What our sex hormone levels (and their outward expressions) say about (and do to) us. Part 4

After studying the topic of hormones, how and why they differ between people and races, and the behavioral ramifications of those differences, the link with IQ becomes obvious. I am going to simplify things for you here though, as I have gathered a mountain of research on this subject and it would take me way too long to go through it all here.

The connection with hormones and IQ is a bit of a two step process though, unlike the correlations of many other things I showed in my post in part 2. Maybe you need a bit of a refresher on those though. Here is the conclusion of the many many studies I have dug up on what the high and low IQ tendencies and correlations are: 

poor or on welfare
raised in unsafe environments
likely to be in jail
uneducated, highschool drop outs
have a supervised learning style
From abusive homes
raised in large families
born to young single moms who they did not bond with.
likely to bear an illegitimate child
Not breastfed, read to, or exposed to good classical and calming music, or expose their own child to such.
Highly religious and superstitious, but with little actual sexual or morality according to jail rates.
they follow the crowd
Are nearly never self employed.
Are carefree and not aware enough of their situation to be depressed or on antidepressants.
Found predominantly in parts of the world with dark coloring, pockets of America that are integrated with those same cultures, and individuals who are also of mixed ancestry, but may not look it. . .color alone being a poor indication of your mixed ancestry.
Odds are great that they will have dark skin

And the high IQ individual's tendencies are:


They are often if not mainly wealthy.
Educated sometimes, but self motivated, surrounded with books, homeschooled and able to get into college if they want to.
From functional families and two parent homes, often neither divorced.
From mothers who are by average 30
from small families
from well bonded families by average
raised in a safe environment
raised in families that eat more protein/meat
Breastfed, fed or eat mainly healthy food.
Read to and read a lot.
Often drawn to classical or other intelligent music.
Rarely want to be employed by a company and are often entrepreneurs.
Not likely to be jailed.
Tendency to reject superstitions and religion.
Tendency to depression and worrying.
High sense of morality, not dictated by the crowd.
Civil and behaved, but sometimes see no point in rules put in place for idiots, and will speak out.
Found predominantly in places of the world with light skin; lighter skin in a population (not individual) always correlates with the highest IQ in it.
odds are great they have white skin

So taking that into consideration, we go a little deeper and look to why those with low IQ are highly correlated with divorce, jail time, abusive families, do not bond well, have babies out of wedlock and are generally aggressive and passionate. Scientists say this behavior is due to high testosterone. . .but testosterone is complicated. 

When you think of testosterone, you automatically think of males, but females have it too. (They just have a lot less.) Obese women tend to have elevated testosterone levels, but in general men have much more testosterone than woman. . .but this is not always true, and this accounts for the unusual cases of domestic abuse where the woman is the aggressor.

Because of the slight advantage males have in the testing arena with some IQ tests being more mathematical and spacial -leading to a higher number of male geniuses- a few scientists have concluded that testosterone makes you smarter.

In fact, while some is slightly advantageous, more is not! A study from pub Med states " It is concluded that T may be related to IQ. . . too low or too high T levels may be disadvantages for the fluid intelligence. . ."
Source

Why would this be so contradictory, with testosterone causing high and low IQ?

The vast majority of people in this country (for a generation still) are white, and the prime cause of very low IQ in them is mental retardation. Have you ever met a muscular and aggressive (two signs of high testosterone) mentally handicapped white person? Stout and a maybe little strong yes, but I personally have never met any that are anything but passive sweethearts.


 So I am actually not at all surprised that the very low IQ (like probably 30-60), have low testosterone. These mentally retarded whites are no doubt why a low IQ doesn't guarantee criminal behavior. The confusion with low IQ and how it is expressed in different races is part of the issue with confusion, as a white with a low IQ looks and acts like he needs to be put in a special home, whereas a black with the same IQ appears relatively normal. . .but aggressive on closer examination.

It gets even more confusing than different racial expressions to testosterone though, as testosterone is difficult to measure, and changes throughout the day and month, depending on what you are doing. Winning a fight raises it, while losing one lowers it. Having sex raises it temporarily, then lowers it to pre-sex levels.

To make matters even more complicated, in some people testosterone is mainly converted to dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which amplifies the effect of testosterone, while bringing down the levels. So while some are low in one type of testosterone, the "high octane" type of testosterone may be high. So who has higher levels of the "high octane" dehydroepiandrosterone and generally testosterone too? Not surprisingly: blacks. Seen in men, woman and children. Here are 2 sources of scientific studies with woman.

"The difference in the dehydroepiandrosterone and testosterone levels in Bantu young women and prepubertal Bantu girls, suggests differences in adrenal activity between Bantu and Caucasian women."
Source

"The testosterone content was markedly lower in Caucasian than in Bantu girls. "
Source

Few scientists want to admit to the racial origin of these aggressive hormones (even though it's clearly in the genes as studies have proven time and time again), In fact other genes like DRD4 7R are associated with low attention and high risk behavior and found at twice the rate in Africans as Caucasians!

Blacks will even brag about having high testosterone! I have met few that will deny it! It is whites who have issues with admitting to the sex hormone levels and their corresponding behaviors. 

The blacks and politically correct whites reading this will now try to excuse away Testosterone levels by saying how they change throughout the day and month, dependant on what you do, as well as changing with different times of life. It also effects races differently according to the levels of other stuff like dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which amplifies the effect of testosterone, so a black can have lower levels of one, but still act like he has high testosterone.

These inconsistencies have been used as excuses (mainly by defensive whites) as to why the rare small sample groups have shown no racial differences. No doubt I could repeat those results if I had just told the men to run a marathone and/or have sex before coming to get tested. (Both lower the levels temporarily.) Oh, and make sure the blacks were old too. (As their levels are similar if not equal then.)

Scientists fearing the label "racist", and the loss of their jobs, feel it would be risky to be politically incorrect even if it means to tell the truth. So they make up a disorder for the behavior that stems from the sex hormones. Like conduct disorder.  

"CD [conduct disorder] boys had significantly higher levels of DHEAS [dehydroepiandrosterone ] and marginally significantly higher levels of A [androstenedione a form of testosterone as well]. . ." "The results suggest that adrenal androgen functioning plays an important role in the onset and maintenance, of aggression in young boys."
Source

Other studies go on to say that "Conduct disorder is a childhood behaviour disorder that is characterized by persistent aggressive or antisocial behaviour that disrupts the child's environment and impairs his or her functioning. A proportion of children with conduct disorder have psychopathic traits. Psychopathic traits consist of a callous–unemotional component and an impulsive–antisocial component. . ."
Source

Psychopathic traits have been linked to a large number of criminals and crimes in the world, and typical black behavior in numerous studies of all kinds, but this article puts them all together. It's a must read if you believe all are created equal.

Some scientists are brave enough to say that behavior issues (a new disorder this time called oppositional defiant disorder or ODD) may be due to "genetic factors."

."adrenal androgen functioning is specifically elevated in children with ODD [oppositional defiant disorder]. It is speculated that the mechanism could be a shift in balance of ACTH-beta-endorphin functioning in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis due to. . . genetic factors." This study was done "To examine the relationship between adrenal androgens and aggression in children with oppositional and antisocial behavior. . ."
Source

It is clear by many studies that high levels of any form of testosterone is linked with aggression, seen more in boys and men consequently then woman or girls. . .but they also note that high testosterone causes an early puberty. If you didn't know it, blacks have a much earlier puberty, and in general mature faster, while smaller, from the day they are born. They are even born earlier and are not generally preemies according to tests.
Source

 "The findings [about aggression and high testosterone appears to mainly] apply only to men. After puberty, testosterone levels in men are about 10 times higher than in women.

''The highest testosterone level in women tends to fall within the low range for men, so that the hormone is a far greater factor for men than women,'' said Dr. Richard Udry, head of a center for population study at the University of North Carolina, who is studying the effects of testosterone on sexuality."

Source

Here is where the obvious connection comes to how those with a high level of testosterone, being mainly blacks and those mixed, are connected to IQ. . .

"Scientists have long linked abnormally high levels of testosterone to an unusually early involvement with sex and drug use and to certain violent crimes, like particularly vicious rapes."

"Those men who are most likely to try to dominate. . . in a prison yard. . . are likely to have higher testosterone levels than their peers, new data show."

Source

Low IQ is also correlated with being in jail, as mentioned at the start, so one could say that those with a low IQ are likely to be more violent, be more sexual mature and be aggressively acting on it early on. (All of this is linked to a high level of testosterone being expressed.)

Not surprisingly, numerous studies have confirmed that "teens with IQs ranging from 75 to 90 had the lowest probability of virginity (the authors note this is also the same IQ range where propensity towards crime peaks)." Whereas Smart Teens Don't Have Sex (or Kiss Much Either). Each additional point of IQ increased the odds of virginity by 2.7% for males and 1.7% for females. But higher IQ had a similar relationship across the entire range of romantic/sexual interactions, decreasing the odds that teens had ever kissed or even held hands with a member of the opposite sex at each age. Not only do intelligent people have a delayed onset of sexual behavior. . . they also have a lower number of premarital sex partners throughout adulthood. . . "

While this is consistent with the theory that high IQ people are more religious and conservative, this theory is of course, not true. Religiousness correlates with lower IQ, and certain 3rd world countries. . .

"In other studies it was found that smart men were less likely to be athletic, and this paper shows, unathletic men and women have fewer sex partners. So intelligent people have lower libidos and less masculine physiques. What hormone is responsible for both sex drive and masculine builds? That's right: testosterone."

"And two new papers suggest that testosterone may depress IQ. One team found that salivary testosterone levels were lower for preadolescent boys with IQs above 130 and below 70." (The same two groups most likely to be virgins in adolescence, one by choice, one not so much. . .)

"Another paper suggests that a gene responsible for androgen sensitivity and higher sperm counts may also create a tradeoff for intelligence."
Source

So it's androgen or testosterone sensitivity, not necessarily testostrone levels that links with aggression AND low IQ, as well as early puberty, higher libidos, more partners, more muscles and a higher sperm count. Suddenly the blacks reading this are not so thrilled about claiming high testosterone. . .but these things are all evidenced in stats of the black community.  (Things like marriage rates, rape rates, and studies on sperm count, as well as the larger package. . . linked to prostate cancer (High in the black community.), and poor parenting. . . People also believe penis size is linked to high testosterone, and blacks also lead there, according to world maps of such thing. as well as much bragging online. 
Source

. . .In fact studies say that having a large penis is highly correlated with a low IQ. . .I wonder why!)

High testosterone has also been shown in animal studies to raise the chance of spreading diseases to whole herds or packs. This is evidenced in STD's, which run rampant in the black community, and blacks in general!!

Testosterone also is known to strengthen bones and lower your voice. . .both seen as racial differences. (Blacks having harder bones, and lower voices.)

If you note on the study about sexuality above though, it's not all men with high testosterone that are highly sexual. . .just those with an IQ above 75 and below 90, in other words, most blacks and hispanics. Hmm, is this really surprising?

In fact, the average IQ for their more pure race in sub sahara Africa  is 70. You see, according to stats, 80% of Africans are mixed with an average of 20% European genes in the USA. So being that the average black person is raised to an 86 IQ average in this country, some would be above and 90, and in the normal range, while the rest of the blacks in the low range. The same can be said for the average Hispanic with an IQ of 86. While the average for any mainly pure white countries are 102, with elite Asian nations being 107.

It seems no matter the IQ, this higher sexuality is seen in even the mixed blacks. For instance even north African blacks are highly sexual and this is found wherever they go! Check out what happened when 2,000 north Africans moved into England here.

The stats and figures of these high testosterone behaviors are often hidden by different names for dark people, like the French in Canada, or Muslims. When we look at stats on muslims and child rape or prostitution, not only do we find that they are 200 times more likely to be actually convicted, but most of the crime is not punished in their communities, which are often self governing, as cops tend to avoid those areas. Furthermore, their rape victims are likely to be white!!

Source

Testosterone is also responsible for confidence, and self esteem though. This is something blacks, males and females revel in, and brag about, and many whites are even jealous of. Also what causes strong pesonalities and strife between blacks. . .

The swagger is a black walk of confidence that young white males often try to emulate. Whites could honestly stand more of this, as it is nice to have! It makes you less depressed for one thing, and increases your attractiveness to woman. (Depression is a trait of a high IQ, and not surprisingly, much more common in whites than blacks, according to studies.)

While confidence and a healthy self esteem is good, being a narcisist is not. Pathological Narcisism also known as narcissistic personality disorder, is found to be more prevelant in blacks, this being due to their high testosterone. 

"A 2012 study stated that Black individuals have been found to report the highest levels of self-esteem of any racial group in the United States. The study itself found higher levels of narcissism in Blacks than in Whites and also that "the pathological aspects of narcissism were more strongly associated with maladjustment for Black individuals than for White individuals".


"A 2002 study found that Australian Aboriginal secondary school students had higher average self-esteem than Europeans. This has been argued to be remarkable considering the poorer average achievement of Australian Aboriginals. [These are the purest blacks in the world, with the lowest average IQ, 54. Why they are even in a school is beyond me!] Richard Lynn has stated that similar results have been found for African Americans in the United States and Africans and Britain."


"The high self-esteem also contradicts the argument that low self-esteem (due to factors such as racism by Whites) is causing the low achievement of these groups."
Source

Blacks have a very high opinion of themselves generally, and back down to no one, thus they make very poor marriage partners, or team players in general.

So enough about blacks having higher testosterone, another study notes that there are racial (black-white) differences in androstenedione and estradiol. (The good news is they have a drug for this "genetic problem that causes aggression and is associated with mild mental retardation". . . One drug all blacks should look into! Others have considered this approach for blacks because of testosterone. "Assuming that higher Black testosterone levels are a causative agent in Black crime, aggression and lowered IQ, experimental interventions could be tried: two pills – first one pill to lower testosterone to Black fetus’s brains by 20%, and possibly another pill to lower Black infant testosterone by 20% – could be beneficial." 

Source

Not only that, but there is a difference between Salivary cortisol levels of normal controls and boys with a diagnosis of ODD. "The results of the study support an important role for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis sympathetic autonomic functioning in persistent antisocial behavior in young boys."
Source

Numerous studies like here, here and here say there are salivary cortisol difference between races, blacks being lower. This is the stress hormone, that has been claimed as another excuse for the differences in crime in the black community. 

Stressful situations are said to cause your testosterone to raise, or your cortisol to raise. Either fight, or flight. . .your heartbeat apparently giving away which you are more likely to do. Low stress and a consequently low heartrate. (This is also linked to better sleep, low depression, etc..)

Not surprisingly, when I traced that lead, I found that a low heartrate is linked strongly with aggression. Men having consistently lower heart rates than woman for one thing, meaning because of testosterone, men will be more aggressive than woman in general. (Exceptions being made for black woman compared to high IQ white or Asian males, where we see these woman being the aggressors.)

"Low resting heart rate is a strong and consistent predictor of conduct disorder and chronic aggression. . . the origin of low heart rate and its significance for understanding aggression and violence remain obscure."

Source

I don't think aggression's origin in the low heartrate is so obscure! Blacks average heartrate proves that while lacking stress, they are more aggresive and the origin of aggression with their higher levels of it.

 As shown here in a study on the racial differences in heartrates.

 "Blacks had heart rates 6 to 12 beats per minute lower than whites of the same age and sex." 
(In fact the scientists claim it may have been a drop in testosterone levels that hailed the beginning of civilization, as you do not see coorperation or teamwork with any species with a high testosterone.)

 So according to those numerous studies, the belief that all the junk that blacks deal with is stressful for them is wrong! If anything they cause their issues, excuse them away as intentional, and simply move on with their life. (It has also been seen in racially differing effects of living without a father figure, and numerous other things that would stress out the analitical, easily depressed, high IQ person of any shade. It simply is a very obvious evidence of the confidence and happy go lucky nature of the low IQ. Something I frankly envy, and try to emulate with little sucess.)

The sex hormones certainly aren't just good or bad, but they are different in the sexes, and races. They affect Femininity or masculinity, with estrogen supposedly being the hormone to make woman more attractive, and testosterone the one to make men more attractive. There is some truth in this to be sure! As my own brothers have higher testosterone levels, and are very attractive!

This is even seen with interracial marriage rates. According to numerous stats and here on Metapedia.org:

"Asians are stereotypically viewed as relatively more feminine compared to Whites while Blacks are stereotypically viewed as relatively more masculine. One study found that this perception occurred also on an implicit (subconscious) level. Another study argued that men are more attracted to Asian women relative to Black women, while women are more attracted to Black men relative to Asian men. This since females on average prefer masculine males and males on average prefer feminine females. Statistics on interracial marriages were argued to follow this with 75% of Asian-White marriages consisting of a White husband and an Asian wife and with 73% of Black-White marriages consisting of a Black husband and and White wife."

"In a study in which participants evaluated job candidates, Asians were more likely to be selected for a leadership position that required collaboration and relationship building, traits typically perceived as feminine. Black candidates were more likely to be chosen for positions that required a fiercely competitive approach, typically seen as masculine."

"Another study analyzed data the National Collegiate Athletic Association's regarding 30 different collegiate sports and found that the more a sport was perceived to be masculine the greater the relative number of Black to Asian athletes."

"Such systematic racial differences regarding perceptions and effects are likely difficult to explain using non-biological explanations. But they can be easily explained by racial differences regarding sex hormone systems. General indications that there may be racial differences related to differences regarding sex hormones include that different populations differ regarding variables such as frequency of prostate cancer and the digit ratio which is a crude measure of prenatal androgen exposure."

See also Race and crime: Testosterone and Differential K theory.
Source
Another article states, "Like science-backed palm reading, new studies use digit ratio to predict aggressive behavior and risk of disease."

Due to admixture of European blood in nearly if not all Africans in America, the (I believe) racial difference in finger sizes called digit ratio is not always dominantly expressed in the bi-racial person. In fact, what was originally called "ugly hands" (having a larger ring finger than pointer), is something even seen in some whites now who are mixed. 

So as studies show, there is consequently a weak correlation with digit ratio, IQ and aggression, which is why the above article says it is "a crude measurement of prenatal androgen exposure", or testosterone in the womb. (Which black women are tested as having. Debunking the belief that anything done could cause the males to raise their own testosterone. Nor are these woman stressed out and having it raised in pregnancy, although their aggressive and wild actions to calmer whites would suggest they are stressed.)

There are other things that evidence this prenatal androgen exposure as well though.
There is a stronger link to head/face size and shape, and they say it has to do with prenatal androgen exposure . And this they say is correlated with attractiveness. Males with more testosterone having a smaller head and wider face, and being less attractive. (While the above article says testosterone gives males more attractiveness, and females less attractiveness, this doesn't take race and selection into account. . .attractiveness differs greatly between races, and while testosterone seems to help black males slightly, it hinders black females even more. Check out Race and physical attractiveness.) As well as my article why black men are attractive and woman are rejected?

Testosterone giving traits like larger muscles, it is not considered attractive for woman, while it is for men, so this is unfortunate for black woman. Even the educated ones have found themselves 70% single. Black woman have even been accused of being men, due to larger muscles, and the other testosterone induced differences. Maybe you have heard that rumor about Michelle Obama. . . Don't worry, I defended her! Blacks liked that, even though it meant admitting they have higher testosterone levels.

As if we needed more proof that blacks are more muscular and sporty, as said in a weight lifting forum, and confirmed by all science I have read, "pound for pound blacks are stronger
but don't carry strength as well as whites. . ." (Whatever that means.)

Source

The apes beat humans in strength too! Speaking of leg muscles the scientists say, "despite our reliance on our legs for locomotion. A 2006 study found that bonobos can jump one-third higher than top-level human athletes, and bonobo legs generate as much force as humans nearly two times heavier."


Not shockingly, blacks have the same muscle types, where with even less effort, they are much stronger. Their short twitch muscles, recovery time from build up of lactic acid and other stuff makes the black's muscles much different, and frankly originally perfectly suited for sports, fighting or hard manual labor. Source

Chimps too have been found to be about twice as strong, with different muscle structure than anotomically modern man, a term to disguise the fact that some today still do not have those features. In fact,
 "In the past few years, geneticists have identified the loci for some of these anatomical differences [that are associated with primitive homo erectus or modern man]. One gene, for example, called MYH16, contributes to the development of large jaw muscles in other apes, while a "mutation stemming from the Neanderthal was said to have been responsible for not just smaller and weaker jaws, but a bigger brain!
Source

This brings us to the connection with the high testosterone feature of a large jaw or wide face as being tied together with a small brain, and consequent low IQ, which I will discuss further later.

 Testosterone levels are expressed most accurately in the face and body, like through the muscles, finger ratio, penis size, and even height and strength of bones they say. . .but mostly in behavior. (Sexual and otherwise aggressive.)

 Here is a very interesting article on testosterone, as seen by a man who needs to supplement due to HIV, which ironically lowers testosterone, while being found primarily in the blacks worldwide. . .Source

The most damning evidence of a high level of aggression/testosterone. . .is crime. In Africa this high testosterone is adventageous, just as it is in primates, the high ranking ones always having the most. . . but in civilization, we call it crime.

Just as in Africa, it starts young, at puberty, and that testosterone boost. (Which hits younger for blacks.)


Similarly we can see young black males accounting for a majority of the violent crimes in this country.

From "The Color of Crime Race, Crime, and Justice in America — Second, Expanded Edition, 2005"

  Major Findings: Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities. Crime Rates show that Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery. 

 When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife. 

 Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate. 

 The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic. 

 Interracial Crime Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent. 

 Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black. 

 Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa. 

 Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely...

Checkout these stats as well.

Concerning Gang participation:

 (Not effected by cop prejudice or the legal system at all!)

 Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white, even though around 70% of this country is white! Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely. 

And while I'm on this subject, let's talk about the silance of the media on these racial matters. . .

When the media covers the gangs in the country, they generally focus on how humanitarian and charitable they are, with many lawyers and doctors, and then show the white gangs. . .but when they want to show how whites are just as bad as other minority groups they will highlight white gangs a racist white supremacists when they defend their state against hordes of Hispanic gang members. Furthermore, the media lies and says the gang fights like this are white on white. Hispanics are not white! (This was the case in the Waco bike gang fight as of late. . . The Bandidos, the second largest biker gang in the world with a history of violence in Texas, were at the center of the brawl. Picture above.) This media dishonesty is no doubt to give a false sense of security and to hide the fact that these freedom fighters are fighting a racial war in our own nation. Black gangs fight everyone, Hispanic gangs mainly fight black gangs, but whites on ocassion too, but most if not all white gangs are known for stopping the violence.

When you compare white crime with black crime it is often noted that most of black crime is among those of their own community, and similarly whites with their own community. . .which hides the vastly uneven numbers of murders and crime per portion, as blacks are a mere 13%  of this country.

Being that a comparable few victims of black crime are white, compared to white on white, it may seem that there is no problem. . .but on comparing white on black crime with black on white crime, evening up the percentages. . . you see a stark difference!!

 Which again shows the cause of all this black and hispanic crime being either an uncontrollable testosterone induced aggression, which would follow them wherever they go. . .or an intentional racism and premeditated attack on the peaceful and smarter whites, or any who are around them! I believe there is some of both, and it is linked to the amount of European genes and your IQ as to what way you are more likely to lean towards, as a more passionate, more aggressive black person. 

It really comes down to being empathetic towards your fellow man. And speaking of hormones, empathy is also in the hormones. . .but I will get into that in another post. Next though, I will delve into the most fascinating topic yet. . .obesity! Really! You will be surprised at what I have found and it's tie to IQ, and racial differences, I can almost guarantee! Check it out here.

Homeschooling and private schools a classic form of "white flight."

 Schools have self segregated naturally these days, with the free and public ones now mainly comprised of the poor or minorities (often one and the same), with white flight happening towards homeschooling and private schools. 

"Separate but equal education policies allowed whites and blacks to share the same school systems. School districts were integrated, individual schools were not. When the federal government forced integration to be extended to individual schools, white people moved out of integrated school districts, leaving them to blacks. . . The advent of forced school busing was an admission to the failure of forced integration."
Source
After the government used school buses to force integration of different classes/races of kids, the kids went on strike. Why? Have you ever had to be on a bus with inner city blacks?

Source

"Jim Crow forced whites to sit in the front of the bus, blacks in the back. Southerners viewed that arrangement as a fair and equitable means of protecting whites from black crime, violence and "rascality." When Jim Crow ended, white people were effectively forced off the bus. For the most part, buses became segregated, black-only means of transportation. Whites not only found buses too dangerous, they also fled formerly Jim Crow communities for all-white suburbs. . . Jim Crow laws allowed whites and blacks to occupy the same space at the same time. Communities were more racially integrated with Jim Crow than without."

Source

Anyone who grew up with one or more blacks in school has had to admit that they were always the ones who beat up on the white kids. They were the bullies. Many online have said that this was on a daily basis! (Never the other way around.) 

In fact any school with more then a few minorities in general has had to ramp up their security. In my state it is quite telling! The government has recently given a huge grant to Virginia public schools for security purposes, as well as a free breakfast program. . .to add to the free lunch program. Only some schools are getting use of the grant, and it seems to be proportionate to the amount of blacks in the schools. The schools with the most blacks are getting the most money for security as well as charity to feed the blacks 2 meals a day, on the tax payers tab.


 In fact, one site with demographics showing white flight has happened, and because of that the school lunch program and soon to be breakfast program, has gotten disproportionate use by that school, when compared to the country. . . the number of kids on it matches almost perfectly the number of blacks. No doubt the crime in those schools must be bad, or they would not be getting so much money to protect themselves and the kids. . .while the majority of the rest of the suburban schools got nothing. The test scores of those schools getting the grants also correlate with the low IQ blacks in them. . .
Source

In a school setting it is hard for blacks, because they are not in their element, and generally do poorly. The confusion between the ones with scholastic potential and the others without it led some to do testing to segregate into special classes, not unlike "achievement tests" today. Honor and special ed. classes being the result.

The old idea of "intelligence (IQ) testing" was strangely found to be more "politically incorrect" then the testing on what was actually taught in the class. 

This was because the IQ test almost always segregated the kids into races. (It was said to measure potential, as opposed to learned skills or knowledge.) 

The average tests being failed could be chalked up to learning disability, ADD, bad home life/lack of studying, lack of ambition, different learning style, etc. but there was little that could have more then a tiny effect on an IQ test, as it was said to be mainly heritable. 

While the IQ tests showed a big intelligence disparity, just as averages for continents did, (something still denied or hotly debated and excused by the black community and few others), the same thing has been seen by the standardized state tests they do today. . .blacks are far below whites and Asians. Of course some defending the low IQ minorities claim the tests unfairly advantage whites and Asians.

 The only thing a bit unfair is that for black kids (as opposed to whites) segregation lowered their performance in school and brought up the violence. 

Other tests have shown a correlation with minorities and low test scores as well as bad behavior in school. The studies also claimed that a disproportionate number of the children with attention problems (ADD?) were black students. All of this not surprisingly, correlates with what we know of jails being full of those with a low IQ (and blacks) as well. More on IQ and it's correlations here.

 IQ differences (which are generally equated with the wage you make) separate people of all shades into classes, naturally.

Race and IQ are both well studied, but cultural Marxists would like to believe it doesn't exist, or that it can be excused away, but the fact is it can't. Watch Race and IQ denial explained for more on that.

The schools in Detroit and Ferguson give a clear picture of the link between black violence and low IQ as well as other test scores. 

Frankly, the white flight to private schools or homeschool is inevitable and not racist but a matter of self defense! (As well as trying to get a good education and not be held back by the behavioral and intelligence issues of the minorities.) 

Whites try to forcibly stop this separation, in their push for equality and cultural Marxism, but it naturally happens. These days it is obvious in my area, as well as other areas with minorities, that the schools the white tax payers are supporting, are mainly filled with the future criminals and the illegal aliens. (You vote for that when you vote Democratic folks!)

Some still in the public system have gotten angry about the white flight towards homeschooling, saying it "destroys communities".

 While there is good reason for this observation, the real destruction is done by the minorities, and just becomes more apparent when the whites leave.   Amazingly this liberal and often Afrocentric site had a very good article debunking this argument.)

This problem is sadly not only in the South, or even in the USA. For instance in BC Canada, the public school teachers have had such problems with the growing minorities populations in them (though you would not catch that being said out-loud or in the media) that they were on strike for many months, demanding smaller classes and higher pay to deal with so many "special needs kids", read "minorities". The strike made the kids miss 5 weeks of school on both ends of the summer, and due to "little understanding" from naive white folks or angry minorities as well as little support from government officials, the negative feedback seriously hurt the teachers moral, causing many to rethink the profession even more!

Source Source

Some ethnic groups in Canada have even demanded that the government help them start and finance their own schools. (Which public schools are turning toward these days anyhow.) Some liberals have protested saying that "Canada's multicultural policy, as envisaged in the early 1960's, did not promote separateness. Early philosophies and policies of multiculturalism in Canada were benign. They were based on toleration and accommodation and harmonious relations between different groups and races. But multiculturalism in the 1990's seems to be taking a different shape. It has become akin to ethnocentricism." [They are calling for a] "segregated system of schooling based on children's ethnic heritage. This is the kind of system South Africa has now."

 In fact this is what is happening by choice and because of white flight in any area of the world with minority domination. What they fail to see is that while the whites would flourish without the minorities in general, the minorities would grow more ethnocentric and angry and entitled without integration. 

Yes, no doubt the minorities will in general have a poor education, worse teachers, and less resources, just as predicted, and just as in every other area of the world that they are in. . .but that is their doing, not whites.

Source

So while integration clearly doesn't work for us whites, as we are seeing clear stats on where the crime in schools is coming from. . .having them separate from us, like in Jim Crow, hurts them.  Is there a solution to safely teach those who mainly think that showing an interest in school is "acting white?" Is there any helping their culture of violence?

Will pouring more money into free majority black public schools help?  Will say, 530 million to spend on added security, feeding them two meals a day, lowering the standard to make sure no child gets left behind and the like (all on the mainly white man's tax dollar) be the solution to the problems with the black schools in Detroit, as Obama believes? (And is set to happen.) Audits have already shown that 54 million dollars already poured into Detroit schools have gone missing, or were misspent. . .while they have racked up a 200 million dollar deficit!

Like Bill O'Riley has suggested below in the link, could it be that it is just a waste of money to try to teach the chaotic, poor and low IQ minorities who don't already come from wealthy homes (that could afford public schools), as they obviously have "no learning curve"? (Saying "Obama will bankrupt the country if he tries to throw money at all our problems". . .which could be translated "throwing money at all the blacks of Detroit". I showed in past posts that minorities and blacks in particular are the parasite of not just this country- the USA- but the world!)

Source

This belief that an expensive education makes a smart person, who is less violent, is just wishful thinking on the part of a minority of powerful whites, all over the world. Or they pretend to believe it in order to get their vote. . .In fact in Africa they have seen miserable results with the free public schools whites have set up. Yet the humanitarian white nations keep pouring money into those free schools!

 In Kenya alone "The World Bank expects to spend $100 million on education in Kenya over 5 years. The British are donating $75 million, the Swedes $7 million, the Canadians $6.7 million, the Americans $3 million and Unicef $2.5 million."

"Michael Kremer, a Harvard University economics professor who volunteered as a high school math teacher in Kenya after college and who has done years of research in Kenyan schools, said Kenya clearly needed both more foreign aid and domestic reform of its own education system.

Kenyan officials agree."

Source

My own precious grandma was a teacher in a school she started in Liberia, west Africa. While humanitarians and missionaries want to make Africa a more civilized place by schooling those without potential, or teaching them religion, it's not just a waste of time, but it takes them away from work that helps them survive.

 Without a guaranteed living being made because of slavery (a luxury to the Blacks who went to America) attending a school only makes the families without working kids more poor, and it unrealistically raises their hopes for the future. Yet more money is being poured into Africa to make free schools throughout the most depressed areas. As they have noticed in Africa though, herding 100 kids into a room and not even passing half of them from the first grade (where they only learn their alphabet and to count) is hardly what people would call getting an education. Nor will more money and smaller classes in any part of Africa help that, they have found.

Considering now what we see in Africa, Canada, as well as all other places they have studied that has a black population, there seems to be little hope of giving them an education, or ending up an equal multicultural society.

Noting the inherent inequality between the low and high IQ people, the school system is seeing problems they can't just ignore. "Data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reports that 63 percent of fourth graders perform at only basic, or below basic, levels in reading. Sixty-nine percent perform at these levels in mathematics. African-American, Hispanic, and Native American fourth graders perform consistently lower than their white counterparts."

This minority element is what accounts for "the dumbing down of America", and it is why compared to other white countries (first world nations) we are scoring lower and lower. While blacks. thanks to their high rate of mixed marriages are getting smarter. "Indicators of achievement on mathematics and science, such as the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) comparison of students in the fourth and eighth grades from forty nations (and twelfth-grade students from twenty nations), have revealed that the overall achievement of students in the United States is low compared to students in other industrialized nations."

Source

Yet they keep hoping that more money and programs pushed on these problem schools will change this "unfair" inequality!

"Since the 1950s, federal compensatory education efforts have tried to achieve equity in education with programs such as Head Start, giving preschoolers from low-income families a chance to start kindergarten at the same level as their middle- and upper-class peers. Other major federal policy efforts created categorical programs–such as Title I, bilingual education, and special education initiatives–to promote equity for children with economic disadvantages, language barriers, and physical or mental disabilities."

"A groundbreaking federal commitment, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and subsequent amendments, supports education achievement and equity by providing federal funds to states and school districts." Particularly those with minorities. . .

Source

Inequality being there doesn't mean it was not earned. This is something even the middle class and smart blacks are saying. "Courts, bureaucrats and the intellectual elite have consistently concluded that "gross" disparities are probative of a pattern and practice of discrimination. Given all of the differences among people, such a position is pure nonsense."

Source

The public school system while giving little meaningful education, with low quality teachers, graduating the minorities at dismal rates, and making them college ready at even worse ones (culminating in getting bad jobs or being unemployed), as well as exposing the whites to a lot of violence, have been proven a failure of multiculturalism. In fact multiculturalism around the world has been deemed a failure by nearly all but our politicians. According to a poll done by BBC in Europe, 95% believe multiculturalism has been a dismal failure.

Source

Because of the root cause of the failure of multicultural society, but multicultural schools in particular (being the poor minorities inability to achieve equality), it is obvious that the proposed reform ideas like tax credits and vouchers (for everyone rich or poor to use at whatever school they want) would actually make the problems worse!

I propose that either: 

#1. we make school optional to the non native dark Americans. That alone would turn around the schools as ghetto blacks, as well as some Hispanics would likely drop out.

#2. and/or teachers could simply IQ test the kids, to make sure they don't waste time or state money on the ones with an IQ of below 90. 

Or, we could just do what they used to do all over Africa. . .

#3. make all the public schools private and financially out of reach for all but the wealthy. (Homeschooling being an option for all, but only helping those with smart genes from smart parents. . .as IQ is highly heritable.)

A socialist country just doesn't work with poor and low IQ minorities. We just can't afford the free schools to be taken over by the minorities, who are not giving back in taxes.

 Nor is it fair that whites have had to leave the historically safe, white dominated schools that they started and now continue to pay for, simply because the minorities account for 93% of the growth in this country! 

The ones who started this civilization, and are still paying most of the taxes are having to personally finance the schooling of their own children, while the government throws away money on the education of other nations immigrants, who will (after wasting their childhood stressing out over school), likely end up as pickers, and burger flippers!! (Or unemployed.)

 If minorities (who are now a majority in the public schools), want a free education, besides the self directed education the internet, and libraries can easily give a smart kid, and they believe they can compete for the good jobs in the future, based on a history of intelligence in their family, then they need to be wiling to foot some of the bill for it, as whites have done. 

Down with free public schools! Who's with me?!