Scota, the daughter of an Egyptian Pharoah. He sailed westwards and landed in Spain. From there, he and his followers explored further and one of his sons, named Hiber, found an island (later called Ireland) which he named Scotia, after his mother. So Gaythelos' name gave rise to "Gaelic", Hiber gave rise to Hibernia and Scota gave rise to Scotia and then Scotland. The Scotichronicon does not explain, however, why Ireland is no longer called Scotia and why the Scoti came to Argyll.
Another variation on this legend suggests that an Egyptian princess married the King of Portugal in the 4th century. She brought the Stone of Destiny (Jacob's pillow in the Bible) as a dowry. Her daughter, named Scota, married the King of Ireland's son and her descendants called themselves the Children of Scota."
"Edward I of England [also a direct descendant of the bloodline] stripped Scotland of all emblems of nationhood in 1296, and took the Stone of Destiny to a new home in Westminster Abbey. For the next 700 years it was to be housed in a specially-built coronation chair, on which Kings and Queens of England, then of Britain, were crowned. . . It was used in the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953.Source
Source
Let's talk more about the "King of kings" again (Jesus) and some of the events of his life, and see how it fits with my theory:
Jesus was said to be born in the time of the Roman rule. (Which fits perfectly, and he would have been a relative himself.) He was called out of Egypt. His mothers side was recently from the pharaohs of Egypt. . .and her ancestors left with Moses and Aaron.
His birth was said to be predicted by "Angels" or tall men, and heralded as a special event of the "gods". There were bright lights (space ships?) in the sky suddenly and angels/tall men announcing his birth.
There was a "star" (another space ship?) hovering over the place were he was born. Not feeling safe with a jealous king Herod (not as pure blooded as Jesus was foretold to be) in power, his family resorted back to their noble blooded relatives in Egypt for a time.
Jesus was later noted as a brain with the intellectuals of the time, a leader, a healer, (classic of the magical o- blooded sons of gods through mythology, and even still today in the RH-.) and was suppose to save Israel from their "sin". (The original sin was interbreeding with dark skinned people.)
We are told who Jesus was, "the Most High will overshadow you; Therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.’" (Luke 1:34-35) The Quran describes the Angel as saying, "He said, 'I am but a messenger come from thy Lord, to give thee a boy most pure. S. 19:19
We are told where Jesus came from, and it's not just from Mary! "The Deliverer will come from Zion. [the mountain of "god"] But where did his bloodline go if he actually did die? Whether or not that part of the story was added, (as seems likely) or whether it's true, he before that time had a child with Mary Magdalene, and some disciples were said to have gone with her into hiding in Spain. . .back to Atlantis?
Some other thoughts on Jesus : "He will banish ungodliness[literally, not looking like the gods] from Jacob" (Romans 11:25-26 RSV)
Clearly, not being "godly" would have been not looking like the gods, and as the original creation did interbreed with different species, leading to the many different original men springing from Cro magnon, and the split off of all colors possibly as far back as Babel! So obviously they needed a fresh start. . .in Jesus, the "Savior of the world". "Jesus said, ‘I tell you the truth, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones. . ." Matthew 19:28 "And I confer on you a kingdom, just as my Father conferred one on me, so that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom and sit on thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel." Luke 22:29-30 (All the people of the world who have interbred with Israel could be looked at as the 12 tribes.)
It is said that in the end he will judge the world, and separate the goats of the gentiles from the sheep of Israel.(Clearly not the Jews, or the Christians, but the whites.) The Bible says "All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats." (Matthew 25:31-32) It could be in reference to a physical "End time" separation of the whites from the blacks, O blood types from the A's and B's or more likely, the RH-'s from the RH+. . . I don't know which. I wish it was something I could know I was on his side for, because, from the Biblical account, there is no question which side will be in charge. Or maybe that was allegorical, as they are already on the thrones of the nations. . .
When Jesus was "tempted by Satan' in the desert, it was clearly a story of the "Angels" tall men, sharing how he as their son, will be given all the nations of the world as his throne. It only became a fallen Angel and a negative word "temptation" mistranslated for proving or testing that the story grew into a bad story. It is seen in the Book of Mark as the most original story, but Matthew, and Luke both take from each other, and another source never mentioned by historians. It is presumed to be a tall tale an oral tradition, or from a source called the Q source. The verses in Mark simply say that in the wilderness he was with the animals and "tempted of Satan" but the Hebrew word translated “tempted” is the word nacah, and it means “to test, try, prove, tempt, assay, put to the proof or test.” So the "Fallen angels" were testing out how Jesus was turning out before he started his ministry.
Check it out here, and here.
Romans 5: 14 says, "Adam, who is a pattern of the one to come." Was this speaking of a new perfect man in Jesus? With no mixed blood from the "Gentiles"?
It is said that in the end he will judge the world, and separate the goats of the gentiles from the sheep of Israel.(Clearly not the Jews, or the Christians, but the whites.) The Bible says "All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats." (Matthew 25:31-32) It could be in reference to a physical "End time" separation of the whites from the blacks, O blood types from the A's and B's or more likely, the RH-'s from the RH+. . . I don't know which. I wish it was something I could know I was on his side for, because, from the Biblical account, there is no question which side will be in charge. Or maybe that was allegorical, as they are already on the thrones of the nations. . .
When Jesus was "tempted by Satan' in the desert, it was clearly a story of the "Angels" tall men, sharing how he as their son, will be given all the nations of the world as his throne. It only became a fallen Angel and a negative word "temptation" mistranslated for proving or testing that the story grew into a bad story. It is seen in the Book of Mark as the most original story, but Matthew, and Luke both take from each other, and another source never mentioned by historians. It is presumed to be a tall tale an oral tradition, or from a source called the Q source. The verses in Mark simply say that in the wilderness he was with the animals and "tempted of Satan" but the Hebrew word translated “tempted” is the word nacah, and it means “to test, try, prove, tempt, assay, put to the proof or test.” So the "Fallen angels" were testing out how Jesus was turning out before he started his ministry.
Check it out here, and here.
Romans 5: 14 says, "Adam, who is a pattern of the one to come." Was this speaking of a new perfect man in Jesus? With no mixed blood from the "Gentiles"?
Jesus apparently didn't have very high thoughts of the Gentiles (also called racist) according to Matthew 15:22-28 "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel. " "It is not right to take the children's [Israel's] bread [blessings and miracles reserved for them] and toss it to the dogs [the Canaanite, or the Philistines dark nations]." "Yes, Lord' she said, 'but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table."
Although Jesus did help the woman after a bunch of pleading, it was because of his compassion for the woman's plight. But note that it is only this single Gentile who was helped. There is no other Gentile that Jesus had preached to or healed intentionally. (Although he did stop by a well outside of Samaria to get a drink and ended up talking to a woman who had numerous lovers, and needed some counsel and rebuke. At this time she would have presumably have been from the foreign nations.
Although Jesus did help the woman after a bunch of pleading, it was because of his compassion for the woman's plight. But note that it is only this single Gentile who was helped. There is no other Gentile that Jesus had preached to or healed intentionally. (Although he did stop by a well outside of Samaria to get a drink and ended up talking to a woman who had numerous lovers, and needed some counsel and rebuke. At this time she would have presumably have been from the foreign nations.
Other related statements of Jesus's "racism" can be found in John 11:52 and John 10:16, Matthew 10:5-6. Jesus specifically commissioned his followers saying, "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
The white Jews had left the country when they were taken captive by a small rebel group of Assyria. After the integration of the Israelite "wise man" into the Assyrian nobility, they became an empire. (Apparently due to the "white Assyrians", the empire prospered.) The Dark kings from those small groups used them as wise men and viziers.
"Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen traveled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews only."(Acts 11:19)
"And the apostles and brethren that were in Judea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him. Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised. . ."
"And the apostles and brethren that were in Judea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him. Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised. . ."
(Acts 11:1-3)
It is obvious in (Mathew 28:18-20), that "all nations" is a mistranslation, because in the Middle East, the words for "People" and "Nation" are the same word.
It is obvious in (Mathew 28:18-20), that "all nations" is a mistranslation, because in the Middle East, the words for "People" and "Nation" are the same word.
If Jesus told his disciples to go to "all people", then this simply means to all of the people of the lost tribes of Israel, because he "was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel", and NOT to anyone else, because THERE WERE ALMOST NO NATIONS AROUND HIM AND VERY FEW NATIONS WORLD-WIDE!
"The earliest Assyrian kings such as Tudiya were relatively minor rulers, and after the founding of the Akkadian Empire, which lasted from 2334 BC to 2154 BC, these kings became subject to Sargon of Akkad, who united all the Akkadian and Sumerian speaking peoples of Mesopotamia under one rule." This was the Small kingdom that overtook the divided Israelites, taking the white 10 kingdoms captive. The Israelites quickly assimilated and became part of the elite ruling class, known as the "White Assyrians". Assyrians were two languages, bringing in Aramaic to the original Jewish language. Assyrians were noted to be the first nation to accept Christianity, (the belief that Jesus had come to save them of their sins.)and the Assyrian [lost 10 tribes of Israel] Church was founded in 33 A.D. by Thomas, Bortholemew and Thaddeus. (Who were told to go to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel")
The Israelite white ancestors the Pharaohs had previously started Rome, the first Roman emperors were even called Pharaohs! And took their place in the bloodline, as if they never left it when they abandoned the crumbling plagued Egypt to the inbreeds.
"Egypt became a province of Rome in 30 BC. Subsequent Roman Emperors were accorded the title of Pharaoh, although exclusively while in Egypt. One Egyptian king-list lists the Roman Emperors as Pharaohs.
Augustus (Caesar Augustus, September 23, 63 BC – August 19, 14 AD) was the founder of the Roman Empire and its first Emperor, ruling from 27 BC until his death in 14 AD. Augustus was born into an old, wealthy branch of the Octavii family." [The surname, Octavii, which means "red," may have been obtained because he had red hair.]
"Egypt became a province of Rome in 30 BC. Subsequent Roman Emperors were accorded the title of Pharaoh, although exclusively while in Egypt. One Egyptian king-list lists the Roman Emperors as Pharaohs.
Augustus (Caesar Augustus, September 23, 63 BC – August 19, 14 AD) was the founder of the Roman Empire and its first Emperor, ruling from 27 BC until his death in 14 AD. Augustus was born into an old, wealthy branch of the Octavii family." [The surname, Octavii, which means "red," may have been obtained because he had red hair.]
It was even said by a Roman Pilate at Jesus's trial, that he was the "king of the Jews". And when against the will of the white Roman, Jesus was supposedly condemned to death by a mob of jealous Jews to spite them, Pilate put a sign over Jesus's head on the cross that said, "The king of the Jews". John 19:12-15, 19-22
The Samaritans were the 10 tribes of Israel originally, but in the time of Jesus they weren't a half-breed-Israelite as some have believed (because of the captivity), as they hadn't yet been returned. They were actually a non-Israelite nation, put there in their place by their captors. The Jews of Judah were the half-breed-Israelites but they still despised the other nations. Ironically the later Israelite Samaritans from Sumeria had no dealings with the Gentiles who used to live in Samaria. . . and Jesus was as pure blooded Israelite as it got!
When the Israelites were freed by their relatives the Medes and the Persians, they moved back to Sumeria. . .named after the land of Sumer, which we got the Sumerian texts from. The teachings from Moses had in that time away apparently stayed with the Israelites, and they had the best copy of the "law" called the Samaritan Pentateuch
Calling themselves the Pars after their original Aryan tribal name Parsa. The Persians were an Indo-European people who were linguistically related to the Medes. At the end of the 2nd millennium BCE the Median tribes arrived in the region (one of several Iranic tribes to do so) Both groups had migrated into the Iranian plateau in the early first millennium B.C.E. The Achaemenid empire [of Persia] was not the first Iranian empire, as by sixth century BCE another group of ancient Iranic people had already established the Median Empire. According to the Histories of Herodotus.
The Medes were called anciently by all people Aryans. The Medes had originally been the dominant Iranic group in the region, rising to power at the end of the 7th century BC and incorporating the Persians into their empire. An alliance with the Babylonians and the Scythians helped the Medes to capture Nineveh in 612 BCE which resulted in the collapse of the Neo-Assyrian Empire." [Did Jonah warn them, and the story have it's base in truth?]
"In 553 BC, Cyrus the Great, King of Persia, rebelled against his grandfather, the Mede King, Astyages son of Cyaxares; he finally won a decisive victory in 550 BC. So the Medes were subjected to their close kin, the Persians.
"Cyrus was politically shrewd, modeling himself as the "savior" of conquered nations, often allowing displaced people to return, and giving his subjects freedom to practice local customs. To reinforce this image, he instituted policies of religious freedom, and restored temples and other infrastructure in the newly acquired cities, such as Babylon. (Most notably he freed the Jewish [mixed people of Judah] inhabitants of Babylon, sending them to Palestine to rebuild their Temple, according to 2 cor. 36:22-23, and backed up in the Cyrus Cylinder, Zenophone's account , Herodotus's account and the Tanakh).
As a result of his tolerant policies[ and because of his Israelite bloodline no doubt], he came to be known by those of the Jewish faith, as "the anointed of the Lord." His conquest of Babylon in the Cyrus Cylinder was said to be because the last Chaldean king, Nabonidus, was the enemy of "Marduk", the God of Babylon. [One of the tall men?] He was said to be an incompetent ruler who fell out of favor with the gods. The god Marduk looked for a king to replace him, according to the text, and found Cyrus. (Also apparently known as Cyrus II) In the taking of Babylon, God was said to have been with Cyrus, and he won without a fight. (The people seeing his claim to the throne through his bloodline, and the miraculous signs of the tall men, or their physical presence seemed to have worked, because it seems that Nabonidus abdicated the throne.)
(The Biblical books of Haggai and Zachariah were believed to have been written in this time of captivity of the Jews of Judah. And while we're on the subject of the Bible, Moses predicted that the Law, the books of Moses, will get corrupted in Deuteronomy 31:25-29. The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after did indeed confirm this corruption."How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie." Jeremiah 8:8)
Cyrus' had a son Cambyses II who's major achievement was the conquest of the waning Egyptian Empire. [He took back the throne from the Nubian blacks. In the early Ptolemaic tale of Nectanebo II, the Pharaoh has a prophetic dream of Isis, in which the god. . . is angry with him because of his unfinished temple in Sebennytos. Nectanebo calls in the best sculptor of the realm, Petesis, to finish the job, but he bungles his assignment when he gets drunk and chases a beautiful girl instead. The narrative ends abruptly here, but this could be the preface to the fall of Egypt to the Persians. It is believed that his story story ends with him fleeing to Nubia and disappearing. . .that being a country of blacks considered "vile" to the white pharaohs.]
The Samaritans were the 10 tribes of Israel originally, but in the time of Jesus they weren't a half-breed-Israelite as some have believed (because of the captivity), as they hadn't yet been returned. They were actually a non-Israelite nation, put there in their place by their captors. The Jews of Judah were the half-breed-Israelites but they still despised the other nations. Ironically the later Israelite Samaritans from Sumeria had no dealings with the Gentiles who used to live in Samaria. . . and Jesus was as pure blooded Israelite as it got!
When the Israelites were freed by their relatives the Medes and the Persians, they moved back to Sumeria. . .named after the land of Sumer, which we got the Sumerian texts from. The teachings from Moses had in that time away apparently stayed with the Israelites, and they had the best copy of the "law" called the Samaritan Pentateuch
Calling themselves the Pars after their original Aryan tribal name Parsa. The Persians were an Indo-European people who were linguistically related to the Medes. At the end of the 2nd millennium BCE the Median tribes arrived in the region (one of several Iranic tribes to do so) Both groups had migrated into the Iranian plateau in the early first millennium B.C.E. The Achaemenid empire [of Persia] was not the first Iranian empire, as by sixth century BCE another group of ancient Iranic people had already established the Median Empire. According to the Histories of Herodotus.
The Medes were called anciently by all people Aryans. The Medes had originally been the dominant Iranic group in the region, rising to power at the end of the 7th century BC and incorporating the Persians into their empire. An alliance with the Babylonians and the Scythians helped the Medes to capture Nineveh in 612 BCE which resulted in the collapse of the Neo-Assyrian Empire." [Did Jonah warn them, and the story have it's base in truth?]
"In 553 BC, Cyrus the Great, King of Persia, rebelled against his grandfather, the Mede King, Astyages son of Cyaxares; he finally won a decisive victory in 550 BC. So the Medes were subjected to their close kin, the Persians.
At the height of its power after the conquest of Egypt, the empire encompassed approximately 8 million km spanning three continents: Asia, Africa and Europe. It is noted in Western history as the antagonist foe of the Greeks for emancipation of Jewish slaves from their Babylonian captivity.
The Empire's vast size and its extraordinary ethnocultural diversity are traditionally thought to have been its undoing. The delegation of power to local governments eventually weakened the king's central authority, causing resources to be expended in attempts to subdue local rebellions. "
"During the period of the Neo Assyrian Empire (911-612 BC) the Medes, Persians and other Iranic peoples of northern and western Iran were subject to Assyria. [A people who's kingdom was flourishing thanks to the infiltration of the conquered 10 tribes of Israel ] This changed during the reign of Cyaxares, who in alliance with Babylon [the Jews there] and the Scythians [?] attacked and destroyed the strife riven empire between 616 and 605 BC. " (The term Scythian was used to refer to a variety of groups from the Black Sea to southern Siberia and central Asia.)
"The Persian empire became the first to attempt to govern many different ethnic groups, on the principle of equal responsibilities, and rights for all people, so long as subjects paid their taxes and kept the peace. Additionally, the king would agree not to interfere with the local customs, religions, and trades of its subject states. This system of management would ultimately become an issue for the Persians."
The Empire's vast size and its extraordinary ethnocultural diversity are traditionally thought to have been its undoing. The delegation of power to local governments eventually weakened the king's central authority, causing resources to be expended in attempts to subdue local rebellions. "
"During the period of the Neo Assyrian Empire (911-612 BC) the Medes, Persians and other Iranic peoples of northern and western Iran were subject to Assyria. [A people who's kingdom was flourishing thanks to the infiltration of the conquered 10 tribes of Israel ] This changed during the reign of Cyaxares, who in alliance with Babylon [the Jews there] and the Scythians [?] attacked and destroyed the strife riven empire between 616 and 605 BC. " (The term Scythian was used to refer to a variety of groups from the Black Sea to southern Siberia and central Asia.)
"The Persian empire became the first to attempt to govern many different ethnic groups, on the principle of equal responsibilities, and rights for all people, so long as subjects paid their taxes and kept the peace. Additionally, the king would agree not to interfere with the local customs, religions, and trades of its subject states. This system of management would ultimately become an issue for the Persians."
"Cyrus was politically shrewd, modeling himself as the "savior" of conquered nations, often allowing displaced people to return, and giving his subjects freedom to practice local customs. To reinforce this image, he instituted policies of religious freedom, and restored temples and other infrastructure in the newly acquired cities, such as Babylon. (Most notably he freed the Jewish [mixed people of Judah] inhabitants of Babylon, sending them to Palestine to rebuild their Temple, according to 2 cor. 36:22-23, and backed up in the Cyrus Cylinder, Zenophone's account , Herodotus's account and the Tanakh).
As a result of his tolerant policies[ and because of his Israelite bloodline no doubt], he came to be known by those of the Jewish faith, as "the anointed of the Lord." His conquest of Babylon in the Cyrus Cylinder was said to be because the last Chaldean king, Nabonidus, was the enemy of "Marduk", the God of Babylon. [One of the tall men?] He was said to be an incompetent ruler who fell out of favor with the gods. The god Marduk looked for a king to replace him, according to the text, and found Cyrus. (Also apparently known as Cyrus II) In the taking of Babylon, God was said to have been with Cyrus, and he won without a fight. (The people seeing his claim to the throne through his bloodline, and the miraculous signs of the tall men, or their physical presence seemed to have worked, because it seems that Nabonidus abdicated the throne.)
(The Biblical books of Haggai and Zachariah were believed to have been written in this time of captivity of the Jews of Judah. And while we're on the subject of the Bible, Moses predicted that the Law, the books of Moses, will get corrupted in Deuteronomy 31:25-29. The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after did indeed confirm this corruption."How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie." Jeremiah 8:8)
Cyrus' had a son Cambyses II who's major achievement was the conquest of the waning Egyptian Empire. [He took back the throne from the Nubian blacks. In the early Ptolemaic tale of Nectanebo II, the Pharaoh has a prophetic dream of Isis, in which the god. . . is angry with him because of his unfinished temple in Sebennytos. Nectanebo calls in the best sculptor of the realm, Petesis, to finish the job, but he bungles his assignment when he gets drunk and chases a beautiful girl instead. The narrative ends abruptly here, but this could be the preface to the fall of Egypt to the Persians. It is believed that his story story ends with him fleeing to Nubia and disappearing. . .that being a country of blacks considered "vile" to the white pharaohs.]
"As reports of mistreatment caused by Amasis, the "non-native" Pharaoh of Egypt, were given by Phanes of Halicarnassus, a wise council man serving Amasis, it further enforced Cambyses's resolve to venture into Egypt. Cambyses II decided to face him, but Amasis died before he could in 525 BCE, . "
"We first know of Amasis as a general in Nubia under Psammetikhos I. It would seem that his predecessor, Apries, undertook several military campaigns, but his last against the Greek city of Cyrene ended in disaster."
Amasis, was originally only a general in the Egyptian army. He was sent to put down the revolt of the machimoi (the non-native Egyptian soldiers source), but instead the soldiers proclaimed him as Pharaoh.
While Cambyses II was in Egypt, a man named Gaumata, and called a Magi, ascended the throne. (presumably with his blessing.)[The later Medes had an Ancient Iranian Religion also had a priesthood named as "Magi". It was a sort of sacred caste, which ministered to the spiritual needs of the Medes. Translators often translated the Hebrew original magoi as "wise men" in English. In other languages the word "magoi" meant Persian priest. (Both of which would have been acociated with the white Jews of the time.
Three explanations of the magi have been proposed over the years:
Source]
After setting up an Israelite"Magi" as king, Cambyses II died due to accidental injury on the way back from Egypt.
Gaumata ruled for seven months before being overthrown in 522 BCE by Darius the Great (Darius I) (Old Persian Dāryavuš "Who Holds Firm the Good". The practice of slavery in Persia, as Egypt, was generally banned, although there is evidence that conquered and/or rebellious armies were sold into captivity. Zoroastrianism, the de facto religion of the empire, explicitly forbids slavery, and the kings of Persia, especially the founder Cyrus the Great, followed this ban to varying degrees, as evidenced by the freeing of the Jews at Babylon."
Source
"The people of the southern kingdom of Judah however did return to Jereusalem after the Babylonians fell to the Persians and their descendants have become the Jewish people of today."
Source
Ezra in the Bible talks favorably of Darius in relation to the Jews [from Judah] in his kingdom, as he helps them build the temple. The dark implants to Jerusalem were not kind to the returning half breed Israelites though, and because of their history of rebellion and violence, the Israelites got help from the [white] king to rebuild the Temple.
Source
We see some connection with the Persians to the rest of the world after this, via a road system called the "Silk road." "The Tocharians, living along the Silk Road, had contacts with the Chinese, Persians, Indian and Turkic tribes. Tocharians were “Indo-Iranian"[European]. The Tocharian mummies proved to belong to the very same population who spread haplogroup R1a1 all over Eurasia, from western Norway to Mongolia.
There is an ancient link between BOTH the Etruscans and the Tocharians - and the most ancient population of the present Europeans. Mythically the Etruscans are originating from “Troy”.[Which use to be put in the realm of myth, with Atlantis, but has now been shown to be true history.]
DNA evidence says that Tokarian was not like "Indo-Iranian”, but "European". [Some have redefined "Indo-Iranian”, as "European" now though, and both meaning of Israelite origin.]
"Both modern and ancient sources are (now) describing them as blond-haired and blue-eyed. Their clothes and their weaving patterns were European - identical to the style (“fashion”?!), the coloring AND the weaving techniques known from the "Nordic Bronze Age" cultures in Northern Europe. Some references say they wore Kilts, had tartan-patterned clothing and "witch's hats" – yet another parallel from what appear in the European bronze-age culture."
"The Tocharian language shares commonalities with all other Indo-European languages. . . nearly all lexicostatistical studies put it as next neighbor to Hittite."Source
Source
"In the late 1980's, perfectly preserved 3000-year-old mummies began appearing in a remote Chinese desert. They had long reddish-blond hair, European features and didn't appear to be the ancestors of modern-day Chinese people. Archaeologists now think they have been the citizens of an "ancient civilization" that existed between China and Europe.
The presence of an ancient genetic substratum of European origin in West Asia may be related to the discovery of ancient mummies with European features in Xinjiang and to the existence of an extinct Indo-European language, Tocharian. This study demonstrates the usefulness of the ancient DNA in unravelling complex patterns of past human migrations so as to help decipher the origin of present-day admixed populations."
- The first is that magi were leaders of a non-Jewish Middle Eastern religion, Zoroastrian priests, from Persia.
- The second, with a bow to the attention that Matthew gives to the unusually bright star that they followed, is that they were Chaldean astrologers from Babylonia, modern Iraq.
- The third explanation is that magi were merchant Israelite princes from northern Arabia. A good case also can be made for the merchant princes because in the gospel of Matthew he mentions gifts of gold and spices that were available along the great trade route through those lands.
Source]
After setting up an Israelite"Magi" as king, Cambyses II died due to accidental injury on the way back from Egypt.
Gaumata ruled for seven months before being overthrown in 522 BCE by Darius the Great (Darius I) (Old Persian Dāryavuš "Who Holds Firm the Good". The practice of slavery in Persia, as Egypt, was generally banned, although there is evidence that conquered and/or rebellious armies were sold into captivity. Zoroastrianism, the de facto religion of the empire, explicitly forbids slavery, and the kings of Persia, especially the founder Cyrus the Great, followed this ban to varying degrees, as evidenced by the freeing of the Jews at Babylon."
Source
"The people of the southern kingdom of Judah however did return to Jereusalem after the Babylonians fell to the Persians and their descendants have become the Jewish people of today."
Source
Ezra in the Bible talks favorably of Darius in relation to the Jews [from Judah] in his kingdom, as he helps them build the temple. The dark implants to Jerusalem were not kind to the returning half breed Israelites though, and because of their history of rebellion and violence, the Israelites got help from the [white] king to rebuild the Temple.
Source
We see some connection with the Persians to the rest of the world after this, via a road system called the "Silk road." "The Tocharians, living along the Silk Road, had contacts with the Chinese, Persians, Indian and Turkic tribes. Tocharians were “Indo-Iranian"[European]. The Tocharian mummies proved to belong to the very same population who spread haplogroup R1a1 all over Eurasia, from western Norway to Mongolia.
There is an ancient link between BOTH the Etruscans and the Tocharians - and the most ancient population of the present Europeans. Mythically the Etruscans are originating from “Troy”.[Which use to be put in the realm of myth, with Atlantis, but has now been shown to be true history.]
DNA evidence says that Tokarian was not like "Indo-Iranian”, but "European". [Some have redefined "Indo-Iranian”, as "European" now though, and both meaning of Israelite origin.]
"Both modern and ancient sources are (now) describing them as blond-haired and blue-eyed. Their clothes and their weaving patterns were European - identical to the style (“fashion”?!), the coloring AND the weaving techniques known from the "Nordic Bronze Age" cultures in Northern Europe. Some references say they wore Kilts, had tartan-patterned clothing and "witch's hats" – yet another parallel from what appear in the European bronze-age culture."
"The Tocharian language shares commonalities with all other Indo-European languages. . . nearly all lexicostatistical studies put it as next neighbor to Hittite."Source
Source
"In the late 1980's, perfectly preserved 3000-year-old mummies began appearing in a remote Chinese desert. They had long reddish-blond hair, European features and didn't appear to be the ancestors of modern-day Chinese people. Archaeologists now think they have been the citizens of an "ancient civilization" that existed between China and Europe.
The presence of an ancient genetic substratum of European origin in West Asia may be related to the discovery of ancient mummies with European features in Xinjiang and to the existence of an extinct Indo-European language, Tocharian. This study demonstrates the usefulness of the ancient DNA in unravelling complex patterns of past human migrations so as to help decipher the origin of present-day admixed populations."
Source
Also, The "Japanese Ainu, (the white tribe which was pushed to almost extinction in Japan) all have large percentages of RH negative blood."
Source
"The similarity between the genetic structures of the 2,500-year-old Linzi population and the present-day European populations indicates that there was a genetic shift in the Linzi area from a European-like population to a population more like those found in present-day east Asia, probably caused by migration."
Source
Some of India's population also came from European origin.
"A major wave of humans entered India through the northeast; Indo-Aryan peoples are an Indo-European group united as native speakers of the Indo-Aryan branch of the family of Indo-European languages. Today, there are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, most of them native to South Asia. the upper castes show closer genetic affinities with Central Asian populations, although those of southern India are more distant than those of northern India. "a substantial part of today's North Indian paternal gene pool was contributed by Central Asian lineages who are Indo-European speakers, suggesting that extant Indian caste groups are primarily the descendants of Indo-European migrants." the modern Indian population is a result of admixture between Indo-European (ANI) and Dravidian (ASI) populations. . .Recent research indicates a massive admixture event between the populations 3500 to 1200 years ago."
Source
"Genetic views on race differ in their classification of Dravidians. Dravidians are generally classified as members of the Australoid race. modern Indians (both Indo-Aryan and Dravidian groups) are a hybrid population descending from two post-Neolithic, genetically divergent populations referred to as the 'Ancestral North Indians' and the 'Ancestral South Indians'. According to the study, Andamanese are an ASI-related group without ANI ancestry, showing that the peopling of the islands must have occurred before ANI-ASI gene flow on the mainland. [28] ANI-ASI admixture happened some 1,200-3,500 years ago, which roughly coincides with the Indo-Aryan conquest of the Indian subcontinent.
The geneticist L.L. Cavalli-Sforza of Stanford, based on work done in the 1980s, classified Indians as being genetically Caucasian. She theorized that Indians are about three times closer to West Europeans than to East Asians. More recently, other geneticists, such as Lynn B. Jorde and Stephen P. Wooding, demonstrated that South Indians are genetic intermediaries between Europeans and East Asians."
Source
Also, The "Japanese Ainu, (the white tribe which was pushed to almost extinction in Japan) all have large percentages of RH negative blood."
Source
"The similarity between the genetic structures of the 2,500-year-old Linzi population and the present-day European populations indicates that there was a genetic shift in the Linzi area from a European-like population to a population more like those found in present-day east Asia, probably caused by migration."
Source
Some of India's population also came from European origin.
"A major wave of humans entered India through the northeast; Indo-Aryan peoples are an Indo-European group united as native speakers of the Indo-Aryan branch of the family of Indo-European languages. Today, there are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, most of them native to South Asia. the upper castes show closer genetic affinities with Central Asian populations, although those of southern India are more distant than those of northern India. "a substantial part of today's North Indian paternal gene pool was contributed by Central Asian lineages who are Indo-European speakers, suggesting that extant Indian caste groups are primarily the descendants of Indo-European migrants." the modern Indian population is a result of admixture between Indo-European (ANI) and Dravidian (ASI) populations. . .Recent research indicates a massive admixture event between the populations 3500 to 1200 years ago."
Source
"Genetic views on race differ in their classification of Dravidians. Dravidians are generally classified as members of the Australoid race. modern Indians (both Indo-Aryan and Dravidian groups) are a hybrid population descending from two post-Neolithic, genetically divergent populations referred to as the 'Ancestral North Indians' and the 'Ancestral South Indians'. According to the study, Andamanese are an ASI-related group without ANI ancestry, showing that the peopling of the islands must have occurred before ANI-ASI gene flow on the mainland. [28] ANI-ASI admixture happened some 1,200-3,500 years ago, which roughly coincides with the Indo-Aryan conquest of the Indian subcontinent.
The geneticist L.L. Cavalli-Sforza of Stanford, based on work done in the 1980s, classified Indians as being genetically Caucasian. She theorized that Indians are about three times closer to West Europeans than to East Asians. More recently, other geneticists, such as Lynn B. Jorde and Stephen P. Wooding, demonstrated that South Indians are genetic intermediaries between Europeans and East Asians."
Source
Some American Indian tribes also have a high percentage of Rh-. The American Indians had the tradition of making "blood brothers", if they thought they were worthy. Could this tradition have been for a reason? Could they have actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)? The clumping (agglutination) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye. Could they have been told, by their ancestors, that their blood was different from that of the rest of mankind except for their brothers and sisters, from other tribes, scattered throughout the earth. Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of cosmic origin. The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy.
Source
Source
So to recap. The O- blood is pure; adding an A or B or a RH+ monkey gene factor makes it impure. The A and B blood types came about around 20 million years ago, but the O we only see around 30,000 years ago, with the Neanderthals, whom we also know to be red haired and blond and white skinned. It is said that all homo sapiens came from the O- originally, but yet how could that be?
The RH- also seemed to start with the Neanderthals, and yet they say that we all came from monkeys before that. . .how can a pure O- blood come out of an impure A or B, without turning it O+? It is illogical! Thus scientists have to say it had "unknown origins", or not of this world. (As it has not been found anywhere else on this planet.)
The RH- also seemed to start with the Neanderthals, and yet they say that we all came from monkeys before that. . .how can a pure O- blood come out of an impure A or B, without turning it O+? It is illogical! Thus scientists have to say it had "unknown origins", or not of this world. (As it has not been found anywhere else on this planet.)
So this RH- gene we can see start around the Neanderthals, go to the pharaohs, to the Babylonian kings, then the Assyrians, Romans, the Medes and Persians, interbreeding with the rest of the world via the silk road. With the European kings and queens following the truest bloodline from Jesus, from all I can see. His descendants are the kings and Queens, and the elite that are ruling the world to this day. Are you a relative of theirs, a true "son of God" and on their side? Or are you mistakenly thinking you are their enemy? I for one want to live, and thrive, and I see wisdom in what they are doing to divide the stupid from the smart. . .do you, or are you part of the "races" they want to eliminate? I say, if you fall for their tricks, you get what you deserve. . . infertility, and ill-health.
Whatever the case, Christianity is a misunderstood religion when you actually understand the history of the language, and how the words we base everything on were really in reference to tall, red haired and blond haired, white, tall people. These guys may have created us, but they are themselves evolved on a much older planet. Evolution would work, given enough time. . .but that still wouldn't explain the RH- foreign to the planet. So why not join the ranks of the European atheists, and be happy in this new knowledge of the King of kings. Unless you can think of a loop hole I'm missing, it seems illogical to say religion is right, or a monkey origin is right. In a way though, they both are.
Peace to the world this Christmas day.
Whatever the case, Christianity is a misunderstood religion when you actually understand the history of the language, and how the words we base everything on were really in reference to tall, red haired and blond haired, white, tall people. These guys may have created us, but they are themselves evolved on a much older planet. Evolution would work, given enough time. . .but that still wouldn't explain the RH- foreign to the planet. So why not join the ranks of the European atheists, and be happy in this new knowledge of the King of kings. Unless you can think of a loop hole I'm missing, it seems illogical to say religion is right, or a monkey origin is right. In a way though, they both are.
Peace to the world this Christmas day.
Hi. I thought your info to be full of truth.
ReplyDeleteYou might consider the concept of the I AM Presence:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ascension-research.org/presence.html
Even those who don't have a 3 fold flame due to "genetics" can earn one and ascend.
I see how the I am presence as described on that site certainly ties in. . .but it is a small view of the spirit of the alien within, and much more mystical and spiritual then I see it. As for the rest of that, it wasn't mentioned in your source, but I am skeptical of anything that says you can "ascend" with no connection to the bloodline. . .history and the ancient texts all say that God will only favor his "children" and those have historically been his chosen people, the white race, sad to say. Give me any actual evidence and I will consider it, but that site had nothing.
ReplyDeleteI came across this while researching the Rh- connection to still born children in Tut's tomb. Interesting read. You had me up until the mentioning of space ships, aliens and breeding with monkeys.
ReplyDeleteHey, the evidence doesn't lie. There is a lot of evidence for spaceships in Egypt, as I get into later, and Aliens is simply perspective. I deny nothing in all the ancient texts discussing their gods. . .including the Bible. Actually, if you believe in any god, the obvious evidence is that we would call them an alien now. As for the breeding with monkeys, genetics doesn't lie. We are predominantly cousins of the monkeys, and so it is not a debate that if we started with pure, and unearthly blood, not found in primates, then we could not have originally come from monkeys. . .and yet we know that most people have the "monkey gene" now. (Making most scientists claim that the evolutionary theory of us all evolving from apes is right. . .but that doesn't account for the RH-. So, keep reading, and you will see there is much more to it. Denial is futile. . .:)
ReplyDeletethis info is a mix of truth and speculation assumptions theory and some good old fashion white supremacy. it sounds as stupid as a black radical trying to say that the white man is the child of the devil... O+ blood type is originally negroid just as Rh is neanderthal or rhesus monkey blood and %100 european. what we seem to have is a small group of europeans who has negro blood. this small percentage of euro/negro's? are ruling over the rest of the white race tricking them into the belief that they are superior to the original O-pos ppl due to skin tone while still, they are recessive and inferior. monkeys! made in a lab...
ReplyDeleteTruth is truth, and you are naively following superstition. You have no idea about RH-. I will be generous and show you what all the theories are on it here:http://rhnegativeregistry.com/Rh_Negative_Factor_Blood_Origin_Theories_Migration.html My conclusion on all of them fits perfectly with the evidence. It came from the original man, Adam, who was also the Neanderthal, through poor dating from the "flood" which was actually an ancient nuclear event (a war of the gods, described in every ancient text). RH+ is likely from what the Bible called bestiality. RH- comes from O blood, the bloodtype they believed to be the origin of man, as it is pure. . .Europeans don't have another type without interbreeding with a negro, and negros don't have anything but B unless they mix. Asians seem to be the origin of A as well. The Asians have a personality for the bloodtypes, and they show the difference in blood to be huge! Actually, that is my most popular post, check it out.http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-difference-in-our-blood-and-what-it.html
DeleteIn western countries, nearly every imaginative painting of Adam and Eve depict two adult Caucasians with fair skin and blue eyes. These images, even used as Bible illustrations, tend to shape the reader's mental image of the first man and woman. The Sunday-school origin of the dark races is often that they were descendants of Adam and Eve who had migrated to a hot climate where the suntan eventually became an inherited characteristic. These images and explanations discredit Christianity.
ReplyDeleteThe true explanation began to be resolved in 1913 when it was shown that human beings carry two genes for color and that each gene consists of "black" or "white" alleles. One allele was received from the mother and the other from the father. The allele is part of the gene, and the gene is part of the DNA – while the DNA resides in the nucleus of every cell in our body. Our skin color is caused by the pigment melanin, and this is controlled by two pairs of genes that geneticists refer to using the letter designations Aa and Bb, where the capital letter represents dominant genes and the small letters represent recessive genes. A and B, being dominant, produce melanin in good quantity while recessive a and b produce only a minor amount of melanin. Hence, our coloration depends upon the number of black and white alleles we received from our parents. The color genes express themselves in only one place – specialized skin cells called the melanocytes – that produce granules of melanin that are delivered to neighboring cells.
Eve was made from Adam's rib and was thus a clone of Adam [Genesis 2:21-22]. They would therefore have had identical genes for melanin production. If they were both AABB, they would have been Negroid and produced children of only the darkest of Negroid coloration. If this were the case, the world's population today would be entirely Negro. In fact, only about 10% of the world's population is Negro, so we can be certain that our first parents were not of the AABB combination. By the same argument, if Adam and Eve had both been aabb, all their children would have been aabb meaning that all their descendants would be the lightest Caucasoid possible – there would be no other colors. Clearly, this is not the case, so by a process of deduction we can conclude that Adam and Eve were heterozygous, each having two dominant and two recessive genes, AaBb. They would thus have been middle-brown in color and from them, in one generation, the various shades of brown would have been produced.
These color differences were likely amplified following the business at the Tower of Babel [Genesis 11:1-9] when the human gene pool was divided. Loss of genetic information in an isolated population is well known and a problem to breeders of pure-bred dogs, horses and other animals. It seems that one population group that migrated from the Tower of Babel suffered a greater loss of the genetic information required to produce the melanin and became the Caucasians. The bottom line is that Adam was not white or black but a good middle brown.
repost;
I forgot, here is another one on the RH-. http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2012/12/variety-is-spice-of-life-part-2.html and anotherhttp://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-origin-of-aryan-race-part-6.html
ReplyDeleteCommon sense says a white man has never come from two mexican looking people, the creationists tried that one before seeing that it doesn't work. They use to depict Adam and Eve as both brown, but stopped after having that debunked. The truth is, the only ones who made civilization and were called man were Adam's children. We can see an Adam that we can trace back to, that fits the Bible, but the pure Africans are an exception. . .you might want to read about the differences in origins of the pure blacks (and whites) here:http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/05/all-about-africans-original-earthly.html
The real bottom line is, if Adam was brown, he has a negro in him, and a white person, meaning he was not Adam. You can't have it both ways. We know he was the father (and Eve the mother) of Noah though, who they call eurasian Adam. . .explain that away. Do pure whites come from two Mexicans in supposedly only a few generations? All color but white comes from mixing with blacks. If you think of it like paint, the blacks are the black paint, and can make all colors only when they mix with whites, clearly shown in maps of Africa. I get into that with mixed marriage posts more.http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-origin-of-miscegenation-is-cultural.html
ReplyDeleteRacist BS all the way thru. Try as you might to paint Khemet (True name for Egypt) White, your lies cannot prevail the truth comes to light more and more each day. Evidence of Egyptian Mummies DNA related to UGANDAN region of AFRICA....http://www.monitor.co.ug/artsculture/Reviews/Ancient-Egyptian-Pharaohs-related-to-Ugandans---DNA/-/691232/2419938/-/cjldv9/-/index.html
ReplyDeleteI know all about your evidence , and while you believe it being tied to a location in Africa means pure Africans, you are mistaken. To my knowledge there isn't a tribe in Africa it doesn't type back to Ethiopia. And Ethiopia has a long history of being tied back to the middle east via the biblical king Solomon. As that region has done DNA testing and found out that King Solomon was white, it's not surprising that they had pound white DNE in all of Africa, an average of 13% in the least mixed parts. The diverse city of characteristics in Africa is simply because they have separated themselves through selection for different white man's traits. Some height, some intelligence, some good looks. . . Sadly none of them in Africa selected for high oxytocin and empathy. Because they wouldn't have survived if they did. Instead Africans out of necessity selected for aggression in order to survive the attacks of other Africans, and thus they became the most violent people on earth, similar to animals in how they select for high testosterone.
Delete