I believe that culture, as well as poverty, education, IQ and the like are all connected to violence, but correlation does not equal causation. We have to look deeper into the cause of the violence, not just what they often have in common.
How can we tell what there is in common if we do not have a good picture of the criminals though? Some crimes and criminals get a lot of publicity, because the story is sensational. The dog bites man story is common, but when a man bites a dog, that is news worthy! So we can't trust the media to report fairly on the common crime, or what links them together. They have been known to show a bias and hide key evidence. . .We can trust the science and the stats on crime though.
For instance hormones. . .can we trace violence to certain hormones? Yes we can! It is called testosterone.
Testosterone is a hormone associated with a quick temper, rage, lack of impulse control, etc.
When studying high testosterone in men they say ''The overall picture among the high-testosterone men is one of delinquency, substance abuse and a tendency toward excess. . .They have more trouble with people like teachers while they are growing up, have more sexual partners, are more likely to have gone AWOL in the service and to have used hard drugs. But that was so mainly for men who had low income and little education. . . among rapists, high levels are found in those who committed the most vicious attacks, and that among young men, schoolyard bullies have high levels of the hormone. . .testosterone levels correlated with certain vocations. Ministers were low in the hormone, while actors and football players had the highest levels. . .those who described themselves as entertainers also had high testosterone. . .The behavior of high testosterone individuals reflects intractability, unmanageability, and lack of docility as well as aggression and violence."
Source Source
When studying high testosterone in men they say ''The overall picture among the high-testosterone men is one of delinquency, substance abuse and a tendency toward excess. . .They have more trouble with people like teachers while they are growing up, have more sexual partners, are more likely to have gone AWOL in the service and to have used hard drugs. But that was so mainly for men who had low income and little education. . . among rapists, high levels are found in those who committed the most vicious attacks, and that among young men, schoolyard bullies have high levels of the hormone. . .testosterone levels correlated with certain vocations. Ministers were low in the hormone, while actors and football players had the highest levels. . .those who described themselves as entertainers also had high testosterone. . .The behavior of high testosterone individuals reflects intractability, unmanageability, and lack of docility as well as aggression and violence."
Source Source
OK, so high testosterone is very BAD!
Furthermore, we are apparently not idiots, we can tell a face with high testosterone with "above-chance accuracy."
According to an article in Psychology today on facial profiling, we instinctively judge a face and it is generally right! They says that "High testosterone shows itself in strong jawbones, darker coloring, and hollower cheekbones. . . At the University of St. Andrews, volunteers of both genders could tell, with above-chance accuracy, whether people were promiscuous (open to one-night stands and sex without love) just by looking at photos of their faces. . . Among men, the Lothario face (a composite of the most promiscuous males) had high-testosterone features: slightly smaller eyes, larger noses, and broader cheekbones."
Furthermore, we are apparently not idiots, we can tell a face with high testosterone with "above-chance accuracy."
According to an article in Psychology today on facial profiling, we instinctively judge a face and it is generally right! They says that "High testosterone shows itself in strong jawbones, darker coloring, and hollower cheekbones. . . At the University of St. Andrews, volunteers of both genders could tell, with above-chance accuracy, whether people were promiscuous (open to one-night stands and sex without love) just by looking at photos of their faces. . . Among men, the Lothario face (a composite of the most promiscuous males) had high-testosterone features: slightly smaller eyes, larger noses, and broader cheekbones."
Other studies connected behavior of different men with different monkeys.
"Whereas "status-striving" men tend to produce the macho hormone testosterone when challenged, like chimpanzees, laid-back men produce cortisol, nicknamed the cuddle compound, like bonobos."
So the two monkeys produce the fight or flight hormones. The "fight" men are like chimps in their hormonal response, while the "flight" men are like the bonobos in their hormonal response the article showed.
Interestingly, there are other studies that show a genetic link of certain races to those same monkeys. Which may make these same races actually have the same reactions as those monkeys.
Interestingly, there are other studies that show a genetic link of certain races to those same monkeys. Which may make these same races actually have the same reactions as those monkeys.
Source
Considering the numerous features and bad behaviors of high testosterone males, not shockingly then, a much higher level of testosterone has been registered in young blacks, as well as many Hispanics. (Though likely not all, as many are a large part white now.)
"Sub-Saharan Blacks are highly polygynous, and this resulted in intense competition for fewer women and selection for very robust male body types. SS Blacks are more robust than Whites on all variables. Young Black males have higher levels of active testosterone than European and Asian males. Asian levels are intermediate to Blacks and Whites, but Asians have lower levels of a chemical needed to convert testosterone to its active agent, so effectively they have lower levels."
Source
In primates, the higher the testosterone, the higher their rank. ''Finding your place in the hierarchy is a basic part of primate life, and testosterone is tightly linked to the outcome of battles for dominance in other species.'' In black culture the most dominant male is the most domineering and rough. This would be why from the age of even 2, black boys will attack and even growl at others they perceive to be challenging them. (I have seen this myself, and the little white boy was just smiling at him!)
Even to look a black guy in the eyes is a show of superiority to him! Only the alpha male looks a male in the eye, all others who are from less dominating positions must look down. In all dark countries they look down to superiors, just as monkeys do. In all white countries they are equals and maintain eye contact out of respect and confidence.
Everything is a competition to black men! Which is why they dominate in violent sports. Are dominating/controlling mates (with consequently abysmal divorce rates if they even get married, and the rest of the time are single), and are bullies in school. This has led to white flight from public schools, as I showed in my post here.
"Male dominance status is not a simple function of aggressiveness, but acquisition and maintenance of high dominance rank often involves frequent aggression, and testosterone has been considered the quintessential physiological moderator of such behavior. Testosterone can alter both neurological and musculoskeletal functions."
Source
High testosterone is said to supposedly stunt bone growth, grow big muscles, strengthen bones and lower IQ. . .that is presuming we would without these "imbalences" all be the same. Only problem is, in Africa they are all short, stocky, have strong bones and a low IQ when pure. They also have dark skin. . .that is a little more then a correlation. Perhaps the causation of the high testosterone and the genes for those things are just naturally found in all pure blacks. . .as they are all things we see in the chimp-like, riotous ghetto blacks. (Starting very young, and with both sexes.)
It should come as no shock then that the blacks, in the time frame of their highest spike of testosterone, are committing 52% of the murders, though not even 13% of the population.
This need to dominate by the blacks has always brought on one of two things in history or now, fight or flight. The classic is white flight, less classic is an honor culture. You either adapt your behavior to the violence around you and survive, or you run away like a coward and show them who is the boss. (Them.)Considering the numerous features and bad behaviors of high testosterone males, not shockingly then, a much higher level of testosterone has been registered in young blacks, as well as many Hispanics. (Though likely not all, as many are a large part white now.)
"Sub-Saharan Blacks are highly polygynous, and this resulted in intense competition for fewer women and selection for very robust male body types. SS Blacks are more robust than Whites on all variables. Young Black males have higher levels of active testosterone than European and Asian males. Asian levels are intermediate to Blacks and Whites, but Asians have lower levels of a chemical needed to convert testosterone to its active agent, so effectively they have lower levels."
Source
Some tests for the mixed races showed significant differences with whites, while others didn't. . .likely dependent on the sample group being screened for IQ or not. IQ tends to be low in those with high testosterone, causing some scientists to say that high testosterone lowers the IQ.
"Intelligent people have lower libidos and less masculine physiques. What hormone is responsible for both sex drive and masculine builds? That's right: testosterone. And two new papers suggest that testosterone may depress IQ."
Source
Of course testosterone may appear to "depress IQ", as testosterone is high in Africans, and IQ is abnormally low in all of Africa. . .
Again, they are avoiding the obvious, it is the blacks who are the ones with the high testosterone and the low IQ.
Testosterone doesn't change your IQ. Studies show it changes very little by diet or environment. . .it is mostly if not all genetic.
If IQ isn't obvious enough with this link, the brain size is another.
"Promiscuity [linked with high testosterone males] in a population correlates with larger testicles. . . There is a tradeoff between testicle size and brain size because both are costly organs – if more resources are invested in larger testicles, then there are fewer resources available for a larger brain. Also, brains and testicles support different strategies for the male to pass on his alleles. . . If females need male resources, big brains beat big balls. Of the three major races, blacks have the largest testicles and the smallest brains."
Source
Then there is head size, which is very different with whites and blacks. Head size is correlated strongly with brain size, which is also correlated with IQ. Have you ever wondered why they measured a newborns head?
There are many other both historical and scientifically proven links to lowered intelligence in the blacks, as well as violence via their hormones. There are many good books by scientists, just stating the facts. Here are two you can read online. Here and here.
So while many try to skirt around the racial implications of violence and aggression, fighting for the top position, ruthlessly is something that low IQ, testosterone pumped up minorities (but especially the blacks who are pure) are wired for, just as the chimp is. "Intelligent people have lower libidos and less masculine physiques. What hormone is responsible for both sex drive and masculine builds? That's right: testosterone. And two new papers suggest that testosterone may depress IQ."
Source
Of course testosterone may appear to "depress IQ", as testosterone is high in Africans, and IQ is abnormally low in all of Africa. . .
Again, they are avoiding the obvious, it is the blacks who are the ones with the high testosterone and the low IQ.
Testosterone doesn't change your IQ. Studies show it changes very little by diet or environment. . .it is mostly if not all genetic.
If IQ isn't obvious enough with this link, the brain size is another.
"Promiscuity [linked with high testosterone males] in a population correlates with larger testicles. . . There is a tradeoff between testicle size and brain size because both are costly organs – if more resources are invested in larger testicles, then there are fewer resources available for a larger brain. Also, brains and testicles support different strategies for the male to pass on his alleles. . . If females need male resources, big brains beat big balls. Of the three major races, blacks have the largest testicles and the smallest brains."
Source
Then there is head size, which is very different with whites and blacks. Head size is correlated strongly with brain size, which is also correlated with IQ. Have you ever wondered why they measured a newborns head?
There are many other both historical and scientifically proven links to lowered intelligence in the blacks, as well as violence via their hormones. There are many good books by scientists, just stating the facts. Here are two you can read online. Here and here.
In primates, the higher the testosterone, the higher their rank. ''Finding your place in the hierarchy is a basic part of primate life, and testosterone is tightly linked to the outcome of battles for dominance in other species.'' In black culture the most dominant male is the most domineering and rough. This would be why from the age of even 2, black boys will attack and even growl at others they perceive to be challenging them. (I have seen this myself, and the little white boy was just smiling at him!)
Even to look a black guy in the eyes is a show of superiority to him! Only the alpha male looks a male in the eye, all others who are from less dominating positions must look down. In all dark countries they look down to superiors, just as monkeys do. In all white countries they are equals and maintain eye contact out of respect and confidence.
Everything is a competition to black men! Which is why they dominate in violent sports. Are dominating/controlling mates (with consequently abysmal divorce rates if they even get married, and the rest of the time are single), and are bullies in school. This has led to white flight from public schools, as I showed in my post here.
"Male dominance status is not a simple function of aggressiveness, but acquisition and maintenance of high dominance rank often involves frequent aggression, and testosterone has been considered the quintessential physiological moderator of such behavior. Testosterone can alter both neurological and musculoskeletal functions."
Source
High testosterone is said to supposedly stunt bone growth, grow big muscles, strengthen bones and lower IQ. . .that is presuming we would without these "imbalences" all be the same. Only problem is, in Africa they are all short, stocky, have strong bones and a low IQ when pure. They also have dark skin. . .that is a little more then a correlation. Perhaps the causation of the high testosterone and the genes for those things are just naturally found in all pure blacks. . .as they are all things we see in the chimp-like, riotous ghetto blacks. (Starting very young, and with both sexes.)
It should come as no shock then that the blacks, in the time frame of their highest spike of testosterone, are committing 52% of the murders, though not even 13% of the population.
90% of blacks are murdered by other blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black. Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than vice versa”.
Source
Then there are rape stats. . .as seen here. Gang rape stats are an even higher gap, as it is not even on the charts to see a gang rape by whites, against any race! While it is common for the blacks to gang rape white girls.
Other abuse from blacks it towards their own kids!
Arrogance, aggression, dominance. . .that is typical of high testosterone, low intelligence and the black genes, which are genetically closest to the chimps. It is thus inevitable that when challenged, a black man or woman who feels insecure in their status (likely most of them) would seek to dominate a perceived to be easier, less aggressive, target then their own high testosterone race. . .Whites.
Source
Then there are rape stats. . .as seen here. Gang rape stats are an even higher gap, as it is not even on the charts to see a gang rape by whites, against any race! While it is common for the blacks to gang rape white girls.
Other abuse from blacks it towards their own kids!
This is a stereotype, but the many videos on Youtube that compare the parenting styles of blacks vs. whites (from the perspective of blacks!) make it pretty obvious, that there is no denying it, black "culture" (or more like their genes) makes for aggressive and abusive parenting styles. In fact, in defending marks left on a child of an NBA players kid from whipping, a fellow black stated that "Every Black parent in the South whips their kids." (The smart mixed ones leave the South.) This may not be true in middle class families, but when around the typical poor black mothers, I frequently hear threatening of whooping or beatings. Apparently though, they think beating their kids is natural, as it is also what the African and primate "cultures" do. And let me tell you, if I had to deal with their brats, I would be beating them too!! Black kids from the hood have no respect and are as dumb as a brick.
This aggression (as seen by the high levels of testosterone), is in both the male and to a lesser extent the female blacks (as well as others with color as the Hispanics). Don't think blacks don't see the differences in the races, they do, but they always seem to notice it in the opposite sex. Few own up to what their sex does, as that would implicate them, and that would take humility. . .something testosterone suppresses you might say.
For instance, the black males in mass claim the black females are the problem with America, and will often not date black woman for reasons due to testosterone. Saying the cause of their repulsiveness to the black men is:
- because of their attitudes
- because they shift their own blame to the black men
- because they don't listen
- because they have too many babies out of wedlock (73% of black babies are born out of wedlock) too much passion
- because they're too manly, side effect of testosterone
- are too materialistic, attempting to gain status of a white woman they overspend and shop too much.
- and self hate. Black men notice that they will dress above their status, use creams, straighteners, and even get nose jobs to look white.
While the black woman, who are even educated, are scrambling for a black mate (70% of marrying age being single) because of the truth of these statements. Instead of owning to their issues though the black woman will complain that the black guys are mostly in jail, while others say they "don't need no man."
Arrogance, aggression, dominance. . .that is typical of high testosterone, low intelligence and the black genes, which are genetically closest to the chimps. It is thus inevitable that when challenged, a black man or woman who feels insecure in their status (likely most of them) would seek to dominate a perceived to be easier, less aggressive, target then their own high testosterone race. . .Whites.
As a side note, interestingly, the term "gentleman" (from Latin gentilis, means belonging to a race or gens, and man, so putting it together = "belonging to a race of man". The word equates with the French gentilhomme ("nobleman"). It was a term used to describe a well educated man, from a good family line, who didn't need to work hard, if at all. Generally a white man.
Testosterone is more likely, at least in times of conflict, to be temporarily higher in those who are from the South. The rednecks of the South being much more likely to "chimp out" on you, then the Northeners. Which may be why they are said to be an "honor culture", and not as likely to be a "gentle" man even though they were white.
Source
To this day in the South men are more untrusting and ready to fight for their race, families or honor.
Not surprisingly in darker and poorer places white woman prefer more high testosterone or aggressive features in their white men, while in whiter and more civilized places the woman select for less aggression and testosterone.
This is because they theorize that survival depends on being aggressive when living in dark and poor cultures.
Whites who don't stand up for themselves are literally headed for extinction according to the stats.
Woman all prefer (according to the studies of high testosterone features in whites above) some testosterone, as they see a man willing to fight (instead of just run) as one who will be able to keep her safe from attacks and rapes. (Most of which come from being around the blacks.)
This is because they theorize that survival depends on being aggressive when living in dark and poor cultures.
Whites who don't stand up for themselves are literally headed for extinction according to the stats.
Woman all prefer (according to the studies of high testosterone features in whites above) some testosterone, as they see a man willing to fight (instead of just run) as one who will be able to keep her safe from attacks and rapes. (Most of which come from being around the blacks.)
So whites will either have to adapt and defend themselves as the minority population becomes a majority in the next generation (Examples of this fighting back today are found mostly in the South, check out modern examples for your entertainment here.), succumb to their woman being raped as shown above, their things being stolen, being forced to run away (white flight) or get depressed (and sometimes commit suicide) when they find out they can't make peace with and live by the golden rule with some people.
So, as would be expected of a victim, not perpetrator of the violence:
So, as would be expected of a victim, not perpetrator of the violence:
"individuals (particularly Whites) living in honor states (those with many dark people) are at an especially high risk for committing suicide."More on the differences between the cultures of the peaceloving Northerners, and the fighting Southerners here.
This quick temper of the Southerners could be also in part due to their black genes, as the vast majority of those who are passing as white (yet have black genes), are found in the South. Rednecks I'm guessing.
Apparently the rednecks admit they don't put up with troublesome ghetto blacks, claiming to whoop them easily. Saying they are all bark and no bite, as they are too stupid. Or so the forums strongly hint at.
Being part black, rednecks are genetically predisposed to act more like them in their stupidity and violence, but it may also be the proximity to the blacks, as environment and "culture" does corrupt.
Although, according to the above research,
"Laboratory research has demonstrated that men in honor cultures perceive interpersonal threats more readily than do men in other cultures, including increases in. . . testosterone levels following insults."
Maybe experience in living near blacks in the South has allowed some men to stay alive by being more aggressive. . .If all men were wise, they would learn to be quicker to perceive an "interpersonal threats". It is a learned response out of self preservation to be part of an honor culture as a white man. The real violence is, and always has been from the chimp blooded, testosterone pumped, low IQ, black race. As they mix this may appear less true, but genetics all trace violence straight back to Africa. . .something abundantly clear when you leave them to themselves in the pure parts of Sub Sahara Africa. (Almost all of which are in constant civil war. The map below depicting constant war from the time of independence from the whites. The red being constant, yellow only sporadic.)
Source
The most violence is from Sub Sahara Africa, those who have no Neanderthal in them, while having the rare Duffy blood. They are genetically so far from the whites they should be called a different species. In fact, I have linked the genes of the blacks and whites back to homo erectus DNA and Neanderthal DNA, and connecting the evidence with the ancient texts, I have made a pretty solid theory as to the origin of everyone from a few different species. Only one created by "God" though I hate to say. Check out more on that in my posts: Here and here.
Whatever the case, it should be clear now that violence and aggression is based in the blacks nature, not nurture. . .and peaceful blacks, who have a high IQ, are simply mixed blacks. Color is a poor indicator sadly, but the high testosterone features are more accurate, like low IQ, equated with poverty, as they likely can't get or keep a job. Think short and strong. Watch for dark young gangs, as the stupid violent males often travel together. (The peaceful ones, with obviously low testosterone and high IQ prefer to hang out with educated whites, and are generally more "racist" then the whites are against stupid and violent blacks.)
Stay safe.
Source
The most violence is from Sub Sahara Africa, those who have no Neanderthal in them, while having the rare Duffy blood. They are genetically so far from the whites they should be called a different species. In fact, I have linked the genes of the blacks and whites back to homo erectus DNA and Neanderthal DNA, and connecting the evidence with the ancient texts, I have made a pretty solid theory as to the origin of everyone from a few different species. Only one created by "God" though I hate to say. Check out more on that in my posts: Here and here.
Whatever the case, it should be clear now that violence and aggression is based in the blacks nature, not nurture. . .and peaceful blacks, who have a high IQ, are simply mixed blacks. Color is a poor indicator sadly, but the high testosterone features are more accurate, like low IQ, equated with poverty, as they likely can't get or keep a job. Think short and strong. Watch for dark young gangs, as the stupid violent males often travel together. (The peaceful ones, with obviously low testosterone and high IQ prefer to hang out with educated whites, and are generally more "racist" then the whites are against stupid and violent blacks.)
Stay safe.
That is the study you cite and yet nowhere in the entire study does it say that whites are more closely related to Bonobos or that Blacks are more closely related to Chimpanzees. The very suggestion is ridiculous and shows a lack of knowledge of human biology.
ReplyDeleteHouse-wives should not play at being a scientist on the internet.
www.nature.com/nature/journal/v486/n7404/abs/nature11128.html
The original article hinted broadly saying "The bonobo genome shows that more than 3% of the human genome is more closely related to either bonobos or chimpanzees than these are to each other. This can be used to illuminate the population history and selective events that affected the ancestor of bonobos and chimpanzees. In addition, about 25% of human genes contain parts that are more closely related to one of the two apes than the other. Such regions can now be identified and will hopefully contribute to the unravelling of the genetic background of phenotypic similarities among humans, bonobos and chimpanzees." Apparently the furthest genetically apart people being Sub Saharan Africans and Europeans, the second article added that in. While it could be the chimp is related more to the white and the black is related to the bonobo, as the hormones tie the chimp and black together, that seems unlikely to me, but what would I know, I'm just a lowly housewife who has spent 4 years of spare time researching this stuff. I might be wrong, and all the other articles tying the chimp to the blacks might be too. . .but either way, there is no link with behavior or hormones. If I was wrong, and you can show me I am, it is inconsequential.
ReplyDeleteI find your posts to be very interesting. I admire the passion and enthusiasm you have for the things that you've written about, notwithstanding the creative license taken. My interest in your work is borne out of a general curiosity, neither taking a position for or against any of the ideas that you espouse. I will disclose for the sake of context that I am a person of African descent, the descendant of slaves in this great land of America. In spite of the consequentially European heritage I have, most people would be none the wiser if I told them that that I was a direct transplant from some region in West Africa. I’m also an avid reader of literature including the bible.
ReplyDeleteYou make some very bold claims about the distinctions between whites and blacks and their historical implications. If everything you say is 100% true it wouldn’t bother me at all because heritage is not something anyone has a choice in. As I’ve grown more mature in life I find racial pride to be a very ridiculous notion. The idea that an individual can take pride and/or credit for the accomplishments of another person (whether in the past or the present) simply because of genetic proximity or shared lineage doesn’t really say much about the individual. For all of Albert Einstein’s contributions to modern science, none of his children turned out to be geniuses. One of his sons, Eduard was a schizophrenic. Puffing himself up on his father’s accomplishments would have done little to help Eduard aside from perhaps garnering more sympathy for his condition.
The recounting of historical events is notoriously subjective. In my opinion the subjectivity of history is inextricably tied to the desire or need for self-worth. In the absence of personal accomplishments some people create them by insinuating or fabricating a personal or genetic connection to some noble feat or notable personality (something Afro-centrist are often taken to task for while Euro-centrist i.e. virtually the majority of the scientific community, are rarely if ever). Although the truth has no agenda, people do.
If you are in pursuit of truth then I have some questions about your theories in light of the narratives used to back them up. For instance, if I accept your theories about the difference between races, the whites being closer to some unearthly angelic beings (being descended from ancient aliens or angels) and the blacks being lowly creatures of the earth created or bred as a slave race. How do I juxtapose these ideas with the overall theme of Genesis, which views the Nephilim (the mating of angelic beings with man) as a negative event? It was because of the union (of the sons of god and man) that the earth was purged of all life save eight individuals (Noah and his family) and a select few animals. Genesis 6:4-6
Also, you state that being a child of God is due to a genetic link?
According to the bible being a child of God has more to do with those who believe in the one whom God sent (The Christ) and who receive them into their hearts, not according to any genetic link. John 1:10–13
Lastly, my question is in regards to this perception of a more intense violent nature in Africans than any other race. I find this idea very interesting, considering that some of the first observations made by people like Johann F Blumenbach concerning the docility and childlike nature of the Negro. I’m curious to discover how African’s can go from being docile and childlike to violent raging beasts in only two centuries. Perhaps it’s all about how convenient the narrative is at the time? Yes the statistics about the number of violent crimes committed by blacks in the U.S. are for the most part true. However, I contend that the impetus for the disproportionate amount of violence is not due to high levels of testosterone but rather the fact that people living in highly condensed urban areas with little resources tend to become violent. You can observe the same thing in 19th century Europe.
ReplyDeleteBefore the European colonization of Africa, the Africans were very self-sufficient hunter gatherers. In this present Earth climate cycle, the interior of Africa is unlikely to produce any native engineers or scientists because the environment is just not conducive towards people doing a whole lot of moving around. Most of the energy is expended in just trying to stay cool. However, there is evidence of civilizations that existed in the interior of Africa thousands of years before the time of the great Pyramids. Before the great Pyramids were built, civilizations rose and fell in Africa. As seems to be the pattern (similar to the Mayans and Aztecs in South America) humans build civilizations and then abandon them for whatever reason.
In closing, if the truth is that Africans have not produced anything of value in the world then that is a truth I would have no choice but to accept. Although, I suspect that this isn’t a truth at all. Or perhaps like you I could find my truth selectively. For instance, The Greek historian Herodutus is quoted as such "Where the south declines towards the setting sun lies the country called Ethiopia, the last inhabited land in that direction. There gold is obtained in great plenty, huge elephants abound, with wild trees of all sorts, and ebony; and the men are taller, handsomer, and longer lived than anywhere else.” Also, the Greek historian Diodorus who says, Now the Ethiopians, as historians relate, were the first of all men and the proofs of this statement, they say, are manifest. For they did not come into their land as immigrants from abroad but were natives of it and so justly bear the name "autochthones" is they maintain, conceded by practically all men"
The whole issue with the New testament was a loss of information in the span from the books, and a dark age of knowledge afterwards. Thus, not having the original stories of the Sumerian, or understanding ever about the whole point of religion being traditions of a bloodline, the New testament became evolved and symbolic. Yet blood is mentioned on nearly every page of the Bible, as well the pure restart, "the second Adam", a genetically manipulated and implanted pure alien son of "God" was found in Jesus. (The star above the house where he was born ws a spaceship no doubt.) So the fact of his birth meaning salvation for Israel, to save them from their original sin of interbreeding seems obvious to me. Interracial marriage is about the worst sin in the Bible, and something that got you the death sentence at times. Based on my research, the effects of it are not only dire for the children of God, but not great for the others either. http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/07/love-who-you-will-but-should.html
DeleteActually, the mix of black hormones with white increased intelligence is a dangerous mix. Generally, like in the case of Gangis Khan, it makes for an angry, jealous child who fits in with neither the stupid of the typical blacks, not the smart of the typical whites. That breeds violence. The pure blacks in Africa welcome the whites as gods, and they rarely see them as a threat. This idol worship leads to white men taking advantage, and having kids with them. Which in turn leads to the kids taking leadership and in a rage against not fitting in with the elite, they get all the blacks to destroy what the white man had brought. Generally though, pure black populations are very docile. . .another word for lazy. That is, when their men aren't drinking or fighting for a mate. Lions are the same way. It is simply nature. The woman do all the work and even a lot of the scrapping in Africa. Males are expected to do basically nothing. So not surprisingly in America, it is the woman who are dominant, get jobs, go to school, etc. The only blacks who are smart and not in jail seem to be those with a high IQ from mixed blood. They will do what they can to distance themselves from the ghetto blacks.
The violence of the ghetto is not because of crowded conditions, just look at monkey behavior. One monkey is fine and cute. But when they get together, they will mob and rape and kill any in their way. Monkeys in mass are very dangerous, and yet they love to congregate. You never see white riots, because whites don't prefer to be in crowds, they avoid them. Intelligent people of any race tend to avoid mass rioting groups, whereas the monkey like poor blacks love it! The ghetto is filthy and dangerous, and yet they want to be around their people. It's in the blood to be poor and violent. Of those in jail, most of them have family members in jail, and thus scientists say violence is genetically predisposed. If you are from a middle class black family though, you are basically white inside and just fighting the black man outside. (I'm guessing that is your case.) Congrats of your win though, you are one of a select few smart blacks who have figured this stuff out and are honest. Please spread the word!
Sorry but the order got confused and the replies below are to you too.
DeleteSo if I were to Guess, you are an intelligent, reasonable Nigerian, with bloodlines tracing back to Jewish heritage (meaning white people originally). . . tell me I'm wrong but by my research I have found that the vast majority of intelligent blacks are transplants from either Nigeria or Ethiopia, and both claim to be Jews, and tie back to Solomon or Jacob. . .both of whom had foreign wives or kids with slaves. Something I will get into more in a future post I'm working on. . .
ReplyDeleteLike you actually noted, in the need for self esteem, many Afrocentrics tend to major of the genetic ties they have to someone of importance, in the case of a Jew with color, that is their white father. . .only they often don't realize he was even white. So they just say Jew. Have you noticed that most people claiming Jew now are dark? They are tied to converted dark people of the Khazar empire. The Zionist Jews are the only claiming Jews still that are Jews, the rest are only tied into being a jew by a bastard child or conversion for political reasons. Our own president claims to be a Jew! His dad was a Jew from Nigeria, traced to Jacob's child from a slave. The tribes from those children of slaves were not traced in the Bible, and were not the lines that the kings came from you might notice, yet when they returned back to their roots in Africa, they became kings there. To this day, the bloodlines that claim ties to Jews in Africa are the elite and have made a success of themselves wherever they go. (Generally seeking out their white heritage for schooling or mates if they can.) I get ahead of myself though.
Being a child of God, from the line of Adam has always been equated with the son of God title, so understanding that, in Genisis 6 when it speaks of the sons of God (white men) coming into the daughters of man (black woman?), I suspect it was a case of interracial marriage. Further evidence of this is the violence that ensued in the earth, and the marrying and giving in marriage. These mutts being a failure to the gods were to be destroyed, with exception for Noah, who was "pure in his generations". . .in other words, genealogy.
ReplyDeleteA lot of the misunderstanding about the flood, has to do with mistranslations of words, like all the earth, or all man, which generally only refer to Adamic people, or the location they are in. . .as seen in many other places. (I get into that in my next post. You might want to subscribe:) From a Christian perspective you can read about the original man of every civilization here:http://www.crutchercpa.com/adamcpts.htm
And from an Afrocentric position, you can see similar, but biased info of the original (not called man) here:http://israelseed.tripod.com/id28.html
Angela,
ReplyDeleteI'm not a Nigerian, Ethiopian, or a Jew. As I've said I am merely the descendant of African slaves brought to America hundreds of years ago. By the way, there is long history of riots involving a majority white crowd. The Boston Tea Party comes to mind for instance. Civil unrest is not exclusive to any so called race htttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unrest_in_the_United_States#18th_century_.E2.80.93_United_States_of_America_under_the_Articles_of_Confederation. Also, as I’ve mentioned in earlier comments, London in 19th century Europe was essentially a filthy crime ridden ghetto. I believe that history is the best teacher, that is, when seen through the lens of objectivity. Unfortunately, most people have an agenda and will therefore selectively choose how they view history in order to bolster their agenda. Just as I view Afro-centrist as being misguided, likewise the Nordicists, Aryanisms , and any other group trying to promote the superiority of one over the other. My personal observation is that in every race and culture there are examples of behavior unbecoming of civilized beings. The Europeans worshipped phalluses, participated in orgies, and performed human sacrifice, and perpetuated violence just like other groups of people. I have observed depravity in people of all races. Evil does not seem to be discriminatory about what form it’s manifested in. I’m sure you know of someone in your “white” circles, who has murdered, molested, or otherwise brought undue harm to another human being. The truth is neither black nor white, it just is.
Some of the slaves at the time of the slave trade were from the Igbo tribe, and were known to be mixed people originally. Also, 35% of those who were slaves got some white blood in America. If you have a DNA test saying you are pure from the only parts of Africa that are pure, then you would have an IQ that matches that part of the world. (70 or less.) I'm guessing around 100 is more likely, and maybe higher. Meaning only one thing is possible, you're a mix. If you want more evidence, we can look to the teeth, or color or bloodtype. . .
ReplyDeleteThere is truth in what you have said about violence being found in all races to some extent, no doubt. Some of which can be attributed to mixed people only passing as whites, like in London, and the UK, as well as the worst parts of Europe now that have mixing from the time of the Moors. The Southern states too, famous for their rednecks are tested to be most of those who are mixed, but passing as whites. Looking at the behavior of the whites in New England, and the middle states, where there are pure whites, and no minorities to speak of, the violence is so low it's shockingly different! Honor cultures are those where the people fight for the honor or safety of their kin, and the South is famous for very different acting whites, due to the challenges they have had defending themselves against the black crime. Black on white crime is a genocide! If the ghetto blacks don't murder the whites, they rape them, and make a mixed race, what we see in Brazil and every brown country. Tracing the DNA of the mixed in Europe we see it was nearly all black men who mixed with white woman when the moors infiltrated. We could call that raping, or we could say it was consensual, but that's where bias comes in. Just as the blacks who were slaves in America claim the mixing all came from white slave owners raping the black woman, it is simply bias that says that. If the attraction and rape rate then was anything like the proven stats on white on blacks now though, we can tell it was not only consensual, but a privilege for a slave to get a white man. So bias is inevitable, but we need evidence and DNA to help us translate all the bias going around from the Afrocentrics and Eurocentrics. . .although I got to admit, much as I don't like the way it is put across by some, I have not heard anything wrong about history from the "worst" of a white perspective. I keep looking though.
Who do you think you're to insult a whole race? Are you somebody special huh? Please take your hill billy, backwards, not with this century type of thinking back to wherever it is you cam from. You ignorant, uneducated woman.
ReplyDeleteNo worries, the foolish shall be enlightened in time. Until then, we must educate them.
DeleteHillbillies are mixed with black blood or their IQ's could not be so low, and they not be found in places where blacks are, and DNA companies say all the passing whites are. . .I am not from those areas, and have a high IQ. As for backwards thinking, I know plenty of backwards doctors, lawyers, geneticists, scientists of all sorts that admit to the truth of the stats, studies, hormones genetics. Did you eve read any of the article, or look up the sources?! Oh, I suppose a white man made them, so you won't believe them anyways right? I have heard that one weekly from some idiot black. News flash, most brilliant people are white.
DeleteFurthermore, if you hear from a smart black, he is ALWAYS a mix, even if he isn't aware of it. Here's the give away: pure blacks are found in mass mainly only in Sub Sahara Africa, where the average IQ is 70. So if you are on a computer, have descent spelling ("You are" is proper English BTW Simba, you might want to take an English class before making accusations of a blogger being uneducated. . .I got a kick out of that though.) and longer hair than an inch, you can thank a white man for sharing his genes with one of your ancestors and evolving your race. (80% now being mixed and civilized at least partially, even if having too high testosterone causing low impulse control and the inability to think when angry. . .which is a lot.)
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOne of the prominent problems of today in the world is that people of higher privilege (aka the white/Caucasians) feel the need to demonstrate such arrogance as if to act out the whole “why white supremacy is right and justified?” routine.. It is people like you who feel the need to cast the Black man as a ruthless animal. It is people like you who believe that God commanded the Black man to be persecuted as a slave and culprit; an outcast if you will. It is people like you who may have even implemented idiotic movements such as the KKK. How can a “fellow” human being continue to humiliate a race that has already been through tremendous trials, which are still happening today? YOU ARE PRIVLEGED. You say the Black man is violent and illogical. Who was it that made him that way? Who was it that came into his home and brought him to a foreign land against his will, with VIOLENCE? Why is it that people ignore the fact that it was the Caucasians that came into our world as thieves, deceivers, war mongers, and rapists? The crazy fact is that without Us here, your people would not prosper, or even survive. Slavery built Europe and The Americas to what it is today, so please don’t act like we are some type of atrocity to your people. However, I do understand that this is a free country, therefore permitting freedom of speech (which evidently includes the ignorant). You have demonstrated your freedom, so I have demonstrated mine. And I am proud to say that I am 100% Igbo, Nigerian. No, I do not know my IQ. But I can confidently say that I am NOT an uneducated, ignorant chimpanzee. NOR are any of my ancestors, especially the males.
ReplyDeleteThere are three things that throw out every single presumption you make: IQ, hormones and genetics. You can't judge an individual by the race, as 80% of blacks we now know are a mix. You can look at the studies of the potential of those with the average IQ found only in pure parts of Africa. And you can look to even the studies on the mixed blacks in this country to know how much different the pure blacks must even be, if the average testosterone is 15% higher in college educated blacks. The hormone Oxytocin has also been equated with trust, civilization, the ability for government, bonding with your own family and people and group. . .and the blacks are low in it by average, while the whites are high. When you see it in a big picture, the slaves coming over were even often the mixed Igbo tribe, and were indentured servants until the black men from the Northern part started rejecting the rights of the slaves to work of their freedom. A black man led slavery in America to be just as it is still today in Africa. Generally it is the smart enslaving the stupid who are only capable of servitude, as their IQ is retarded levels. You can't reason with a people like that, you can only protect yourself from them when they go on attack in a mob against those they are jealous of. Riots are a black behavior, just as monkeys do, and they are very dangerous. Bringing even the mixed to white civilizations was the worst thing whites ever have done, and yet, because we are stupidly naive and trusting (due as I said to our hormone Oxytocin) we believe the blacks will be just like us. Only the mixed blacks even think we are all the same I'll have you know. If you are under that impression, you don't know your roots. Read on:http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/05/all-about-africans-original-earthly.html
DeleteOh, and when you understand the complete dependancy of the pure black man you will realize that they are the parasite of the entire world, and as we all know, parasites require a host to survive. If welfare stopped today, blacks would hit the streets and destroy this country in a fit of rage, while whites would get a job, go live with family, or otherwise get sustainable. Blacks are angry chimps, as their blood proves, and their hormones dictate. The exceptions are the smart mixed ones, but even then they struggle overriding their blood.
Oh, and you would say that all whites are priviledged, but while blacks that are smart have a slight handicap in perception, if they hang out with whites, show themselves smart and calm, they will have no disadvantages but advantages. Affirmative action gives them more than any white man could ever get. I as a woman may be privileged in some ways, but I have it very hard in other ways. Less pay than a man, high chance of being raped by a black man due to desirability over any other race. Every race has their privilege, which they have rightfully earned. The blacks have high testosterone and muscles because of it, as well as inability to burn in the sun. How's about being thankful and go with your strengths, instead of entitled and bitter about what you don't have as a race (like an average normal or high IQ, equated with everything good). . .just a thought.https://alfinnextlevel.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/everybody-talks-about-low-iq-in-africans-but-nobody-does-anything-about-it/comment-page-1/
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete