Where did the "ancient aliens" that later became known as the gods of all the world's religions (said to have seeded earth) come from?
It seems that they came from "the heavens" or the sky, as all the myths agree, but did they really create man or even life on this planet, as the myths all allude to? Well, there is evidence now that life on this planet is older then the planet itself, (very interesting article) so it is becoming quite obvious, if it wasn't already, that the theory of the ancient aliens is well supported. As if that wasn't enough though, DNA, (specifically the RH- blood of the gods) history of the kingly bloodline, archaeology, (though some of it has been hidden), religion/rituals, (as discussed in my last post: How worship and church rituals started. Part 12)
linguistics, etc. all support the theory as well.
It seems that they came from "the heavens" or the sky, as all the myths agree, but did they really create man or even life on this planet, as the myths all allude to? Well, there is evidence now that life on this planet is older then the planet itself, (very interesting article) so it is becoming quite obvious, if it wasn't already, that the theory of the ancient aliens is well supported. As if that wasn't enough though, DNA, (specifically the RH- blood of the gods) history of the kingly bloodline, archaeology, (though some of it has been hidden), religion/rituals, (as discussed in my last post: How worship and church rituals started. Part 12)
linguistics, etc. all support the theory as well.
Just because humans on this planet were seeded by aliens from another planet though it doesn't discount evolution as a whole; I have not suddenly reverted back to my creationist days and believe that the world was created in 6 days, and is no older then 7 thousand years old! As scientists all agree though, micro evolution is a fact. We know that all life could have possibly evolved at one time or another, since the "big bang", if their environment demanded the changes.
The intelligence, (large heads; higher IQ) culture and advanced technology that the aliens brought to our planet though. . . as well as the RH-, white skin (which has not evolved because of more of a need for vitamin D as some would like to tell us) and sensitive blue or green/clear eyes shows that our planet was not the likely origin of the children of the god's/white man's evolution.
While cave living could have produced the big blue eyes, and white skin theoretically, no logical need or amount of time would have ever produced the RH- on this planet from what I can see. Blood would have no cause or ability to mutate anymore in the future then it does now. . .and the only time it does now is with a transfusion of an impure blood to a pure.
More then likely, O- was the only bloodtype for "humans" on another planet that was perhaps much older. Had the humans there trashed it, as they had in the movie Wall.e and came to Earth because they wanted to find a new home? Or did they simply see a catastrophe coming with a collision from a comet?
Speaking of cave living though, there is no doubt that the "caveman"/ape was within the realm of possibility on this planet, but it had a different blood type and RH factor. As we have no evidence of the pure bloodline/creation/children of the gods ever coming from the ape, (based on the pure blood of some of the Jews, the kings and even pharaohs) it seems highly unlikely that we share an evolution alongside the ape on this planet. . .unless from genetic splicing of two species, implanted into the womb that had our RH- blood.
As a matter of fact, the genes of the ape are so distant from that of the Neanderthal that they think they were completely separate lines. Yet, there is a definite connection to Europeans. . .not surprising since the Neanderthals had red hair, white skin, and large heads/intelligence, as well as the first sign of culture, long life, fire, tools. Maybe that's because they were the first actual humans, and the rest were simply apes/gorillas/monkeys, as the creationists clearly think.
Source
Other theories out there:
Some think that human life could have evolved separately, but still from earth. They speculate that maybe some of the most advanced people went away in space ships to a more distant and cold planet, to live underground for a time. Thus leaving the less fortunate people to stay on earth marooned and helpless without the advanced knowledge and technology of the elite. With these people left in solitude to live like animals, it is thought that eventually they would start evolving backwards to suit their primitive environment. . . thus we would have the dark cultures of Africa, and much of the world before the interbreeding with the white's came in. But again, a major issue with this theory is, where did the white people's bloodtype of O- originally come from?!
Another theory is that maybe some of Earth's future people made a time machine to go back in time. Through interbreeding or manipulating genes they encouraged evolution to speed up considerably from the apes, as we can see it did at the basic time of the Neanderthals. . . Unfortunately for this theory, the top physicist Stephen Hawkins says that there is little chance of ever making technology to take us back in time. A machine to take us slightly ahead in time has possibility, but back in time is full of issues. Let's just forget that little detail though. . .we still have to ask again, where did the different looks and blood come from if it couldn't have evolved here originally?
The most plausible explanation for the looks and the unearthly bloodtype to go with it, is that the aliens came from an outer body in our solar system, just like the Sumerian text tells us they did. (The 10th planet, which has since been reduced to an asteroid belt.) Another possibility is that they came from beyond our solar system and then suffered dire technological setbacks due to an unforeseen catastrophe and had to rebuild their technology using only the materials of Earth. Ancient Egypt shows evidence of their use of a three stage rocket. . .
(source)
which would indicate that their technology at that time was insufficient to navigate very far. . . but that is not an issue, as all the planets would have been considerably closer back when they came to Earth.
The real question though isn't where the gods (who were the basis of all the myths) came from, but where did they go. . .or have they? Did they survive, and if so, are they still watching over their creation/children/chosen people? Do they interact with and help them, answering their children's prayers. Or are they attempting to moderate their rule of the world? (As the elite bloodline has always been the controlling class, in every country of the world.)
It is said that:
"They interact with man through their dreams and in riddles, seeming to prefer inspiring from behind the scenes to any kind of direct communication. When overt contact is necessary, they assume the guise of the Virgin Mary, the Corn Mother, angels, kachinas, or whatever is appropriate for that culture. There is a strong circumstantial evidence for this race's continual intervention on a number of levels in man's development - from the crudely physical to the artistic, scientific and esoteric. They cover their tracks by using hypnosis or some unknown technology capable of clouding the memories of their visitants."
"It would seem that the 'off world' visitors reason for being here are little known at this time. It does seem that there is no hostile intent, being that if there were , we would have known it by now.
We can base this on their actions - They evade when pursued, fire only when fired upon, and despite unquestionable superiority do not exploit their advantage in any discernible attempt for
invasion or conquest. They are plainly 'unfriendly' towards military buildup and are monitoring our industrial and military capacity ."
"We do have abductions and contacts. One of the purposes of contact seem to be to establish ambassadors between us and them, the indications being that the 'offworlders' are in the process of gradually preparing our world for a more open relationship with them. Surgery of the abductees seem to be to assist the reproduction program."
It seems there is much evidence from eye witness accounts of the aliens (as many pictures and witnesses testifying of the aliens as there are of Africa existing. . . yet if you have never been there, you could be just as skeptical of either's existence.) and of their ability to get around in flying saucers.
There is much evidence also of their desire to contact some people at least. The ability to see and hear them though has notoriously been linked with the pure RH- bloodline, or those closest to the bloodline. Ironically, this ability has often been confused with seeing Angels/ Jesus and hearing "God's voice", or seeing a prophetic vision, which is probably why the people that are the most psychic are often highly religious, unless they become aware that the spirits they see or hear are the "dead" or waiting spirits of the alien creations and not their religious figures. . .although in most cases, they are one and the same.
With all the evidence for "ghosts", psychic powers, flying saucers, and aliens (at least the ones that are green and odd looking, and probably a slave creation of the blond and red headed gods made to spy on us,) why don't the creators of the original humans make their presence more widely known if they are still around? And why, with their advanced technology, don't they take over and fix the mess some of their creation has made of the world? Are they too far away to care anymore?
The myths consistently mention a place that they were said to walk with man in. It was "the Garden of Eden" in the Bible and "the Garden of the gods" in the Sumarian text. Scholars originally believed there was an original lower Eden, as well as a higher Eden. . .as I discussed in my post: The reality of Heaven and Hell in history, part 9 There we concluded that the higher or upper Eden was not the original, and was none other then the mythical Atlantis! We did not discuss the original lower Eden though. . .
I propose though that the original cradle of civilization or the "lower" Eden though would be a good starting place to finding the original gods again. . .but every biblical scholar that I'm aware of has speculated that all it's mentioned landmarks were lost in the flood, and we have no idea where it is! (Other then an "Angel" is said to be guarding it's entrance. . .)
Well, let's go back first and talk about this supposed global flood that was said to have brought about it's destruction, since many both Atheists and Christians will say that the flood was simply a myth.
As far as we can tell, as I discussed in detail in my post: The reality of Heaven and Hell in history part 9, the "Upper" Garden of the gods or garden of Eden/ paradise (otherwise known as Atlantis) was destroyed by "a cataclysm" (with a sudden rise in tide or quite possibly a global flood). This seems a likely connection to the worldwide myths of the flood connected to the wrong Eden though. . . so let's check it out.
In the ancient texts, the "kings, of great and marvelous power" of Atlantis, (some later known as "gods") were said to have had warning of this catastrophe, and/or somehow have even caused this by bringing a humongous spaceship into orbit. (What we call our moon today. Many say the race to the moon was about seeing junked or crashed alien gear on it's surface. If not though, why was their landing spot right by the spot that had the suspicious signs of past civilizations? And why did the public radio go fuzzy as they went to explore? If you watched the movie transformers, it may be a likely depiction of what really happened on the moon. . .)
It seems that at least many of these gods may have abandoned their city for a safer location like the space ship. . .leaving animals, birds, and reptiles, as well as their genetically modified human creation and the "son's of god"/half men, half Angels/giants to be destroyed.
According to a few of the myths though, (some of the) god(s) deeply regretted the mess they had made with the creation of man (mainly because man became interbred with Angels (as we see in many of the ancient texts including the Bible) and the surrounding dark skinned "nations" and wanted them-or were content to let them-to be all wiped out with the coming disaster.
There are many cultural myths around the world that include one of the ancient aliens/gods taking pity and warning a favorite of his of the coming doom though (the Bible puts it this way, he "found favor"). This man according to the Bible, was a pureblooded man, ( the Bible puts it this way, "pure in his generations") which, according to the evidence shown in my previous posts, seems to have been the bloodtype of O-.
Noah was the lucky man's name. . . in one language, but there is evidence that there were either many names for him and his family, or that the gods each had their favorite creation that they saved alive to seed a separate part of the world. The myths may have developed as being different groups of families alone because they believed themselves to be the only ones saved.
They simply may not have ever met up after the continental drift that was likely started or sped up by the flood, as the Bible spoke of fountains of the deep being opened up. And so the survivers future relatives never knew of others, and only wrote about their own histories in their later books. As these books were first totally dependent on the oral traditions, human nature would not be concerned with a family heritage not their own, so it seems very likely that the other groups in other boats, (even if originally known about) would have been dropped from the history of their people in time.
Besides the evidence of different cultures having different named people, and different family groups all making boats to be saved from the coming flood in their myths, there is more that makes me suspect this theory. The god(s), being historically very knowledgeable in boating, helped their favorite children build something to survive the expected flood. Later, with this knowledge of sailing, it is said that the ancestors of the people saved, emigrated anywhere boats could take them.
The intelligence, (large heads; higher IQ) culture and advanced technology that the aliens brought to our planet though. . . as well as the RH-, white skin (which has not evolved because of more of a need for vitamin D as some would like to tell us) and sensitive blue or green/clear eyes shows that our planet was not the likely origin of the children of the god's/white man's evolution.
While cave living could have produced the big blue eyes, and white skin theoretically, no logical need or amount of time would have ever produced the RH- on this planet from what I can see. Blood would have no cause or ability to mutate anymore in the future then it does now. . .and the only time it does now is with a transfusion of an impure blood to a pure.
More then likely, O- was the only bloodtype for "humans" on another planet that was perhaps much older. Had the humans there trashed it, as they had in the movie Wall.e and came to Earth because they wanted to find a new home? Or did they simply see a catastrophe coming with a collision from a comet?
Speaking of cave living though, there is no doubt that the "caveman"/ape was within the realm of possibility on this planet, but it had a different blood type and RH factor. As we have no evidence of the pure bloodline/creation/children of the gods ever coming from the ape, (based on the pure blood of some of the Jews, the kings and even pharaohs) it seems highly unlikely that we share an evolution alongside the ape on this planet. . .unless from genetic splicing of two species, implanted into the womb that had our RH- blood.
As a matter of fact, the genes of the ape are so distant from that of the Neanderthal that they think they were completely separate lines. Yet, there is a definite connection to Europeans. . .not surprising since the Neanderthals had red hair, white skin, and large heads/intelligence, as well as the first sign of culture, long life, fire, tools. Maybe that's because they were the first actual humans, and the rest were simply apes/gorillas/monkeys, as the creationists clearly think.
Source
Some think that human life could have evolved separately, but still from earth. They speculate that maybe some of the most advanced people went away in space ships to a more distant and cold planet, to live underground for a time. Thus leaving the less fortunate people to stay on earth marooned and helpless without the advanced knowledge and technology of the elite. With these people left in solitude to live like animals, it is thought that eventually they would start evolving backwards to suit their primitive environment. . . thus we would have the dark cultures of Africa, and much of the world before the interbreeding with the white's came in. But again, a major issue with this theory is, where did the white people's bloodtype of O- originally come from?!
Another theory is that maybe some of Earth's future people made a time machine to go back in time. Through interbreeding or manipulating genes they encouraged evolution to speed up considerably from the apes, as we can see it did at the basic time of the Neanderthals. . . Unfortunately for this theory, the top physicist Stephen Hawkins says that there is little chance of ever making technology to take us back in time. A machine to take us slightly ahead in time has possibility, but back in time is full of issues. Let's just forget that little detail though. . .we still have to ask again, where did the different looks and blood come from if it couldn't have evolved here originally?
The most plausible explanation for the looks and the unearthly bloodtype to go with it, is that the aliens came from an outer body in our solar system, just like the Sumerian text tells us they did. (The 10th planet, which has since been reduced to an asteroid belt.) Another possibility is that they came from beyond our solar system and then suffered dire technological setbacks due to an unforeseen catastrophe and had to rebuild their technology using only the materials of Earth. Ancient Egypt shows evidence of their use of a three stage rocket. . .
(source)
which would indicate that their technology at that time was insufficient to navigate very far. . . but that is not an issue, as all the planets would have been considerably closer back when they came to Earth.
The real question though isn't where the gods (who were the basis of all the myths) came from, but where did they go. . .or have they? Did they survive, and if so, are they still watching over their creation/children/chosen people? Do they interact with and help them, answering their children's prayers. Or are they attempting to moderate their rule of the world? (As the elite bloodline has always been the controlling class, in every country of the world.)
It is said that:
"They interact with man through their dreams and in riddles, seeming to prefer inspiring from behind the scenes to any kind of direct communication. When overt contact is necessary, they assume the guise of the Virgin Mary, the Corn Mother, angels, kachinas, or whatever is appropriate for that culture. There is a strong circumstantial evidence for this race's continual intervention on a number of levels in man's development - from the crudely physical to the artistic, scientific and esoteric. They cover their tracks by using hypnosis or some unknown technology capable of clouding the memories of their visitants."
"It would seem that the 'off world' visitors reason for being here are little known at this time. It does seem that there is no hostile intent, being that if there were , we would have known it by now.
We can base this on their actions - They evade when pursued, fire only when fired upon, and despite unquestionable superiority do not exploit their advantage in any discernible attempt for
invasion or conquest. They are plainly 'unfriendly' towards military buildup and are monitoring our industrial and military capacity ."
"We do have abductions and contacts. One of the purposes of contact seem to be to establish ambassadors between us and them, the indications being that the 'offworlders' are in the process of gradually preparing our world for a more open relationship with them. Surgery of the abductees seem to be to assist the reproduction program."
It seems there is much evidence from eye witness accounts of the aliens (as many pictures and witnesses testifying of the aliens as there are of Africa existing. . . yet if you have never been there, you could be just as skeptical of either's existence.) and of their ability to get around in flying saucers.
There is much evidence also of their desire to contact some people at least. The ability to see and hear them though has notoriously been linked with the pure RH- bloodline, or those closest to the bloodline. Ironically, this ability has often been confused with seeing Angels/ Jesus and hearing "God's voice", or seeing a prophetic vision, which is probably why the people that are the most psychic are often highly religious, unless they become aware that the spirits they see or hear are the "dead" or waiting spirits of the alien creations and not their religious figures. . .although in most cases, they are one and the same.
With all the evidence for "ghosts", psychic powers, flying saucers, and aliens (at least the ones that are green and odd looking, and probably a slave creation of the blond and red headed gods made to spy on us,) why don't the creators of the original humans make their presence more widely known if they are still around? And why, with their advanced technology, don't they take over and fix the mess some of their creation has made of the world? Are they too far away to care anymore?
The myths consistently mention a place that they were said to walk with man in. It was "the Garden of Eden" in the Bible and "the Garden of the gods" in the Sumarian text. Scholars originally believed there was an original lower Eden, as well as a higher Eden. . .as I discussed in my post: The reality of Heaven and Hell in history, part 9 There we concluded that the higher or upper Eden was not the original, and was none other then the mythical Atlantis! We did not discuss the original lower Eden though. . .
I propose though that the original cradle of civilization or the "lower" Eden though would be a good starting place to finding the original gods again. . .but every biblical scholar that I'm aware of has speculated that all it's mentioned landmarks were lost in the flood, and we have no idea where it is! (Other then an "Angel" is said to be guarding it's entrance. . .)
Well, let's go back first and talk about this supposed global flood that was said to have brought about it's destruction, since many both Atheists and Christians will say that the flood was simply a myth.
As far as we can tell, as I discussed in detail in my post: The reality of Heaven and Hell in history part 9, the "Upper" Garden of the gods or garden of Eden/ paradise (otherwise known as Atlantis) was destroyed by "a cataclysm" (with a sudden rise in tide or quite possibly a global flood). This seems a likely connection to the worldwide myths of the flood connected to the wrong Eden though. . . so let's check it out.
In the ancient texts, the "kings, of great and marvelous power" of Atlantis, (some later known as "gods") were said to have had warning of this catastrophe, and/or somehow have even caused this by bringing a humongous spaceship into orbit. (What we call our moon today. Many say the race to the moon was about seeing junked or crashed alien gear on it's surface. If not though, why was their landing spot right by the spot that had the suspicious signs of past civilizations? And why did the public radio go fuzzy as they went to explore? If you watched the movie transformers, it may be a likely depiction of what really happened on the moon. . .)
It seems that at least many of these gods may have abandoned their city for a safer location like the space ship. . .leaving animals, birds, and reptiles, as well as their genetically modified human creation and the "son's of god"/half men, half Angels/giants to be destroyed.
According to a few of the myths though, (some of the) god(s) deeply regretted the mess they had made with the creation of man (mainly because man became interbred with Angels (as we see in many of the ancient texts including the Bible) and the surrounding dark skinned "nations" and wanted them-or were content to let them-to be all wiped out with the coming disaster.
There are many cultural myths around the world that include one of the ancient aliens/gods taking pity and warning a favorite of his of the coming doom though (the Bible puts it this way, he "found favor"). This man according to the Bible, was a pureblooded man, ( the Bible puts it this way, "pure in his generations") which, according to the evidence shown in my previous posts, seems to have been the bloodtype of O-.
Noah was the lucky man's name. . . in one language, but there is evidence that there were either many names for him and his family, or that the gods each had their favorite creation that they saved alive to seed a separate part of the world. The myths may have developed as being different groups of families alone because they believed themselves to be the only ones saved.
They simply may not have ever met up after the continental drift that was likely started or sped up by the flood, as the Bible spoke of fountains of the deep being opened up. And so the survivers future relatives never knew of others, and only wrote about their own histories in their later books. As these books were first totally dependent on the oral traditions, human nature would not be concerned with a family heritage not their own, so it seems very likely that the other groups in other boats, (even if originally known about) would have been dropped from the history of their people in time.
Besides the evidence of different cultures having different named people, and different family groups all making boats to be saved from the coming flood in their myths, there is more that makes me suspect this theory. The god(s), being historically very knowledgeable in boating, helped their favorite children build something to survive the expected flood. Later, with this knowledge of sailing, it is said that the ancestors of the people saved, emigrated anywhere boats could take them.
"According to the ancient Lhasa Records, among many others manuscripts, the Muvians [apparent ancestors of the people from Atlantis] were great navigators and sailed all over the world - much as the Atlanteans are purported to have done and later the Phoenicians also. They were also reputed to have been great builders, too ... another thing the people of Mu had in common with the Atlanteans and later Israelites. . ."
Source
(Also the Egyptians, and later the blond Nordic gods/vikings. . .)
After the disaster/flood which sunk the god's paradise civilization, or the "Upper" Eden (Atlantis) the gods seemed to have either mostly died or wisely moved on to a safer location. . .but some apparently stayed and moved into cities in the mountains. Actually, maybe all the land they or their pure blooded creation (who were often called gods or sons of gods themselves) landed on originally only became a mountain as the water receded, after the flood. . .but before the flood it may have been flat ground. Actually the Bible says about as much.
Consider Psalm 104:5-9. Giving the gods praise wrote: "You who laid the foundations of the earth, so that it should not be moved forever, You covered it with the deep as with a garment; the waters stood above the mountains. At Your rebuke they fled; at the voice of Your thunder they hastened away. The mountains rose; the valleys sank down to the place which You did establish for them. You have set a boundary that they may not pass over, that they may not return to cover the earth."
There is actually a lot of evidence for their being almost nothing for mountains the further back you go, but I'll get into that later. . .Whatever the case, if the mountains hardly existed, and the oceans weren't deep, the statement that the flood covered the highest mountain suddenly becomes plausible. It may explain away one of the best rebuttals for why the flood couldn't have been global; it is said that there wasn't enough water on earth to cover the mountains of today, much less in how short of a time it took. Mind you, the Bible speaks of the "fountains of the deep being opened up", not just rain causing the flood. . .
Interestingly, core samples of the different elevations on the globe all tell a clear tale; the oldest land is the tops of the mountains, and it gets progressively younger as you go down towards the oceans. We also see many extinct sea life fossilized high up on mountaintops, either suggesting the mountains were low, or the oceans were very high.
"I am told that prior to the theories of Charles Darwin, most educated men explained the vast quantities of fossils as evidence of the global Flood from the days of Noah. In spite of what you may have heard elsewhere, animals and plants decay rapidly under normal circumstances, rarely leaving any trace for very long that they ever even existed on the planet. The mechanism for creating fossils requires unusual circumstances where an organism is buried before it can be eaten by other animals and bacteria. It is my opinion that the fossil record and sedimentary layers are best explained by a worldwide Flood."
Source
So logically then the first survivors of the flood would have lived on the mountains, either before the water receded or the mountains grew. . . The mountains ironically continue to do today by the way, even accounting for erosion! All of them. . . Which is easily explained by what I will discuss in a later post. . .
The Bible again confirms the mountain residences with Noah landing on what was later known as Mt. Ararat. To further confirm this hypothesis, mountain residences were mentioned in many different legends. In the Bible the mountain(s) of "God" is spoken of in many places. So we know that is where the gods (at least some of them) went for a time, but we no longer see them on the mountain tops. Though in many parts of the world temples still exist to worship them there.
So where did they go? Perhaps they returned to the original cradle of civilization, the "lower" Eden, that has nothing apparently to do with the destroyed upper Eden of Atlantis. Where could that be though, if it's landmarks cannot be excused away by the flood destroying it, and we see it as nowhere else on Earth?!
Here's a crazy thought, maybe the original Eden was literally "lower" then Atlantis, and in a hollow Earth! "How could there be a hollow earth you say? Scientists have long ago disproved that archaic thought, right?" Well, as this post is too long already, I think I will leave that for another post. . .so stay tuned for: Making sense of the world and how it works. Part 14
(Also the Egyptians, and later the blond Nordic gods/vikings. . .)
"When this blonde haired/red haired, blue eyed race survived the Atlantean/Mu cataclysm they emigrated to the distant Occident in their ships — under the guidance of admirals like Aeneas, Hercules, Phoroneos, and Hu Gadarn and, perhaps, Noah, Canopus and Jason — they settled in colonies along the way, on every coast and every island that looked promising."
The legends of the great flood and it's survivors are certainly founded in actual facts, or the stories wouldn't be found all around the world! Check out flood myths and you will see all the similarities.
The legends of the great flood and it's survivors are certainly founded in actual facts, or the stories wouldn't be found all around the world! Check out flood myths and you will see all the similarities.
Consider Psalm 104:5-9. Giving the gods praise wrote: "You who laid the foundations of the earth, so that it should not be moved forever, You covered it with the deep as with a garment; the waters stood above the mountains. At Your rebuke they fled; at the voice of Your thunder they hastened away. The mountains rose; the valleys sank down to the place which You did establish for them. You have set a boundary that they may not pass over, that they may not return to cover the earth."
Interestingly, core samples of the different elevations on the globe all tell a clear tale; the oldest land is the tops of the mountains, and it gets progressively younger as you go down towards the oceans. We also see many extinct sea life fossilized high up on mountaintops, either suggesting the mountains were low, or the oceans were very high.
"I am told that prior to the theories of Charles Darwin, most educated men explained the vast quantities of fossils as evidence of the global Flood from the days of Noah. In spite of what you may have heard elsewhere, animals and plants decay rapidly under normal circumstances, rarely leaving any trace for very long that they ever even existed on the planet. The mechanism for creating fossils requires unusual circumstances where an organism is buried before it can be eaten by other animals and bacteria. It is my opinion that the fossil record and sedimentary layers are best explained by a worldwide Flood."
Source
So logically then the first survivors of the flood would have lived on the mountains, either before the water receded or the mountains grew. . . The mountains ironically continue to do today by the way, even accounting for erosion! All of them. . . Which is easily explained by what I will discuss in a later post. . .
So where did they go? Perhaps they returned to the original cradle of civilization, the "lower" Eden, that has nothing apparently to do with the destroyed upper Eden of Atlantis. Where could that be though, if it's landmarks cannot be excused away by the flood destroying it, and we see it as nowhere else on Earth?!
Here's a crazy thought, maybe the original Eden was literally "lower" then Atlantis, and in a hollow Earth! "How could there be a hollow earth you say? Scientists have long ago disproved that archaic thought, right?" Well, as this post is too long already, I think I will leave that for another post. . .so stay tuned for: Making sense of the world and how it works. Part 14
No comments:
Post a Comment