In my first post of the series I discussed the many differences of the gene that causes red and blond hair, red, blue and green eyes, and pale skin, defining it as basically coming from some original Albinos.
While in the second post, I showed how the RH factor played heavily on the evolution of humans, and was said to have also originated with a few individuals. The people without the RH factor, or RH- people were said to not have had the monkey gene. As all RH- people came from RH- blood, and blood cannot apparently mutate, but just come from a parent with it, I thought we'd next look into the blood types.
Type O blood cells display neither A nor B antigens on their surfaces. O negatives can give blood to everyone but they can only receive it from another o negative. A, B or AB negative can take o negative blood.
We don't know presently where the A blood type originated, but the highest frequencies of A are found in small, unrelated populations. Like the Blackfoot Indians of Montana (30-35%), the Australian Aborigines (many groups are 40-53%), and the Lapps of Northern Scandinavia (50-90%).
Blood type B evolved as early humans moved from eastern Africa to the highlands of Asia."It's lowest in the Americas and Australia."
"AB- blood, is the result of your A positive and B positive ancestors breeding with an o negative individual. AB negative blood is the rarest, but it is simply a bi-product of interbreeding."
Barak Obama is AB-. While only less than 0.09% of people of African descent being Rh Negative, he is ironically one of the 5 percent of the world's Rh negative people. Genealogists have linked Barack Obama to John Punch, an indentured servant who went on to have children with a white woman, who eventually produced Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham’s lineage (read here).
Speaking of genealogy though, why was genealogy so important to some ancient groups? Why when we think of them as so primitive, were they calculating, and writing such things down in such permanent ways? You could say that it was because the bloodline was so special that there was cause to want to know about it. The royals for instance.
The royal families in Europe pride themselves on their bloodline. (Called the Merovingian blood line.) Apparently the red carpet they walk on constantly is symbolic of their bloodline. The royal families have preserved the purity of their bloodline by interbreeding exclusively within royal circles, even making laws that made it illegal to do otherwise. This is why originally marriages had to be arranged down through time for the royal blood line. The uniqueness of the European royalty bloodline could be tied to RH negative blood as it seems to be predominant.
Did you know that hemophilia is called a royal disease? The disease is caused by mixing the iron based hemoglobin of commoners with the copper based blood of the royals. Everyone knows that copper turns blueish green when is oxidizes, that’s why the copper based blood of the royalty is rumored to be blue in color! Other wise known as "the blue bloods." Red blooded is still in reference to common people. This could be the connection between color blindness and the royal family.
An interesting quote from Neil deGrasse Tyson makes me wonder if he is aware of different bloods: "I remember once, just reflecting when I was driving down the street after I saw a streetlight, "When that turns red, I stop. But suppose our blood was based on copper instead of iron? It would be green instead of red, so green would be a color of warning. What would stop lights look like if we had green blood?")
Source
An interesting quote from Neil deGrasse Tyson makes me wonder if he is aware of different bloods: "I remember once, just reflecting when I was driving down the street after I saw a streetlight, "When that turns red, I stop. But suppose our blood was based on copper instead of iron? It would be green instead of red, so green would be a color of warning. What would stop lights look like if we had green blood?")
Source
You might notice a whole lot of white skin and red or blond shades of hair in those pictures of the Tudor family. The royals all for sure have at least a recessive Rh negative blood. . .
So, is there anyone else with this line of blood? Or is it just the royals with RH-? You will be surprised to know, that there are a lot of famous people who publicly tell their blood type. These are some famous people I've found:
Actors and Actresses:
Dan Aykroyd (AB-)
Charlie Chaplin
Tom Cruise
Johnny Depp (B-)
Leonardo Di Caprio (B-)
Clint Eastwood
Mia Farrow (B-)
Morgan Freeman
Jennifer Garner
So, is there anyone else with this line of blood? Or is it just the royals with RH-? You will be surprised to know, that there are a lot of famous people who publicly tell their blood type. These are some famous people I've found:
Actors and Actresses:
Dan Aykroyd (AB-)
Charlie Chaplin
Tom Cruise
Johnny Depp (B-)
Leonardo Di Caprio (B-)
Clint Eastwood
Mia Farrow (B-)
Morgan Freeman
Jennifer Garner
Steve Guttenberg
Angelina Jolie
Brad Pitt
Marilyn Monroe (AB-)
Fox Mulder “X-files” (O-)
Paul Newman (0-)
Jack Nicholson (B-)
Robert Pattinson
Kristen Stewart
Musicians:
Marc Bolan
Kurt Cobain
Phil Collins
Jimmi Hendrix (0-)
Mick Jagger (AB-)
Janis Joplin
Lenny Kravitz
John Lennon (0-)
Other Famous people
James Dean
O. J. Simpson
Freddie Mercury
Einstein
Possibly, nearly every king, queen, emperor, pharaoh and president of the world have had this rare blood type.
"..If America declared its Independence from the European monarchies in 1776, how is it possible that every single president has descended from European monarchs? If presidents are democratically elected, (as we are told,) what are the odds that we would always choose members of the European royal bloodlines (Rh-) to lead us?" Well, considering the only candidates that get passed as an option for the white house have RH- blood too, it's really just an illusion of a choice. (Yes, Mitt Romney had AB- blood too.) So basically, Americas have always been governed by the same royal families that govern Britain and Europe This mysterious bloodline has and is actually ruling the world. This shouldn't shock anyone who's looked into the personalities of the blood types though. The Japanese people consider blood
type to be very important. It is not uncommon for young Japanese women to even select a prospective husband based on his blood type. This is because they see the blood types as saying a lot about you. And they do. . .
General personality of people who have type A blood
—Consider things carefully
—Can understand other people’s feelings easily
—Kind
—Good at hospitality
—Don’t express themselves in order to avoid possible quarrel
—Do things carefully and steadily
—Honor student types
—Big on cleanliness
—Can be calm with stress
—Strong on taking responsibility
—Hard workers
—Safe drivers
—Can understand other people’s feelings easily
—Kind
—Good at hospitality
—Don’t express themselves in order to avoid possible quarrel
—Do things carefully and steadily
—Honor student types
—Big on cleanliness
—Can be calm with stress
—Strong on taking responsibility
—Hard workers
—Safe drivers
General personality of people who have type B blood
—Like to go their own way
—Do what they want without considering other people’s feelings, rules and customs
—Happy-go-lucky and masters of breaking rules
—Optimistic
—Friendly and open their heart to anybody
—Not pretentious
—Afraid of being alone
—Pragmatists
—Don’t chase a dream much
—Like to play
—Love festivals and parties
—Have been in love many times
—Don’t get heart-broken over lost love
—Do what they want without considering other people’s feelings, rules and customs
—Happy-go-lucky and masters of breaking rules
—Optimistic
—Friendly and open their heart to anybody
—Not pretentious
—Afraid of being alone
—Pragmatists
—Don’t chase a dream much
—Like to play
—Love festivals and parties
—Have been in love many times
—Don’t get heart-broken over lost love
General personality of people who have type O blood
—Realistic
—Good at developing economic concepts
—Vigorous at earning a living
—Strong in face of adversity
—Romanticists
—Dream of getting rich quick, but actually take a steady approach
—Ambitious
—Go straight toward their goal
—Have leadership ability and often take care of younger people and people below them
—Very cautious
—Don’t care about small things, taking a wider perspective instead
—Devoted, but with a strong desire to monopolize
Source—Good at developing economic concepts
—Vigorous at earning a living
—Strong in face of adversity
—Romanticists
—Dream of getting rich quick, but actually take a steady approach
—Ambitious
—Go straight toward their goal
—Have leadership ability and often take care of younger people and people below them
—Very cautious
—Don’t care about small things, taking a wider perspective instead
—Devoted, but with a strong desire to monopolize
Perhaps it is worth considering whether an elite can be made, or whether such powers are purely in the blood .
Source
Some get scared that the Rh-'s (all originating in the O- blood type) that are in power, otherwise known as "the Illuminati" or "the elite", seem to be tracking the Rh- people. I choose to see it as less of a conspiracy, as much as it is just for practical reasons. If ruling elites and the wealthy are all Rh- then they would simply want to know where all their family or potential blood/organ donors are.
The majority of the world has rh positive blood though, (dominantly so!) which means that about 85% of the world is genetically more closely related to the rhesus monkey.
When you look at those dominantly RH positive "minorities", with a lot of the melanin in their genes, as discussed in my first of this series, and compare them to monkey troops, it becomes abundantly obvious there is a relation. From similar health concerns, and diet requirements, personality, as well as learning styles, and family or social habits, the monkeys and the minority's culture is nearly identical where ever they move from or to! This would not be true of those with any white genes in them necessarily though.
Statistically speaking, even accounting for all the inbreeding of the blacks with whites though, the differences between white people and dark minorities, generally, is huge!
- "Whites get more and better-quality sleep than people of other races."
- "The IQ of whites is 15 points higher on average then minorities."
- White babies are usually bigger, and tend to have a longer gestation then other minorities.
- White people, the original O blood type, (according to the book "Eat right for your type"), digest and need animal protein. Whereas, the minorities need a predominantly vegetarian diet. (Could this be part of the reason why the minorities have such high rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes and other health problems?. . .because few eat much for vegetables or fruit it seems.)
- The whites even get cheaper prices on stuff like houses then minorities. ("One theory is that sellers are “willing to accept a lower transaction price from a buyer that they deemed more likely to be able to secure financing and close the deal,” and that either due to assumption or reality, African-Americans and Hispanic buyers often don’t fit the mold sellers are looking for.")
- Whites have a low ability to jump,("White man can't jump.") and sports like basket ball show that clearly.
- Whites aren't generally as strong, as seen in sports like football.
- Whites have poor eyesight compared to minorities.
- and much more. . .
All in all, we can see that to treat the minorities as equal and the same, and expect them to fit into our white dominated society, is like trying to push a square block into a circular hole. Would we loose a monkey in a china shop? Would we expect a horse to act as a cat? No. It is not racist to say this, as all humans did not come from the same species originally. . .Or they would not have had the breeding issues that continue until this day.
They are different species no doubt, but only do they seem "inferior" or "bad" to the white person, when we expect them to act like a white person. . .and not like their close relative the monkey. If all minorities were back in their ancient cultural societies, mostly untouched by western or European influence, they would do fine. (Maybe this is why the apparent late push to tighten our borders. . .)
When Americans brought some of the Blacks here to America as slaves, (totally outside of their natural habitat,) they were treating them as their domesticated pets. (albeit work horses). The natural consequence would be a tendency to being dependent on the master.
That dependency as an adult would have to be humbling on the men I'd think, taking away any ambition they may have had. I believe slavery taught the slaves such a dependency, that they started having major issues with entitlement and aggression if not given what they felt was due them. When the slaves were freed and owners no longer were required to feed and house them, they were ill prepared.
The elite, realizing that they had made minorities incapable of taking care of themselves, have provided for them now with numerous state programs and thus have again became their masters in a sense. . . as white people had done before in every ancient society.
The kindest slave masters of the past, (Like a red haired Thomas Jefferson) did what all the past generations of whites did with their slave "pets", and interbred with them to make a hybrid, more capable of survival, in this land of whites.
Now because of much of that inbreeding in America, we are all much more of a hybrid of the two separate species, (RH+ and RH-) but we still see these differences in those with the strong monkey genes ,( A, B, or AB Positive blood types) and those with the white man's blood. (O or the negative factor.)
If all mankind evolved from the same ancestors (monkeys) then their blood would all be A or B or AB, and with a RH+, which would be compatible in the whole species of monkeys. Instead though we find that the gene that causes white skin, red/blond hair and blue/green eyes is a "mutation" that had unknown origins, unlike anything of this planet, and certainly unlike any other primate! Even creationists loudly proclaim this, as supposed proof for Adam and Eve. Saying: "The deletion responsible for converting an A allele to an O allele is not present in chimpanzees, and sequence comparisons between humans and chimps indicate this allele is unique to the human lineage, further complicating an evolutionary scenario for the origin of blood type O".
Source
To be continued. . .in:
Could the Biblical accounts of origins actually be right?! Part 4
Update: the obvious conclusion to the puzzle of Adam and Eve, would be finding "God", who made them in his image. This I have done, as you will see in my popular post: "Real evidence of God. Part 3" , as well as confirming that Man was actually the Neanderthal in: All about the hybrid Neanderthal named Adam. part 5 Leaving the only conclusion being, that those who have no Neanderthal in them, and can not be traced genetically to a bottleneck at Y chromosome Adam, must not be the man the creation story was inreference to. He was instead the original man on earth, the natural man, the homo Erectus. Read all about him, and
who is still pure Homo Erectus in my post: All about Africans, the original earthly species. . .Part 6
who is still pure Homo Erectus in my post: All about Africans, the original earthly species. . .Part 6
Wow! Just happened upon this and I have to say, your conclusions are some of the most racist I've seen in quite a while. Comparing minorities to animals and quoting studies about the superiority of whites without any regard to education and access to medical care is irresponsible. And this is coming from a white female with A- blood. If you don't see your comments as racist, you really have a problem.
ReplyDeleteI am male A neg this article is interesting. Racist but interesting. From some whites I have seen there is little difference from them and dog eat dog animals. From some nineties I have seen they are the understanding and compassionate. I don't think blood type has anything to do with it.
DeleteYou may be speaking of rednecks. . .http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/08/interracial-marriages-make-it-tricky.html
DeleteThis is racist. Guess I'm one in a million. I'm white ab+ 6'1" tall Sandy blond, blue eyed male. In this I should be Egyptian.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThat term means nothing to me but idiocy. Truth is "racist" if you do not like it, sorry. The facts are seen in the masses, not the individuals. Your reasoning is as dumb as the smart black who claims there are no racial differences between blacks and whites in IQ, because look at him! It just so happens that admixture generally accounts for things out of the stereotype. When you breed dogs you understand how behavior is genetic, as well as intelligence and looks. . .the problem is, you can not base a pure bred off of looks alone. You may be pure white, but you also may be mixed. Up to 30% of passing whites are mixed. Or you could have had a surgery and a blood transfusion, transplant, vaccination, etc. so your blood changed. This may be due to naive doctors or an intentional push to mix by our government. The truth of race mixing horrors is seen in genetics and medical studies, but the civil rights activists and cultural Marxist liberals are trying to peddle the propaganda that we are all alike, and thus equal. We are not equal, and never will be, and this is tied to what is in our genetics, which for blacks is anyone's guess. . .most if not all of them being a mix. Like with dogs, mutts can come out with any trait dominant, thus the bi-racials can be smart and stupid in the same family, can be white and black in the same family, and have different hormone levels, tied to different behaviors, stemming from the different races. This I have blogged on as of late. To hide the facts that are so evident in pub med studies about the average differences, and only going on the unusual black who seems just like you, is hiding the facts of race, to the great detriment of the masses. get an education please. My blog is a great place to start.
DeleteAnd BTW, Egyptian originally meant white, and they simply split off and became Asians and Europeans after leaving North Africa and the middle east. Those left in Egypt were the mixed people, so the now Egyptian bloodtype seems to be selection for dark genes, the whites rejecting those who are mixed. While in Africa they highly select for white genes, but in the black people, so they look black, and act whiter than they do in the middle east. The North Africans have actually been called black Europeans due to high selection and admixture!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteCultural Marxism is complete bs, made up by by mostly male WASPS who were threatened by things like liberal arts, humanities, minority human rights, female voting and lib, theory of evolution, socialized programs vs laissez-faire capitalism,etc. So they called anything that threatened thier power a commie plot TO invade usa,carried out by liberal jew college professors to turn kids communist. See mcarthyism,red scare.....
DeleteYou must be a conservative Christian to not compare blacks to animals. . .because it is believed that we are all animals by 99% of scientists. I only deny those without the impurities as not monkeys simply because they don't have the "monkey gene". I'm sorry if the facts seem racist, but racism treats people differently because of feeling superior to them. I believe evolution created us all, no matter our ancestry, so there is no superior or inferior, even if one has been around for longer and come from another planet. . .You base your judgment of me as racist on a lot of presumptions that are just plain ignorant and judgmental yourself. I am very kind to blacks, and most of my life planned on following in my Grandparents footsteps to minister to them in Africa. (Going on numerous humanitarian/missionary trips there before I got married.) My info I got was backed up by much study, that did include education and medical care, though I would love to have more that revolves around the bloodtype, as I suspect that is what accounts for the exceptions in the blacks. I know that it appears to be racist though, which is why I wrote: http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2012/12/variety-is-spice-of-life-part-2.html
ReplyDeleteHello Angela, this is Jason. I'm an African American male, I don't know my blood type but I suspect I may be Rh positive anyway. I read your blog and I don't think it's racist, this coming from a guy like myself who grew up in orange county ca during the eighties when it was really racist. Anyhow, I'm trying to learn and find out some information and educate myself. Yes, your blog would appear to be racist and if I had read it 10 or more years ago, I probably would have thought it was racist too. But now that I'm older, more mature, and wiser, I look at it as information. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jason. (Like your name BTW, just named my new baby that.) You sound wise, and as you are interested in learning more, you obviously don't fit into the category of purely monkey gene blacks. . .it's obviously complicated getting into genetics with dominant things and recessive things too. Color means a lot, but RH- or not only means what recessive gene got passed down, as those with RH- can occasionally be black. (And those with RH+ can be from very royal families and have red or blond hair.) So while stereo types may be often right for that reason, there are plenty of exceptions because of anciently mixed blood, and thus it will never be right to be presumptuous about races, much less treat them poorly because of that prejudice. (Which is what racism really is if you ask me.) Glad you figured out my intention was just to educate, but I bet it's not a popular blog post for most of your African American friends.
ReplyDeleteNo, I'm the only one that would be interested in this type of information. I'm the one that tries to educate and inform my friends and family, they think I'm crazy, but I don't care. I feel I'm doing my job to pass around information that appears to be factual and truthful, then I wash my hands because I know I had good intentions anyway. I don't give up though, I try to get through to my friends and family. Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. Question?? How do I go about getting my blood test in a safe way in order to find out my blood type is?? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteWell, good for you. As for testing, just sign up to give blood, and they test that there. I'm pretty sure they either write it on your card if you become a regular, or they are just going to tell you.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteI'm sorry, but closeminded people are not allowed on my blog. Calling names and trying to make yourself feel better by claiming a history that is only due to admixture of high IQ white genes is only making you look worse. No pure black, with an average IQ of 54 is capable of civilization or ruling anyone, including themselves! If this were not true, explain to me why the Australian Aboriginals, the purest blacks in the world are hunter gatherers, and live like animals on protected reserves, cannibalistic and so stupid no one tries to teach them anything! They have an IQ of 54, and are only 20% pure, as opposed to the rest of the blacks who are pretty much 100% mixed, and by average 13-20% European, with the IQ average raising with the admixture average. The facts are facts, and stupid people can deny them all they want, but it has noting to do with hate, just history and genetics, which I have blogged on more as of late. This is the tip of the iceburg of the science on racial differences!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThanks for letting me know. Which blood bank do you suggest?
ReplyDeleteDude get a blood test done and then you will know for a certainty! I'm A+ :)
DeleteJason The red cross or a Walk in clinic. There's one called Doctors in Carlsbad CA. I know because I was treated there before and their nice. :)
DeleteWowwwwwwww this is amazing, considering the social conditioning of people in this era lol Thank you for putting your energy into this. I have O+ have you done any reports on my bloodline?
ReplyDeleteI am not personally affiliated with one jwwds01 :) and am not even heavy enough to donate myself, but my hubby is happy with the red cross. (Donating today as a matter of fact.) Any should be fine though I would think, just make sure they will tell you the results after they come in.
ReplyDeleteHmm, I'm not sure what "considering the social conditioning of people in this era" is suppose to mean peacersvp. . .Like that I'm not being socially cooth to write this per chance? Well, you may be right there, but I am just a blunt sort of person who has never cared to be normal. Anyways, thanks for appreciating the hard work I put into this post, and the whole series, which I hope you have also checked out, or will. . .
ReplyDeleteAs for your question, no I haven't done anymore studies on your exact bloodtype, but I don't feel it's really needed. I'm pretty sure O- was the original bloodtype, and the RH+ was just a sign that it got mixed (genetically spliced or otherwise) with something else on the planet that was more dominant. (Sometimes the RH- gene is so strong the mixing is not dominant apparently though, as in the case of Obama.) So your bloodtype and mine is getting more and more common, but could still possibly produce an RH- offspring, depending on who we combine our genes with. Overall though, it's pretty unlikely, so thus kind of boring to study IMO.
Obviously you do feel that you are of a superior race from your overtly biased statements. The only group of people on this planet with an over abundance of recessive genes are of European descent who are the MINORITY group on this planet. It is this group that has produced/backed and/or engineered the suffering of the MAJORITY on this planet. Please spend some time reading REAL history and you will receive TRUE enlightenment. Your ideology mirrors that of your predecessors; Hitler, Orthodox Jews, Jihadists, White Supremacist, et. al. No one is on this planet by accident. Everyone has a purpose either positive or negative. If you want to help people, see and treat them as you treat yourself. Try loving everyone you meet instead of focusing on perceived differences. Read real histories of people who do not look like. First, read your own real history and you will discover 2 things: people who live in glass houses should never throw stones and we all need each other.
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading
Ahh, always refreshing to hear from the religious bigots. . .glad to see some read my blog. Bigot I'm sure of, religious, I presume by some of the wording, and the fact that you don't understand my post. Ironically you don't see how I actually agree with your premise, but not your conclusion. You are judging me harshly, but not yourself. . . as is common. You see, you call me ignorant of history and believe I'm for white supremacy and the support of the ones in power doing the damage to the rest of the world, whereas I am not! I have a different take on things, as everyone does, but I do not condone the actions of the past racist dictators and groups. Some, (being the "gods") may have originally had the "right" to keep their creation "pure" and thus set them apart for themselves, but that too wasn't very ethical or even healthy, as it stopped natural diversity. Just as it isn't best to sever the gene pool of dogs and only allow select breeding, so the pure Rh- was found to have issues. . .at least on this planet. In that sense we can see that the pure blooded are actually prone to problems, and those are mainly due to the incompatibility with their environment. As time passes, they are adapting, and diversifying along with blending, and so while being the natural born leaders the crowd is being more like them, and filled with more competition. That is evolution, but as you claim that "Everyone has a purpose either positive or negative." You apparently are a black and white person who doesn't understand how the different backgrounds can both be good. Is a monkey better then a dog, or vise versa? No, just different. I dedicated on of the posts in this series to that actually. Those of unbiased and intellectual minds appreciate this info, no matter their color, as you can see by the comment section.
ReplyDeleteFunny thing, I wouldn't say that studying history and genealogy makes a person biased, that takes beliefs and religion. . .neither of which I put any stock in. Evidence trumps, and my evidence is good. Disprove any of it, and you've got my ear. . .judge me harshly, and well, you can take it elsewhere.
Hello messenger of Enlil an Enki, I am Avatar to Kaya and believe you are wrong and Racist. I have O- Blood and I am not white. My mother is dark skinned and Indigenous to this world and she is O+. My father is Iberian and Haudenosaunee and he is AB-. How do you and your Nazi info explain that? I am Master of the Occult and Keeper of the Akash, I am a man of Truth and Honor. I know that type O blood is the most common in the world. A B AB is rarer still but exist. a is mostly Caucazoid b is mostly Asian and O is Polynesian and Indigenous. rh is a protein that blood creates, sometimes. If you're rh neg it just means you don't produce that protein. It don't make you special or better just different. what you type is fallacy. just another excuse to judge and hate. How can we as humans move forward in unity or evolution when we argue and cry about insignificant subjects? We as a species need to accept our differences and work together for a more evolved and advanced technological Future. Stop being a slave to fake stories that make you feel superior over other and accept the fact that irregardless of anything, skin hair eyes blood, we are all people sentient beings that deserve respect and acceptance no matter what.
ReplyDeleteI'm guessing that you didn't read this series in order. I explained the supposedly "racist" outlook in my last post. I agree that "We as a species need to accept our differences and work together for a more evolved and advanced technological Future. " Except that I don't believe humans are all one species exactly, we are hybrids. Now with interbreeding though, we rarely see the issues. Your thoughts about your bloodtype BTW are explained by the O blood being dominant, whereas the RH- is recessive. It would be evolutionary suicide for the RH- to be dominant when trying to blend the planet's blood with the aliens blood.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure why you felt it necessary to enlighten me as to your religious (?) standing, unless to just try me as to how accepting I really am of differences, but let it be known that you are OK with me. I am also OK with dark skinned people, as was understood by a black man above named Jason. My church is a Unitarian Universalist church, which accepts all religions and lifestyles. Check them out if you don't believe me.
What is your opinion of these people?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.pinterest.com/Queenlocks/black-natural-redheadsfreckles/
Are they abominations or are the apart of the serpentine bloodline?
My opinion is that if they were looked at from a religious standpoint, they would have been stoned for being the children of half Israelite, children of God, and half of the black nation. (Likely the first creation of the gods, made for digging gold.) This was forbidden by the gods, as interbreeding was not only difficult with the difference in RH factors, but was the original sin. Not that the fathers of faith didn't intermingle with the dark nations, but after Moses did it, and was told he shouldn't (promptly leaving his wife Zipora and 2 sons). I'm not coming from that position though, as I think the Bible is very immoral and racist. So, as your first option is not good, but Biblical, I cannot agree. Your second option is based out of ignorance, as the serpentine or reptilian bloodline is none other then the children of "God". There is a lot of confusion on those bloodlines, but from what I have seen, the bloodline originates in the RH- blood, and the O-blood. The serpentine bloodline is bunk, as it is based on a few verses and belief in Satan, who wasn't even invented until the New testament time! I seriously hope you aren't religious, and planning on stoning these half breeds!! Your question seems to not give an out for these folks. . .
ReplyDeleteIt is utterly ridiculous to make differences of people based on the color of skin. The difference in skin color is based on blocking or letting in of Vitamin D. You can't mate with a monkey or a dog. The human race is one race. Culturally we all think different ... no one race is smart if you can learn something different from anyone. You people trip me out... you want to separate people , well it seems every race on this planet has one thing in common... they are constantly looking for ways to separate from others based on visually cues. Every group on this planet thinks they are better than the next and will go out of their way to find any bit of information to prove it. If a mexican person was so different from a chinese person then they'd not be able to produce off spring. The color of skin only indicates where your ancestors are from ... nothing more. If the world was rascist then everyone would really have a huge score to settle with Europeans. How smart is it to leave you lands and invade the rest of the world. A technological advantage is only temporary and its not smart to make enemies of all the colored peoples of the world. A 15 point increase in intelligence should of shown that its better to make friends than enslave and have that history on your back. Good luck with expressing your elite color of skin. Taking an advantage because you have one is not christian. The meek shall inherent the earth
ReplyDeleteHi, I don't know if you missed my explanations in my post Racism and the RH factor part 2 here,http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2012/12/variety-is-spice-of-life-part-2.html but this addresses most everything you said. Further more, while some take that information and more to spout racism, or even religion, I have nothing but interest in origins for science and the sake of truth. I have since studied that the Neanderthal is the Adam and Eve of the white man (proven by DNA) and that the children of [the] god(s) were this bloodline passed down at first only through kings. The O bloodtype is this bloodline, but unless it's O- is not pure. O is still today known for it's leadership qualities in some countries still. We can see with the intermixing of the Neanderthal, that they are somewhat in every culture of the world, except the Sub Saharan African, and most in the European. The reason the world shouldn't be angry at the European is because it is their bloodline that seeded the entire world. The dark nation (s) were also a part though, but the gods that started them did not start them for their glory, or in their image. . .they were a basic servant race. Yes there is much evidence of this, as I get into in other posts if you read on. Look into the original creation story the rest came from, in the Sumarian text, and you will see that man's creation, is simple white man, the rest were a previous experiment. BTW, the gods were aliens called the Annunaki, as I get into later. This is much deeper then just a made up prejudice, it was a separate species that was forbidden to interbreed because of the Rh- and RH+ blood. (Which makes hybrids that are basically sterile.) I don't mean to sound harsh, as I am all for equality and fair treatment, but there is no point in treating lions like lambs, or blacks like whites. False assumptions have been the base of the prejudice down through history. Don't abuse any animal or even plant, much less "people" of any "race". I get into this later to do with unalienable rights of man who are created equal. . .
ReplyDeleteYou make a load of false assumptions in your comments, in regards to the Bible. That always interests me when people do such because it is usually the signal of very erroneous beliefs (the Nazis, Scientologists, Louis Farkkhan—or however that name is spelled, and etcetera) when it comes to racial dynamics.
ReplyDeleteFor example, yes humans have different species. You are right there. But a species is not a different race. Pitbull, shephered, doxon, or pug: all of these are still dogs. African, Asian, European, or American: all of these are still human. If they were different races, as you posit, there would be a butt load of complications. Why? Because you would have humans living alongside . . . not-human-beings.
Imagine how mucked up that would look.
Furthermore, I also find it interesting that your conclusions are rooted in what the Bible would call the "Mother of all Abominations" or the "Mother of all Prostitutes". Satan was a liar from the beginning, so it does not surprise me that his first, systemized lie would produce such a contrived theory as this. It is the daughter of the Great Whore, after all. But the real question is the same one that is placed before evolution: if you wish to posit that there were different races of men, you first need the evidence (where are this RACIAL differences, not differences of SPECIATION or ADAPTATION; and where the ancestors fossils of these humanoid, "others") and you secondly need to explain how these different races (essentially dogs alongside horses alongside crows) mated without dire consequences--because the world would look alot different if your alternate theory were true.
I'm pretty sure there are some other basic things at issue, that I do not know (because my science knowledge is not great), but hopefully someone with that knowledge will be able piggy-back me in a sense.
Before I go though, I would also like to add that I can seebthe fallacy of Democrat elitists in your post. There seems to be this running thread of removing responsibility from people for their actions and blaming it on external factors. Whether your compassion for my ethnicity is genuine or not, the way to help Blacks is to stop teaching them to fatilists--it starts with perception: God made man in his image, but if man believes that he is an animal, he will live one no matter what the truth.
Firstly, check this out to show the different species:http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap28.html then since you believe in God, you might want to check this out, which can be shown in their other places to be Adam, or at least Noah who was a pure son of God:http://www.icr.org/article/6252/289/ Then check out my rendition of creation with the whole picture. http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-story-of-creation-as-seen-by.html If it doesn't make sense to you then, check back as I have a lot more. None of which excuses anyone, but simply explains how it is to be expected. . .I do have compassion for all minorities, and use to think I could help them by being a missionary. I now realize that to butt in and try to get blacks to act white is neither needed or appreciated. They need to return back to their roots, have some pride in their differences and stop trying to fit in with and be treated the same as whites. Those who are mixed may feel more white, then black, and thus fit in, kind of, but it is an injustice to the resulting children to interbreed. IMO
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYour awsome and this is not rascism on her part its the facts of life ..and as u all know rascism is a huge issue...but its no longer just a color issue but a blood type issue with those that have the knowledge , due to science..angela ..u rock ..
ReplyDeleteYour study is about genetics, not race or colour so I understand your theories. My matrilineal blood group line is A pos, my father was O pos my children are all A pos and their father is O Neg (Hungarian). My matrilineal ancestors (23,000 in tree so far) are of strong royal lines including Norman French including Plantagenet and William the Conquerer, Stewart, Tudor and Queen Elizabeth II is my mother's 7th Cousin. So 100% European including 10% Viking, the rest is western and Eastern European. So according to your theory my blood group should be A Neg but it is not, it is A Pos. Ideas? My Royal links are direct ie I am the Gt Granddaughter of many kings.
DeleteThere is intermixing in both french and viking lines sadly. You may be European, just like I am, and even blond and blue eyed, like me, but one of your ancestors must have been a slight mix. Technically, mine too.
DeleteI am African American b neg I am not scientist. But how is it that whites started civilization. . whites can only create white. But blacks can create all shades & albino... In the beginning there was darkness. .black... blacks began civilization & in time environment changes & evolution other races were created from the black womb man.. ...
ReplyDeleteYou wouldn't even have looked into this if it weren't for your alien blood factor. White is in your past, or you would be positive for the RH factor, and in fact you must have just gotten it from a recessive gene or on one side like Obama. If you were black and had O-, then it would mean that you were pure blooded. You think that blacks create all the colors, but in fact the only reason they do is because of mixing with some gene from the Neanderthal, the Adam of creation. What is often said is that God created man, but then we use our modern culture to define the word. As a term, human or man was never implying the black race up until recently, and now through genetics we can prove that the bloodline of the blackman, found evolving for millions of years, was untouched and unchanged until they started interbreeding with the mysterious Neanderthal, made in the likeness of the gods. As we can see evidence of the original gods of the entire world always being depicted as tall, blond or red haired with white skin, it is not surprising that when using the female earthling's stripped egg, with the aliens sperm and growing Adam in an alien womb, coming out he would be white. We now know he was, which would not be likely if he were black. And if he were the creation that the Sumerians spoke of, then the dark natives of earth would have already been here. Thus both evolution is right, and creation (of man anyways), you just have to redefine the word man. Sorry if that's offensive but the previous homo erectus that made the Sub Saharan blacks are further apart from Neanderthal then anyone should ever be able to call the same species. Check out this link:http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap28.html
ReplyDeleteHow is it u believe whites began civilization melanin is in everything & least found in whites. Why would God create a man & woman lacking the key component that which is used to create all living things .To watch u sun burn... no maam people of color started civilization the Sun loves us & nourishes our essence of being extraordinary creatures. & whites the experimental specimen
ReplyDeleteLet's just say that the gene that started all the mixed races did start civilization, those of the Sub Saharan Africans. Tell me, why are they still living as uncivilized humans then? Furthermore, why is it that those with the Neanderthal gene are civilized? Better yet, why are those in the first world countries, those with the most of their genes, and those who have the whitest skin? I admit that there is confusion with intermixing, as the dark slaves followed the gods and their children around the globe, or were perhaps there to begin with, as they were native to earth. . .but the melanin race did not start the Neanderthal, as we can see in their color, fathers side, RH- and the emergence of the O blood. The color of the rulers of any culture at the death of it, or of any army of them will likely be black, but if you trace the blood, and the family lines that are big into incest because of the RH-, you will see that those who have the looks of the Neanderthal have always ruled the world. It's called the divine right to rule, as it was an inheritance passed from father to son from the time that "God" created Adam. And who did this bloodline originally rule over as they were not to make their own slaves? Blacks. Not saying it was right, but if it weren't for interbreeding, blacks would never have gotten where they are today towards equality. Asking for respect and fairness as another species may have been the better goal then equality to a hybrid of an alien species. Neanderthal blood is way older then the earthly African's blood from the homo Erectus, so consequently, they evolved to have bigger brains, and more technology. Not having them in your bloodline is seriously indicative of an uncivilized monkey. Thankfully for you, you have strong ties. Now you just have to admit that it is the reason you were even looking into this, because it is rare black person that does. Although you might note that there was one in the comments above that did, and appreciated the research I have done on this.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteHi Angela - I have a B- blood type and I have severe migraines. Being adopted from birth and a mother of two (one in college - the other in the last stride of his sophomore yr in HS), I have been racking my brains trying to figure out if there might be a genetic link to this nightmare, and if so, is there any way to proactively guard my children against this disabling constellation of incapacitation that has plagued me the lions share of my adulthood; since blood typing has often been rumored to be associated with all kinds of genetic predispositions based on (for lack of an MD in my list of accomplishments) sugars and other big words doctors and scientists use lol, I decided to take a google around and came across your fascinating project. And I gotta say. I'm impressed.
ReplyDeleteNot too many people can pull off what you pulled off. Assuming your research is accurate and the science is completely, utterly and 100% untainted, seems really interesting to me. But what really fascinated me was your analysis, and how you chose your words in opining and explaining the social impact relative to these data. Not your best work I am sure.
In the future, assuming you want to make some sort of a living doing stuff like this, I would challenge you to bring your A game. Your grandparents viewpoint and how you were raised in terms of values and socialization is meaningless and in fact, is a conflict of interest if introduced into a sterile scientific environment, at least from a scientific research and pure scientific findings standpoint. It is inappropriate and highly suspect to any scientist, medical doctor, and frankly any layman reading your literature to accept any posturing you make that connects two factual data points with such as the ABO origin, evolution/distribution of each, Rh factors, etc. to a sociological analysis supporting a value system. That's not what science is for.
Your readers are very interested in your research - but you are clearly offending all of us.
Taking that abrupt turn from sharing your findings about ABO into a form of false justification for one group of human beings to declare ownership over another group of human beings was unexpected. But when you took your personal prejudice and values passed down to you from your family tree, well, that is simply unprofessional. And rather short sighted, immature.
In order for your statements to be factual, Slave owners would have had their hands on the double helix back then, and a big MARKER saying SUPERIOR on one, and INFERIOR on the other, which they did not. And in order for anyone to respect your point of view, we would have to believe that had the black man been in charge, your research would be identical, only instead of laying out these data posturing yourself in the role of superior, you would associate yourself with the rhesus monkey, am I right?
Nobody in any legitimate medical or scientific arena cares about your posture against human beings who do not comply with your version of acceptable. I state with zero hesitation that based on the readership and the commentary I have seen thus far, which has been plentiful, you most assuredly do not rise to the level of most of ours.
And here's the difference - so take this bit of constructive advice - when we pull our research together, we do not opine, generalize or incorporate you specifically, or your inabilities to perform on even a pedestrian scale in spite of yourself when we publish what we research, test, and can prove to be true. That we can prove you to be ineffective may be a fact, but it is not a helpful one overall.
So you're impressed, but you think I'm offensive and unprofessional to state my background as a caring humanitarian towards blacks (in my attempt to step lightly in this very touchy subject), is that right? 90% of what you said is nonsensical to me sadly, so while you have some intelligent words in there, it is Greek to me. Sorry. If it was said to complement me in a backhanded way, I'll take it. If it was said to make me feel like less of a scientist. . .well, I'm not. I'm what is called an "armchair philosopher" or a visionary. I pretend to be nothing more.
ReplyDeleteOMG thank god???? im a white AB+ monkey girl
ReplyDeletewho couldnt giv a toss where any1 comes from
Lets jus talk break bread an Laugh
Thank you me 4 havin such a happy position
sistasue
Thank you for your even slight interest in researching your history. I figured no one with your blood would drop by this post. I am working on a post more directed at you black folks. . .or is that a presumption? I do love the lackadaisical attitude of blacks when it comes to many things us whites stress over. I personally have always had a drive to know my origins, because I never quite felt at home anywhere I lived. Come to find out, there is a good reason for that. . .and it's something that blacks will never be able to empathize with. Not that you would care to read more about that, with no invested interest. So enjoy your life.
ReplyDeleteAngela - well though out, investigated, and presented. The way you handle wannabe "smurt peepul" like MCR (I agree with you - that was a muddled sumpfing... too many prescription migraine drugs methinks), Quanterius Freeman (where in the HELL did anything about Democrats and Republicans come from ????? geez...) and some of the others was intelligent, balanced, and frankly... much nicer and informative than I could ever be. Kudos for being up on our true origin (Annunaki) and for the hard research (like chemistry and blood-related). I note that the less intelligent a reader is, the more they tend to go to the "you're-a-racist" card - also the idiot Christians... and by that I don't mean Christians who have intelligently and with great research decided to be Christians, but the idiots who simply parrot the pablum that's been force-fed them. Facts are facts whether people like them or not... not for them to be made out as some kind of racist diatribe. Thanks for an interesting read. I'm off to read your other posts now.
ReplyDelete"Thank you, thank you very much. . ." ;) You are so observant, about everything. I so agree! Unfortunately though, much as I'd like to agree completely, I have to speak in defense of two close and even genius friends of mine who have said that this is racist, they are not stupid, just close-minded. They believe it is wrong morally, so they can't bring themselves to even want to admit to, or support it, even if all the evidence is undeniable. And as a matter of fact, my most resent post shows not only proof of two different species, but that one was created by the gods. Pretty funny for an Atheist to admit to huh? Check it out!http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/05/proof-that-we-did-not-just-evolve.html
ReplyDeleteSaying something is "genetically close" or "genetically similar" to something else is a very dangerous thing to say, for example, we share 88% of our genetics with mice, and 85% with cows.
ReplyDeleteThe blood type to personality thing is pure superstition, the Japanese are very superstitious. It's comparable to a birth sign.
The reason people have different blood types, as well as RH differing blood is similar to the reason people have different facial proportions. Over time different groups bred differently to create different looking people. This is why there are groups of people in Europe who look differently than each other as a nationality, since they bred independently for a very long time.
Neil degrasse tyson's post is not accepting two different blood types, he is remarking on the color of blood in relation to our culture, not saying there are two different basic blood types (copper and iron based).
You don't seem intentionally racist, but your science is shoddy at best, and when I say shoddy, I mean really, really bad.
I am fully aware that the genetic separation between most life is insignificant, which actually makes scientists point that we are all the same even more ridiculous. The difference between one race and another is every bit as large as any two primate species, and the physical separations are every bit as wide as two dog breeds. (That are a huge exception due to selective breeding.)The time it would take for the differences in races to naturally evolve by selecting out for those different traits is much longer then the time they were separated, nor is there any logical explanation for the selection to have happened in most cases. The thousands of mutations that came about in only the last 6 or so thousands of years have no apparent use or benefit. All the scientists are doing in their presumptions are trying to excuse away what is obvious in genes, that a civilized man came about at the same time as the timeline of all the creation myths about the chosen people in God's image. Yes religion is evolved too, and very foolish sounding, just as many things in ancient civilizations are considered superstitious, but the more we understand the origins of them, the more we see how right they were. For instance, even if the Japaneze, the highest IQ people are superstitious about the bloodtypes, we know the most ancient bloodtypes originated in Africa, and are still found in the purest people without white in them. O blood is and has always been associated with the white people, from the time of the Neanderthal. To this day, the blacks who are O blooded are a mix. Bloodtypes are only confusing with time and mixing, but the originals would always have the character traits that go with the species. . .either homo erectus or Neanderthal. . .
ReplyDeleteThe belief that certain characteristics are bred into a people group from only a few thousand years ago is based in sheer speculation. I am not aware of any groups in Europe that have selected for different looks, but they were invaded by the Moors from Africa, and based on the Y chromosome we know that the males raped or married a lot of white woman. This is not really a shock as when those two cultures are side by side the males always highly select out the white females to rape or marry, whereas the black genes are almost never selected out by the white males. Look up interracial stats on black on white marriage and rape, and compare it to white on black rape or marriage. The differences show who is selecting for whom. As a matter of fact, there are only pure blacks in SubSahara Africa now, and they are selecting out all the mixed tribes even there!
As for the rest of your bias, we all have it, but I presume you have invested interest in discrediting me. . .you might want to check out a few more of my post that apply. http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/08/thoughts-on-interracial-marriage-who.html http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/08/why-are-black-woman-rejected-while_8.html http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/10/gods-chosen-people-race-or-religion_31.html http://passionateproject.blogspot.com/2014/09/racism-through-eyes-of-science.html
Pure unadulterated Garbage.
ReplyDeleteEspecially the part where I admitted how there are racial disparities that favored the blacks, right? Like: "Whites have a low ability to jump,("White man can't jump.") and sports like basket ball show that clearly.
DeleteWhites aren't generally as strong, as seen in sports like football.
Whites have poor eyesight compared to minorities." If you can't admit to the facts like DNA, bloodlines, etc. than you can't take the positive differences either. Cherry picking seems to be the typical response of black people, which I can only guess you are because of your denial of obvious facts (an either low IQ or high testosterone/arrogant response) and your name.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI am also not looking to offend, but sometimes the truth is offensive, as you might have noticed. Whatever the case, I have many civil conversations with smart blacks, of which I would guess you are one. Of course, that tells me you are a mix though. That and the fact that you have RH- and O bloodtype. While I use to believe it was pure from both sides to have O-, I have come to realize that any combination can come out recessively if you are a mix. Just as black skin or hair is dominant from the black side, it seems RH+ is too. So while it is rare, blacks, being mainly mixed now, will come out with both O blood, and RH-blood, and rarely both together! They can also produce a pure white child if they are both mixed enough, even anciently. Two Nigerians have produced white kids a number of times recently.
ReplyDeleteI am a medical doctor and I came across your article as part of a Google search looking for some extra info while studding for my Masters of Medicine course. I also have a Bachelor of Science degree with a major in genetic engineering.
ReplyDeleteI could only manage to skim down the page to realise that this stuff is mostly rubbish.
As a white male I also find a bit racist.
I don't know why I am actually wasting my time writing here but sometimes we all procrastinate I suppose.
I hope you are not too offended to read my say that most of the assumptions/conclusions are just plain wrong.
I hope that this doesn't put you off continuing your charity work.
Sorry about the USA education system.
If you did more than skim, and checked out the research, not being conditioned to automatically discount everything showing evidence of racial differences, you would see that I am right. You have unfortunately been indoctrinated by a lot of liberal teaching though, in being taught what to think, not how to in the schools of today. Like you said, the state of the educational system is pathetic in this country. This is because of the unfortunate dumbing down through the lowered IQ by integration with third world countries. Yes I am called racist for this too, but as I have blogged on lately, the evidence is overwhelming that all low IQ that doesn't stem from brain damage, comes from Africans.
DeleteBeing politically correct about truth never helped anyone, and I am ashamed of the brains of this country being too intimidated to tell the truth. Yes, you may loose your job, but if you want to know the truth, read the evidence without excuse. I could prove my point to any open minded smart person, and I have. . .regardless of color and bias. Truth is something we just know, even if we are fighting it.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteAngela -- thank you for your work and research .. But just end this senseless debate and metion Rhogam .. Everyone who has read into this knows for a FACT RH negative was NEVER meant to mix nor interbreed with RH positive .. a RH negative and a RH negative can only produce a negaitve,, and a RH positive can NEVER produce a negative .. So RH negatives could not possibly have derived from RH positives as they clearly are and NEVER were the same,, they were obviously created differently .. Again the after results of blood transfusions and interbreed births have mostly followed with horrible illnesses and deaths due to such differences .. I am a naturalist . I will NEVER NEVER allow my RH negative I.e "white" daughter to EVER nurturer the blood of a RH positive I.e "negroloid or other " thru the use of atrocious medicinal syrums like Rhogam to manipulate desensitize and force blood mixing or interbreeding. To stop the blood and immune system or God knows what else from reacting the way it naturally would/should is an abomination and down right retarted .. And our blood says it doesn't want yours- bottom line .. This is not a rasist post ... This is pure facts before the eyes.. Grow up people .. Take that peace love we all need to be one junk and stuff it !! Lllol !! Rhogam
DeleteThank you I appreciate your comment . I did erase one of them though as it was a repeat . I do suspect so that there is a bit of misunderstanding with what our age negative energy positive means today though . Simply because your daughter has Rh negative blood it does not guarantee she is pure white , as Obama also has Rh negative blood . Furthermore although only 30% of white people at very most are a mix according to, furthermore although only 30% of white people at very most are a mix according to estimates, most of them have Rh positive blood . Pure white people can get our H positive from blood transfusions and possibly other ways as well ! So while I am totally against race mixing as well , I would be horrified if your daughter could not marry my redheaded son simply because of your belief about Rh negative meaning they are pure whites. RhoGAM is often used with white couples , not just the Negro and white interracial couples . I say this stuff to make people racially aware of where the origins of these things come from , not to cause more divisions in the white community .
DeleteSv40 virus Rh Factor , Cancer causing virus purposely injected into 100's of Millions ,and the cause of the current longterm Cancer Endemic , The only connection to monkey blood we have is via vaccines and the sv40 virus now showing up in cancer victim tissue cultures , All Soft tissue cancers brain bone and thioroid cancers . i am o neg
ReplyDeleteI am dying to know where you got that info, because it answers a deep personal question of mine, as to why so many whites no longer have the original white bloodtype, yet are seemingly pure from black ancestors. (My family included!) If cancer comes from the vaccines, which come from monkey blood, then it seems that RH- people would have a very low or zero rate of cancer. Can you give me any proof for these assertions, as I would love to blog on this! Already I can say that just about everything physically bad for whites can be traced back to mixing races, but this is just adding fuel to the fire. I could do a long post on this!! Wait, all my posts are long. I've got to work on summarizing better.
DeleteAngela at the moment all I have is 6 yrs research and study on this subject ,one because I am O neg ,and 2 because Humanity needs the truth to be told so that needless deaths of innocent people can be stopped .
DeleteI believe that all we see today as far as wars and killing is based on Blood and its type . with negative blood Types ruling the world
Every President of the USA has been neg blood .
They say that RH blood was discovered in 1930 or so ,I say this is a lie to ,hide the real reason that people have rh blood , which is crimes against Humanity via the sv40 virus Have you seen the images of Mary Sherman ? her murder in relation to the sv40 virus ? https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Mary+Sherman&hl=en&authuser=1&biw=1242&bih=592&site=webhp&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMI_PTVrJTCxwIVpZCmCh2AFQcz#hl=en&authuser=1&tbm=isch&q=Mary+Sherman++Death
And How lee Harvey Oswald was involved with the person who ultimately shot him ,in searching for a fast kill vaccine ? Dr Mary's monkey , By Ed Haslam ,et search , and Dr Randy Tent Has what I think is an outstanding video on this subject as far as the sv40 virus goes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aHRMjVHggI i hope this helps and i am sorry i cannot provide proof for my assertions but i do believe i am a lot closer to the truth ,than the fact they try to convince us we evolved from Monkey's . Love your'e work .
I too have studied this topic (passionately) for 6 years! I don't doubt you, but I do think most people are ignorant, not necessarily devious. I believe the original RH- people were the Neanderthals, and that they have been very misunderstood and misdated. I believe the RH- is from off world, and started with the children of the alien gods, who made man in their own image, and with their own DNA, or essence, as the Sumerian puts it. This accertion too is not 100% proven, but it seems to connect with all history, including genetics of the Jews.
DeleteI see many angles on the RH- bloodline, and some say the people are magical, some aliens, some reptilians and some healers or children of God. In a sense, they were all right, just as Atheism and Christianity both have good points.
I don't like conspiracies and fear mongering, but I too just want history to be known, so we don't have to repeat it! Sadly, history has a pattern, and we are in another cycle of it, that shows an inevitable war coming. Eugenics or separation could avoid it, but due to the empathetic biology of the whites, and the low empathy and aggressive biology of the blacks, it will never happen. Until we know we came from seperate species, we will never see that we should seperate back into them. There are plenty of pure whites left on earth, and a few pure blacks left on earth, so it would simply be having intentional, wanted pure babies, based on seeing what pure stock of both are like. An intelligent and educated black would always chose sterilization over having a pure black child though if they knew what they were like. Furthermore, if civilization sterilized, (temporarily) all those dependent on the system, that would leave only smart blacks who are highly mixed, and whites. Consequently, no more idiots could reproduce, and crime would plummet and we would go back to a white utopia. It could easily happen, as all pure blacks are highly parasitic in nature.
Surely this is a joke blog right??
ReplyDeleteNo one in their right mind would believe any of this! I simply cant believe the garbage that's on here (nothing here has any scientific merit!).
Even if it is joke I find this stuff utterly offensive and I hope this page gets removed ASAP.
Whether or not you want to believe something is no indicator of it's worth, or the motivation of it's author. I will admit that this was one of my less scientific posts, and actually quite old. I know so much more now about the differences in races. This stuff is less accurate than it should be because of admixture in nearly every black person on earth. If it is offensive to hear that for instance the original blacks were as far apart as another species from the original whites, then I'm sorry, but you do not like truth. We know that the Neanderthal is the forerunner of the whites, and that the pure blacks from the homo erectus time, have no Neanderthal in them, and we call those two different species. . .so it is obvious that their children would be as well. The problem is terms and admixture. You want offensive, I'll give you offensive! Black, homo erectus was not considered human or homo sapien until they mixed with the Neanderthal in the middle east. Funny thing, the same is true of the blacks when they mixed in the middle east, and became the Ethiopians.The difference is dating and the confusions of carbon dating because of the nuclear war of the gods messing with the carbon. This is a theory, but it explains why Neanderthals are basically whites, and homo erectus are basically pure blacks. (To this day.) The more you actually study the genetics found in the Neanderthal, the more we see that the original O- white Neanderthal originated the stuff equated with civilization. So whether or not we have found them preserved in structures outside of shelters impervious to nuclear war (caves), having high civilizations or not in their small numbers, we know the Neanderthal potential, and that is due to things passed on to their kin. This is a post based on correlations, but they do equal causation, if you look more into it. As you can see in more resent posts, I have looked into it. . .have you? I find those who find my posts to be generally very intelligent people, from 1st world countries. . . but some young liberal/wishful thinkers and blacks occasionally find me too. Which are you?
DeleteProcrastinator Surely it is you who are kidding , seriously you have to be joking right ? this is a great site ,and as you can see has plenty of interest ,and no one in their right mind would discount this ,it really makes one think doesn't it Pro ! anyway you are entitled to your opinion like everyone but I just cant believe you can be that ignorant {lack Knowledge }and because you don't understand pay out on the Author .funny really you are joking surely ?
ReplyDeleteThank you. Please share it around, as I have no time or desire to do more with my blog these days. What I really need is a secretary or tech person!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYour blog is so interesting, got me thinking.
DeleteQuestion pls: How do you expalin the many Nigerians like me with O blood type? I am not mix, never in my linage have we been mixed (Nigerians are not mixed people...only very few). My husband, a German, former East German, never mixed, never ever mixed has A blood type? How is this? Please I am very much interested to know why. By the way am O- and Rh+.
Nigerians are highly mixed, whether or not you know it. The more they select for those mixed genes, wanting more white genes for say, high IQ, the more they get the characteristics they desire. The elite are highly selective in Africa, and being choosy, end up evolving. While the whites in America select for love mainly, and seem uninterested in selection. In fact, due to high empathy for the weak, it seems that the whites are more likely to de evolve, and select for weak elements. Besides the fact that most weaker elements would be pitied and give preference. Walk a dog without a leg in a wheelchair, and a white guy would be surrounded by woman amazed at his kindness, but a guy doing that in Africa would be considered mental or something, and no attention would be given in a positive way.
DeleteOff topic I know, sorry.
Whatever the case, selection brings the white genes to the forefront, like the O bloodtype, even though it was likely not dominant originally. The odds of a black person having both O and RH- though seems astronomically unlikely!
As for your husband, if he is a pure white, with blue or green eyes, blond or red hair, and big eyes and a noble nose. . .yet with A bloodtype, only a DNA test could say that. If he was unmixed though, bloodtype can change via transfusion, organ doning, being bloodbrothers, or contamination in other ways too. It is a curious thing in his case I must admit, and if you ever do a DNA test and find I am wrong, I would love to know if there was a medical procedure you can trace it to for him or his family. . .
Landsteiner (sp) Who came up with the Rhesus name worked for the Rockefeller Institute. So anything coming from that camp is questionable.Positive blood has a D antigen that protects people from Toxoplasmosis. Different bloods have antigens that fight off disease. Zero blood type O is susceptible to smallpox, plague and Cholera. Negative blood woman shouldn't mate with positive (D antigen) men due to Hemolictic disease. Rogam shot available since 1967. Royal blood is diseased. The in-breeding has led to hemophiliacs, and pyphoria. Intelligent people breed out.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteExplain ancient khemit..a high civilisation created by black people..disprove Robert Bauvals work 'imhotep the African architect' and 'black genesis'...there is all of historical evidence showing that black people were clearly capable of creating an advanced civilisation..like in pre dynastic egypt(khem). This idea that blacks wouldn't generally research this kind of information is just wrong..open your eyes..search khemit, search black civilisation, search black moors, Moorish science, I'm European so I'm no expert on true black history but I've seen enough to know that alot of history has been whitewash.
ReplyDeleteAll ancient civilizations in Africa tie back to Jewish/European roots, or have obvious ties to the middle east. Genetics show to this day that the area of those civilizations are highly mixed. Without a high mix, the blacks have an IQ of around 50. . .So these are the blacks that do not look into and research this kind of info. The blacks who read my blog are looking for it, and are generally smart. I talk to these smart blacks all the time who are fully aware that what I say is true. . .though they have a lot to lose. History has not been whitewashed, it has been black washed. Blacks neither had a history past 6,000 some years, or wrote it down. They were before the timeline of the Bible. . .but they were not considered human until mixed with the children of "God".
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThe RH Negative & Positive factors are fascinating aren't they...
ReplyDeleteTechnically no humans are fit to rule the lands, & I don't even care what the blood type is... Humans have been ruling Earth for hundreds of years & look at the state of things. As far as intelligence goes, I do not believe an IQ test can be an accurate method to measure intelligence as I firmly believe wisdom & experience can take a being way farther in life. I have never liked how humanity has become obsessed with which beings are more intelligent, I find many of the beings who label themselves as having higher IQ's turn out to be rather unintelligent as all they know how to do is rattle off info which when applied to real life situations makes no sense. Evolution is not about intelligence, it is about adaption & the ability of that species to fit in to it's environment ... Scientists should be studying which beings are more adaptable, which beings are able to survive, not who knows more about the controversial education system created by the very beings who have little to no knowledge of the very planet they are destroying. Not based off of blood type, as if it is only RH negatives running the world, they, in my eyes do not seem very intelligent, but rather power hungry addicts claiming false titles & entitlements.
As for the RH negative info...
You might never find out the secrets behind the RH negative bloodlines, it is kept secret for a reason, & I am sorry but Humanity is not allowed to know those secrets. Perhaps the answers you seek have always been there, but you are just absorbing the wrong info. Perhaps the only way to understand it is to get a microscope & study it yourself. Beings cannot always be trusted to tell the truth, especially when it comes to things like lineage.
The phrase “Blue Blood” is used to designate a person of royal heritage in many European countries. A popularly repeated theory is that this phrase describes a condition caused by a rare genetic defect that is carried by the royal families of Europe, due to their habit of only ever marrying other members of European royal families. This small breeding pool is said to have led to a tendency for the disease called “hemophilia” to be inherited by royals, and it is believed by some that this condition is the origin of the phrase “Blue Blood”. The other theory is that the pale skin showed the veins, thus they were given the names blue bloods. But all blood in all beings is blue in the veins & red when exposed to oxygen.
I do believe the Human race is made up of many different breeds of Human, just as in Dogs, Cats & Cattle... All the various breeds within the species can interbreed, just like humans, well that is except for RH negatives, thus this is where the controversy lies.
Perhaps RH negatives are from an alien heritage, or perhaps they are simply a mutation Nature has decided on. But for now, no one can claim to know for sure, we can all agree more studies are needed and anything put forth is nothing more than opinions based on assumptions.
Should Rh negatives feel superior to other beings, no, I do not believe so. I don't care if your superman, you Never look down on any other being unless to help them up, be that being human, dog or rat. We All serve a purpose on this planet & as the universe shines down upon us, can we not show our gratefulness by striving to see all life as equals & evolve society from there.
I am a being who studies human interactions with other beings as well as other life. I find it fascinating that humans are willing to label themselves as being different, be it by blood type, beliefs, sexual preference, or even color. I do not see too many animal species do this. I find it an odd characteristic humanity holds on to. The day when all humanity is willing to let go of things that divide them, only then will the world find it's peace & happiness.
I disagree. The day we except our differences and understand their origins is the day we stop comparing ourselves and start excepting our roles and pecking orders.
DeleteRace mixing and it's ramifications with health, intelligence and behavior are the things that have been the cause of all the division's throughout history! When people understand genetics, and how people races are like dog breeds, in the consistency of how they act and look, we will Be only content with purebreds if we want predictable behavior to match with looks. All pure whites have high intelligence, high empathy, and low aggression, the latter two due to certain hormone levels, as I have blogged on recently. Blacks who show these white characteristics are mixed and passing on recessive traits. Mutts are not desirable in the world if they are not intentionally selecting for good things and not just a product of rape or lust, which most interracial marriages or relationships seem to be.
Amazing work.
ReplyDeleteThanks! My blog is full of it, check it out and subscribe!
DeleteToo bad, the blood type of Caucasian or white people specifically are mostly A, not O. Hitler's blood type was A (I don't know the Rhesus though), and he wants to pure the Aryan blood by killing every single one who has blood type B in it. Go check out your fact straight!
ReplyDeletehttp://blog.mamashealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/test_blood_type-e1357865018345.png
As you can see, Black and Hispanic people have way more people with O blood type in it. Shame on you and your stupid pseudo-scientific bullshit! However, they have more A blood type compared to other race.
I'm O+, non-White and I act nothing like O blood type, and generally don't get along really well with other O's.
On doing more research I realized that there is more of a correlation with blood type, but the rest of it is more accurate.
DeleteYou have enough facts in here to be dangerous. And while you make some educated assumptions, they are still assumptions. They shouldn't be presented as facts.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThere are few assumptions, but I will admit that the blood type personality is more of a correlation now with admixture and vaccines.
Delete