"Separate but equal education policies allowed whites and blacks to share the same school systems. School districts were integrated, individual schools were not. When the federal government forced integration to be extended to individual schools, white people moved out of integrated school districts, leaving them to blacks. . . The advent of forced school busing was an admission to the failure of forced integration."
Source
After the government used school buses to force integration of different classes/races of kids, the kids went on strike. Why? Have you ever had to be on a bus with inner city blacks?
Source
"Jim Crow forced whites to sit in the front of the bus, blacks in the back. Southerners viewed that arrangement as a fair and equitable means of protecting whites from black crime, violence and "rascality." When Jim Crow ended, white people were effectively forced off the bus. For the most part, buses became segregated, black-only means of transportation. Whites not only found buses too dangerous, they also fled formerly Jim Crow communities for all-white suburbs. . . Jim Crow laws allowed whites and blacks to occupy the same space at the same time. Communities were more racially integrated with Jim Crow than without."
Anyone who grew up with one or more blacks in school has had to admit that they were always the ones who beat up on the white kids. They were the bullies. Many online have said that this was on a daily basis! (Never the other way around.)
In fact any school with more then a few minorities in general has had to ramp up their security. In my state it is quite telling! The government has recently given a huge grant to Virginia public schools for security purposes, as well as a free breakfast program. . .to add to the free lunch program. Only some schools are getting use of the grant, and it seems to be proportionate to the amount of blacks in the schools. The schools with the most blacks are getting the most money for security as well as charity to feed the blacks 2 meals a day, on the tax payers tab.
In fact, one site with demographics showing white flight has happened, and because of that the school lunch program and soon to be breakfast program, has gotten disproportionate use by that school, when compared to the country. . . the number of kids on it matches almost perfectly the number of blacks. No doubt the crime in those schools must be bad, or they would not be getting so much money to protect themselves and the kids. . .while the majority of the rest of the suburban schools got nothing. The test scores of those schools getting the grants also correlate with the low IQ blacks in them. . .
Source
In a school setting it is hard for blacks, because they are not in their element, and generally do poorly. The confusion between the ones with scholastic potential and the others without it led some to do testing to segregate into special classes, not unlike "achievement tests" today. Honor and special ed. classes being the result.
The old idea of "intelligence (IQ) testing" was strangely found to be more "politically incorrect" then the testing on what was actually taught in the class.
This was because the IQ test almost always segregated the kids into races. (It was said to measure potential, as opposed to learned skills or knowledge.)
The average tests being failed could be chalked up to learning disability, ADD, bad home life/lack of studying, lack of ambition, different learning style, etc. but there was little that could have more then a tiny effect on an IQ test, as it was said to be mainly heritable.
While the IQ tests showed a big intelligence disparity, just as averages for continents did, (something still denied or hotly debated and excused by the black community and few others), the same thing has been seen by the standardized state tests they do today. . .blacks are far below whites and Asians. Of course some defending the low IQ minorities claim the tests unfairly advantage whites and Asians.
This was because the IQ test almost always segregated the kids into races. (It was said to measure potential, as opposed to learned skills or knowledge.) The average tests being failed could be chalked up to learning disability, ADD, bad home life/lack of studying, lack of ambition, different learning style, etc. but there was little that could have more then a tiny effect on an IQ test, as it was said to be mainly heritable.
While the IQ tests showed a big intelligence disparity, just as averages for continents did, (something still denied or hotly debated and excused by the black community and few others), the same thing has been seen by the standardized state tests they do today. . .blacks are far below whites and Asians. Of course some defending the low IQ minorities claim the tests unfairly advantage whites and Asians.
The only thing a bit unfair is that for black kids (as opposed to whites) segregation lowered their performance in school and brought up the violence.
Other tests have shown a correlation with minorities and low test scores as well as bad behavior in school. The studies also claimed that a disproportionate number of the children with attention problems (ADD?) were black students. All of this not surprisingly, correlates with what we know of jails being full of those with a low IQ (and blacks) as well. More on IQ and it's correlations here.
IQ differences (which are generally equated with the wage you make) separate people of all shades into classes, naturally.
Race and IQ are both well studied, but cultural Marxists would like to believe it doesn't exist, or that it can be excused away, but the fact is it can't. Watch Race and IQ denial explained for more on that.
The schools in Detroit and Ferguson give a clear picture of the link between black violence and low IQ as well as other test scores.
Frankly, the white flight to private schools or homeschool is inevitable and not racist but a matter of self defense! (As well as trying to get a good education and not be held back by the behavioral and intelligence issues of the minorities.)
Whites try to forcibly stop this separation, in their push for equality and cultural Marxism, but it naturally happens. These days it is obvious in my area, as well as other areas with minorities, that the schools the white tax payers are supporting, are mainly filled with the future criminals and the illegal aliens. (You vote for that when you vote Democratic folks!)
Some still in the public system have gotten angry about the white flight towards homeschooling, saying it "destroys communities".IQ differences (which are generally equated with the wage you make) separate people of all shades into classes, naturally.
Race and IQ are both well studied, but cultural Marxists would like to believe it doesn't exist, or that it can be excused away, but the fact is it can't. Watch Race and IQ denial explained for more on that.
Whites try to forcibly stop this separation, in their push for equality and cultural Marxism, but it naturally happens. These days it is obvious in my area, as well as other areas with minorities, that the schools the white tax payers are supporting, are mainly filled with the future criminals and the illegal aliens. (You vote for that when you vote Democratic folks!)
While there is good reason for this observation, the real destruction is done by the minorities, and just becomes more apparent when the whites leave. Amazingly this liberal and often Afrocentric site had a very good article debunking this argument.)
This problem is sadly not only in the South, or even in the USA. For instance in BC Canada, the public school teachers have had such problems with the growing minorities populations in them (though you would not catch that being said out-loud or in the media) that they were on strike for many months, demanding smaller classes and higher pay to deal with so many "special needs kids", read "minorities". The strike made the kids miss 5 weeks of school on both ends of the summer, and due to "little understanding" from naive white folks or angry minorities as well as little support from government officials, the negative feedback seriously hurt the teachers moral, causing many to rethink the profession even more!
Some ethnic groups in Canada have even demanded that the government help them start and finance their own schools. (Which public schools are turning toward these days anyhow.) Some liberals have protested saying that "Canada's multicultural policy, as envisaged in the early 1960's, did not promote separateness. Early philosophies and policies of multiculturalism in Canada were benign. They were based on toleration and accommodation and harmonious relations between different groups and races. But multiculturalism in the 1990's seems to be taking a different shape. It has become akin to ethnocentricism." [They are calling for a] "segregated system of schooling based on children's ethnic heritage. This is the kind of system South Africa has now."
Yes, no doubt the minorities will in general have a poor education, worse teachers, and less resources, just as predicted, and just as in every other area of the world that they are in. . .but that is their doing, not whites.
So while integration clearly doesn't work for us whites, as we are seeing clear stats on where the crime in schools is coming from. . .having them separate from us, like in Jim Crow, hurts them. Is there a solution to safely teach those who mainly think that showing an interest in school is "acting white?" Is there any helping their culture of violence?
Will pouring more money into free majority black public schools help? Will say, 530 million to spend on added security, feeding them two meals a day, lowering the standard to make sure no child gets left behind and the like (all on the mainly white man's tax dollar) be the solution to the problems with the black schools in Detroit, as Obama believes? (And is set to happen.) Audits have already shown that 54 million dollars already poured into Detroit schools have gone missing, or were misspent. . .while they have racked up a 200 million dollar deficit!
Like Bill O'Riley has suggested below in the link, could it be that it is just a waste of money to try to teach the chaotic, poor and low IQ minorities who don't already come from wealthy homes (that could afford public schools), as they obviously have "no learning curve"? (Saying "Obama will bankrupt the country if he tries to throw money at all our problems". . .which could be translated "throwing money at all the blacks of Detroit". I showed in past posts that minorities and blacks in particular are the parasite of not just this country- the USA- but the world!)
This belief that an expensive education makes a smart person, who is less violent, is just wishful thinking on the part of a minority of powerful whites, all over the world. Or they pretend to believe it in order to get their vote. . .In fact in Africa they have seen miserable results with the free public schools whites have set up. Yet the humanitarian white nations keep pouring money into those free schools!
In Kenya alone "The World Bank expects to spend $100 million on education in Kenya over 5 years. The British are donating $75 million, the Swedes $7 million, the Canadians $6.7 million, the Americans $3 million and Unicef $2.5 million."
"Michael Kremer, a Harvard University economics professor who volunteered as a high school math teacher in Kenya after college and who has done years of research in Kenyan schools, said Kenya clearly needed both more foreign aid and domestic reform of its own education system.
Kenyan officials agree."
My own precious grandma was a teacher in a school she started in Liberia, west Africa. While humanitarians and missionaries want to make Africa a more civilized place by schooling those without potential, or teaching them religion, it's not just a waste of time, but it takes them away from work that helps them survive.
Without a guaranteed living being made because of slavery (a luxury to the Blacks who went to America) attending a school only makes the families without working kids more poor, and it unrealistically raises their hopes for the future. Yet more money is being poured into Africa to make free schools throughout the most depressed areas. As they have noticed in Africa though, herding 100 kids into a room and not even passing half of them from the first grade (where they only learn their alphabet and to count) is hardly what people would call getting an education. Nor will more money and smaller classes in any part of Africa help that, they have found.
Considering now what we see in Africa, Canada, as well as all other places they have studied that has a black population, there seems to be little hope of giving them an education, or ending up an equal multicultural society.
Noting the inherent inequality between the low and high IQ people, the school system is seeing problems they can't just ignore. "Data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reports that 63 percent of fourth graders perform at only basic, or below basic, levels in reading. Sixty-nine percent perform at these levels in mathematics. African-American, Hispanic, and Native American fourth graders perform consistently lower than their white counterparts."
This minority element is what accounts for "the dumbing down of America", and it is why compared to other white countries (first world nations) we are scoring lower and lower. While blacks. thanks to their high rate of mixed marriages are getting smarter. "Indicators of achievement on mathematics and science, such as the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) comparison of students in the fourth and eighth grades from forty nations (and twelfth-grade students from twenty nations), have revealed that the overall achievement of students in the United States is low compared to students in other industrialized nations."
Source
Yet they keep hoping that more money and programs pushed on these problem schools will change this "unfair" inequality!
"Since the 1950s, federal compensatory education efforts have tried to achieve equity in education with programs such as Head Start, giving preschoolers from low-income families a chance to start kindergarten at the same level as their middle- and upper-class peers. Other major federal policy efforts created categorical programs–such as Title I, bilingual education, and special education initiatives–to promote equity for children with economic disadvantages, language barriers, and physical or mental disabilities."
"A groundbreaking federal commitment, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and subsequent amendments, supports education achievement and equity by providing federal funds to states and school districts." Particularly those with minorities. . .
"Since the 1950s, federal compensatory education efforts have tried to achieve equity in education with programs such as Head Start, giving preschoolers from low-income families a chance to start kindergarten at the same level as their middle- and upper-class peers. Other major federal policy efforts created categorical programs–such as Title I, bilingual education, and special education initiatives–to promote equity for children with economic disadvantages, language barriers, and physical or mental disabilities."
"A groundbreaking federal commitment, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and subsequent amendments, supports education achievement and equity by providing federal funds to states and school districts." Particularly those with minorities. . .
Inequality being there doesn't mean it was not earned. This is something even the middle class and smart blacks are saying. "Courts, bureaucrats and the intellectual elite have consistently concluded that "gross" disparities are probative of a pattern and practice of discrimination. Given all of the differences among people, such a position is pure nonsense."
The public school system while giving little meaningful education, with low quality teachers, graduating the minorities at dismal rates, and making them college ready at even worse ones (culminating in getting bad jobs or being unemployed), as well as exposing the whites to a lot of violence, have been proven a failure of multiculturalism. In fact multiculturalism around the world has been deemed a failure by nearly all but our politicians. According to a poll done by BBC in Europe, 95% believe multiculturalism has been a dismal failure.
Because of the root cause of the failure of multicultural society, but multicultural schools in particular (being the poor minorities inability to achieve equality), it is obvious that the proposed reform ideas like tax credits and vouchers (for everyone rich or poor to use at whatever school they want) would actually make the problems worse!
I propose that either:
#1. we make school optional to the non native dark Americans. That alone would turn around the schools as ghetto blacks, as well as some Hispanics would likely drop out.
#2. and/or teachers could simply IQ test the kids, to make sure they don't waste time or state money on the ones with an IQ of below 90.
Or, we could just do what they used to do all over Africa. . .
#3. make all the public schools private and financially out of reach for all but the wealthy. (Homeschooling being an option for all, but only helping those with smart genes from smart parents. . .as IQ is highly heritable.)
A socialist country just doesn't work with poor and low IQ minorities. We just can't afford the free schools to be taken over by the minorities, who are not giving back in taxes.
Nor is it fair that whites have had to leave the historically safe, white dominated schools that they started and now continue to pay for, simply because the minorities account for 93% of the growth in this country!
The ones who started this civilization, and are still paying most of the taxes are having to personally finance the schooling of their own children, while the government throws away money on the education of other nations immigrants, who will (after wasting their childhood stressing out over school), likely end up as pickers, and burger flippers!! (Or unemployed.)
If minorities (who are now a majority in the public schools), want a free education, besides the self directed education the internet, and libraries can easily give a smart kid, and they believe they can compete for the good jobs in the future, based on a history of intelligence in their family, then they need to be wiling to foot some of the bill for it, as whites have done.
Down with free public schools! Who's with me?!
