Tuesday, December 10, 2013

False flag operations. . .for better or for worse.

This may be hard to believe, but the government actually stages terrorist attempts on it's own people! This is called a false flag operation, or a black flag operation.

  • Pearl Harbor was one of these times- 3000 dead and declassified government documents reveal it was neither unprovoked nor a dastardly surprise attack.


Military officials have confirmed that the government at least planned to stage a phony attack other times as well, and always to justify war.

  •  Operation Northwoods for instance was a proposal put together by the Joint Chief of Staff, designed to kill Americans to provoke a war with Cuba. Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted as it was rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

Please read the following ABC news reportthe official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. Source

Not surprisingly, we see a chain of "conspiracies" that happen next against that well loved president of the people (and his family). It is now a well known fact that the assassination of JFK was not just done by one man with an issue, instead, there is strong evidence linking the deed to the CIA! The corporate media is still pushing the myth that JFK was killed by a communist lone nut named Lee Harvey Oswald. But most of the American people are not buying it. Since the early 1990s, a strong majority of Americans has believed that JFK was killed by a conspiracy, and that the CIA had a hand in it.
The American people are right.

Overwhelming evidence confirms that the JFK assassination, like the assassinations and overthrows of so many of the world's best leaders, was a CIA operation. Bobby Kennedy his brother suffered a similar fate by getting too close to the truth, and being a good guy.
(Of course, small groups are regularly taken out as well, if they are deemed troublesome or uncooperative. -Those like the Ruby Ridge family, or the cult in Waco, TX .- The government in those cases got away with murdering men, woman and children because of the people owning and using guns. While guns may be our right to own, it seems more often then not, that "those who live by the sword/gun, shall die by the sword/gun." 

Pacifism is said to be "the wimps way out", and "not protecting your family", but if you have ever heard the stories of a pacifist group like the Mennonites in war time, you will know that it takes two to fight. Those who refuse to take sides get passed over by both sides most often. My hero is Dr. Who, a wise OLD man who hates guns. I guess I show my pacifist Canadian blood on this point "eh"?)
I hate guns and I hate war even more! So more on the all out war I promised in my last post;
have you ever heard of the "conspiracies" at the Gulf of Tonkin?

  •  On August 2, 1964, the destroyer USS Maddox engaged three North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats. A sea battle resulted, in which the Maddox expended over two hundred and eighty 3-inch and 5-inch shells, and in which four USN F-8 Crusader jet fighter bombers strafed the torpedo boats. One US aircraft was damaged, one 14.5 mm round hit the destroyer, three North Vietnamese torpedo boats were damaged, and four North Vietnamese sailors were killed and six were wounded; there were no U.S. casualties. But the second Tonkin Gulf incident was originally claimed by the U.S. National Security Agency to have occurred on August 4, 1964, as another sea battle, but instead may have involved "Tonkin Ghosts" (false radar images) and not actual NVN torpedo boats. In other words, they lied about this encounter, and Vietnam apparently never even fought back after being attacked two days before!

The outcome of these two incidents was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson, (the one who took over from Kennedy) the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by "communist aggression." 

The resolution served as Johnson's legal justification for deploying U.S. conventional forces and the commencement of open warfare against North Vietnam. This has recently been declassified and now mainstream media exposes the fraud. Whereas in 1964 the CIA used the NY Times and other mainstream media to spread the lie. Ultimately, 58,000 Americans died, hundreds of thousands were maimed and wounded and over 1.500.000 Vietnamese (conservative estimate) were murdered in Vietnam.

After that war people literally went crazy from what they were made to do and see. This led to the opening of many government run or supported insane asylums. They were around before then for sure, but they boomed at that time, as it was seen as a huge money maker.

These "hospitals" or "homes" would not just take care of these people, but make big money off of further torturing and testing with them. Science needed test subjects, and while grave robbing was the preferred method of getting dead flesh, many times they needed alive subjects who were not deemed normal. (Or even fully human with a "soul".)

Now, I believe in the basic goodness of man, and I think everyone intends well, including our often misjudged leaders. They inevitably have to consider the whole and are likely consequently as in the past, still thinking along the lines of eugenics to help mankind out. In order for the evolution, and even survival of humanity, they may feel we need to grow in some ways, while shrinking in others. Growing in perhaps intellect or talent, while only allowing breeding of the best of the best, and encouraging the rest to die out, or actively killing them. No one wants to kill or have war just for the fun or likely even the money of it though, least of all those fighting it! So how can those in charge inspire the right people to do their dirty work, and "kill two birds with one stone?"
 A wise man once said:

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

As war is a money maker, and a great population controller of the violent, naive and stupid who are drawn to fighting out of patriotic pride and bigotry, the government takes every opportunity to send us to war, even like I said before, setting us up. Some notorious recent ones I will mention now.

There is the Oklahoma City bombing, for which there exists a significant body of evidence of a shadow government operation. Not surprisingly it was used as justification for the enactment of the very provisions lawmakers had previously been found most constitutionally troublesome. . . the resulting 1996 Antiterrorism Act.

And now, the biggest false flag and conspiracy of them all…9/11.

Many well known and respected senior U.S. military officers, intelligence services and law enforcement veterans, and government officials have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report or have made public statements that contradict the Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11.

Over 1,500 Engineers and Architects have showed the impossibilities of the commission report. I have read attempts at debunking this "conspiracy", and each one has neglected to mention any key evidence, and instead point to how hard it would be, or how much we should trust the government. I challenge anyone to try to debunk these points of evidence:

1. Near Free-fall Collapse of three buildings (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7)

The laws of physics don’t lie. Even after a plane struck around the 90th floor of WTC2, there was still 80+ floors of completely intact, steel-framed structure below the damaged area. How would 80+ floors of intact steel-framed structure provide zero resistance to the “collapse”?

2. Molten Metal Pools, and chemical evidence of “Nano-Thermite”

There are many statements from firemen and other officials indicating the presence of pools of molten metal below all three collapsed buildings. The problem here is that according to the “official theory”, those fires shouldn’t have ever come anywhere near the temperatures required to melt steel into pools of molten metal.

Incendiary explosives in general, and nano-thermite specifically would have done that though.

3. Pulverized Concrete, Lateral Ejection of massive steel columns

If the buildings all truly collapsed due to damage from the airplanes and fire alone, then the “official theory” is a gravity based collapse. If so, then how do you explain the fact that virtually all of the concrete in all three buildings was pulverized into fine dust? Would gravity do that?

How do you explain that massive multi-ton steel columns were ejected with incredible force and embedded into buildings as far as 600ft away? Would gravity do that?

4. Building 7 Collapse

How do you explain the perfectly symmetrical, nearly free-fall collapse of WTC Building 7 neatly into it’s own footprint at 5:20PM on 9/11? It was not struck by an airplane. It had been damaged by falling debris, and there were a few pockets of fire that had been burning on a few floors of the building.

5. Missing Plane at the Pentagon

Immediately after the impact at the Pentagon, CNN Reporter Jamie McIntyre stated unequivocally “after my close inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon”.
Lots more evidence and testimonies here.

And have you heard that the anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the Fort Detrick military base? Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong"; Also evidenced in this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer; and this statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (and this one). And it might be coincidence, but apparently being warned, White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks even occurred.

The Anthrax scare had nothing to do with Islamic terrorists. This was instead said to be the work of a high-ranking ex-freemason and ex-CIA agent by the name Weston, who left freemasonry because he thought that his rank in freemasonry should be higher than it was. After he left freemasonry and the CIA, he was no longer involved with the laboratories that experimented with the Anthrax spores but kept a close touch with old associates still working there. They are the ones who provided him with the spores. He and some of his associates had a bone to pick with the American establishment and the September 11th events gave them the opportunity to start the scare.  The attacks occurred one week before the passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot Act which was the motivating factor for 9/11. 

Just like with The Oklahoma City bombing ending in the Antiterrorism Act, 9/11 ended in the patriot act. "The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened". - Josef Stalin

With these new laws they are taking more power to do anything they want, saying it's in the best interest of the whole. If this continues they will be able to have the power to force vaccinations, fluoride, GMO's, toxins and more ways of population control on us. They already have the power to kill (or imprison for life) suspected terrorists, or trouble makers. Just this week I read of a 15 year old who after lighting a roll of TP in his highschool, was convicted and charged of being a terrorist.

 This is not the only case of this either. . .leading many to believe the government is just desperate to fill the jails. Recently I read that that is exactly the truth! Prisons have sometimes 20 year contracts with the government to stay 90% full or more or they can sue and fine tax payers millions!! All incentive to lower the crime rate disappears as taxpayers just have to foot the bills as it does.

The war on terror was just another ploy like the "war on drugs" that the government made out as a threat so they could fill up the jails.

The term was popularized by the media shortly after a press conference in June 1971 by United States president Richard Nixon where he declared drug abuse "public enemy number one." War on Drugs was started by the Nixon administration as a means to suppress political dissent. After all, it was mainly people on the Left who were opposed to the Vietnam war, who were vocal about personal freedom and the use of drugs back then as now.

Most disgusting is the very politically motivated war on Marijuana, a drug that does very little, if any harm. . .and a lot of good! Up until 1883, and for thousands of years before, Cannabis/hemp/marijuana was the largest agricultural crop in the world! The majority of fabric, lighting oil, medicines, paper and fiber came from this plant.

Being that it does no harm, and is used by the individual usually at home, there arises a need for the government to spy on us in order to fill their jails. Unfortunately they can and do spy on us through our phones, cameras, computers, etc. Most people know that, but don't realize that they also have their spies. . . These come in the form of doctors of all types, social workers, counselors, cops and likely others too. These truly believe they are doing what's right to tattle on the private American who uses Marijuana, doesn't vaccinate, or has non-typical methods of schooling or discipline for their child.  I personally am very wary of befriending people with this mindset as they have been known to see things that aren't there, and have people unfairly jailed or their kids taken away. Once you foster a mindset of suspicion, and self righteousness, you see what you want to see I find.

Did you know that the Government spies on what it considers "rebellious people or groups"? A covert program called COINTELPRO has a mission to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” rebellious people and groups. (COINTELPRO even now has PETA and members of Greenpeace on its "terror" watch list)
So, while the government has slightly changed their tactics, things have really not changed much, it is still all about money, justifiable control of the mainstream idiocy and power.

What about the future though? Is the US gullible enough to keep falling for these tactics? Will we evolve and be enlightened with more knowledge? Or with the economic pressure, will the poor get poorer, having less time to live and learn, and only time to work? Will the rich just get richer, and control the media and government more? Will we stand for any more of these false flag operations that have a new law taking away our rights at their heels?

Republican U.S. congressman Ron Paul said "a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran".

The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan administration, called the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service, has said: "Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?"

Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will include a dictatorship.

The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.

And a member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically.

Some would even claim that a war is oncoming without an incident. . ..

Either way, if our president calls for war, he has only as much power as his peons give him. If good people rebel, he will have only the bad or stupid people to fight his battles, and then the wars won't happen, or we will make the leaders happy when they do and take many casualties.

 In the end we all have a choice; no gun can be blamed for the crime done with it. We can take back this country, but not by the power of force. After all, "the pen is mightier than the sword." And so I write on.. .

No comments:

Post a Comment